Germany and last Kaiser's heirs agree to keep treasures on display
"After 100 years, we have amicably resolved a dispute dating back to the transition from the monarchy to the republic," said Culture Minister Wolfram Weimer, hailing the "historic success".
The collection reportedly covers 27,000 objects including paintings, sculptures, coins, books and furniture.
"Countless works of art that are of great importance to the history of Brandenburg, Prussia, and thus Germany will now be permanently accessible to the public and continue to form the centrepieces of our museums and palaces," said Weimer.
Prince Georg Friedrich of Prussia said in a statement that "it has always been my goal to permanently preserve our shared cultural heritage for art-loving citizens and to make it publicly accessible".
"The solution now found provides an excellent basis for a new partnership between the state cultural foundations and my family."
Under the agreement, previously disputed objects will be transferred to a non-profit Hohenzollern Art Heritage Foundation, with two thirds of the board made up of public sector representatives, and one third by the aristocratic family.
Advertisement
Lost behind Iron Curtain
The ancient House of Hohenzollern ruled the German Empire from its establishment in 1871 until Wilhelm II was forced to abdicate in 1918, going into exile after Germany's defeat in World War I.
The Prussian royals were initially to be stripped of their properties but a deal was later worked out under a 1926 law.
The imperial family received millions of Deutschmarks and kept dozens of castles, villas and other properties, mainly in and around Berlin but also as far away as today's Namibia.
However, after Nazi Germany's World War II defeat, Soviet occupation of eastern Germany and communist rule led to additional expropriations.
The riches lost behind the Iron Curtain only came back into reach for the Hohenzollern family with the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall.
Under a 1994 law, people whose property was expropriated by the Soviets have a right to claim compensation -- but only if they did not "lend considerable support" to the Nazi regime.
The family fought for years to recover the treasures but dropped the bid in 2023 when a family representative acknowledged that Kaiser Wilhelm II "sympathised with the Nazis at times".
The deal announced on Friday was sealed after the German Historical Museum Foundation gave its approval, following the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation and the Prussian Castles and Gardens Foundation in Berlin-Brandenburg.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
German Foreign Minister Wadephul visits Japan – DW – 08/20/2025
On his first trip in office to Japan, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul stressed the two countries' "longstanding, deep and close friendship." Johann Wadephul also spoke of the role China plays in global geopolitics and how he'd welcome Beijing's contribution to ending the war in Ukraine.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Which European countries might send troops to Ukraine? – DW – 08/20/2025
US President Donald Trump is urging EU allies to send ground troops to Ukraine to secure a ceasefire and guarantee security there. Not every European state is prepared to do so though. Following talks about Ukraine in Washington early this week, Western states are working to fine tune the details of the much-discussed "security guarantees" for Ukraine. One important question is how a possible ceasefire could be secured along the more than 1,000-kilometer-long (621 miles) front line in eastern Ukraine. Another is which countries would be prepared to send soldiers to Ukraine? And how many, and with what sort of mandate? US President Donald Trump has spoken positively about supporting security guarantees for Ukraine but has left open exactly what they should look like. He has categorically ruled out the deployment of US troops on the ground in Ukraine. He seems to assume that Germany, France and the UK are prepared to send troops to Ukraine to secure peace, as he told US broadcaster Fox News after the talks in Washington. He suggested that the US would be prepared to provide air support. The German government does not seem to be as far advanced in its decision-making as Trump might like. "Germany's contribution tosecurity guarantees hasnot yet beendetermined and this issue will be decided at the political and military levels," German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday. He added that there were still too many uncertainties, for example, regarding further negotiations as well as the contribution of the US and other allies. "This will have to be discussed carefully. And these talks are currently taking place," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told DW. "So far Germany and its willingness to take responsibility in this conflict" cannot be described as lacking, he noted. What remains unclear is what mandate any international peacekeeping force might have. Germany's opposition Left Party (Die Linke) has expressed preference for a UN blue helmet deployment instead of a NATO-led mission so as to avoid any direct confrontation between NATO and Russia. Some members of Germany's Social Democrats, who are part of the country's ruling coalition, are also critical about NATO troops being deployed in Ukraine. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has shown himself to be open to sending a peacekeeping force to Ukraine in principle, but only in the event of a permanent ceasefire. Should this occur, London would be prepared to take a leading role in enforcing security guarantees for Ukraine, Starmer has said. This could also include the deployment of troops to monitor the ceasefire, for example. In February, British newspaper reported on a plan by London that would send 30,000 European troops to police a ceasefire. These would be deployed to guard Ukraine's cities and ports, as well as critical infrastructure such as nuclear power plants, far from the front line. The mission would also rely heavily on technical surveillance. The use of drones, satellites, reconnaissance aircraft and naval patrols in the Black Sea were all possibilities. In a virtual meeting with other leaders on Tuesday, Starmer said that, "Coalition of the Willing planning teams would meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended." French President Emmanuel Macron recently warned against rushing into a deal without safeguards. "This peace must not be rushed and must be backed by solid guarantees, otherwise we will be starting over again," he told French broadcaster TF1. In the past, Macron has not ruled out sending French troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force. In March, he presented a plan to send a "reassurance force" suggesting this might involve "a few thousand troops" per country, which would be stationed in "certain strategic locations" such as Kyiv, Odessa and Lviv. The mission would be defensive in nature, not for direct combat operations, and would act as a deterrent and for stabilization and training. France has already carried out exercises in which conditions in Ukraine were simulated. During the maneuvers, soldiers received training on how to behave in the event of a Russian attack via Belarus. Drone defense, electronic warfare and tactical coordination were also part of the training. Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and the Baltic states have also signaled their willingness to participate in a possible peacekeeping force in Ukraine. However other European states are more cautious. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk rejects the deployment of Polish soldiers, which he says, would be extremely unpopular with the Polish population. Polls say that 85% of Poles reject the deployment of their own soldiers, even for a peacekeeping mission. Hungary and Slovakia are also opposed to the deployment of European troops. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has even described the possible deployment of Western troops as "warmongering." Austria and Italy are also cautious. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is particularly skeptical about the deployment of NATO troops and would prefer a UN-led mission. Meloni has so far avoided making any clear commitments. In any case, nothing will happen without a prior agreement with Russia. But Moscow has so far categorically rejected the deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine and there is little indication that would change, even if there are signs that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy could soon meet in person. German Foreign Minister Wadephul remains skeptical. "I would advise that we first wait and see whether there are any talks at all," he told DW. "And secondly, if there are talks, whether there is an agreement that is resilient. And there, we are all waiting for Russia."To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany's Wadephul urges China to help Ukraine peace push – DW – 08/20/2025
With Russia and Ukraine floating the idea of peace talks, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told DW that it was "never too late" for China to step in and use its influence on Moscow. Germany would welcome China taking a more active role in the peace process in Ukraine as negotiations with Russia appear likely to ramp up, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told DW on Wednesday. At the same time, Wadephul also cautioned that Beijing had not appeared interested in such a role, despite explicit appeals from Berlin and other countries. "Hardly any other country, any other government, has such a strong influence on Russia as China. Unfortunately, China hasn't used its opportunities so far, but it is never too late," Wadephul said in an interview with DW's Rosalia Romaniec. The German minister is currently visiting Indonesia as part of his Asia tour that also included a two-day stop in Japan. "China defines its own role," Wadephul said during the interview. "China is an important country, a huge country which can have a lot of political influence, that has a lot of economic influence and is a permanent member of the UN Security Council. And for a long time now, we've been calling on China to use these opportunities to help ensure the war is ended." Wadephul added that he had raised the issue during his most recent conversation with his Chinese opposite number Wang Yi and said he would be "very pleased if this appeal was heard in Beijing." Hopes for peace talks rise amid positive signals from Trump, Putin, Zelenskyy The conservative politician expressed optimism about the latest push for talks aimed at stopping the fighting in Ukraine. He praised US President Donald Trump both for trying to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiations, and for talking about security guarantees for Ukraine. "There's a good chance that this is a step towards security and peace," Wadephul said. "But now everyone's waiting to see whether Vladimir Putin is genuinely ready to preside over an end to this war. Unfortunately, things are still looking very different on the battlefield." "There are obvious doubts, because President Putin has not yet said 'yes' to negotiations. President Zelenskyy said he is ready to hold a bilateral meeting with Putin, and then a trilateral meeting with President Trump. Where is the 'yes' from Putin?" Wadephul warned that if Putin was not willing to negotiate, this would lead to further sanctions on Russia, saying he believed that both Europe and the US were ready to pursue this course of action if necessary. He also said that given these uncertainties, it was too early to discuss issues like the German deployment of troops as part of any possible security guarantees, but stressed Germany "has so far never failed to show its readiness to take responsibility in this conflict." Wadephul said Berlin did not have "any ambition" to host potential talks. "We don't see our greatest contribution as being the venue for the talks. The most important thing is that they take place. There are many good venues in Europe for them to be held," he said. "I think it should be as neutral as possible. That's why Switzerland has always been good in the past." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video During his press conference with Indonesian Foreign Minister Sugiono, Wadephul also stressed that it should be "Russia and Ukraine" shaping such decisions, "not the German foreign minister from Jakarta." How Ukraine war fuels fears in Asia Wadephul told DW that one message he had brought with him to Asia, which he felt was also understood in the region, was how various crises around the world were interconnected, "and either we defend the international, rules-based order and peace together, or we lose this battle." "And that's exactly why I said here that a peaceful situation in the Taiwan Strait, for example, is as important for regional stability as it is for the global economy and also for economic and security policy in Europe," Wadephul said, adding that people in Asia "appreciate that Germany recognizes these issues." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He cited the coalition of 30 countries supporting Ukraine, including Asian countries like Japan, as evidence of how "many nations are now prepared to work together." "So by the same token, this region has the right to demand solidarity from us," as "new global partnerships are being created," Wadephul said. Bilateral trade between Indonesia and Germany has been growing rapidly in recent years. However, Indonesia — despite its population of some 285 million — is only 50th on the list of German international trade partners. But trade ties might ramp up as Germany and the EU seek to "de-risk" and become less dependent on China for certain core products like rare earths. More than 90% of Germany's rare earth supply currently hails from China. "We're not talking about decoupling ... that would be separation from China," Wadephul stressed, noting how Beijing was also looking to diversify its sources for certain imports. "But what we're seeing now in new and current restrictions in the delivery of rare earths from China reinforces our quest for new trade partners." He described Indonesia as a "good, new, and I think, reliable trade partner."
