History celebrated, history made at a picture-perfect running of the Boston Marathon
It was a day to make the most of their meteorological good luck (temperatures hit the low 60s) for the estimated more than half million who cheered the 30,000 runners on, at the 129th Boston Marathon.
It was a day of firsts. Kenya's Sharon Lokedi obliterated the record for fastest time among the women's elite runners by nearly three minutes, an astounding feat even to her: 'I didn't even believe it,' she said. The new time to beat is 2:17:22.
Also lasts. Des Linden, who in 2018 became the first American to win the marathon in more than 30 years, and in the process to many running fans an honorary Bostonian, announced just before the race that
Elite men's winner John Korir finished first despite
Advertisement
'For us, two brothers winning Boston, I think we're happy now,' the younger Korir said Monday.
For Marcel Hug, the champion wheelchair racer for the third year in a row, it came on the
Advertisement
American Susannah Scaroni this year became two-time women's wheelchair champion more than two minutes ahead of her Swiss rivals, and six minutes ahead of her first win in Boston in 2023. 'You can call it a miracle,' she said afterward. 'I'm so thankful.'
It was not a picture-perfect race for 20-year-old Villanova student Matt Nawn, w
'
You don't quit. You keep going. That's how I've always been in life,' Nawn, of Hanover, Pa., said in an interview.
He chalked his collapse up to dehydration and is back in good health. He said he is thankful for the hearty cheers he got from the finish-line bleachers, although he was hardly processing them in the moment.
'Thank you to the entire city of Boston,' he said. 'For everyone else who's watched the video, don't give up. Just because something bad happened doesn't mean it's an opportunity to give up. Keep pushing forward. Keep chasing it.'
The race had an especially patriotic air, coming amid celebrations of the 250th anniversary of the start of the Revolutionary War.
In the Colonial spirit for the occasion was Jared Levine, of Sterling, Va., who ran the entire route in 1775-era garb, with tan pants, a vest and blue regimental coat, a pair of gold buckles ornamenting his black Asics running shoes, and a tricorn hat atop a curly white wig — which stayed on the entire route, he said. He planned to make some history of his own: He's vying for the world record for fastest marathon in a Colonial-American costume.
Advertisement
'I sent an application to Guinness,' Levine said, referring to the company that validates such feats. 'I have no idea if it fits their guidelines.'
Even on years without the revolutionary anniversary, watching the Marathon is a matter of civic duty for Maureen Sanditore, 54, who moved to Boston from Costa Rica as a teenager in 1983 and has embraced Boston traditions wholeheartedly since.
'Nothing gives me more pride than being here,' said Sanditore, who added there are only two days a year she makes sure to take off work: the Boston Marathon and the Fourth of July.
'It's very important for me to be here to support everyone who runs,' Sanditore said, from a viewing spot on Boylston Street. 'People who come from all over the world, people who have disabilities, people running for a cause.'
Enjoying his second annual Boston Marathon, presumably, was 5-month-old Knox Brown. Last year he tagged along with his mom, Megan, who ran the race while two-months pregnant. This time, he was waiting for her at the finish line.
'I hope he's a little runner,' Brown said, cradling her son in her arms.
It was a day of mixed emotions for many Catholics, who woke up Monday morning to the news that
'I think Pope Francis would be the first one to say, 'Forget about me. Go on with the celebration,'' said Father Jim Croghan, superior of the
Advertisement
Croghan was
at the finish line awaiting the arrival of Father John Predmore, the chaplain for Ignatian Ministries at BC High, who was running his third Marathon after raising $24,000 for the charity
'This is his way of putting into action what Pope Francis was calling the church to do, paying attention to the marginalized, the overlooked, and those on the peripheries,' Croghan said of his colleague.
Some of the papal remembrances were less solemn. In Brookline, one spectator waved a sign that read, simply: 'Run for the Pope!'
Runners intent on maximizing the joy of race day dressed up in costumes. People playing the roles of Star Wars' Princess Leia, a banana, Celtic Larry Bird, and 'Buddy the Elf,' could all be seen planting one foot in front of the other.
Other fans waved signs that brought their wit to the sidelines. One, in a tribute to Taylor Swift, read 'IDK ABOUT U BUT I'M FEELIN 26.2.'
On the road, Ken Bereski was easy to spot, as he was covered head to toe in red paint. Across his face, in gold, was drawn a cross, and on his chest, the numbers '150.' It was his 150th marathon, he said. And the colors were a nod to his alma mater, Boston College.
'I was the crazy lunatic at every game,' Bereski said of his college days as a spectator. 'Going past BC is my favorite mile in all of marathoning.'
Advertisement
Chad Finn, Amin Touri, Christopher Huffaker, and Matt Porter of the Globe staff, and correspondents Emily Spatz and Sarah Mesdjian contributed to this report.
Spencer Buell can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
How a Carolina Panthers legend is elevating a football team he now owns
Charlotte remembers Ryan Kalil as the Carolina Panthers center — the man who snapped the ball to Cam Newton. Today, the retired NFL All-Pro player has traded his helmet and pads for the role of team owner. Why it matters: American football is huge stateside, but passion for the game is growing in other countries, too. Catch up quick: Earlier this year, Kalil and retired NBA All-Star Blake Griffin acquired Osos Monterrey, a professional Mexican football team playing in Liga de Fútbol Americano. Context: Mexico's passion for football (soccer) isn't a secret, but its love affair with football, the type with helmets and pads, isn't as widely known. Attendance ranges from 6,000-12,000 per game and it's a short season. Tickets range from $25-$50, Kalil says. They rebranded the team and had roughly three months to figure out the business side, Kalil says. Yes, but: The highest level of the sport in Mexico isn't a full-time job, Kalil tells Axios. Players are there because they love the game, but they still have day jobs. The goal is to elevate their team and the league to a point where it can be a full-time gig — including everything from league exposure to fields and equipment. The latest: That starts with outfitting players with better helmets. The team is working with LIGHT Helmets, which as the name implies, is a lighter helmet intended to keep players safe without impeding performance. "We need better exposure for [players], more resources for equipment, and honestly, that's part of our partnership with LIGHT Helmets," Kalil says. "It's that first step." Kalil says this is a sign for the players and the league as a whole that resources are coming. What we're watching: Kalil and Griffin are working on a documentary (akin to "Welcome to Wrexham") on Osos. Details including the timeline for its release and where you'll be able to stream it are TBD. It's expected to be released in either late 2025 or early 2026. The documentary will focus on Osos, but it will also look at the state of the league.
Hamilton Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
US Open ‘25: Decades ago under dark of night, Oakmont began removing trees and started a golf trend
Last month, Scottie Scheffler made mention of a trend in golf design that rubs him wrong — removing trees from courses. This week, the world's best player and favorite to win the U.S. Open will play a course that did just that, but didn't become one bit easier the way some layouts do when the trees go away. Under the dark of night three decades ago, the people in charge of Oakmont Country Club started cutting down trees. They didn't stop until some 15,000 had been removed. The project reimagined one of America's foremost golf cathedrals and started a trend of tree cutting that continues to this day. While playing a round on YouTube with influencer Grant Horvat, Scheffler argued that modern pro golf — at least at most stops on the PGA Tour — has devolved into a monotonous cycle of 'bomb and gouge': Hit drive as far as possible, then gouge the ball out of the rough from a shorter distance if the tee shot is off line. 'They take out all the trees and they make the greens bigger and they typically make the fairways a little bigger, as well,' Scheffler said. 'And so, the only barrier to guys just trying to hit it as far as they want to or need to, it's trees.' With or without trees, Oakmont has stood the test of time Scheffler and the rest in the 156-man field that tees off Thursday should be so lucky. While the latest Oakmont renovation, in 2023, did make greens bigger, fairways are never wide at the U.S. Open and they won't be this week. Tree-lined or not, Oakmont has a reputation as possibly the toughest of all the U.S. Open (or any American) courses , which helps explain why it is embarking on its record 10th time hosting it. In the two Opens held there since the tree-removal project was completed, the deep bunkers, serpentine drainage ditches and lightning-fast greens have produced winning scores of 5-over par (Angel Cabrera in 2007) and 4 under (Dustin Johnson in 2016). In an ironic twist that eventually led to where we (and Oakmont) are today, the layout was completely lined with trees in 1973 when Johnny Miller shot 63 on Sunday to win the U.S. Open. That record stood for 50 years, and the USGA followed up with a course setup so tough in 1974 that it became known as 'The Massacre at Winged Foot' — won by Hale Irwin with a score of 7-over par. 'Everybody was telling me it was my fault,' Miller said in a look back at the '74 Open with Golf Digest. 'It was like a backhanded compliment. The USGA denied it, but years later, it started leaking out that it was in response to what I did at Oakmont. Oakmont was supposed to be the hardest course in America.' It might still be. In a precursor to what could come this week, Rory McIlroy and Adam Scott played practice rounds last Monday in which McIlroy said he made a 7 on the par-4 second and Scott said he hit every fairway on the front nine and still shot 3 over. Nicklaus: Trees should only come down 'for a reason' While Oakmont leaned into tree removal, there are others who aren't as enthused. Jack Nicklaus, who added trees to the 13th hole at Muirfield Village after seeing players fly a fairway bunker on the left for a clear look at the green, said he's OK with tree removal 'if they take them down for a reason.' 'Why take a beautiful, gorgeous tree down?' he said. 'Like Oakmont, for example. What's the name of it? Oak. Mont. What's that mean? Oaks on a mountain, sort of. And then they take them all down. I don't like it.' A lot of Oakmont's members weren't fans, either, which is why this project began under dark of night. The golf course in the 1990s was barely recognizable when set against pictures taken shortly after it opened in 1903. Architect Henry Fownes had set out to build a links-style course. Dampening the noise and view of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which bisects the layout, was one reason thousands of trees were planted in the 1960s and '70s. 'We were finding that those little trees had all grown up and they were now hanging over some bunkers,' R. Banks-Smith, the chairman of Oakmont's grounds committee when the project began, said in a 2007 interview. 'And once you put a tree on either side of a bunker, you lose your bunker. So, you have to make a decision. Do you want bunkers or do you want trees?' Oakmont went with bunkers – its renowned Church Pew Bunker between the third and fourth fairways might be the most famous in the world – and thus began a tree project that divides people as much today as it did when it started. 'I'm not always the biggest fan of mass tree removal,' Scott said. 'I feel a lot of courses that aren't links courses get framed nicely with trees, not like you're opening it up to go play way over there.' Too many trees, though, can pose risks. Overgrown tree roots and too much shade provide competition for the tender grasses beneath. They hog up oxygen and sunlight and make the turf hard to maintain. They overhang fairways and bunkers and turn some shots envisioned by course architects into something completely different. They also can be downright dangerous. In 2023 during the second round of the Masters, strong winds toppled three towering pine trees on the 17th hole, luckily missing fans who were there watching the action. 'There are lots of benefits that trees provide, but only in the right place,' said John Fech, the certified arborist at University of Nebraska who consults with the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America. When Oakmont decided they didn't want them at all, many great courses followed. Winged Foot, Medinah, Baltusrol and Merion are among those that have undergone removal programs. Five years ago, Bryson DeChambeau overpowered Winged Foot , which had removed about 300 trees, simply by hitting the ball as far as he could, then taking his chances from the rough. It's the sort of golf Scheffler seems to be growing tired of: 'When you host a championship tournament, if there's no trees, you just hit it wherever you want, because if I miss a fairway by 10 yards, I'm in the thick rough (but) if I miss by 20, I'm in the crowd,' Scheffler told Horvat. How well that critique applies to Oakmont will be seen this week. ___ AP Golf Writer Doug Ferguson contributed. ___ AP golf:
San Francisco Chronicle
13 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
US Open '25: Decades ago under dark of night, Oakmont began removing trees and started a golf trend
Last month, Scottie Scheffler made mention of a trend in golf design that rubs him wrong — removing trees from courses. This week, the world's best player and favorite to win the U.S. Open will play a course that did just that, but didn't become one bit easier the way some layouts do when the trees go away. Under the dark of night three decades ago, the people in charge of Oakmont Country Club started cutting down trees. They didn't stop until some 15,000 had been removed. The project reimagined one of America's foremost golf cathedrals and started a trend of tree cutting that continues to this day. While playing a round on YouTube with influencer Grant Horvat, Scheffler argued that modern pro golf — at least at most stops on the PGA Tour — has devolved into a monotonous cycle of 'bomb and gouge': Hit drive as far as possible, then gouge the ball out of the rough from a shorter distance if the tee shot is off line. 'They take out all the trees and they make the greens bigger and they typically make the fairways a little bigger, as well,' Scheffler said. 'And so, the only barrier to guys just trying to hit it as far as they want to or need to, it's trees.' Scheffler and the rest in the 156-man field that tees off Thursday should be so lucky. While the latest Oakmont renovation, in 2023, did make greens bigger, fairways are never wide at the U.S. Open and they won't be this week. Tree-lined or not, Oakmont has a reputation as possibly the toughest of all the U.S. Open (or any American) courses, which helps explain why it is embarking on its record 10th time hosting it. In the two Opens held there since the tree-removal project was completed, the deep bunkers, serpentine drainage ditches and lightning-fast greens have produced winning scores of 5-over par (Angel Cabrera in 2007) and 4 under (Dustin Johnson in 2016). In an ironic twist that eventually led to where we (and Oakmont) are today, the layout was completely lined with trees in 1973 when Johnny Miller shot 63 on Sunday to win the U.S. Open. That record stood for 50 years, and the USGA followed up with a course setup so tough in 1974 that it became known as 'The Massacre at Winged Foot' -- won by Hale Irwin with a score of 7-over par. 'Everybody was telling me it was my fault,' Miller said in a look back at the '74 Open with Golf Digest. 'It was like a backhanded compliment. The USGA denied it, but years later, it started leaking out that it was in response to what I did at Oakmont. Oakmont was supposed to be the hardest course in America.' It might still be. In a precursor to what could come this week, Rory McIlroy and Adam Scott played practice rounds last Monday in which McIlroy said he made a 7 on the par-4 second and Scott said he hit every fairway on the front nine and still shot 3 over. Nicklaus: Trees should only come down 'for a reason' While Oakmont leaned into tree removal, there are others who aren't as enthused. Jack Nicklaus, who added trees to the 13th hole at Muirfield Village after seeing players fly a fairway bunker on the left for a clear look at the green, said he's OK with tree removal 'if they take them down for a reason.' 'Why take a beautiful, gorgeous tree down?' he said. 'Like Oakmont, for example. What's the name of it? Oak. Mont. What's that mean? Oaks on a mountain, sort of. And then they take them all down. I don't like it.' A lot of Oakmont's members weren't fans, either, which is why this project began under dark of night. The golf course in the 1990s was barely recognizable when set against pictures taken shortly after it opened in 1903. Architect Henry Fownes had set out to build a links-style course. Dampening the noise and view of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which bisects the layout, was one reason thousands of trees were planted in the 1960s and '70s. 'We were finding that those little trees had all grown up and they were now hanging over some bunkers,' R. Banks-Smith, the chairman of Oakmont's grounds committee when the project began, said in a 2007 interview. 'And once you put a tree on either side of a bunker, you lose your bunker. So, you have to make a decision. Do you want bunkers or do you want trees?' Oakmont went with bunkers – its renowned Church Pew Bunker between the third and fourth fairways might be the most famous in the world – and thus began a tree project that divides people as much today as it did when it started. 'I'm not always the biggest fan of mass tree removal,' Scott said. 'I feel a lot of courses that aren't links courses get framed nicely with trees, not like you're opening it up to go play way over there.' Too many trees, though, can pose risks. Overgrown tree roots and too much shade provide competition for the tender grasses beneath. They hog up oxygen and sunlight and make the turf hard to maintain. They overhang fairways and bunkers and turn some shots envisioned by course architects into something completely different. They also can be downright dangerous. In 2023 during the second round of the Masters, strong winds toppled three towering pine trees on the 17th hole, luckily missing fans who were there watching the action. 'There are lots of benefits that trees provide, but only in the right place,' said John Fech, the certified arborist at University of Nebraska who consults with the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America. When Oakmont decided they didn't want them at all, many great courses followed. Winged Foot, Medinah, Baltusrol and Merion are among those that have undergone removal programs. Five years ago, Bryson DeChambeau overpowered Winged Foot, which had removed about 300 trees, simply by hitting the ball as far as he could, then taking his chances from the rough. It's the sort of golf Scheffler seems to be growing tired of: 'When you host a championship tournament, if there's no trees, you just hit it wherever you want, because if I miss a fairway by 10 yards, I'm in the thick rough (but) if I miss by 20, I'm in the crowd," Scheffler told Horvat. AP Golf Writer Doug Ferguson contributed. ___
