Why College Football Playoff committee could be tested by these two SEC teams
Florida's gantlet in 2025 projects to be among the nation's toughest, while its fourth-year coach tries to stay off the hot seat.
'I don't have control over' the schedule, Napier said in May as we chatted in a hotel basement during the SEC's spring meetings.
Hard to imagine any coach asking for a schedule like the one Napier's Gators will play. Florida will face seven teams expected to be ranked in the preseason US LBM Coaches poll. With non-conference games against Miami and Florida State in the mix, the Gators are one of three SEC teams that will play 10 games against Power Four competition.
'Big-picture wise, it can be an advantage or a disadvantage,' Napier said of the schedule, 'based off' how the College Football Playoff committee makes its at-large selections.
Oklahoma's Brent Venables can relate. His Sooners will face seven, maybe even eight, teams likely to be ranked in the preseason Top 25.
Florida and Oklahoma serve as a backbone of the SEC's quest for the playoff committee to more heavily weight strength of schedule when making at-large selections. The SEC continued its strength-of-schedule drumbeat this week during the conference's media days.
PRESSURE POINTS: Alabama, Kalen DeBoer face big questions in post-Saban era
GO TIME: Auburn's Freeze ends excuses, but is he ready for expectations?
Why Florida, Oklahoma could challenge playoff committee
The SEC positioned three 9-3 teams for playoff consideration last season based on schedule strength, but neither Alabama, Mississippi nor South Carolina earned selection.
On paper, at least, Florida and Oklahoma will endure a more intense gantlet than those 9-3 SEC teams navigated in 2024.
A 9-3 team from the SEC qualifying for the playoff would vindicate the conference's relentless messaging campaign touting its strength of schedule and as it implores the committee to more heavily weight those metrics.
In truth, the committee traditionally values the SEC's strength of schedule, but Alabama, Ole Miss and South Carolina each presented résumés that were too flawed a year ago. Also, it became difficult to distinguish which of those three 9-3 teams most deserved playoff consideration. The committee opted for none of them.
Lessons from Alabama, Ole Miss not earning playoff selection
I thought the committee erred by awarding the final at-large bid to SMU, which lacked a signature victory despite its 11-2 record, but I didn't interpret the committee's choice as a rule that it would never take a three-loss SEC team instead of a one- or two-loss team from another conference.
Florida and Oklahoma, with their capable lineups but daunting schedules, are candidates to become the playoff's first 9-3 qualifier. Each touts one of the nation's most talented quarterbacks, in Florida's DJ Lagway and Oklahoma's John Mateer, a Washington State transfer. Mateer highlighted Oklahoma's portal plunder that transformed its roster after a losing season.
Alabama, too, could present a more compelling playoff case if it finished at 9-3 this season, compared to its three-loss résumé from 2024.
The Crimson Tide will play 10 Power Four opponents, after facing nine last year. Two of Alabama's three losses last season came against teams that finished the regular season 6-6. Ole Miss, like Alabama, secured a marquee victory against Georgia, but the Rebels lost at home to woebegone Kentucky.
Strength of schedule influences the committee's rankings, but losses to bad or mediocre teams become an anchor on a résumé. Interestingly, Oklahoma and Florida landed crippling blows to SEC's quest for four playoff bids last year, by upsetting Alabama and Ole Miss, respectively, in late November.
Let Alabama and Ole Miss be a lesson for Florida and Oklahoma: If you must lose, don't lose to the weaker teams on your schedule. Score some wins against Top 25 opponents, let your strength of schedule work for you, and don't lose to Vanderbilt or Kentucky.
Oklahoma won't need to worry about that last point. Its schedule includes neither Kentucky, nor Vanderbilt, nor any SEC opponent that's expected to finish among the bottom four of the conference standings.
Oklahoma's schedule amounts to 'the biggest challenge in all of college football,' Venables said on the SEC Network in December. That's not hyperbole.
I could say the schedules staring down Florida and Oklahoma seem engineered to get a coach fired. Alternatively, they're also designed to nudge a team that finishes 9-3 into the playoff.
Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Florida, Oklahoma could test College Football Playoff committee
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
National college football writer calls Big Ten playoff plan 'absurd'
Blake Toppmeyer at USA TODAY Sports isn't buying what the Big Ten is selling. He isn't alone. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey didn't seem to be interested in expanding the playoff on the Big Ten's terms. Tony Petitti, the commissioner of the Big Ten, has proposed an alteration to the College Football Playoff. Under his plan, the playoff would expand to 16 teams with four guaranteed bids for the Big Ten, four for the Southeastern Conference, two each for the Big 12 and the Atlantic Coast Conference, and a final spot reserved for the highest-ranked non-power conference champion. The three remaining bids would be at-large. "I think everybody outside of Big Ten land has realized that this Tony Petitti plan is patently absurd," Toppmeyer said on The Paul Finebaum Show. Big Ten coaches are behind the plan because they helped Petitti formulate it. And because it helps their conference, in turn, it helps their team. The Big Ten would have held 54 spots in the College Football Playoff over the last 11 years, the history of the playoff, if Petitti's plan were in place. "It would make the regular season worse when you consider 13 of the 16 bids would be rewarded purely off of conference standings and play-in games," Toppmeyer said. "Games like Texas-Ohio State, LSU-Clemson, Michigan-Oklahoma, that we're looking forward to this season, if we were in a world of Petitti playoff plan, those nonconference games would become glorified exhibitions. That's not how you make the season better." As much as the plan has support in the Big Ten, most of the rest of the college football world agrees with Toppmeyer. ACC and Big 12 commissioners have recommended the 5 + 11 plan, for example. But whatever changes come to the playoff will ultimately be decided by the Big Ten and SEC. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey has largely hemmed and hawed on Petitti's plan so far. Any changes to the playoff format would have to be agreed on by December 1 to take effect for the 2026 season, and it's looking more like the playoff may not expand at all. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. This article originally appeared on Sooners Wire: USA TODAY Sports' Blake Toppmeyer calls Big Ten playoff plan 'absurd'
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Two LSU football stars make Maxwell Award watchlist ahead of 2025 college football season
The Maxwell Award@Garrettnuss13 and @CadenDurham29 are on the watch list for the top offensive player in college football Ahead of the 2025 college football season, LSU's Garrett Nussmeier and Caden Durham were named to the watch list for the Maxwell Award Given to the top offensive player in college football, the Maxwell Award last went to an LSU player in 2019 when Joe Burrow took it home. He is the Tigers' lone recipient and won it after leading them to the national championship. Nussmeier and Durham each enter their second seasons as full-time starters in Baton Rouge. Both earned AP preseason All-SEC second-team in July. Nussmeier, entering his fifth season of college football, threw for 4,052 yards and 29 touchdowns in 2024. He begins his second season as the starter this year and is under 4,000 yards away from becoming the program's all-time leading passer. He used the offseason to build chemistry with a slew of new receivers and working on different parts of his game. Coming off an All-SEC freshman season, Durham finished with 1,013 total yards and averaged 9.3 yards per carry in 2024. He developed into a versatile weapon and will be the feature back in 2025 to balance out an improved passing game.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Greg Sankey not in a hurry to expand College Football Playoff
College football is a constantly evolving sport that has seen a number of changes take place over the last decade and a half. Realignment, the College Football Playoff, the transfer portal, and name, image, and likeness has changed the game. As teams prepare for the 2025 college football season, the game will continue to change as discussion continue about the future of the playoff. When Greg Sankey speaks, whether in Destin or at SEC media days, the college football world listens. While he didn't break down any details on the future of SEC scheduling or the College Football Playoff. He spent time defending the league's eight-game schedule, saying, "I don't believe there's anyone looking to swap their conference schedule and its opponents with the opponents played by the Southeastern Conference teams in our conference schedule, be it eight or nine. There is a rigor here that is unique." One of the biggest issues that college football faces is the constant evolution of the College Football Playoff. There has been a lot of discussion about moving to a 16-team playoff, but the Power Five conferences can't agree on a format. There's a lot of momentum for the 5+11 model, where the Power Four conference champions and the highest-rated Group of Six champion earn an automatic bid, and then 11 at-large bids are handed out. One of those at-large bids would go to Notre Dame if they were ranked inside the top 16. But the Big Ten is hoping for more automatic qualifiers to an expanded playoff. The proposal would give the Big Ten and the SEC four automatic bids to the playoff while the Big 12 and the ACC would each get just two. The Group of Six would still get a spot. There would be fewer at-large bids available to fill out the 16 teams. "The Big Ten has a different view," Sankey said. "That's fine. We have a 12-team playoff, five conference champions. That could stay if we can't agree. I think there's this notion that there has to be this magic moment, and something has to happen with expansion, and it has to be forced, no. I think, when you're given authority, you want to be responsible in using that authority. I think both of us are prepared to do so." No expansion is certainly an option, and it doesn't seem like Greg Sankey is in any hurry to force it. There's plenty of time to figure it out, but a decision will need to be made one way or the other in the coming months, so teams can fill out or adjust their schedules accordingly. One of the sticking points from the Big Ten's side is the conference schedule. The Big Ten is at nine conference games and believes the SEC should follow suit. According to Sankey, strength of schedule is not an issue in the SEC. They're playing nine Power Four games every year anyway. The SEC, which has been at the forefront of the explosion of the sport over the last two decades, doesn't feel the need to do a nine-game conference schedule just to do a nine-game conference schedule. If it makes sense and is in the best interest of the SEC and college football as a whole, the SEC will go that direction. But until then, Sankey is content to stay at eight and keep the current College Football Playoff format. And with so many changes that have occurred in the sport over the last decade, a little continuity isn't a bad thing. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow John on X @john9williams. This article originally appeared on Sooners Wire: Will the College Football Playoff expand again?
