As Iran comes under attack, its Arab neighbors are largely AWOL
TEL AVIV — If Iran had hoped its neighbors would rise to its defense in the wake of unprecedented American and Israeli attacks, that moment may have passed.
On Monday, Iran fired back at the U.S. with a strike on the American Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, in what is already being seen as merely a face-saving gesture. Qatar said it had intercepted the Iranian missiles and condemned the attack, calling it a violation of its sovereignty.
But even as Middle Eastern leaders were quick to criticize President Donald Trump's paradigm-shifting assault on Iran following 10 days of Israeli bombardment, the American strikes are likely to be accepted — and even privately cheered — by an Arab officialdom that has long seen Shia Iran as the primary threat to regional stability.
'These countries are quietly delighted to see Iran cut down to size,' said Firas Maksad, the managing director for the Middle East and North Africa at the Eurasia Group. 'But the primary objective is to guard against blowback targeting them.'
Statements from the governments of Turkey and Saudi Arabia, for example, have stopped short of condemning the U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, instead only issuing expressions of concern over an expanding regional conflict.
The statement from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates didn't even mention the United States by name. The most recent comments contrast with the countries' strong condemnations of Israel's attacks on Iran over the past 10 days.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK vows to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to meet a new Nato target to spend 5% of the UK's GDP on national security by a Nato summit in the Netherlands, 32 member countries including the UK are expected to agree the 5% goal, with 3.5% to go on core defence and the remaining 1.5% on defence-related areas such as resilience and security. The split target is aimed at placating US President Donald Trump, who has urged Nato allies to spend more, while giving cash-strapped EU countries flexibility over how they meet the Street has argued measures on energy and tackling smuggling gangs could be classified as security spending. Speaking ahead of the two-day summit, Sir Keir said the UK had to "navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest". "After all, economic security is national security, and through this strategy we will bring the whole of society with us, creating jobs, growth and wages for working people." Nato (the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) is made up of 32 member countries who agree to defend each other if attacked. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and Trump's re-election as US president last year, members of the organisation have faced increased pressure to boost their defence had been expected to spend at least 2% of their national income - or GDP - on defence, although last year, only 23 hit that target - an increase from three in January, Trump said 2% was "not enough" and that Nato allies should be spending 5%.And speaking last year before his re-election, he said he would "encourage" aggressors to "do whatever the hell they want" to European allies who don't pay their February, Sir Keir set out plans to increase the UK's defence spending, as opposed to national security spending, to 2.5% by April 2027 and expressed a "clear ambition" to reach 3% by 2034 if economic conditions Monday, the government said it expected to reach the target of spending 4.1% of GDP on national security by 1.5% element of the 5% Nato target is for what is described as "resilience", such as border security and protection against cyber the UK, this latter element is expected to be met by the year after next, with core defence spending reaching 2.6% by then. Getting core defence spending to 3.5% isn't expected until 2035 – two general elections away – and Downing Street hasn't said how it will be paid the spending commitment, the government published its National Security Strategy which said the UK needed to be more "competitive and robust" in science, education, trade and frontier also sought to stress that investment in defence would be felt "directly in the pockets of working people" pointing to new jobs that would be created. The summit will be Mark Rutte's first as secretary general of Nato. Speaking at a press conference on Monday, the former Dutch prime minister said the 5% spending commitment was "a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic and fundamental to securing our future".However, it is unclear how nations will meet the target or whether they will at Sunday evening, Spain claimed it had secured an opt-out, something later denied by is not a member of Nato and although President Volodymyr Zelensky has been invited to the summit dinner he will not be taking part in discussions of the North Atlantic week, Ed Arnold from the defence think tank Rusi told the BBC contentious issues - including a new Russia strategy - had been removed from the summit's agenda.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump in bizzare rant after Iranian strike on US airbase in Qatar
Donald Trump ignored a dramatic Iranian missile strike on US forces in Qatar — instead unleashing a online rant about 'sleazebags in the media'. Donald Trump launched into a bizarre rant on his Truth Social platform just hours after Iran fired missiles at a US airbase in Qatar. The US President made no mention of the attack, instead lashing out at the media in an angry monologue. As explosions were reported near Al Udeid Air Base — home to American forces — and Iran boasted of a 'successful response' to US aggression, the former President was more focused on slamming journalists and repeating conspiracy-laced grievances, reports the Mirror. He wrote: "The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it. Only the Fake News would say anything different in order to try and demean, as much as possible — And even they say they were 'pretty well destroyed!' "Working especially hard on this falsehood is Allison Cooper of Fake News CNN, Dumb Brian L. Roberts, Chairman of 'Con'cast, Jonny Karl of ABC Fake News, and always, the Losers of, again, Concast's NBC Fake News. It never ends with the sleazebags in the Media, and that's why their Ratings are at an ALL TIME LOW — ZERO CREDIBILITY!" Meanwhile, witnesses in Qatar reported seeing missiles streaking across the sky, followed by blasts near the US base. Though early reports suggested no major damage, Iranian state TV aired martial music and described the strike as 'a mighty and successful response' to US actions. The attack came just hours after Qatar abruptly shut its airspace, bracing for retaliation following recent US bombings on Iran's nuclear sites, believed to have been greenlit by Trump himself. In a post on X just before the explosions, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said: "We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer." Following the strike, Bahrain, which houses the US Navy's 5th Fleet, also closed its airspace temporarily, in a move echoing Qatar's earlier precaution. Qatari officials condemned the missile strike on Al Udeid, claiming their defences intercepted the rockets and no casualties were reported. They added the country's skies are now considered safe. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. But the US later confirmed casualties as a result of the strike, though numbers remain unclear. Tehran said it deliberately targeted the base, arguing it was located away from civilian areas — a move seen by some as an attempt to avoid wider escalation. A spokesman for the Iranian military added the strike mirrored the number of bombs the US had dropped on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend, suggesting it was a measured retaliation. Earlier, Israel dramatically ramped up its assault on Iran, hitting key military targets in the capital Tehran, including the gate of a notorious prison that houses political prisoners and the headquarters of Iran's military repression force. As smoke filled the skies over the Iranian capital, Israel came under a fresh barrage of missiles and drones. The ongoing tit-for-tat strikes have plunged the region deeper into chaos, with civilians in both countries now living under the constant threat of incoming fire.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
If Iran retaliation ends here, Trump's high-risk strikes may pay off
Iran had promised to retaliate for Saturday's US strike on its nuclear facilities - and now it has. According to early reports, all the Iranian missiles directed at the massive US base in Qatar were intercepted and there were no American casualties or media reports, however, that Iranian officials have said that this salvo was not the end of their nation's his address to the nation on Saturday night, President Donald Trump warned that there would be an overwhelming answer to any Iranian attacks on US interests. He promised that there were more targets that could be struck by American live updates on Iran-Israel conflictWhat we know about Iran's attack on US baseFor more than 24 hours, the world waited to see what Iran would do. Once Iran had acted, attention swung back to the US president and, after a few hours, he had his say."Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered," Trump posted on his social media site. He said that Iran had gotten it out of their "system" and added that "perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region".If the damage is indeed limited, and no additional Iranian attacks are forthcoming, Trump seems inclined to hold his fire in the hopes that the Iranians will be willing to negotiate in weekend attack on Iran was a high-risk manoeuvre, but a scenario in which it pays off is coming into view.A similar dynamic played itself out in January 2020, when Trump ordered the targeted killing of Iranian Revolutionary Guard leader Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad. Iran launched missiles at military bases in Iraq, injuring more than 100 American soldiers, but the US chose not to escalate. Cooler heads ultimately prevailed. According to US media, in their latest attack on Monday Iran fired a number of missiles at American bases equal to the total number of bombs US warplanes dropped during its weekend attack. That, along with the advance notice Iran provided to the Qatari government prior to the launch, for which Trump said he was grateful, suggests the Iranians are seeking proportionality, not most of the day, Trump was more focused on the price of oil, American media coverage and a suggestion by former Russian President Dimitry Medvedev that an outside nation provide Iran with nuclear of regime change resonates with fleeing IraniansWhat happens if Iran shuts the Strait of Hormuz?On his flight back from the G7 meetings in Canada Monday night, Trump had told journalists aboard that the US military was prepared for an Iranian threat."We have great people that know how to protect themselves," he said. "Our troops are ready."If Iran has another round of attacks, however - and there are American deaths or significant damage - pressure will mount for Trump to respond. On Sunday, US officials had stated, in no uncertain terms, that - unlike past US leaders - this president follows through on his do so, however, would risk exactly the kind of protracted warfare that even some of Trump's own supporters feared would result if the US joined this the moment, however, Iran is offering an off-ramp from this conflict, and Trump appears more than eager to take it.
