Coventry's mettle tested by Russian Olympic debate, say former IOC figures
olympics
By Pirate IRWIN
International Olympic Committee president Kirsty Coventry is in the spotlight on how she handles her "baptism of fire" over Russia, former IOC executives have told AFP.
With just six months to go to the opening ceremony for the Milan-Cortina Winter Games the odds are that Russian athletes -- normally a Winter Games superpower -- will have to compete under a neutral banner, owing to the country breaching the Olympic Charter.
The IOC excluded the Russian NOC after it had placed under its authority several sports organizations from Ukrainian regions that Russian forces now occupy.
That move came after President Vladimir Putin -- not for the first time in his country's turbulent relationship with the IOC -- broke the Olympic Truce when he launched the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
When the IOC under Thomas Bach -- and with Coventry a member of the Executive Committee -- permitted Russian athletes to compete as neutrals at the Paris Summer Olympics last year, some federations took a far harsher line.
World Athletics barred all athletes from Russia and its allies Belarus from its competitions, as did other federations.
The scenario is no different for winter sports, with the International Ski Federation (FIS), which is responsible for more than half the Olympic medal events, biathlon and luge taking a similar stance, though figure skating has not followed suit.
Michael Payne, a former head of IOC marketing, told AFP there is "no question that Russia at some stage has to be brought back in from the cold" -- but the 2026 Winter Games will come too soon.
"Kirsty Coventry is in the spotlight, everyone is watching everyone," he said. "There will be strong views and opinions no matter what decision you take. You will have various politicians using that decision to make a point, (and it) probably won't always be complimentary.
"You are walking on thin ice. I think the right thing is to say you cannot rush this, you cannot blindside different stakeholders and politicians. The political challenges facing a new IOC president was always going to be a baptism of fire."
'Complex problems'
Payne said Russia was the "elephant in the room" for all of Bach's 12-year tenure, from the two invasions of Ukraine to the state-sponsored doping scandal at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics.
The 67-year-old Irishman says the challenge for Coventry is that politicians are seeking "to weaponize the sports agenda" once again having largely stayed away during earlier eras, such as that of Juan Antonio Samaranch's tenure from 1980-2001.
"One of Samaranch's great achievements was to bury the boycott agenda and for the better part of three decades or more politicians generally left sport alone," said Payne, who is credited with overhauling the IOC's brand and finances through sponsorship during Samaranch's reign.
"Under Bach, with the Russia/Ukraine agenda, politics re-entered it and navigating an ever more complicated global political environment and keeping sport out of the crossfire is going to tax any leader. A new leader is going to have their hands full."
Another former IOC marketing executive, Terrence Burns, knows Russia well having first worked there in 1992 as Delta Air Lines' country marketing manager for the entity then known as the Commonwealth of Independent States.
"There's no shortcut back in," Burns told AFP, adding that Russia "has never really owned up to any of it".
"There's been no admission, no accountability. Zero," the American said. "That leaves the IOC in a tough but manageable spot. If Russia wants back in, it's going to have to show it's willing to change."
Burns, who later played a key role in five successful Olympic bid city campaigns, argued however that in the end Russia is integral to the Olympics.
"The Olympics need Russia at the Games, just as they need the USA, China, etc," said Burns. "The true Olympic thesis is 'we all belong, or no one does.' That works fine in theory, speeches, and marketing campaigns.
"Translating it into the real geopolitical world is a hell of a lot harder than it looks."
Burns believes the Russians should not expect a speedy return.
"People always want simple answers for complex problems," he said. "But the IOC cannot afford simplistic solutions because the universality that it espouses may well be the last, truly global theology upon all humanity can agree.
"Yes, I think the stakes are that big. (Coventry) knows this too and she won't be pressed into a 'convenient decision.'"
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
19 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Zelenskyy to visit Berlin for meetings ahead of Trump-Putin summit
BERLIN (AP) -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will visit Berlin on Wednesday to join German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for talks with European and U.S. leaders ahead of the Trump-Putin summit later this week, the German government said. Merz has convened a series of virtual meetings on Wednesday in an attempt to have the voice of European and Ukraine's leaders heard ahead of a summit that they have been sidelined from. Zelenskyy is due to meet with European leaders first, to prepare for a virtual call with U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance about an hour later. A call between leaders involved in the "coalition of the willing" countries prepared to help police any future peace agreement will take place last. Trump has said he wants to see whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year. Trump has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender. The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the EU, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. European countries' overarching fear is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine. Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that still it controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected. Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not give up any territory it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. He said diplomatic discussions led by the U.S. focusing on ending the war have not addressed key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and including Europe in negotiations. Three weeks after Trump returned to office, his administration took the leverage of Ukraine's NATO membership off the table -- something that Putin has demanded -- and signaled that the EU and Ukraine must handle security in Europe now while America focuses its attention elsewhere. Trump has also routinely threatened and cajoled his NATO allies over defense spending, and has shown little mercy in trade talks by hiking tariffs on most EU imports to 5%, ostensibly for U.S. national security reasons. Senior EU officials believe that Trump may be satisfied with simply securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, and is probably more interested in broader U.S. geostrategic interests and great power politics, aiming to ramp up business with Russia and rehabilitate Putin.
The Mainichi
3 hours ago
- The Mainichi
You really can see Russia from Alaska, and other things to know ahead of Friday's Trump-Putin summit
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -- When U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska on Friday, it will be the latest chapter in the 49th state's long history with Russia -- and with international tensions. Siberian fur traders arrived from across the Bering Sea in the first part of the 18th century, and the imprint of Russian settlement in Alaska remains. The oldest building in Anchorage is a Russian Orthodox church, and many Alaska Natives have Russian surnames. The nations are so close -- Alaska's Little Diomede Island in the Bering Strait is less than 3 miles (5 kilometers) from Russia's Big Diomede -- that former Gov. Sarah Palin was right during the 2008 presidential race when she said, "You can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska," though the comment prompted jokes that that was the extent of her foreign policy experience. Alaska has been U.S. territory since 1867, and it has since been the location of the only World War II battle on North American soil, a focus of Cold War tensions and the site of occasional meetings between U.S. and world leaders. Here's a look at Alaska's history with Russia and on the international stage: Russian trappers and Seward's Folly The fur traders established hubs in Sitka and on Kodiak Island. The Russian population in Alaska never surpassed about 400 permanent settlers, according to the Office of the Historian of the U.S. State Department. Russian settlers brutally coerced Alaska Natives to harvest sea otters and other marine mammals for their pelts, said Ian Hartman, a University of Alaska Anchorage history professor. "It was a relationship that the Russians made clear quite early on was not really about kind of a longer-term pattern of settlement, but it was much more about a short-term pattern of extraction," Hartman said. Meanwhile, Russian Orthodox missionaries baptized an estimated 18,000 Alaska Natives. By 1867 the otters had been hunted nearly to extinction and Russia was broke from the Crimean War. Czar Alexander II sold Alaska to the U.S. for the low price of $7.2 million -- knowing Russia couldn't defend its interests in Alaska if the U.S. or Great Britain tried to seize it. Skeptics referred to the purchase as "Seward's Folly," after U.S. Secretary of State William H. Seward. That changed when gold was discovered in the Klondike in 1896. World War II and the Cold War The U.S. realized Alaska's strategic importance in the 20th century. During World War II the island of Attu -- the westernmost in the Aleutian chain and closer to Russia than to mainland North America -- was captured by Japanese forces. The effort to reclaim it in 1943 became known as the war's "forgotten battle." During the Cold War, military leaders worried Soviets might attack via Alaska, flying planes over the North Pole to drop nuclear weapons. They built a chain of radar systems connected to an anti-aircraft missile system. The military constructed much of the infrastructure in Alaska, including roads and some communities, and its experience building on permafrost later informed the private companies that would drill for oil and construct the trans-Alaska pipeline. Last year the Pentagon said the U.S. must invest more to upgrade sensors, communications and space-based technologies in the Arctic to keep pace with China and Russia, and it sent about 130 soldiers to a desolate Aleutian island amid an increase in Russian military planes and vessels approaching U.S. territory. Past visits by dignitaries Putin will be the first Russian leader to visit, but other prominent figures have come before him. Japanese Emperor Hirohito stopped in Anchorage before heading to Europe in 1971 to meet President Richard Nixon, and in 1984 thousands turned out to see President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II meet at the airport in Fairbanks. President Barack Obama visited in 2015, becoming the first sitting U.S. president to set foot north of the Arctic Circle, on a trip to highlight the dangers of climate change. Gov. Bill Walker welcomed Chinese President Xi Jinping at the airport in Anchorage in 2017 and then took him on a short tour of the state's largest city. Four years later Anchorage was the setting for a less cordial meeting as top U.S. and Chinese officials held two days of contentious talks in their first face-to-face meeting since President Joe Biden took office two months earlier. Critics say Alaska is a poor choice for the summit Sentiment toward Russia in Alaska has cooled since Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022. The Anchorage Assembly voted unanimously to suspend its three-decade-long sister city relationship with Magadan, Russia, and the Juneau Assembly sent its sister city of Vladivostock a letter expressing concern. The group Stand Up Alaska has organized rallies against Putin on Thursday and Friday. Dimitry Shein, who ran unsuccessfully for Alaska's lone seat in the U.S. House in 2018, fled from the Soviet Union to Anchorage with his mother in the early 1990s. He expressed dismay that Trump has grown increasingly authoritarian. Russia and the U.S. "are just starting to look more and more alike," he said. Many observers have suggested that holding the summit in Alaska sends a bad symbolic message. "It's easy to imagine Putin making the argument during his meetings with Trump that, 'Well, look, territories can change hands,'" said Nigel Gould-Davies, former British Ambassador to Belarus and senior fellow at the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London. "'We gave you Alaska. Why can't Ukraine give us a part of its territory?'"
Asahi Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Ishiba not serious about seeking abolition of nuke weapons
Doves are released at the peace memorial ceremony held in Nagasaki on Aug. 9. (Pool) In his speeches at the memorial ceremonies held in Hiroshima on Aug. 6 and Nagasaki on Aug. 9, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba quoted from individuals with long ties to the respective cities. He used a tanka poem by Shinoe Shoda, a Hiroshima resident, who wrote many such works about the effects of the atomic bombing of her city. In Nagasaki, Ishiba quoted the words of Takashi Nagai, a Catholic doctor, who continued to care for others even after surviving the atomic bombing. But regarding the path toward abolishing nuclear weapons, Ishiba only referred to efforts made by his predecessors and said Japan, as the only nation to have an atomic bomb dropped on it during war, would lead the international community in its efforts to eliminate such weapons. Atomic bomb survivors and others in the two cities have an unprecedentedly strong sense of crisis because Russia has repeatedly threatened the use of nuclear weapons and the United States also has moved toward modernizing its nuclear arsenal. Ishiba has not touched upon his past call to share with the United States in the handling of its nuclear weapons since becoming prime minister and even stressed in his speeches at the memorial ceremonies that he would maintain Japan's three non-nuclear principles. However, there was understandable disappointment and dissatisfaction directed toward the prime minister. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which includes both nuclear and non-nuclear powers, has reached a dead end. The mayors and hibakusha organizations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have called on Japan to sign and ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which came into existence through the initiative of non-nuclear nations. The treaty's wide ban on producing, possessing and using nuclear weapons is believed to be a path toward abolishing such weapons. But like his predecessors, Ishiba did not refer to the TPNW in his memorial ceremony speeches. Japan is protected by the nuclear umbrella of the United States and the increasingly severe international situation might make it difficult for Japan to become a member nation of the TPNW. But it should be possible for Japan to take part as an observer nation in the treaty's meeting of state parties. The Liberal Democratic Party's junior coalition partner, Komeito, and many opposition parties have called for such participation. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has become prolonged and Israel continues its attack on Gaza. Asking nuclear powers that continue to use force to attend the peace ceremonies might be considered confirmation of their violations of international law or it could allow for making an anti-war appeal while such nations are present at the ceremony. The Nagasaki city government in 2024 did not invite Israel to its ceremony because of concerns about possible disruption of the event. But that led to criticism from the United States, Britain and other nations, which refused to send their ambassadors to the Nagasaki ceremony. This year, both Hiroshima and Nagasaki called for a wider range of nations to participate in the ceremonies. But Hiroshima changed its past 'invitation' to a 'notification' for this year's event, while Nagasaki maintained its invitation wording. Although a record number of nations and regions participated in this year's Hiroshima ceremony, the response of nations in the spotlight was scattered. Israel and Palestine attended both ceremonies, but Russia was not present at Hiroshima and Ukraine sat out the Nagasaki ceremony. In his peace declaration, Nagasaki Mayor Shiro Suzuki said, 'Immediately cease from disputes in which 'force is met with force.'' That sentiment is likely shared by Hiroshima as well. There is a need to seek a way to transmit that message in a wider, but steady manner. --The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 10
