
Protests Erupt In Village Near Raipur Over Eviction Drive For 'MLA Colony'
Last Updated:
Residents argue that the land, classified as 'Shamilat Charagah' — traditionally used as common pasture — has been in their families for generations.
Over 80 families in Sammanpur village, located in Chhattisgarh's capital Raipur, have been protesting for the past 10 days following eviction notices issued by the local administration, which claimed they had 'illegally occupied" the land.
Residents argue that the land, classified as 'Shamilat Charagah' — traditionally used as common pasture — has been in their families for generations.
They also point out that nearly 30 houses in the area were constructed under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), the central government's flagship housing scheme for economically weaker sections, reported PTI.
They claimed that now the government plans to build a colony for legislators on the land in question. However, the administration did not confirm it.
Women Lead Protest
In Sammanpur village—also known as Nakti—on the outskirts of Raipur near the airport, villagers, especially women armed with sticks, have been holding daily protests inside the local community hall.
For the past 10 days, the demonstrations have continued from 10 am to 10 pm, as the residents oppose the eviction notices served by the local administration.
Most of the villagers are daily wage labourers who live hand to mouth.
One of the villagers, Roshan Sahu, told PTI on Tuesday, on April 17 this year, Raipur tehsildar (revenue officials) served eviction notices to around 85 families who have been residing in the Bhatapara area, the outskirts of the village to vacate the land.
The eviction notices by the tehsildar said the land situated in Khasra no. 460, measuring 15.4790 hectares (around 38 acres) in Nakti village of the district Raipur, has been encroached/occupied by the encroachers residing in Nakti Gram Panchayat.
The order to evict the encroachers from the said land was passed by this (tehsildar) court on April 11, 2025, under section 248 of the Land Revenue Code 195.
In the notice, the authorities asked the occupants to leave their possession of land failing which the encroachment will be removed forcibly.
Sahu said the 38 acres of land on Khasra no. 460 do not belong to the government and it has been classified as 'Shamilat Charagah' in the land record. The names of owners are still mentioned in the land record and our forefathers have been owners since 1940, he said.
In the last 35-40 years, around 85 families from the village shifted to this land, he said.
Of the total houses, around 30 were built under the PM housing scheme, while around 10 houses were being constructed under the scheme but were put on hold by the administration after eviction notices served, he said.
Electricity lines were laid by the government in the locality and tap water connections were laid under Jal Jeevan Mission by erecting two overhead plastic tanks in the village, he said.
After spending several lakhs of rupees to provide various amenities in the area, the government now claims its residents as encroachers, the villager added.
When we contacted the local public representative and administration, they said the land will be used for the construction of the MLA colony, he claimed.
Sahu, 32, said he was born in a house built on the same land, living there with his family since his birth.
Newly-elected sarpanch of Nakti village panchayat Bihari Yadav, 48, said the village has a population of around 2,500 people and 85 families comprising around 350 people have received the eviction notice from the tehsildar for encroaching on government land triggering the protest.
These families have been staying here for 30-40 years.
(With PTI inputs)
First Published:
June 03, 2025, 22:11 IST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
India, Pakistan conflict among issues discussed during Putin-Trump phone call: Kremlin aide
The recent conflict between India and Pakistan was among the issues figured during a phone call between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, according to a Kremlin aide. During their conversation on Wednesday, the two leaders discussed Ukraine and also touched on some other issues, Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov told a briefing. "They also touched upon the Middle East and the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which was stopped with the personal participation of President Trump," Ushakov was quoted as saying by Russia's state-run TASS news agency. Ushakov, however, didn't share the details. Trump has repeatedly claimed that he stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. Live Events However, India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has urged President Putin to assist in resolving the conflict with India, Pakistan PM's special aide Syed Tariq Fatemi said. Fatemi, who met Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow on Tuesday, handed over a letter from Sharif for Putin. His visit came days after a highly successful tour of a multi-party parliamentary delegation led by DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, who spread awareness about Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism and got solid Russian backing for India's zero-tolerance policy against terrorism. "I met with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov. I gave him a letter from our prime minister to Mr. Putin. We asked...[him] to use his influence to make sure that India and Pakistan sit down at the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution," Fatemi said on Wednesday. He also emphasised that Pakistan awaits any initiative from Russia that would help reduce the degree of tension with India, TASS reported. "We are here to see support from Russia to any initiative that would ease tensions. Pakistan and India must sit down at the negotiating table," he was quoted as saying by the Russian news agency. "We are ready to sit down with them at the negotiating table and let them solve the problem," he added. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of May 7. Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions. The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10. PTI
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Working in national interest, not against Congress: Tharoor slams critics
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday said anybody who thinks that working in the national interest is a sort of anti-party activity needs to question themselves rather than us. Tharoor, who is leading an all-party delegation to the US to highlight India's zero tolerance against terrorism, told PTI in an interview, 'When one is doing the nation's service, I don't think one needs to worry too much about these things.' Tharoor was responding to questions that while leading the delegation, he was at the centre of attention after some members of the Congress party criticised his statements. When asked what message Tharoor would like to give to those party leaders upon his return to India, he told news agency PTI, 'I think anybody who sort of considers that working in the national interest is some sort of anti-party activity needs to question themselves rather than us.' He said the all-party delegation is on a mission, and they should not worry about what is being said or not by several individuals. The Congress MP further added that they will respond when the time comes. Tharoor made the statement after some Congress leaders, including Udit Raj and Pawan Khera, took jibes at his remarks in Panama about surgical strikes, leading to a war of words within the party. In the light of the controversy, social media was filled with speculations of Tharoor joining the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP). Responding to this, the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram said, 'I'm an elected member of parliament. I have four years left of my term. I don't know why there is any question to be asked.' Commenting on remarks made by Leader of Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for surrendering after a call was made by US President Donald Trump, Tharoor said, 'In a democracy, and this is normal, parties will contend, express criticism, and make demands.' Rahul Gandhi criticised PM Modi after India and Pakistan reached an 'understanding to stop all military actions' after four days of cross-border firing and drone strikes on May 10. The cross-border firing was in response to ' Operation Sindoor ', coordinated missile strikes launched by the Indian armed forces to retaliate for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. US President Donald Trump claimed credit for both nations agreeing to a ceasefire after four days. However, the Indian government has denied any mediation in the matter.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Solution must not come at the cost of judicial independence: CJI Gavai
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai stated on Wednesday that while the Collegium system is not without criticism, any solution must not come at the cost of judicial independence. "There may be criticisms of the collegium system, but any solution must not come at the cost of judicial independence. Judges must be free from external control," he said. The statement came while he was speaking at a roundtable discussion at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. CJI Gavai also justified the collegium system for appointment of judges in higher judiciary and pointed out that until 1993, it was the executive that had the final say in the appointment of judges. He said that during this period the executive superseded the senior-most judge in appointing CJI, which went against tradition. Talking about the credibility of courts, the CJI said that the legitimacy and public confidence are secured through the "credibility earned by the courts" and not through coercion of command. Erosion of this confidence risks weakening the judiciary's constitutional role as the ultimate arbiter of rights, he said. He also stated that in today's digital era, where perceptions are rapidly shaped, the judiciary must become 'accessible, intelligible, and answerable, without compromising its independence.' CJI Gavai also expressed concerns over judges accepting government appointments and contesting elections after retirement, he said that it raises 'ethical questions' and undermines public confidence in the judiciary. Speaking on the topic "Maintaining Judicial Legitimacy and Public Confidence," the CJI said every system, no matter how robust, is susceptible to professional misconduct issues. The CJI said transparency measures, such as the declaration of judges' assets, also bolster public confidence in the judiciary. Talking about accountability to people, he said that the Supreme Court maintains a portal where judges' declarations are made public, which shows that judges are willing to subject themselves to a degree of scrutiny. Talking about the role of the judiciary in democracy, he said that the judiciary must not only dispense justice, but also be seen as an institution that deserves to hold truth to power and the terms "judicial legitimacy" and "public confidence" are interconnected. With ANI and PTI inputs