The world is a better place for Pope Francis
That affection is unsurprising. I was lucky enough to know Pope Francis personally, and his characteristic greeting of 'John, you must pray for me,' was immediately disarming. It exemplified his humility, simplicity and warmth, and even carried a suggestion of the wit he showed in private. It was through his encouragement that I became involved in work to combat modern slavery and human trafficking.
But there was also a sterner, authoritative, 'Old Testament' side to Pope Francis. In these often turbulent and adversarial times he was steadfast in asserting his position as a moral leader, and he did so with a combination of humanity, frankness and clarity that achieved universal resonance. His death does not merely represent the end of a papal tenure. It is the culmination of a journey marked by courage, empathy and a resolute belief in the principles of the Good Shepherd. Pope Francis took us along a route that we would do well to continue to follow.
Even amid pomp and ceremony, he remained a man of the people. As the first Latin-American pope he brought a distinctive and fresh perspective on our society, on the haves and have-nots. His background as a Jesuit instilled in him a deep sense of social justice and a commitment to serving people who were marginalised or oppressed. He challenged indifference to poverty with unwavering conviction, reminding the privileged that human dignity is universal and non-negotiable. He consistently emphasised a preferential option for the poor. His ministry transformed the Church's engagement with issues of social justice.
These initiatives were part of his tireless work to ensure the Church remained relevant at times of rapid and challenging change. His encyclicals, such as Laudato si and Fratelli tutti, called for a renewed emphasis on environmental stewardship, social justice, and fraternity among all people, regardless of faith or background. In a world plagued by authoritarianism, disregard for the rule of law, and diminishing respect for human life, he stood as a beacon of moral clarity.
Pope Francis's tenure was not without controversy. His progressive stance on issues such as economic inequality, climate change, and the inclusion of marginalised groups within the Church prompted criticism as well as admiration. Yet his passion for these causes remained unwavering. He moved the ball down the playing field – and he took the people with him.
It helped that Pope Francis, with his ability to speak to the universal human experience, was such a remarkable bridge-builder among faiths. He recognised that the challenges facing humanity cannot be surmounted without a collective effort. In a world where religious differences are too often exploited to create division, he sought and mapped out common ground, fostering dialogues with Muslim, Jewish, Hindu and Buddhist leaders. By taking the lead in fostering a spirit of unity and mutual respect, he set a standard for future generations.
He continued to embody the virtues of the Good Shepherd in his final days. Despite his frail health and physical limitations, he remained resolute in St Peter's Square on Easter Sunday. He understood that a crucial part of his role as a leader was to be present, to offer solace and guidance, especially in times of hardship. In his final act of courage, Pope Francis demonstrated that moral leadership is not about power or prestige but about service and sacrifice.
As we reflect on the life and death of Pope Francis, we are reminded of the profound impact one individual can have on the world. His legacy is rich, multifaceted and vibrant. He leaves behind a Church that is more inclusive, more compassionate, and more attuned to the needs and the spirit of the modern world.
John Studzinski KSG is Vice Chairman and a Managing Director of PIMCO, and Founder and Chairman of the Genesis Foundation
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Trump lands in Alaska for crunch Ukraine summit
Donald Trump has just touched down in Alaska to take part in crunch talks with Vladimir Putin about the war with Ukraine. The American president is meeting with his Russian counterpart in Alaska to discuss bringing an end to the Russia-Ukraine war which has been raging for more than three years. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky once said he wanted to end by 2023, and Trump said he would end the war within '24 hours' of being re-elected last year. But now Trump and Putin are set to meet for the first time in six years for a one-on-one meeting about Ukraine's future that left Zelensky off the guest list. It's a high stakes meeting, with Trump simply writing 'HIGH STAKES!!!' on his Truth Social account before taking off for Alaska. The US president has beaten Putin to the summit, touching down at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Alaska on Air Force One. Once both the US and Russian presidents have touched down, they're set to meet at 11.30am local time (8.30pm BST) during a 'working breakfast'. Trump and Putin are expected to meet behind closed doors, with interpreters the only other people in the room. Once that's done, the two presidents are expected to hold a wider meeting with their delegations, before Trump gives Mr Zelensky and other European leaders a call, and a joint press conference is held. Trump's stance on the war has swung wildly in recent months. One moment, the president is humiliating Zelensky in the Oval Office. The next, he's calling out Putin's 'bulls**t' and saying he's 'disgusted' with him. More Trending In comparison, Putin has remained fairly tight-lipped about his goals for the meeting. 'The current American administration… is making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict,' he said yesterday. Mr Zelensky is not best pleased about the 'bilateral' meeting excluding him, and has raised concerns that talks 'will not achieve anything' without Ukraine having a seat at the table. 'We understand Russia's intention to try to deceive America – we will not allow this,' he said over the weekend. Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ Or you can submit your videos and pictures here. For more stories like this, check our news page. Follow on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here. MORE: Unruly flyer is 'picked up like a child' and restrained by fellow passenger MORE: Russia-linked DHL warehouse fire in Birmingham left Amazon container '100% destroyed' MORE: Who is Gavin Newsom? The trolling Democrat feuding with Donald Trump
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm'
Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, warned earlier this year that it was in imminent danger of closure as crisis talks continued with the Government. This followed the end of the 19% tariff on American bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. On Friday, the Government said: 'This Government will always take decisions in the national interest. 'That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace. 'We have worked closely with the companies since June to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces. 'We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process. 'We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long-term in consultation with the sector.' Ben Hackett, managing director of Vivergo Fuels, said: 'The Government's failure to back Vivergo has forced us to cease operations and move to closure immediately. 'This is a flagrant act of economic self-harm that will have far-reaching consequences. 'This is a massive blow to Hull and the Humber. 'We have fought from day one to support our workers and we are truly sorry that this is not the outcome any of us wanted. 'This decision by ministers will have a huge impact on our region and the thousands of livelihoods in the supply chain that rely on Vivergo, from farmers to hauliers and engineers.' Mr Hackett said the industry has faced 'unfair regulations' for years that favoured overseas producers, and the recent US-UK trade deal pushed the sector 'to the point of collapse'. He said: 'We did everything we possibly could to avoid closure, but in the end it was the Government that decided the British bioethanol sector was something that could be traded away with little regard for the impact it would have on ordinary hard-working people. 'We did not go down without a fight and I hope that the noise we generated over the past three months will make the Government think twice before it decides to sign away whole industries as part of future trade negotiations.' A spokesman for Associated British Foods, which owns Vivergo, said: 'It is deeply regrettable that the Government has chosen not to support a key national asset. 'We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. 'We initiated and led talks with Government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the Government's own green industrial strategy.' The spokesman said the Government had 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber and a sovereign capability in clean fuels that had the chance to lead the world'. The bioethanol industry, which also includes the Ensus plant on Teesside, has argued the trade deal, coupled with regulatory constraints, has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Vivergo said the Hull plant, which employs about 160 people, can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms. It has described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future. The firm recently signed a £1.25 billion memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy to anchor a 'world-class' sustainable aviation fuel facility at the site. But Meld Energy said earlier this month uncertainly over the bioethanol industry was putting this plan in jeopardy. The Vivergo plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed, and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region. Vivergo has said it buys more than a million tonnes of British wheat each year from more than 4,000 farms, and has purchased from 12,000 individual farms over the past decade. But it took its last wheat shipment earlier this month. The farmers' union described the imminent closure of the Vivergo plant as a 'huge blow'. NFU combinable crops board chairman Jamie Burrows said: 'Not only is it terrible news for those hundreds of workers who will lose their jobs but also for the thousands of people whose livelihoods depend on this supply chain – that includes local farmers who have lost a vital market for their product.' The Ensus plant in Teesside differs from the Vivergo operation because it also produces CO2 as part of the process. Ensus, which is owned by CropEnergies, part of the German firm Sudzucker, is the UK's only large scale manufacturer of CO2, which is used in a wide range of sectors, including in drinks and the nuclear industry. Grant Pearson, chairman of Ensus UK, said on Friday: 'I met with Sarah Jones, the minister for business, today, to receive the Government's response to our request for financial support and the policy changes required to ensure that the Ensus facilities can continue to operate. 'The minister confirmed that they value both our contribution to the UK economy, the jobs we provide and support in the north east of England and in particular our production of biogenic CO2 which is a product of critical national importance. 'They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO2 from the Ensus facility. 'This is positive news, however it is likely to take time to agree upon and finalise and therefore urgent discussions will be taking place to provide a level of assurance to the Sudzucker and CropEnergies' boards that there is a very high level of confidence that an acceptable long-term arrangement can be reached.'
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm'
Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, warned earlier this year that it was in imminent danger of closure as crisis talks continued with the Government. This followed the end of the 19% tariff on American bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. On Friday, the Government said: 'This Government will always take decisions in the national interest. 'That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace. 'We have worked closely with the companies since June to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces. 'We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process. 'We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long-term in consultation with the sector.' Ben Hackett, managing director of Vivergo Fuels, said: 'The Government's failure to back Vivergo has forced us to cease operations and move to closure immediately. 'This is a flagrant act of economic self-harm that will have far-reaching consequences. 'This is a massive blow to Hull and the Humber. 'We have fought from day one to support our workers and we are truly sorry that this is not the outcome any of us wanted. 'This decision by ministers will have a huge impact on our region and the thousands of livelihoods in the supply chain that rely on Vivergo, from farmers to hauliers and engineers.' Mr Hackett said the industry has faced 'unfair regulations' for years that favoured overseas producers, and the recent US-UK trade deal pushed the sector 'to the point of collapse'. He said: 'We did everything we possibly could to avoid closure, but in the end it was the Government that decided the British bioethanol sector was something that could be traded away with little regard for the impact it would have on ordinary hard-working people. 'We did not go down without a fight and I hope that the noise we generated over the past three months will make the Government think twice before it decides to sign away whole industries as part of future trade negotiations.' A spokesman for Associated British Foods, which owns Vivergo, said: 'It is deeply regrettable that the Government has chosen not to support a key national asset. 'We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. 'We initiated and led talks with Government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the Government's own green industrial strategy.' The spokesman said the Government had 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber and a sovereign capability in clean fuels that had the chance to lead the world'. The bioethanol industry, which also includes the Ensus plant on Teesside, has argued the trade deal, coupled with regulatory constraints, has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Vivergo said the Hull plant, which employs about 160 people, can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms. It has described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future. The firm recently signed a £1.25 billion memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy to anchor a 'world-class' sustainable aviation fuel facility at the site. But Meld Energy said earlier this month uncertainly over the bioethanol industry was putting this plan in jeopardy. The Vivergo plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed, and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region. Vivergo has said it buys more than a million tonnes of British wheat each year from more than 4,000 farms, and has purchased from 12,000 individual farms over the past decade. But it took its last wheat shipment earlier this month. The farmers' union described the imminent closure of the Vivergo plant as a 'huge blow'. NFU combinable crops board chairman Jamie Burrows said: 'Not only is it terrible news for those hundreds of workers who will lose their jobs but also for the thousands of people whose livelihoods depend on this supply chain – that includes local farmers who have lost a vital market for their product.' The Ensus plant in Teesside differs from the Vivergo operation because it also produces CO2 as part of the process. Ensus, which is owned by CropEnergies, part of the German firm Sudzucker, is the UK's only large scale manufacturer of CO2, which is used in a wide range of sectors, including in drinks and the nuclear industry. Grant Pearson, chairman of Ensus UK, said on Friday: 'I met with Sarah Jones, the minister for business, today, to receive the Government's response to our request for financial support and the policy changes required to ensure that the Ensus facilities can continue to operate. 'The minister confirmed that they value both our contribution to the UK economy, the jobs we provide and support in the north east of England and in particular our production of biogenic CO2 which is a product of critical national importance. 'They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO2 from the Ensus facility. 'This is positive news, however it is likely to take time to agree upon and finalise and therefore urgent discussions will be taking place to provide a level of assurance to the Sudzucker and CropEnergies' boards that there is a very high level of confidence that an acceptable long-term arrangement can be reached.'
