Chocolate, already expensive, set to get even pricier ahead of Easter
Even though the indulgence of festivities like Easter and Eid al-Fitr is weeks away, shoppers might be best advised to start getting hold of chocolate as soon as possible, lest the increasingly expensive treats see further price hikes.
Poor harvests in recent years in Ghana and the Ivory Coast have reduced the supply of cocoa, in turn making it more expensive for chocolate producers and in the end for consumers, once costs are passed on.
Mondelez International, the parent company of British brand Cadbury, recently warned of reduced profits for 2025 in the wake of "unprecedented cocoa cost inflation." Switzerland's Lindt issued a similarly downbeat assessment in which it pointed to "record-high cocoa costs, substantial price increases, and weakened consumer sentiment."
Similar to the run-up to Easter, demand for chocolate often soars in February ahead of St. Valentine's Day, with Wells Fargo saying earlier this month that chocolate in the US was 20% more expensive than it was ahead of February 14 last year.
A tonne of cocoa hit a record $12,646 in December, around four times as much as a decade ago, while producers in turn have reported that making chocolate has been made more expensive not only by cocoa, but by price increases for fuel and transport.
Cocoa supply has fallen short of demand for around four years. Chocolate producers last year were also faced with reduced supplies of sugar after smaller-than-usual harvest in Thailand and curbs on exports by India. Sugar became more expensive in turn, adding to the upward price pressure on chocolate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
23 minutes ago
NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense
LONDON -- LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday. Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Rutte's speech. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defense spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.
CNBC
30 minutes ago
- CNBC
Nvidia CEO says the UK is in a 'Goldilocks' moment: 'I'm going to invest here'
LONDON — Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang poured praise on the U.K. on Monday, promising to boost investment in the country's artificial intelligence sector with his multitrillion-dollar semiconductor company. "The U.K. is in a Goldilocks circumstance," Huang said, speaking on a panel with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Investment Minister Poppy Gustafsson. "The U.K. is in a Goldilocks circumstance," Huang said, speaking on a panel with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Investment Minister Poppy Gustafsson. "You can't do machine learning without a machine — and so the ability to build these AI supercomputers here in the U.K. will naturally attract more startups." The Nvidia boss went on to say, "I think it's just such an incredible, incredible place to invest. I'm going to invest here." Huang also stressed that Britain "has one of the richest AI communities anywhere on the planet," along with "amazing startups" such as DeepMind, Wayve, and Synthesia, ElevenLabs. "The ecosystem is really perfect for take-off — it's just missing one thing," he said, referring to a lack of homegrown, sovereign U.K. AI infrastructure. Earlier on Monday, Nvidia announced a new U.K. sovereign AI industry forum, as well as commitments from cloud vendors Nscale and Nebius to deploy new facilities in the country with thousands of the semiconductor giant's Blackwell GPU chips. The U.K. has been touting its potential as a global AI player in recent months, amid Keir Starmer's efforts to lead his Labour government with a growth-focused agenda. In January, Starmer unveiled a bold plan to boost the domestic U.K. AI sector, promising to relax planning rules around new data center developments and increase British computing power by twenty-fold by 2030.
Chicago Tribune
35 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Hoping for a bond market crash to take down MAGA? Please wish for something else.
Americans unhappy with President Donald Trump's second term have taken to wishing for something they shouldn't. If only the U.S. Treasury bond market were to crash, the thinking goes, then Trump would be forced to change his policies. Bond traders could simply knock down the whole economic house of cards and then, presto! Goodbye to tariffs and hello to fiscal responsibility. Time for a reality check: First, a bond market crash would be a disaster that would cost Americans dearly for years to come. Second, the bond market sure doesn't look like it's going to crash. How do we know? No one can predict the future, but for decades Chicago has played a leading role in the Treasury markets via CME Group futures contracts. And one great thing about futures is that anyone can see what real traders putting real money on the line believe is going to happen in, yes, the future. The most active 30-year Treasury bond and 10-year Treasury note contracts show expected prices through the end of the year, and there's been volatility, for sure. They also reflect an unusual pattern of interest rates staying relatively high even as the dollar weakens, probably because Trump's trade wars do indeed stand to hurt the economy, as does the lamentable lack of fiscal discipline in Congress. So far, however, the markets are not pricing in anything like a crash. In fact, long-term interest rates are less than 5% and inching lower in recent days, which is hardly a sign of an imminent crisis. Of course, markets can turn on a dime, as the United Kingdom experienced three years ago. A newly elected prime minister, Liz Truss, pushed through an irresponsible budget that would have funded huge tax cuts with increased borrowing. Sound familiar? In that case, the reaction was swift: Traders dumped British bonds and sent the British pound plunging against the dollar. Truss wound up being forced out after just 50 days in office, and the British economy is just now starting to recover. The same could happen to the U.S., in theory. But in fact, the U.S. economy has a much greater capacity to absorb bad policy than did the U.K., because it has been doing quite well. At a speech earlier this month, Austan Goolsbee, who heads the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, likened the economy to a buff gym rat with a six-pack of abdominal muscles. Trouble is, this gym rat has a layer of fat over the muscles, so they're hard to see. In his analogy, the underlying economy is strong, but it's being obscured by the uncertainty of Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs, now popularized by the acronym TACO, among other destabilizing policies. But with unemployment at just 4.2% and inflation at 2.3% (and closing in on the Fed's 2% target) the 'hard data' are still amazingly healthy. Not only did the U.S. avoid an oft-predicted recession over the past several years, but growth picked up momentum throughout 2024. The U.S. remains the world's wealthiest country, and if it decided to curb its growing debt by raising more revenue, it could well afford it. But the political will is missing, and 'soft data' such as surveys of consumer sentiment and business investment plans are decidedly negative. At the same time, some notable experts are warning of trouble ahead if the U.S. maintains an unsustainable course. Hedge fund kingpin Ray Dalio recently told Bloomberg he gives the U.S. 'three years, give or take a year,' to avoid an economic 'heart attack.' Jamie Dimon, head of JPMorgan Chase, similarly predicted the U.S. is headed for 'a crack in the bond market,' adding, 'I just don't know if it's going to be a crisis in six months or six years.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reacted to Dimon's prediction by noting that Dimon loves to make predictions and, according to Bessent, 'None of them have come true.' What true is that given the strength of the economy, interest rates should be lower. In continuing to issue a massive amount of debt, America is beginning to pay what British pundits during the Truss fiasco took to calling the 'moron risk premium.' That's the extra cost a country pays in the form of higher interest rates on its debt when incompetent leadership raises the risk of financial instability or default. In his recent talk, Goolsbee acknowledged that U.S. interest rates are higher than they should be because of policy uncertainty. Getting that 'dust out of the air,' as he put it, would tee up lower rates. 'If you have stable, full employment and inflation going to target, rates can come down.' Lower rates make it cheaper to obtain loans and manage debt, which would encourage consumer spending and business investment. Washington needs to cut the chaotic policymaking and embrace responsible political solutions without bond vigilantes forcing the issue — as much as Trump's critics wish they would.
