File affidavit detailing NAT-PCR rollout in blood collection centres: HC to govt
2
Cuttack: Orissa High Court on Thursday directed the state's health and family welfare department to file an affidavit within two weeks detailing the steps taken to implement Nucleic Acid Testing Polymerase Chain Reaction (NAT-PCR) blood testing facilities in all govt-run blood collection centres.
The directive came after a petition was filed by advocate Prabir Kumar Das.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice M S Raman passed the order while hearing the petition, which sought contempt proceedings against the commissioner-cum-secretary of the health and family welfare department for allegedly failing to comply with the court's earlier directive issued on Nov 30, 2023.
The court had, at the time, disposed a PIL filed by Das calling for the introduction of advanced NAT-PCR testing in all blood banks, citing that the method allows for earlier detection of HIV 1 & 2, and Hepatitis B and C, compared to the traditional ELISA test.
In its 2023 affidavit, the state govt had informed the court that 47% of the state's blood collections were already being tested via NAT-PCR at 11 centres and that it had decided, in principle, to extend the facility to the remaining 45 centres by March 2025 at a cost of Rs 200 crore.
However, in his contempt plea filed on April 2 this year, Das submitted that information obtained via RTI from the directorate of blood Safety (on March 3) and the health department (on March 17) revealed that no progress had been made, and NAT-PCR testing remained limited to the same 11 centres.
"The govt made a commitment before this court and failed to act on it. This amounts to a deliberate and wilful violation of the court's order," Das said before the bench, appearing in person.
Taking note of the submissions, the bench asked the commissioner-cum-secretary to clarify what actions had been initiated since the court's directive and fixed the next hearing for Aug 4. In his original PIL, Das had highlighted the risks of transfusing infected blood due to the limitations of ELISA testing. He urged the court to ensure the implementation of NAT-PCR testing across all centres in a time-bound manner to ensure safer blood transfusion practices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How Hepatitis D virus can cause liver cancer: Know its symptoms, risks, causes, and more
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have officially classified the Hepatitis D virus (HDV) as carcinogenic to humans. This places HDV alongside Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C as major causes of liver cancer. The reclassification is based on increasing evidence of HDV's severe health risks, especially its role in accelerating liver damage and cancer in co-infected individuals. This important update emphasises the urgent need for better awareness, expanded testing, and improved treatment options to combat HDV and reduce the global burden of liver cancer and liver-related deaths. Understanding Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) and its symptoms Hepatitis D is a unique and dangerous virus that requires the presence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) to infect and replicate. HDV cannot infect people on its own; it "hijacks" the HBV infection process, resulting in more severe liver disease when both viruses coexist. Symptoms of HDV infection often overlap with other liver diseases and can be easily overlooked. Common signs include: Fatigue and weakness Nausea and loss of appetite Abdominal pain or discomfort, especially in the upper right side Dark-coloured urine Yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice) Unexplained weight loss Fever Because symptoms may be mild or mistaken for other illnesses, many individuals delay seeking medical care, increasing the risk of serious liver damage. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Signs Of Heart Attack That Shouldn't Be Ignored (Take A Look) TheDaddest Undo What causes Hepatitis D virus infection HDV spreads primarily through direct contact with infected blood or bodily fluids. Common modes of transmission include: Infected blood transfusions or blood products Unprotected sexual contact with an infected person Sharing needles or syringes among people who inject drugs Unsafe medical procedures involving non-sterile equipment Mother-to-child transmission during childbirth (less common) Because HDV can only infect individuals already carrying HBV, anyone with chronic hepatitis B is at risk of contracting HDV. Who is at risk of Hepatitis D Infection Populations at higher risk for HDV infection include: People living in regions with high HBV prevalence such as parts of Asia, Africa, and the Amazon Basin People who inject drugs and share needles Patients receiving haemodialysis or undergoing frequent blood transfusions Individuals with multiple sexual partners or those who engage in unprotected sex Infants born to mothers infected with both HBV and HDV Awareness and screening in these groups are essential for early detection Global impact: How widespread is Hepatitis D According to the WHO, over 300 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B, C, or D, contributing to about 1.3 million deaths annually, mostly from liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. About 5% of chronic HBV carriers, roughly 12 million people worldwide, are co-infected with HDV. Why is Hepatitis D considered dangerous Co-infection with HDV dramatically worsens liver health outcomes. Research shows: HDV increases the risk of liver cancer by two to six times compared with HBV infection alone. Up to 75% of chronic HDV patients develop liver cirrhosis within 15 years, which is significantly higher than HBV-only cases. HDV accelerates liver inflammation and damage, raising the risk of severe complications and death. Current treatment options for Hepatitis D While chronic HBV infection can be managed with lifelong antiviral therapies, treatment options for HDV are limited but improving: Bulevirtide: Approved in Europe, this antiviral helps block HDV entry into liver cells, improving outcomes, especially when combined with pegylated interferon. Pegylated interferon: Sometimes used to suppress HDV replication, but effectiveness varies. No specific hepatitis D vaccine exists; prevention depends on hepatitis B vaccination, which protects against both HBV and HDV infections. Progress in global hepatitis B vaccination and testing Vaccination remains the most effective prevention method. As of 2025: 129 countries have adopted hepatitis B testing for pregnant women (up from 106 in 2024). 147 countries provide the hepatitis B birth dose vaccine (up from 138 in 2022). These efforts are critical to preventing HBV and consequently HDV transmission. Expert recommendations to combat Hepatitis D To achieve WHO's hepatitis elimination goals by 2030, health authorities must: Scale up hepatitis B vaccination coverage worldwide Ensure universal testing of HBV-positive individuals for HDV Expand access to novel HDV therapies and affordable medicines Strengthen healthcare infrastructure and data systems Combat stigma and discrimination around viral hepatitis to encourage testing and treatment Meeting these goals could save 2.8 million lives and prevent 9.8 million new infections by 2030. Also read | Testicular cancer symptoms men often miss: Know the risks, treatment options, and what to watch for
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
17-Yr-Old Addict ‘Sold Her Body For Drugs', Ends Up Giving HIV To Many: ‘Was Then Transmitted To...'
Last Updated: Men who had physical relations with the girl from Uttarakhand were "unaware" she was HIV positive. Since some of them were married, their wives "too got HIV". A troubling case from Uttarakhand's Ramnagar town has resurfaced online. A 17-year-old girl, allegedly addicted to drugs, transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) to at least 19 men over the past year and a half. The incident initially came to light in October last year in the Gularghatti area in Nainital district. According to reports, the teenager was in contact with several local men, and many of them later tested positive for HIV. The girl was reportedly using the money she received to fund her drug addiction. Men Unaware Of Infection A post that gained widespread attention claimed that the men who came in contact with the girl had no idea she was HIV positive. Some of them were reportedly married, which led to the further spread of the virus to their wives. 'A 17-year-old girl gave HIV to 19 youth in Nainital, Uttarakhand. She was addicted to smack, and to fund her addiction, she engaged in physical relationships with men. The men didn't know that she had HIV. She slept with even some married men, whose wives also got HIV," read a post shared on X (formerly Twitter). Infections Linked To Drug-Addicted Teen The case started unfolding when several young men in the area began reporting severe health issues. They had approached the Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre (ICTC) at Ramdatt Joshi Joint Hospital, where tests confirmed they were HIV positive. An investigation followed and pointed to a common link: a teenage girl with a financially disadvantaged family who was taking heroin. During counselling, it was revealed that she had been sexually active with many of the infected men over several months. Many Question Men's Actions After the post resurfaced online, social media users reacted to it. While the incident itself shocked many, several people pointed out that the men had sexual relations with a minor, which is a punishable offence. One user commented, 'So married men cheated on their wives and slept with a minor. They deserve it." Another added, 'Those men made a personal choice of sleeping with a MINOR without protection while being MARRIED. ZERO SYMPATHY FOR SUCH PEOPLE!!! The only victims, in this case, are the poor women who were married to these disgusting men!" 'You mean to say multiple married men need to be booked under POSCO now. Good for the men," someone else said. 'Why are adult men sleeping with an underage person not the main problem here?" a person questioned while an individual shared, 'Those men deserved it! Why did they sleep with a 17 y/o? It's entirely their fault. Look at those married men, because of those imbeciles, now innocent women are affected." Meanwhile, a user shared, 'Two years ago, I worked in Noida and noticed a girl, about 16-18 years old, living in a room inside mine. She consistently invited male friends daily for obvious reasons. Once the landlord discovered this, they chased her away." Following the incident, the health department in the region took several steps to spread awareness about HIV/AIDS. Seminars and awareness drives were organised where free testing and medicines were made available to those affected. The identity of all diagnosed individuals was kept strictly confidential. About the Author Buzz Staff A team of writers at bring you stories on what's creating the buzz on the Internet while exploring science, cricket, tech, gender, Bollywood, and culture. News18's viral page features trending stories, videos, and memes, covering quirky incidents, social media buzz from india and around the world, Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
In Delhi's prisons, the mental health of inmates is a footnote
India's prisons are among the harshest in the world. They are overcrowded, with unhygienic living conditions and poor healthcare that can endanger the lives of inmates. The right to healthcare, including mental healthcare, is fundamental, enshrined in Indian constitutional law and international human rights conventions to which India is a signatory. However, despite extensive legal safeguards and judicial directives, India's prisons routinely neglect the mental wellbeing of inmates – to the detriment of jails as well as the criminal justice system. The mental health concerns of prisoners are widespread. Some enter prisons with existing conditions, often untreated, while others develop mental health issues during their incarceration. Delhi's Tihar Jail – India's largest correctional facility, has long struggled to address the mental health needs of its inmates. There are 19,000 inmates across Delhi's three prison complexes – Tihar (nine jails), Mandoli (six), and Rohini (one). The responses by jail hospitals to right to information applications I filed in April indicated significant lapses in procedural compliance, staffing, training and infrastructure. Ensuring the mental wellbeing of inmates is not merely a legal obligation, but is essential for rehabilitation and reducing the tendency of inmates to relapse into criminal activity. No oversight mechanisms The Central Jail Hospital at Tihar, which covers the Tihar and Rohini complexes, provided information for Central Jails 1 to 10, while the Mandoli Jail Hospital submitted responses for Central Jails 11 to 16. The information provided included the number of prisoners with mental illness and the implementation of mental healthcare provisions. As of September 2024, there were 749 inmates with mental illnesses in these three prison complexes, according to a response to a previous RTI application dated August 2024. By May, the number had increased by 100. In the responses dated May 1, Tihar Jail Hospital reported 653 undertrial prisoners with mental illness and 54 convicted prisoners with mental illness. Mandoli Jail Hospital had 142 inmates being treated for mental illness. Under Section 103 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, these prisoners should have been transferred to a psychiatric ward in the medical wing or a mental health establishment within the prison. But only 36 of these prisoners had been shifted, Tihar and Mandoli Jail Hospitals said in their responses. The Tihar Jail Hospital said that only 'actively symptomatic inmates with severe mental illness' are transferred to the psychiatric ward while other inmates with 'common mental illness' and those with 'severe mental illness but stable on medications' are given outpatient treatment in their respective jails. There was no explanation about the criteria used to classify mental illnesses as 'common' or 'severe'. This affects the medical treatment prisoners receive. In psychiatric wards, psychiatrists conduct daily visits but in jails, there are typically weekly visits, said the replies. Oversight mechanisms, too, are virtually absent. There is no Mental Health Review Board to visit and inspect Delhi's prison complexes, though it is legally required. The Mental Healthcare Act says state governments must set up a Mental Health Review Board based on the number of mental health establishments, patients and population in a district or group of districts. Without a review board, the legal aspects of the mental health of prisoners are simply not being enforced. According to the responses by Tihar and Mandoli Jail Hospitals, there had been no inspections of Delhi's jails, which had also not submitted quarterly reports to the nonexistent board. Similarly, Section 103(3) of the Mental Healthcare Act requires prison medical officers to send quarterly reports to the Mental Health Review Boards certifying that there are no prisoners with mental illness in the jail. Section 103(4) empowers the Mental Health Review Boards to inspect prisons and investigate why inmates with mental illnesses have not been transferred to the psychiatric ward. The Board can question prison medical officers on their decisions. These failures are due to the inaction of the Delhi State Mental Health Authority, which is responsible for constituting Mental Health Review Boards. Section 103 of the Mental Healthcare Act mandates prisons to register their mental health establishments with the State Mental Health Authority. But, again, none of the three mental health establishments in Delhi's prisons are registered. The Delhi government has failed to act despite repeated judicial orders, including a directive issued in December 2024 by the Delhi High Court to appoint members of the Delhi State Mental Health Authority. Since the enforcement of the Mental Healthcare Act in 2018, such court directives have become routine – as has the government's failure to comply. Staff shortage Non-compliance, coupled with a severe shortage of mental health professionals, risks endangering the lives of inmates. The 2016 Model Prison Manual says that there must be one psychologist or counsellor for every 500 inmates, which means Delhi's jails need at least 38 mental health professionals for emotional and psychological support. But there are only four full-time psychiatrists posted across 16 jails, out of a total of 10 sanctioned positions, said the Tihar and Mandoli Jail Hospitals. Though jail authorities claimed that 'regular counsellors are posted in each jail', they did not disclose specific numbers or other details. This shortage mirrors a national crisis. The India Justice Report, 2025, states that as of 2022, there were only 69 psychiatrists or psychologists sanctioned across India's 1,330 prisons, with just 25 appointments made. That equals one mental health professional per 22,929 inmates. The report found that twenty-five of India's 36 states and Union Territories have not sanctioned a single psychologist or psychiatrist within their correctional staff. At the same time, the number of prisoners officially diagnosed with mental illnesses nationwide nearly doubled between 2012 and 2022, as per the report. Prison conditions, including overcrowding and isolation, make inmates especially vulnerable to mental health issues. Due to a severe shortage of mental health professionals, many inmates likely remain undiagnosed, suggesting that the true number is higher than the reported figures. There are infrastructural deficits as well. The Mental Healthcare (Rights of Persons with Mental Illness) Rules, 2018, prescribe minimum standards and procedures for mental healthcare services in prisons. The schedule to Rule 11, which is titled 'Minimum standards and procedures for mental healthcare services in prisons', mandates telemedicine services and a list of 29 antipsychotic medicines. But telemedicine facilities, which could have eased the burden on limited resources, are non-existent across all three prison complexes in Delhi. 'Some' of the necessary medicines are available in Mandoli while nine are reportedly unavailable in Tihar and Rohini, said the replies by the Tihar and Mandoli Jail Hospitals. Prisons also rely on non-clinical alternatives, such yoga, meditation and group counselling, as outlined in the National Human Rights Commission Advisory on the Rights of Prisoners, 2020. They are also supposed to hold awareness classes and stress management workshops in accordance with a 2021 Ministry of Home Affairs Advisory on the mental health needs of inmates. But, again, implementation is inconsistent across Delhi's jails. In the responses, Central Jails 1, 3-4, 7-9, 14 and 16 did not specify the number of sessions conducted – these varied from daily to weekly to monthly. Two jails provided numbers. Central Jail 12 reported 76 sessions on yoga, meditation, and group counselling in a month, while Central Jail 5 said it had conducted 59 sessions. But only a comprehensive evaluation can assess how effective these sessions were. The judiciary has repeatedly intervened to address these concerns. In 2023, the Delhi High Court highlighted the inadequacy of the prison system in addressing the mental health needs of inmates. The Court acknowledged that incarceration could lead to depression and other emotional disturbances. It directed prison authorities to promptly inform the psychiatrist posted in the facility if any inmate exhibits symptoms of mental distress and to ensure that counselling and therapy are provided. A few years earlier, the Supreme Court in 2018 issued similar directions to all state governments. The apex court also directed medical officers in jails to receive training in providing basic and emergency mental healthcare. But none of the Tihar jails had conducted these trainings, according to the RTI response. On May 2, the Ministry of Home Affairs issued another advisory requiring prisons to provide psychiatric and psychological services to inmates. Legal frameworks and judicial precedents are clear that although incarceration limits an individual's liberty, their human rights, including the right to mental healthcare, remain intact. The reality in Delhi's prison complexes falls short of this.
