UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says
The Online Safety Act, which is being rolled out this year, sets tough new requirements on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and X, as well as sites hosting pornography, to protect children and remove illegal content.
But it has attracted criticism from politicians, free-speech campaigners and content creators, who have complained that the rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content.
Users have complained about age checks that require personal data to be uploaded to access sites that show pornography, and more than 468,000 people have signed an online petition calling for the act to be repealed.
The government said on Monday it had no plans to do so and it was working with regulator Ofcom to implement the act as quickly as possible.
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said on Tuesday that those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators".
Elon Musk's X, which has implemented age verification, said the law's laudable intentions were at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach.
"When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'," it said in a statement.
"It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made."
X said the timetable for meeting mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight, and despite being in compliance, platforms still faced threats of enforcement and fines, encouraging over-censorship.
It said a balanced approach was the only way to protect liberty, encourage innovation and safeguard children.
"It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK," it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Oil falls as OPEC+ proceeds with September output increase
LONDON :Oil prices fell to their lowest in a week on Monday after OPEC+ agreed to another large output increase in September, though traders remained wary of further sanctions on Russia. Brent crude futures fell $1.17, or 1.7 per cent, to $68.50 a barrel by 1127 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude declined $1.26, or 1.9 per cent, to $66.07. Both contracts lost about $2 on Friday. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day (bpd) for September. The latest in a series of accelerated output increases aimed at capturing market share was in line with market expectations and marks a full and early reversal of the group's largest tranche of output cuts, amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4 per cent of global demand. Oil prices are under pressure because of the OPEC+ decision, said PVM analyst Tamas Varga, adding that potential discussions to unwind a further 1.65 million bpd of cuts added to the downside price pressure. Analysts at Goldman Sachs expect that the actual increase in supply from the eight OPEC+ countries that have raised output since March will be 1.7 million bpd because other members have cut output after overproducing. Investors also continued to digest the impact of the latest U.S. tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners and remain wary of further U.S. sanctions on Russia. U.S. President Trump has threatened to impose 100 per cent secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers as he seeks to pressure Moscow into halting its war in Ukraine. "In the medium term, oil prices will be shaped by a mix of tariffs and geopolitics. Any price jump triggered by energy sanctions is expected to be ephemeral," PVM's Varga said. At least two vessels loaded with Russian oil bound for refiners in India have diverted to other destinations after new U.S. sanctions, trade sources said on Friday and LSEG trade flows showed. About 1.7 million bpd of crude supply will be at risk if Indian refiners stop buying Russian oil, ING analysts wrote.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
US dollar steadies after jobs rout, Swiss franc drops
LONDON :The U.S. dollar found some support on Monday after Friday's dismal U.S. jobs report and President Donald Trump's firing of a top statistics official battered the currency and prompted investors to ramp up bets of imminent Federal Reserve rate cuts. Data on Friday showed U.S. employment growth undershot expectations in July while the nonfarm payrolls count for the prior two months was revised down by a massive 258,000 jobs, suggesting a sharp deterioration in labour market conditions. "The report itself was perhaps not that weak but the revisions were extremely significant," said Mohamad Al-Saraf, FX strategist at Danske Bank. "We have a hard time seeing how the Fed cannot lower rates at the September meeting." Adding to headwinds for markets, Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer the same day, accusing her of faking the jobs numbers. An unexpected resignation by Fed Governor Adriana Kugler also opened the door for Trump to make an imprint on the central bank much earlier than anticipated. Trump has been at loggerheads with the Fed for not lowering interest rates sooner. The barrage of developments dealt a one-two punch to the dollar, which sank more than 2 per cent against the yen and roughly 1.5 per cent against the euro on Friday. The greenback steadied on Monday, last trading flat at 147.47 yen. Still, it was down over 3 yen from its peak on Friday. The euro was also little changed on Monday at $1.1584, while sterling rose 0.2 per cent to $1.3310. Trump said on Sunday he will announce a candidate to fill an open position at the Fed and a new BLS head in the next few days. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar was little changed at 98.70, after sliding more than 1.3 per cent on Friday. The dollar rose 3.4 per cent in July, its biggest monthly gain since a 5 per cent jump in April 2022 and first monthly rise of the year, as markets became more at ease with Trump's trade policy and economic data had remained resilient in the face of tariffs. TREASURY YIELDS DROP AS FED CUT BETS MOUNT The policy-sensitive two-year Treasury yield fell to a three-month low of 3.659 per cent on Monday as traders heavily upped bets of a Fed cut in September, while the benchmark 10-year yield strayed not too far from a one-month low at 4.2257 per cent. Markets are now pricing an over 90 per cent chance the Fed will ease rates by a quarter-point next month owing to the weaker-than-expected jobs data, with just under 60 basis points worth of cuts expected by December, implying two 23 basis point cuts and a 40 per cent chance of a third. "Market reactions to Friday night's events were swift and decisive," said Tony Sycamore, a market analyst at IG. "Equities and the U.S. dollar tumbled, along with yields." In other currencies, the dollar strengthened over 0.4 per cent against the Swiss franc after Trump hit the country with some of the highest tariffs as part of the White House's global trade reset. The euro rose 0.4 per cent against the Swiss currency. "We saw the franc weakening a lot after the announcement," Danske Bank's Al-Saraf said. "If these tariffs were to be sustained, the relative downside for the Swiss economy will be quite big."
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
FIFA faces class action over player transfer regulations
(Makes clear in first paragraph that the action is Europe-wide) A Dutch soccer players' group is preparing a "potentially billion-dollar" Europe-wide class action claim against FIFA and other associations, seeking compensation over alleged loss of income due to restrictive transfer rules, it said on Monday. The Dutch Foundation for Justice said world soccer governing body FIFA's rules had affected approximately 100,000 players in European member states and the United Kingdom since 2002. The foundation added that consultancy firm Compass Lexecon had estimated that damages could run into billions of euros, with the foundation's board member Dolf Segaar telling Dutch news agency NOS that "it is a billion-dollar claim". The Dutch Football Association (KNVB) is among the associations to be named in the suit. "This case is being brought in the Netherlands under the Dutch Act on the Settlement of Mass Damages in Collective Action (WAMCA), which allows this legal action to be launched by JfP on behalf of a large group of professional footballers," it added. FIFA and the KNVB did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comment. The foundation added that a preliminary analysis from Compass Lexecon estimated that professional footballers collectively earned around 8 per cent less over their careers than they would have due to FIFA's regulations. "All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA Regulations," foundation chair Lucia Melcherts said in a statement. "'Justice for Players' is bringing this claim to help achieve justice for footballers and fairness." DIARRA RULING The foundation added that the case was launched following a ruling on French player Lassana Diarra, who was fined 10 million euros ($11.56 million) by FIFA for leaving Lokomotiv Moscow one year into a four-year deal. In October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union said some of FIFA's rules on player transfers went against European Union laws and free movement principles in the case linked to former Chelsea, Arsenal and Real Madrid player Diarra. Following the ruling by the EU's top court, FIFA in December adopted an interim framework concerning the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players. The interim regulatory framework affects the calculation of compensation payable if there is a breach of contract and the burden of proof in relation to both compensation payable and an inducement to breach a contract. Justice for Players said it will be advised by law firm Dupont-Hissel, founded by Jean-Louis Dupont. Dupont is the same lawyer who took the landmark case of Belgian Jean-Marc Bosman, which in 1995 cleared the way for players in the European Union to move to other clubs at the end of contracts without a transfer fee being paid. Dupont-Hissel also represented Diarra in his case against FIFA, with Dupont saying in 2024 that a judgment backing the player would be a milestone in modernising football governance. He added that it would allow players' unions and club associations to regulate their employment practices. ($1 = 0.8654 euros)
