
Ahmedabad: Video of man beating elephant sparks outrage; forest dept starts inquiry
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat forest department started an inquiry on Saturday after a video of a man repeatedly beating a female elephant in Ahmedabad was widely shared on social media platforms, including X. The 43-second footage of the person, reportedly a mahout (handler), striking the elephant around 19 times with a stick has sparked widespread outrage (Video grab)
The 43-second footage of the person, reportedly a mahout (handler), striking the elephant around 19 times with a stick has sparked widespread outrage among citizens, including animal welfare advocates.
The forest department has begun an inquiry into the alleged animal abuse case, an official said.
This incident comes two days after a single male elephant, Babulal—startled by loud DJ music and shrill noises—ran amok near Desai ni Pol in Khadia, causing panic during the 148th Jagannath Rath Yatra in Ahmedabad on Friday.
With 17 elephants, 101 trucks, 30 akhadas, 18 bhajan groups, and three bands, the annual procession—drawing thousands to pull the chariots of Lord Jagannath, Balabhadra, and Subhadra from the Jagannath Temple in Jamalpur along a 16-kilometer route—began around 7 am and was proceeding smoothly until 10.15 am, when the elephant bolted, scattering devotees.
Two people, including a woman police officer, were injured while trying to flee.
Police, mahouts, and forest staff tranquilized the elephant within 15 minutes and removed it, along with two female elephants, Janaki and Rani, who also showed signs of distress during the procession. The remaining 14 elephants continued the 16km journey.
An official, requesting anonymity, said that the person seen beating the elephant in the recent video was present at the Rathyatra procession on June 27 alongside the elephants.
'We have initiated an inquiry to verify the authenticity of the video, which began circulating on the evening of June 27. The person beating the female elephant appears to be a mahout, though we are confirming this. During the Yatra, the female elephants gave a distress call, prompting Babulal to respond due to their strong bond. The elephants were disturbed by loud music, whistles, or colorful balloons. These three elephants are relatively new to large public events. In the footage, Babulal appears to be trying to escape, with the female elephants showing similar discomfort,' chief conservator of forests in Ahmedabad K. Ramesh said.
Condemning the cruelty captured in the video and calling for systemic change, animal activists have raised concerns about the welfare of captive elephants. Many suspect that the harsh conditions during the Yatra—30°C temperatures, tar-covered roads, heavy decorations, and loud sounds—may have caused stress among the elephants, potentially triggering the handler's mistreatment.
The elephant is listed as a Schedule I animal under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, which grants it the highest level of legal protection. Any harm caused to it is a serious offence, punishable with 3 to 7 years of imprisonment and a minimum fine of ₹ 25,000, a forest official said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Female journalists urge media houses to remove content featuring minor
Women in media under the banner of 'Collective of Women Journalists' have come together to condemn the media coverage of a journalist and writer's death by suicide, and urged all the channels to take down the content featuring her daughter who is a minor. Addressing a press conference here on Monday, senior journalists from various media said it goes against the law and ethics to reveal the identity of the minor, and if anyone chooses to seek legal recourse, editors and all the staff will be in the dock. Women's activist and functionary of 'Bhumika Collective' Satyavathi Kondaveeti said she had already lodged a complaint with the Cyber Crime unit, and the Child Welfare Committee, about the reportage of various media. She said as per the The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, identity of minor children, their names, and their parents' names should not be revealed. However, in the present case, the girl's name, face and even the school she goes to is public information, because media channels did not observe discretion. Raising serious concerns with the coverage, another journalist V. Krishna Jyothi cited guidelines issued by Press Council of India, to say suicide should not be considered a 'crime' anymore, and crime reporters should not use the word 'committed'. All journalists, including the copy editor involved in the coverage will be culpable if someone chooses to approach the court about the indiscretion with regard to minor child, she warned. Besides, the letter written by the accused has been openly shared, which goes against the law. Senior media person C. Vanaja said reporting should be sensitive, ethical and more importantly should abide by the laws of the land. She also advised the police to stop addressing media conferences about the issue, and politicians not to politicise it. Another senior professional, Kavitha Katta urged the media to stop the character assassination of the victim. Journalist Rajeshwari Kalyanam remarked that lines are getting blurred between voyeurism and journalism, and urged legacy media houses to immediately remove all the visuals featuring the minor child, as they have a greater reach. Together, around 50 female journalists signed an open letter addressed to the editors and managements of media houses, expressing deep outrage at the irresponsible and insensitive media coverage of the incident. The use of lurid headlines, sensational narratives and thumbnails depicting a minor girl are egregious violations of journalistic ethics and human decency, the letter said. They demanded immediate removal of images, videos and thumbnails showing the minor, a public apology for the distress caused to the family and journalist community, and a concrete commitment to retrain the editorial teams on ethical reporting, especially on issues involving women and children. If the demands are not met, they warned that all legal, regulatory, and professional avenues will be explored to hold the organisations accountable.


The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
May 30: Hyderbad factory blast, major changes in Railways, rain alerts across India and more
A deadly reactor explosion near Hyderabad claims 12 lives. Kolkata gang rape accused had pre-planned the assault. Indian Railways announces key changes to Tatkal booking and fare structure starting July 1. Plus, infiltration attempts foiled in J&K, heavy monsoon rains batter North India, and Rath Yatra stampede kills three in Puri. Editing, narration and script: Aniket Singh Chauhan


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Enact stringent law prescribing severe punishment for ragging: Kerala high court tells govt
Kochi: High court has urged the state govt to enact a stringent law prescribing severe punishment for ragging in educational institutions, noting that such a measure is essential to curb the menace that continues to claim the lives of students due to the unruly and violent conduct of undisciplined peers. The bench of Justice D K Singh observed that the state must also ensure that those found guilty of ragging are not let off unpunished. The court made these remarks while considering the petitions filed by M K Narayanan and R Kanthanathan, the dean and assistant hostel warden, respectively, of the Pookode campus of the Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University. The petitioners had challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated against them following the death by suicide of J S Sidharthan, a second-year BVSc student, who was allegedly subjected to brutal ragging. Disposing of the petitions, HC directed the university to proceed with the departmental proceedings against the petitioners and complete the same within three months. It also mandated that the petitioners cooperate fully with the inquiry. Further, HC instructed the university to ensure appropriate action is taken against the students found responsible for Sidharthan's death. Sidharthan was found hanging in the hostel bathroom on Feb 18, 2024. Following the incident, the vice-chancellor issued suspension orders against the petitioners on March 5, and a three-member inquiry committee was constituted. The committee's report held both petitioners jointly liable for failing to discharge their duties and responsibilities. Subsequently, the chancellor appointed Justice A Hariprasad, a retired HC judge, to conduct an inquiry into the lapses in the administration of the campus and hostel. His report found that the dean failed in his responsibilities as warden and that the assistant warden also failed to enforce discipline in the men's hostel. The report was also critical of the conduct of the vice-chancellor. The petitioners had challenged the disciplinary proceedings and also the chancellor's communication dated August 12, 2024, which called for action under the Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Act, 2010 and asked the management council to respond within 45 days. They contended that the chancellor had no authority under the statute to initiate or direct disciplinary action against them. The court, however, rejected their contentions, holding that the chancellor has wide and overarching powers under the Act, including the authority to issue directions to the university authorities, who are duty-bound to comply.