&w=3840&q=100)
History Today: When Jawaharlal Nehru passed away after a heart attack
On May 27, 1964, Jawaharlal Nehru, the prime minister of India, passed away after suffering a heart attack at age 74. Nehru is widely known as the architect of modern India and one of the most important leaders of the Indian freedom movement. He had been at the helm for 17 years – guiding the country in the backdrop of monumental events including the US-Soviet Cold War and the 1962 War with China read more
Jawaharlal Nehru, also known as 'Pandit Nehru', was the architect of modern India.
One of the most monumental moments in India's history took place on May 27, 1964.
Jawaharlal Nehru, the Prime Minister of India, passed away after suffering a heart attack at age 74.
Nehru, also known as 'Pandit Nehru', was the architect of modern India.
In in the pantheons of India's greatest politicians, he remains a titan.
If you are a history geek who loves to learn about important events from the past, Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today will be your one-stop destination to explore key events.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Nehru passes away
On the day he died, Jawaharlal Nehru was prime minister of India and a towering national figure.
It was the position he had held for 17 straight years – since the country's Independence in 1947.
Nehru was born into a Kashmiri Brahmin family in in Allahabad on November 14, 1889 .
His father, Motilal Nehru, was a well-known lawyer and leader of the Independence Movement. He also knew Mahatma Gandhi.
Nehru was first educated at home. He was then sent abroad – first to Harrow and then to Trinity College in Cambridge. He was not a top student.
'I have become a queer mixture of East and West, out of place everywhere, at home nowhere,' Nehru wrote of his time abroad.
On returning to India, Nehru got married to Kamala Kaul.
Their only child, Indira, would go on to serve as prime minister. But that came later.
Nehru over the next couple of decades became one of the most important leaders of the Indian political movement.
He also became close to Mahatma Gandhi – and was widely seen as the heir apparent to the movement. On August 15, 1947, Nehru became Independent India's first prime minister.
Lord Louis Mountbatten, viceroy of India, discusses Britain's partition plan with Jawaharlal Nehru and Muhammad Ali Jinnah. File image/AP
For the next 17 years, Nehru would guide India through monumental events – including the Cold War between US and the Soviet Union and the 1962 War with China – pursuing a path of non-alignment and policies known as 'Nehruvian socialism.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He died with his daughter Indira at his side.
Nehru's death was greeted by massive shock from by his fellow politicians.
The prime minister is no more. The light is out,' an emotional C Subramaniam, a Cabinet minister, told Parliament.
Incidentally, Nehru had used the very same phrase – the light is out – while announcing Gandhiji's death.
His demise plunged India – its writers, intellectuals, thinkers and the public at large – into a profound sorrow.
Nehru, to this day, remains one of the most important and influential politics India has ever seen.
Golden Gate bridge opens
Also, on May 27, 1937, the Golden Gate Bridge opened for the first time to the public.
The bridge, which had been under construction for five years, was a massive undertaking.
Over 200,000 people came to gape at the 4,200 square foot suspension bridge connecting San Francisco and Marin County.
Work on the bridge began on January 5, 1933 – during the Great Depression.
A decade had passed after bridge engineer Joseph Strauss had first proposed building a suspension bridge for around $27 million.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Five years after work began, the Golden Gate Bridge was opened on May 27, 1937, becoming the longest bridge span in the world at the time. File image/Reuters
Strauss, who was later elected chief engineer of the project, would be ably assisted by consulting engineer Leon S. Moisseiff, architect Irving F Morrow, and others.
Moisseiff and Morrow's contributions cannot be understated.
After all, it was Moisseiff who convinced Strauss to build a simple suspension bridge.
Morrow and his wife Gertrude, meanwhile, developed the look of the bridge.
Morrow also aided in choosing the Golden Gate Bridge's famed colour – 'international orange.'
But the work came at a cost.
In all, 11 men died during the work on the bridge.
At the time of its opening, it was the world's longest bridge.
It would hold that record till 1964.
The Golden Gate Bridge stands to this day as an engineering marvel.
Every year, thousands of people from around the world still come to San Francisco to admire it.
This Day, That Year
1660: Denmark and Sweden signed the Treaty of Copenhagen, bringing an end to the major conflict between the two powers. The treaty, alongside the Treaty of Roskilde, determined the modern boundaries of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.
1679: England passed the Habeas Corpus law – putting a dent in the right of kings. The law, which translates to 'you shall have the body,' arguably remains the cornerstone of legal jurisprudence for democracies around the world.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
1897: Bram Stoker's 'Dracula' went on sale in London. The Irish writer is said to have based the character on Prince Vlad III of Wallachia – also known as Vlad The Impaler. From Buffy The Vampire Slayer to Blade and Twilight, the hold of vampires on Pop culture has never since waned.
1933: Disney releases its animated movie Three Little Pigs. The whimsical musical, which preceded Walt Disney's masterpiece Snow White by four years, was a major hit and influenced the direction of the entire animation industry for years to come.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US balks at India-Russia defence ties: What's delaying Washington's deals?
On Tuesday (June 3), US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick delivered a message that many in New Delhi may have long suspected but seldom heard in such stark terms. Speaking at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) Leadership Summit, Lutnick said past Indian decisions, like defence purchases from Russia and participation in Brics, have 'rubbed the United States the wrong way". 'That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America,' he said, singling out India's military ties with Moscow and its presence in groupings like Brics, which is perceived to challenge the dollar's global dominance. The message was blunt, but it revealed a deeper truth, despite a loud strategic and diplomatic embrace - the India-US defence partnership remains affected by mistrust, mismatched expectations, and mounting delays. Why India-US defence partnership has not taken off Over the last two decades, India has procured nearly $20 billion worth of US-origin military hardware, ranging from C-17 Globemaster and C-130J aircraft to Apache helicopters and M777 howitzers. More recently, India signed agreements for 31 MQ-9B SeaGuardian drones, GE jet engines for fighter aircraft, and joint production of Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stryker infantry vehicles. But in reality, these headlines hide a growing frustration in New Delhi. Nearly all major US-origin defence deals announced in recent years are yet to materialise. Deliveries of GE-404 jet engines, which are critical to India's indigenous Tejas fighter jet programme, have been delayed, setting the project back by at least two years. Additionally, the long-touted Indo-Pacific maritime awareness package, including the SeaVision surveillance system approved in May 2025, is yet to be delivered. Even the high-profile MQ-9B drone deal remains tangled in a web, with final assembly and maintenance arrangements still being ironed out. These delays have cast a shadow over the defence relationship, particularly when juxtaposed with India's parallel defence partnership with Russia. Despite geopolitical turbulence, India and Russia continue to co-develop and manufacture systems like the BrahMos missile and AK-203 rifles under the Make in India programme. Their long-standing cooperation is institutionalised through the Inter-Governmental Commission on Military Technical Cooperation (IRIGC-MTC). US' hesitancy in providing defence equipment and India's 'Aatmanirbhar' push At the heart of the India-US defence dilemma lies a fundamental misalignment of priorities. India seeks co-development, joint production, and above all, meaningful technology transfer to boost its self-reliance (Aatmanirbhar Bharat). The US, on the other hand, largely views India as a lucrative arms market, offering equipment but rarely the underlying know-how. Even when co-production is agreed upon, the technologies involved are dated and old. The Javelin missile, developed in 1989 and inducted in 1996, and the Stryker vehicle from the early 2000s, are far from cutting-edge. While still effective, they represent a bygone era of warfare. In contrast, the future battlefield is increasingly being shaped by AI-enabled systems, autonomous drones, and electromagnetic weapons, domains where US-India collaboration has seen little progress. The contrast is not just technological but economic. A single Javelin missile costs $216,717 (roughly ₹1.9 crore), while a Ukrainian anti-tank drone capable of the same battlefield effect costs just $500 (₹43,685). For India, reliant on cost-effective solutions, the Javelin is a white elephant. What are the regulatory barriers hindering India-US defence partnership? India's quest for deeper military-technical collaboration with the US is hindered by a thicket of regulatory and legal barriers in the latter nation. US laws like the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) severely restrict technology transfers, especially for systems involving nuclear propulsion or fifth-generation fighter capabilities. Conversely, India's defence procurement system, marked by sluggish approvals, budget mismatches, and delayed offset clearances, discourages even the most well-meaning US defence firms. Structural misalignments and unresolved intellectual property concerns further hinder joint ventures. The Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI), once hailed as a breakthrough framework for co-development, has largely under-delivered. India's geopolitical diplomacy a thorn in US' eyes India's insistence on strategic autonomy and refusal to enter formal alliances remains a sticking point. While Washington expects alignment in Indo-Pacific military postures, New Delhi walks a tightrope, maintaining ties with the US, Russia, and France in equal measure. This balancing act has drawn flak in Washington. India's purchase of the Russian S-400 missile system exposed it to potential US sanctions under the CAATSA (Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) law. While the Biden administration held back, the unpredictability of US foreign policy under the Trump administration makes long-term defence planning increasingly difficult for India. What is the size of India's arms import? According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), India was the world's largest arms importer between 2019 and 2023, accounting for 9.8 per cent of global imports. In value terms, India's arms imports in 2023 stood at $1.43 billion (in constant 1990 dollars), with Russia still being the largest supplier, although its share has declined from 76 per cent (2009–13) to 36 per cent (2019–23). France and the US have been the biggest gainers. Therefore, as Lutnick's remarks make clear, the India-US defence relationship may be moving forward, but it is still dragging its feet.


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
The Brahmaputra: Myth, majesty and politics of water
News: Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Tuesday if China were to reduce the water flow of the Brahmaputra, it would benefit the state and help it mitigate the devastating annual floods. He was responding to Pakistan's remark that China might weaponise the Brahmaputra's waters in support of its 'all-weather friend' and retaliate to India's suspension of the Indus Water A River With A Male NameThe Brahmaputra, like every river that flows through the Himalayas, has its own history and mythology. But there is a difference between other Indian rivers, revered as goddesses, and the Brahmaputra: It is one of the few major rivers in India with a distinctly male name, derived from its mythological association with Lord Brahmaputra is believed to have two mythological fathers - Lord Brahma (obviously) and sage Shantanu. In the 16th-century text Yogini Tantra, dedicated to the worship of goddesses like Kali and Kamakhya, the river is linked to an ancient ablution ritual with the following invocation: O Son of Brahma! O Son of Shantanu! O Lohit! O Son of Lohit!I bow before you, wash away my sins of the last three the link to Brahma—the God of creation?advertisementAccording to eastern folklore, sage Shantanu and his wife Amogha live near Lake Lohit in the Himalayas. One day, attracted by her beauty, Lord Brahma approaches Amogha when she is alone. But Amogha locks herself up in a hut. Fearing her curse, Brahma sheds his seed and departs in shame. When Shantanu learns of this, he asks Amogha to consume the seed. From her nostrils later flows the son of Brahma, ergo the name Brahmaputra.A Himalayan LegendAccording to Tibetan folklore, the river originates as a small stream from Mount Tise (the Kailash Parvat–abode of Lord Shiva). At the site of its birth, the river is guarded by four divine entities—a lion, an elephant, a horse, and a the indigenous communities of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, such as the Mising, Bodo, and Adi, the Brahmaputra is a living deity. In The Tribes of Assam (B.N. Bordoloi), the Mising people refer to the river as 'Father River' or a manifestation of Abo Tani, their ancestral Assam, the Brahmaputra is celebrated during festivals like Bihu, where communities honour the river for its bounty. The legendary singer Bhupen Hazarika's ode to the river - Mahabahu Brahmaputra - is considered one of the greatest Assamese does the river originate?advertisementThe Brahmaputra, known as the Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet, Siang or Dihang in Arunachal Pradesh, and Jamuna in Bangladesh, takes on different names along its journey. During the 18th and 19th centuries, British colonial rulers, restricted from entering Tibet due to political constraints, sent Indian explorers disguised as monks to trace the Brahmaputra's path. In the early 20th century, the source of the Brahmaputra was eventually traced to the Chemayungdung Glacier in the Kubi Kangri mountain range in southwestern Tibet, near the Himalayas. This glacier, located at an elevation of about 5,200 meters, was identified as the primary source of the Yarlung Tsangpo, which becomes the Brahmaputra the path of the river?From the Chemayungdung Glacier, the mighty river crisscrosses three countries - China, India, and Bangladesh - before merging with the Padma River (the main distributary of the Ganges) in Bangladesh. Joined by the Meghna River, it forms one of the world's largest river confluences, emptying into the Bay of Bengal. Its total journey from the source to the sea is approximately 2,900 descends the Himalayas in dramatic fashion, plunging through the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon, the world's deepest gorge, on the Tibet-Arunachal Pradesh is building a gigantic dam in Medog, where the river plunges 2,000 metres over a 50-km stretch. In India, the proposed dam on the Tibet-Arunachal border to harness this steep decline for hydel power has led to environmental concerns and fears of weaponisation of the river. (More about it later)The Great BendAs the river makes its way through the Himalayas, it comes across Namcha Barwa, a 7,782-meter peak, often called the 'eastern anchor' of the range. Unable to breach the mighty barrier, the river makes a sharp, U-shaped bend, known as the Great Bend. With this stunning manoeuvre, the river swings from flowing eastward to southward, entering India through Arunachal Pradesh, where it is known as the Siang River (or Dihang).Flowing through Northeast India, it enters the plains of Assam, where it acquires the popular moniker—the Brahmaputra. In Assam, the river widens significantly, flowing west-southwest for about 800 km through a broad, fertile valley covering major towns like Dibrugarh, Guwahati, and this, it enters Bangladesh, where it is hailed as the Jamuna River. It continues to flow south, merging with the Padma River (the main distributary of the Ganges) in Bangladesh. Joined by the Meghna River, it forms one of the world's largest river confluences. The Meghna, now the river's main channel, empties into the Bay of crossing of the MeghnaIncidentally, in the 1971 India-Pakistan war, the Indian army crossed the Meghna River in heroic fashion. The crossing of the Meghna under Lt General Sagat Singh is considered one of the most daring acts of war, a raid that turned the tide of the war for the liberation of China block the river?Completely blocking the Brahmaputra is impossible since the Brahmaputra collects almost 40 percent of its water while flowing through India. Unless this huge basin is altered, the Brahmaputra would continue to feed India, and also India shouldn't worry about China's potential weaponisation of water?China's upstream dams could still manipulate flows, creating risks of artificial floods or droughts, as noted by geostrategist Brahma Chellaney. Chellaney argues China's control over the Tibetan Plateau gives it unparalleled dominance over Asia's water resources (Water: Asia's New Battleground). Its upstream location allows China the liberty to unilaterally manipulate river flows, which can be used to artificially create droughts and floods in addition, China's plan to build a massive dam on the Brahmaputra near the Great Bend is a seismic and strategic risk for India. Chellaney argues the project could manipulate transboundary flows to leverage China's claim over Arunachal Pradesh, a disputed territory, and exert pressure on downstream China's view on this?China has consistently dismissed concerns about its planned hydropower dam as 'conspiracy theories,' asserting that the project is a run-of-river initiative that will not significantly alter the river's flow or affect the rights of downstream to a statement from Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning on December 27, 2024, the dam, located in Medog County, Tibet, has been studied for decades with rigorous scientific evaluations to ensure safety and ecological protection. Mao emphasised that the project 'will not negatively affect the lower reaches,' referring to India and Bangladesh, and is designed to accelerate clean energy development and combat climate experts and downstream nations remain skeptical of China's assurances. A 2024 study in the Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs warned that the Medog dam could disrupt sediment flow, critical for agriculture in India's northeastern plains and Bangladesh's delta, impacting millions of farmers.A 2022 report by Bangladesh's Ministry of Environment estimated that a 5% reduction in Brahmaputra flow could lead to a 15% drop in agricultural output in some regions, threatening food is a precious commodity, especially in the 21st century, where environmental changes could lead to scarcity and flooding. Any country that has the ability to maintain the flow of a dynamic river like the Brahmaputra enjoys a strategic as well as hydrological advantage. India will have to deal with China diplomatically on the issue of the Brahmaputra. It will have to ensure the river is treated as a shared asset and heritage of the three countries through which it passes, not allowing Pakistan to needlessly meddle in the tripartite issue. India and China, as major powers focused on economic and technological growth, recognise the value of cooperation over conflict, reducing the likelihood of escalating tensions over the Brahmaputra at Pakistan's Watch


Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
Kamal Haasan's ‘Thug Life' release halts in Karnataka amid apology row
The controversy surrounding veteran actor Kamal Haasan's remarks at the Thug Life audio launch has taken a serious turn, escalating into a legal dispute with the Karnataka High Court stepping in. The issue, which sparked public backlash from sections of the Kannada-speaking community, has now disrupted the film's regional release plans. During a recent hearing, the High Court came down heavily on Haasan, questioning his authority to comment on historical or linguistic matters. The bench bluntly asked, 'Are you a historian or a linguist? If you want Thug Life to see a smooth release, you must issue a clear apology as you hurted their sentiments.' Responding to the uproar, Kamal Haasan sent an official letter to the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, expressing regret and clarifying his intentions. He insisted that his comments were rooted in affection, especially towards actor Shiva Rajkumar, and not meant to diminish the Kannada language. He emphasized that his career has always celebrated unity among Indian languages. However, the High Court found the actor's statement lacking in sincerity, noting post-lunch that Haasan didn't appear 'truly apologetic.' The matter has now been adjourned to June 10, 2025. In a dramatic development, Kamal Haasan has decided to halt Thug Life's release in Karnataka until further notice. The move has left fans and the film industry watching closely, as the situation continues to unfold with the potential to affect the film's broader release strategy.