RTI revelation exposes massive over-allocation of Hidkal dam water to industries
Belagavi: In a significant development that could intensify the ongoing opposition to the diversion of Hidkal Dam water to industries in Hubballi-Dharwad, activist and whistleblower Sujit Mulgund unveiled official documents revealing that industrial units received nearly 22 times more water than the original allocation.
Mulgund shared a letter from the assistant executive engineer of the Karnataka Niravari Nigam Limited (KNNL), CBC subdivision No. 2, dated July 6, 2024. The letter, addressed to the executive engineer, discloses that only 0.1 tmcft of water was initially allocated to industries under the project report. However, the allocation surged to 0.2 tmcft gradually, and there is an additional fresh demand of 0.5 tmcft under the Bengaluru-Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project, part of the Suvarna Karnataka Corridor initiative.
Crucially, the letter indicates that the excess allocation already far surpassed the sanctioned limit. If the additional 0.5 tmcft is approved, it would come at the cost of irrigation water meant for farmers, a point likely to fuel further unrest among farming communities.
Last month, the Karnataka govt approved the controversial diversion of 0.5 tmcft from Hidkal Dam to industrial areas in Hubballi-Dharwad, sparking widespread protests across Belagavi and neighbouring districts.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Farmers and civil society groups decried the move, arguing it threatens their livelihood and violates the dam's original purpose.
Earlier, water resources minister MB Patil claimed that the water being diverted was within the allocated limits. However, Mulgund's findings—obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act—contradict the minister's statement.
Pipeline construction for the water diversion began over four months ago—without formal approval, tenders, or even informing the local administration, including district minister Satish Jarkiholi.
The work only came to light when local farmers discovered pipelines being laid across their fields. In response, several organisations launched protests under the slogan 'Namma Neeru, Namma Hakku', prompting the Belagavi DC to halt the work temporarily.
Despite the opposition, the project resumed following a green signal from the state cabinet. Activist Mulgund sought further details under RTI—including the tender cost, official approvals, and progress reports—but KNNL denied the information, citing confidentiality.
Constructed in 1961 and named after former prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, the Hidkal dam was built to provide irrigation and drinking water. Though it has a storage capacity of 51 tmcft, effective availability is only around 44 tmcft due to siltation and unusable reserves.
Speaking to the TOI, Mulgund criticised the lack of transparency. "The RTI documents clearly prove that more water has already been diverted to industries than originally sanctioned. Any additional diversion will directly impact farmers in Belagavi, Bagalkot and Vijayapura," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dodgers deny ICE agents entry to stadium amid protests and immigration crackdown in Los Angeles
The Los Angeles Dodgers found themselves at the center of a citywide immigration controversy on Thursday, after the team denied entry to federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents who arrived at Dodger Stadium as demonstrators protested ongoing raids throughout the city. According to statements from the Dodgers, a convoy of ICE agents and Department of Homeland Security vehicles arrived at several parking lot entrances near the stadium early Thursday morning, seeking permission to access the grounds. The organization made it clear: 'ICE agents came to Dodger Stadium and requested permission to access the parking lots. They were denied entry to the grounds by the organization,' the team announced on social media. On this, the ICE responded to the Dodgers on social media saying "False. We were never there." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin clarified that the agents were not attempting to enter the stadium, adding, 'This had nothing to do with the Dodgers. Customs and Border Protection vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement'. Nevertheless, the presence of federal agents- faces covered, arriving in SUVs and cargo vans- sparked immediate concern and confusion among fans, staff, and city officials. Live Events Shortly after the agents' arrival, demonstrators gathered at the stadium's Gate E entrance, wielding signs reading 'ICE out of LA!' and 'I Like My Ice Crushed,' while chanting for the agents to leave. Television footage captured Los Angeles Police Department officers forming a barrier between the agents and the protesters, as the standoff drew city council members and local media to the scene. Council member Eunisses Hernandez, who was in communication with Dodgers officials and the mayor's office, emphasized the distinction between public and private property: 'Businesses and corporations have the power to say, 'Not on my property.' And so we're waiting to see that movement happen here'. The Dodgers, whose fanbase is predominantly Latino, have faced mounting pressure to take a public stance on the immigration crackdown . The organization was reportedly preparing to announce plans to assist immigrant communities affected by the recent events. Veteran player Kiké Hernández voiced his dismay on Instagram , expressing solidarity with Latinos who have been profiled, detained, or separated from their families by ICE. Despite the day's tensions, the Dodgers confirmed that their scheduled game against the San Diego Padres would proceed as planned, with more than 50,000 fans expected in attendance.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Karnataka plans bill for crowd management
The Karnataka government is planning to enact a legislation on crowd control and management, state law and parliamentary affairs minister HK Patil said on Thursday, with the draft proposing up to three years in jail or a fine of up to ₹5 lakh for organisers who fail to obtain permission. The proposed law — Karnataka Crowd Control (Managing Crowd at Events and Venues of Mass Gathering) Bill, 2025 — was discussed at the state cabinet meeting on Thursday along with three other laws, and is likely to be placed for approval during the next meeting, the minister said. 'Four bills were proposed today — Karnataka crowd control, managing crowd at events and venue of mass gathering Bill, 2025; Karnataka Rohith Vemula Bill, 2025; Karnataka misinformation, fake news prohibition Bill, 2025; Karnataka hate speech and hate crimes prevention Bill, 2025,' Patil told reporters after the cabinet meeting. The minister said that some of the proposed bills need detailed discussions. 'These Bills were proposed at the meeting today. I mentioned that on some Bills there is a need for a detailed discussion. It has been decided that before the next cabinet meeting, concerned ministers will meet and discuss and bring the Bills before the cabinet,' he said. The crowd control bill has been proposed days after 11 people were killed in a stampede on June 4 outside the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru during the Indian Premier League victory parade of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru cricket team. The draft crowd control legislation outlines a legal framework to regulate gatherings at 'sponsored events and venues of mass gathering pertaining to political rally, jatra, conference, etc.' and seeks to fix accountability on organisers. The legislation exempts certain events from its purview, including religious and traditional gatherings. 'This Act shall not apply to Jatra, Rathotsava, Pallakki Utsava, Teppada Teru, urus, or any religious event pertaining to any religion, caste or creed,' Chapter I of the bill says. HT has seen a copy of the legislation. Chapter IV of the bill lays out penalties for violation: 'If the event planner does not apply before conducting the event or fails to control the crowd gathered and fails to give the compensation or violates the provisions of this Act or rules made hereunder in any other way, [they] shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine up to five lakhs rupees or both.' Further, the bill proposes that event planners who intentionally ignore regulations or fail to take police permission before holding a gathering will be held liable if the event results in casualties. These offences are classified as non-cognizable and non-bailable, triable by a magistrate of the first class. The legislation also criminalises aiding or abetting a crime at such events. It states, 'Whoever knowingly or unknowingly believes commission or omission of any other person would be an offence under the Act' will face legal action. The draft Rohith Vemula Bill, reportedly proposes for compensation of up to ₹1 lakh for students who face caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, and jail term of one year and pay a fine of ₹10,000 for those guilty of such offences. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had written to chief minister Siddaramaiah in April urging the Karnataka government to enact 'Rohith Vemula Act' to ensure that no one faces caste-based discrimination in the education system. Rohith Vemula, a Dalit student, allegedly died by suicide due to caste-based discrimination in Hyderabad, in 2016. HT reached out to senior BJP leaders BY Vijayendra and R Ashoka, but did not get any response to requests for comments.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Canada Post reaches deal with rural union after 18-month standoff as talks stall with 55,000 CUPW workers
After 18 months of tense negotiations, Canada Post has reached an agreement with its second-largest union, which represents roughly 8,500 members, bringing much-needed relief to rural postmasters and assistants across the country. Yet the larger and more fraught negotiations continue with the Canadian Union of Postal Workers ( CUPW ), which represents 55,000 urban and rural mail carriers. The latest contract by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo The freshly inked contract with the Canadian Postmasters and Assistants Association (CPAA) runs from January 1, 2024, to Dec 31, 2026. It guarantees an 11 percent wage increase over three years, divided as 6 percent in the first year, 3 percent in 2025, and 2 percent in 2026, with full retroactive application to January 2024. CPAA members, representing 8500 members and largely based in rural communities, say the raise recognizes the unique challenges they face, including isolation, limited resources, and underused offices that remain vital lifelines in their towns. Live Events 'This means I can think about repairs or extending hours without fretting about finances,' says rural postmaster Rachel Dalton, who oversees a post office in northern Ontario. 'It may not sound glamorous, but for our community, it matters.' Canada Post credits progress to intervention from a federal arbitrator, which centered on a stern Industrial Inquiry Commission report outlining the corporation's financial pressures . Still, that same report also guided discussions with CUPW. Canada Post formally requested last month that CUPW members vote on its final offer under Section 108.1 of the Canada Labour Code. Tensions remain high. CUPW has imposed an overtime ban since May 23, citing stalled talks as their reason. Urban mail carriers report mounting stress: slower deliveries, weekend backlogs, and surging public frustration. Canada Post reports losses of over $1 billion since 2018, including $4.9 billion in labor costs vs $6.9 billion in revenue in 2023. With parcel delivery costs topping benchmarks, the corporation insists it can't afford unsustainable wage hikes.
