logo
Politicians dangle immigration control as election bait

Politicians dangle immigration control as election bait

The Citizen7 hours ago
As elections near, political parties revive anti-illegal immigration rhetoric to lure frustrated voters while long-standing issues remain unresolved.
A disgruntled South African job seeker belonging to Alexandra Dudula Movement holds a banner reading Foreigners Must Go Home during their operation to remove foreign street vendors on pavements and stalls in Alexandra township in Johannesburg on February 13, 2022. (Photo by Phill Magakoe / AFP)
With the mushrooming of political parties ahead of next year's local government elections, it is becoming obvious that the campaign ticket is 'abahambe' – undocumented foreigners must go.
Operation Dudula started its movement and gained popularity as a result of this. The Patriotic Alliance members at some point stood at a porous river blocking illegal crossing of foreigners, coining the abahambe slogan.
Since then, we have seen a zoning in on the effects of the lack of immigration control that has plagued South Africa.
Houses have been hijacked, services and utilities driven into hundreds of thousands in arrears. Spaza shops on every corner and run from RDP houses meant for the poor.
Then, the expired food fiasco and food manufactured on site, the shops doubling up as living and sleep areas.
ALSO READ: Gauteng Traffic Police and Home Affairs immigration officers arrested for kidnapping and theft
All of a sudden, our political parties see it fit that it is time to regulate the industry. This is despite the fact that home affairs officials are arrested more frequently over corruption.
Our cities are in disarray. South Africans who speak out on immigration control, or its lack thereof, are labelled as xenophobic.
If the stories are true that government clinics are serving more foreigners than South Africans, then somewhere, something is fundamentally wrong.
This is not a call to refuse medical assistance to those in need, but rather a question as to where are South Africans going for assistance because, as said by one woman on social media: 'We have been pushed out of hospitals and forced to go to private practitioners.'
Who, then, are government clinics meant for?
ALSO READ: Two immigration specialists arrested in Beitbridge corruption probe
Let it be understood, compliance is regulation and not xenophobia. The government often talks of good neighbourly relations, a welcoming home for all Africans… but the same government now refuses to take any more strain from illegal immigrants.
Even though the economy is in under strain, the timing of the government's admission is nothing short of dubious.
It was first brought to our attention in 2008. The nerve for us to feign shock and horror when illegal foreigners took the government to court, forcing its hand to allow their stay and the enjoyment of civic provision.
What the politicians use as an electioneering tool, which is close to the hearts of every citizen, becomes the carrot dangled for votes at election time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SAHRC faces sharp criticism amid debates over healthcare access for foreign nationals
SAHRC faces sharp criticism amid debates over healthcare access for foreign nationals

IOL News

time34 minutes ago

  • IOL News

SAHRC faces sharp criticism amid debates over healthcare access for foreign nationals

The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is facing backlash over its recent reaffirmation of the right to access healthcare services as a universal right for everyone within the Republic, a principle enshrined in the South African Constitution. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is facing backlash over its recent reaffirmation of the right to access healthcare services as a universal right for everyone within the Republic, a principle enshrined in the South African Constitution. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has come under fire for asserting the universality of healthcare access within the country's borders, a stance that has spurred heated debate among political parties. In its recent communication to stakeholders, the SAHRC reaffirmed that every individual, including illegal foreign nationals, is entitled to healthcare services as enshrined in the South African Constitution. This position, however, has led to criticism from various corners, including the political party ActionSA. The party vehemently opposes what it terms the 'abuse' of the public healthcare system by illegal foreigners, arguing that this influx strains an already overburdened system. It claims that Section 27 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to access healthcare, has been misapplied, creating a scenario where the rights of South African citizens are compromised. The statement also details that this misinterpretation not only places pressure on healthcare resources but also dilutes the quality of care available to law-abiding South Africans. In May, ActionSA took a proactive step by proposing a set of constitutional amendments aimed at reforming these provisions, which they believe have been exploited to exacerbate the crisis of illegal immigration. The party also highlights that while the intentions of the Constitution are noble, its current application leads to an untenable situation where hospitals are overwhelmed and lacking essential resources. It further questioned why healthcare responsibilities seem to fall disproportionately on South Africa, suggesting that other nations enforce stricter regulations regarding medical insurance for incoming foreigners. 'No South African can enter another country legally without providing proof of medical insurance. This is because responsible governments do not budget to provide public services to foreign nationals without limits. Yet in South Africa, we are expected to carry this burden indefinitely,' argued ActionSA. Adding to the chorus of criticism, local activist and politician Anele Mda voiced concerns on social media, suggesting the SAHRC's actions represent an unconstitutional infringement on South Africans' rights. 'We definitely need to petition Parliament to address the unconstitutional infringement of SAHRC on the rights of South Africans, acting as an unrepentant demagogue to consistently use its power as a Chapter 9 institution to advance/conceal acts of criminality by foreigners,' said Mda. The SAHRC says it is engaging with healthcare administrators and relevant departments to foster better conditions for all healthcare users. In a public statement, the SAHRC urged both the Department of Home Affairs and the South African Police Service (SAPS) to fulfil their roles diligently to prevent citizens from taking matters into their own hands. [email protected] Saturday Star

ActionSA criticizes SAHRC for supporting undocumented migrants' right to public healthcare
ActionSA criticizes SAHRC for supporting undocumented migrants' right to public healthcare

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

ActionSA criticizes SAHRC for supporting undocumented migrants' right to public healthcare

ActionSA has hit back at the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) after the organisation clarified that everyone, including undocumented immigrants, may access the country's healthcare facilities. The party claimed that there is 'abuse' of the nation's public healthcare system by undocumented foreign nationals. In a statement issued on Wednesday, ActionSA Parliamentary Chief Whip Lerato Ngobeni accused the government of enabling an unsustainable burden on healthcare facilities by allowing undocumented migrants to access services without restriction. Ngobeni argued that the 'misapplication' of Section 27 of the Constitution has overwhelmed clinics and hospitals, placing the well-being of South African citizens at risk. "It is unconscionable that a public clinic in Johannesburg can report that over 70% of its patient records belong to foreign nationals. No South African can enter another country legally without proof of medical insurance, yet here we are expected to carry this burden indefinitely," Ngobeni said. ActionSA has proposed a suite of constitutional amendments aimed at restricting access to healthcare for undocumented migrants.

Newspaper headlines from around the world - Thursday, 3 July 2025
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Thursday, 3 July 2025

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

Newspaper headlines from around the world - Thursday, 3 July 2025

Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Thursday, 3 July 2025. The New York Times front page reported that the bill will test the strength of Trump's grip on his party. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that Republican infighting is delaying the bill. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that the IDF's 504th Intelligence Unit busted an Iranian terror cell in Syria. China Daily's front page reported that consumption is set to continue its robust growth. The Daily Mail's front page reported on what or who caused the tears that sparked turmoil in the markets. The Guardian's front page reported tears and turmoil as the PM was forced to defend Reeves following the welfare fiasco. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store