Chocolate, already expensive, set to get even pricier ahead of Easter
Poor harvests in recent years in Ghana and the Ivory Coast have reduced the supply of cocoa, in turn making it more expensive for chocolate producers and in the end for consumers, once costs are passed on.
Mondelez International, the parent company of British brand Cadbury, recently warned of reduced profits for 2025 in the wake of "unprecedented cocoa cost inflation." Switzerland's Lindt issued a similarly downbeat assessment in which it pointed to "record-high cocoa costs, substantial price increases, and weakened consumer sentiment."
Similar to the run-up to Easter, demand for chocolate often soars in February ahead of St. Valentine's Day, with Wells Fargo saying earlier this month that chocolate in the US was 20% more expensive than it was ahead of February 14 last year.
A tonne of cocoa hit a record $12,646 in December, around four times as much as a decade ago, while producers in turn have reported that making chocolate has been made more expensive not only by cocoa, but by price increases for fuel and transport.
Cocoa supply has fallen short of demand for around four years. Chocolate producers last year were also faced with reduced supplies of sugar after smaller-than-usual harvest in Thailand and curbs on exports by India. Sugar became more expensive in turn, adding to the upward price pressure on chocolate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
15 hours ago
- Business Insider
Billionaire Investor George Soros Bets Big on Nvidia (NVDA)
Billionaire investor George Soros has bet big on chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA) in recent months. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The latest 13F regulatory filing of Soros Fund Management shows that the legendary investor boosted his stake in Nvidia considerably during this year's second quarter. Soros' holding of NVDA stock rose from 17,500 shares in this year's first quarter to 103,000 shares at the end of June. The current stake is valued at $18.5 million based on Nvidia's share price. However, Soros also holds bullish call options on NVDA stock, which are bets that the share price will rise. Add in the call options, and Soros' stake in Nvidia is up an astounding 1,600% from the first quarter. Nvidia is one of the biggest technology bets made by Soros Fund Management. Other Bets However, Nvidia wasn't the only tech bet made in Q2 by George Soros, who famously made $1 billion betting against the British currency in the early 1990s. The famed investor also loaded up on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure company Broadcom (AVGO), another chipmaker. Soros raised his holdings of AVGO stock to 37,000 shares from 11,000 shares previously. Soros Fund Management also added to its financial technology exposure through Fiserv (FI), increasing its stake to 31,000 shares from just 15,000 shares in Q1 of this year. Fiserv is a financial technology company that helps to facilitate transactions at banks. It is using AI in fraud detection and other areas of banking. Is NVDA Stock a Buy? The stock of Nvidia has a consensus Strong Buy rating among 38 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 35 Buy, two Hold, and one Sell recommendations issued in the past three months. The average NVDA price target of $191.26 implies 6.56% upside from current levels.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Mondelez International (NASDAQ:MDLZ) Hasn't Managed To Accelerate Its Returns
If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Mondelez International (NASDAQ:MDLZ) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)? For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Mondelez International, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.09 = US$4.6b ÷ (US$71b - US$20b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). So, Mondelez International has an ROCE of 9.0%. On its own, that's a low figure but it's around the 10% average generated by the Food industry. Check out our latest analysis for Mondelez International Above you can see how the current ROCE for Mondelez International compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Mondelez International for free. The Trend Of ROCE There hasn't been much to report for Mondelez International's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So don't be surprised if Mondelez International doesn't end up being a multi-bagger in a few years time. That probably explains why Mondelez International has been paying out 65% of its earnings as dividends to shareholders. These mature businesses typically have reliable earnings and not many places to reinvest them, so the next best option is to put the earnings into shareholders pockets. The Key Takeaway In a nutshell, Mondelez International has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. Unsurprisingly, the stock has only gained 22% over the last five years, which potentially indicates that investors are accounting for this going forward. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options. If you'd like to know more about Mondelez International, we've spotted 2 warning signs, and 1 of them is concerning. While Mondelez International isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Customers Reveal How Bad Service Has to Be to Leave No Tip
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Diners have taken to Reddit to share how bad the service has to be to leave no tip—or a "troll tip" meant to send a message. Reddit user Brandon (u/darkroot_gardner) took to Reddit's r/tipping subreddit to ask, "How bad does the service have to be for you to leave zero tip?" and users didn't hold back. With nearly 400 responses recounting long waits for a check to outright rudeness, customers detailed what pushes them from their usual tipping habits to a complete cutoff. Stock image of tipping in progress Stock image of tipping in progress Photo by AndreyPopov / Getty Images One user described being "eating alone for lunch and the server 'forgot' about me and spent all her time at a table with a large party". After finishing, they said they waited 20 minutes for a check and had to flag down another server. To that comment, another replied they'd tip "1 cent to make a point". For some, it's about the signal: "If service is bad enough for the tip to be zero, the server already knows they messed up. If not, they are in the wrong business," wrote one Redditor. Another agreed, adding, "If I leave a 5% tip, that's pretty much a message that says you suck." Frustration Over Inattention Many explained that inattentive servers were their main gripe. "If I have to wait 15 minutes for water, and 15 minutes for a check after asking for it in a non-busy restaurant... then my tip is going drastically down," wrote one user, who recalled once being the only lunchtime customer and still waiting a quarter-hour for the bill. The debate also drew contrasts between American and European dining. "In America, the servers just drop off the food and run... It ruins the dining experience; it's all about greed. I tip zero now because the system sucks," one user posted. A British commenter, however, shared the opposite complaint, noting that in the U.S., "a lot of servers wouldn't leave my table alone... Much prefer it in Europe, where they are not fishing for tips." Some people have hard lines, with one commenter writing, "The only instance I would tip nothing is if the person giving me service is rude/has an attitude." Another recalled tipping $0 after a server "'accidentally' ran my card for 50% more than my check and insisted that could just be her tip". 'A sort of social obligation' In a message to Newsweek, Brandon explained, "I am generally anti-tipping... While I wish for and advocate for tipping to end and the base wage to be increased to a living wage instead, I still always tip at full-service restaurants and bars, usually around 15%, mainly as a sort of social obligation. "Once or twice a year, I will tip generously (20-25%) when it is a special occasion and the service is excellent." He added, "I wanted to hear what approach others take towards tipping, especially since a 2023 Pew research poll suggested the actual quality of the service might not even be so critical for many people." A Growing Concern Restaurants across the United States often add automatic gratuities, especially for large parties, but these charges are legally distinct from tips. "They can't force you to tip if you make it optional," Bruce McAdams, an associate professor for the School of Hospitality, Food and Tourism Management at the University of Guelph, told Newsweek. "But if you state there is a service charge and add it to the bill, it is legal and the customer is required to pay." Tipping Fatigue Surveys show most Americans would prefer tipping to remain a choice. According to Newsweek, a September 2024 poll found that 73% of respondents wanted tipping to be optional, while only 22% favored making it mandatory. "Unraveling tip culture will be much more complicated than most people imagine," Mary King, editor of The Restaurant HQ, told the publication. Even with "tipping fatigue" on the rise, many service workers depend on gratuities for their livelihoods. As legal experts told Newsweek, mandatory service charges, though often viewed as tips, are considered revenue for the restaurant, not optional bonuses. That distinction is unlikely to end the debate among diners, who, as one Reddit commenter summed up, will "tip $0 by default nowadays," while others insist "outside of physical violence, you're getting at least 20 percent". To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.