logo
Donald Trump's disdain for wind energy could create windfall for Nova Scotia: experts

Donald Trump's disdain for wind energy could create windfall for Nova Scotia: experts

HALIFAX – U.S. President Donald Trump's opposition to renewable energy could create a 'golden opportunity' for Nova Scotia's fledgling offshore wind energy industry, a leading international consulting firm says.
Aegir Insights, based in Denmark, recently presented a webinar that examined Premier Tim Houston's 10-year plan to license enough offshore turbines to produce 40 gigawatts of electricity. Even though the province requires only 2.4 GW, Houston's Wind West plan calls for selling excess power to the rest of Canada and, potentially, the United States.
Experts say such a project would require construction of about 4,000 offshore turbines that would generate as much electricity as China's offshore turbines produced last year.
Scott Urquhart, co-founder and CEO of Aegir Insights, said Wind West has grabbed the attention of the global offshore wind industry.
'The vision is to get Nova Scotia on the radar of big international investors,' Urquhart said Tuesday in an interview from Copenhagen. 'If the big players saw only a one gigawatt ambition, they won't show up.'
During last week's webinar, which attracted about 100 project developers, investors and government officials, Urquhart described Wind West as 'grand and ambitious,' but said it is underpinned by 'rational market fundamentals and economics.'
Founded in 2020, Aegir Insights describes itself as an intelligence provider that offers analytics and models for those investing in the offshore wind sector. Its database of projects spans 60 markets. Though he is based in Copenhagen, Urquhart has taken a keen interest in Wind West, having grown up in Cape Breton.
He told the webinar that the offshore wind industry has been hurt by rising costs and supply chain issues in recent years, but he said the industry appears poised for a recovery as interest rates fall and supply chain competition heats up.
Signe Sorensen, Aegir's regional lead in the Americas, said these encouraging trends have been overshadowed in the United States by Trump's decision to place a hold on offshore projects that have already received permits.
'Even as the global sector looks to be on the road to recovery, the U.S. is on a completely different path,' Sorensen told the webinar. 'And that matters a lot to Canada. One state's challenge could be another state's opportunity.'
In January, Trump announced he would halt leasing for wind projects while fast-tracking plans for more oil and gas production. That move has led to layoffs and stalled construction of wind turbines, which account for 10 per cent of U.S. electricity production — the largest source of renewable energy.
Earlier this month, Trump doubled down on his opposition to wind power.
'The windmills are killing our country,' he said on June 12. 'The fields are littered with them — junk …. It's the greatest scam in history, the most expensive energy you can buy.'
Sorensen said the New England states and New York have been leading development of the offshore wind sector in the U.S., but Trump's opposition could stall the industry for the next four years.
'They need to find renewable sources to supply this energy,' Sorensen said. 'That's where large-scale Canadian wind could come into the picture, specifically Wind West …. There's a golden opportunity in this for Canada.'
Urquhart agreed.
'On the U.S. side, you just had a hole blown in the offshore wind sector and you have a whole bunch of supply chain people and developers who are standing around saying, 'Oh, no,'' he said in an interview. 'Now is the time to put your visionary ideas out. If you were to wait on something like this, you'll miss a window of opportunity.'
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
During his online presentation, Urquhart showed a colour-coded 'heat map' highlighting areas off Nova Scotia's coast where offshore wind development would be feasible.
'There are huge areas that could do tens-of-gigawatts of offshore wind,' he said, pointing to the sprawling, shallow banks around Sable Island and a long stretch closer to Nova Scotia's southern shoreline. 'There are several highly prospective locations.'
As well, Sorensen pointed to charts showing the New England states and New York are willing to pay top dollar for offshore wind energy.
'Nova Scotia could be competitive, pricewise,' she said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Texas House OK'd GOP-favored redistricting. California intends to counter with map of its own
The Texas House OK'd GOP-favored redistricting. California intends to counter with map of its own

Winnipeg Free Press

time10 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

The Texas House OK'd GOP-favored redistricting. California intends to counter with map of its own

The national redistricting battle enters its next phase Thursday as California Democrats are scheduled to pass a new congressional map that creates five winnable seats for their party, a direct counter to the Texas House's approval of a new map to create more conservative-leaning seats in that state. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has engineered the high-risk strategy in response to President Donald Trump's own brinkmanship. Trump pushed Texas Republicans to reopen the legislative maps they passed in 2021 to squeeze out up to five new GOP seats to help the party stave off a midterm defeat. Unlike in Texas, where passage by the Republican-controlled state Senate and signature by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott are now all that's needed to make the maps official, California faces a more uncertain route. Democrats must use their legislative supermajority to pass the map by a two-third margin. Then they must schedule a special election in November for voters to approve the map that Newsom must sign by Friday to meet ballot deadlines. The added complexity is because California has a voter-approved independent commission that Newsom himself backed before Trump's latest redistricting maneuver. Only the state's voters can override the map that commission approved in 2021. But Newsom said extraordinary steps are required to counter Texas and other Republican-led states that Trump is pushing to revise maps. 'This is a new Democratic Party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said Wednesday on a call with reporters. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' Texas Democratic lawmakers, vastly outnumbered in that state's legislature, delayed approval of the new map by 15 days by fleeing Texas earlier this month in protest. They were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring upon their return to ensure they attended Wednesday's session. That session ended with an 88-52 party-line vote approving the map after more than eight hours of debate. Democrats have also vowed to challenge the new Texas map in court and complained that Republicans made the political power move before passing legislation responding to deadly floods that swept the state last month. A battle for the US House control waged via redistricting In a sign of Democrats' stiffening redistricting resolve, former President Barack Obama on Tuesday night backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterm election, and the GOP currently controls the House of Representatives by a mere three votes. Trump is going beyond Texas in his push to remake the map. He's pushed Republican leaders in conservative states like Indiana and Missouri to also try to create new Republican seats. Ohio Republicans were already revising their map before Texas moved. Democrats, meanwhile, are mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps as well. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. The struggle for — and against — Texas redistricting Texas Republicans openly said they were acting in their party's interest. State Rep. Todd Hunter, who wrote the legislation formally creating the new map, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. There was little that outnumbered Democrats could do other than fume and threaten a lawsuit to block the map. Because the Supreme Court has blessed purely partisan gerrymandering, the only way opponents can stop the new Texas map would be by arguing it violates the Voting Rights Act requirement to keep minority communities together so they can select representatives of their choice. House Republicans' frustration at the Democrats' flight and ability to delay the vote was palpable during the Wednesday vote. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced as debate started that doors to the chamber were locked and any member leaving was required to have a permission slip. The doors were only unlocked after final passage more than eight hours later. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back after they left the state Aug. 3, and Abbott asked the state Supreme Court to oust several Democrats from office. The lawmakers also face a fine of $500 for every day they were absent. ___ Associated Press journalists John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, and Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this report.

Nexstar Media Group buying Tegna in deal worth $6.2 billion
Nexstar Media Group buying Tegna in deal worth $6.2 billion

Winnipeg Free Press

time44 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Nexstar Media Group buying Tegna in deal worth $6.2 billion

NEW YORK (AP) — Nexstar Media Group is buying broadcast rival Tegna for $6.2 billion, bringing together two major players in U.S. television and the country's local news landscape. If the transaction is approved, Nexstar will pay $22 in cash for each share of Tegna's outstanding stock. And the regulatory greenlight could be likely under President Donald Trump's administration, which has long-advocated for loosening industry restrictions. Announcing the proposed merger Tuesday, Nexstar CEO Perry Sook pointed directly to actions being pursued by the Trump administration, which he said 'offer local broadcasters the opportunity to expand reach, level the playing field, and compete more effectively with the Big Tech and legacy Big Media companies that have unchecked reach and vast financial resources.' He added that 'Tegna represents the best option for Nexstar to act on this opportunity.' Nexstar oversees more than 200 owned and partner stations in 116 markets nationwide today and also runs networks like The CW and NewsNation. Meanwhile, Tegna owns 64 news stations across 51 markets. Consolidation would mean pooling together all of these resources — and that typically includes cutting any 'redundancies' identified in the process, explained Paul Hardart, director of the entertainment, media and technology program at New York University's Stern School of Business. 'The good news for Nexstar is that makes it run at a lower cost rate, which they need to do because there's all these headwinds on the revenue side,' Hardart said. But for local communities that rely on the company's stations, the bad news is that 'there will be a homogenization of content,' he added. Other experts note that previous consolidation in the industry has already shown this. Nexstar, founded in 1996, has itself grow substantially with acquisitions over the latest two decades, becoming the biggest operator of local TV stations in the U.S. after it purchased Tribune Media back in 2019. And Danilo Yanich, professor of public policy at the University of Delaware, says the company is the 'biggest duplicator' of news content today — pointing to recent research he worked on that looked at how often local TV news used the exact same words in at least 50% on their broadcasts. Nexstar's size gives it the most opportunity to syndicate information in this way, Yanich noted, and further duplication seems all but likely as the company looks to 'achieve economies of scale,' he added. Nexstar on Tuesday maintained that the deal will also help it give advertisers a bigger variety of local and national broadcast and digital advertising options. The potential purchase also arrives amid wider regulatory shifts. Brendan Carr, the Trump-appointed chairman the Federal Communications Commission, which will need to give the transaction the green light, has long advocated for loosening industry restrictions. On Aug. 7, the FCC announced that it would be repealing 98 broadcast rules and requirements that it identified as 'obsolete, outdated, or unnecessary.' Some of those rules date back nearly 50 years, the FCC said, and apply to 'old technology that is no longer used.' Carr maintained that such provisions no longer serve public interest. In late July, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit also vacated the FCC's 'top four' rule, which has long prohibited ownership of more than one of the top four stations in a single market. The ruling is still subject to a monthslong assessment by the FCC, but could significantly clear the way for future mergers in the industry. In company earnings calls held in early August, before Tegna and Nexstar publicly confirmed merger talks, both Tegna CEO Michael Steib and Nexstar's Sook pointed directly to this ruling, and applauded Carr's deregulation agenda as a whole. 'We believe that deregulation is necessary, important and coming,' Steib said in Tegna's Aug. 7 call, noting that local broadcasters are 'up against big tech competitors who have absolutely no encumbrances in how they compete.' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Beyond their core broadcast TV businesses, both Nexstar and Tegna also boast digital news, mobile app and streaming offerings, all of which have played key roles for the industry as consumers change the way they consume news and other entertainment. Broadcast TV has been hit particularly hard by 'cord-cutting,' with more and more households trading their cable or satellite subscriptions into content they can get via the internet. 'The challenge has been recently of 'cord cutters' — but the bigger concern is the 'cord nevers,' of people who grew up never watching television, or linear television,' said Hardart, noting that most consumers, particularly young people, have just about all the content they want on social media or their phone. Despite these shifting landscapes, experts like Yanich say the suggestion that tech players 'could do what local journalism does simply doesn't hold up,' pointing to the difference in content and reach. Still, he notes that other broadcasters could soon follow Nexstar and Tegna's footsteps, consolidating the industry even further. Nexstar's proposed purchase of Tegna is expected to close by the second half of 2026. Beyond the regulatory greenlight, it still needs approval from Tegna shareholders.

The Stock Market Has a Serious Problem (Besides President Trump's Tariffs). History Says This Will Happen Next.
The Stock Market Has a Serious Problem (Besides President Trump's Tariffs). History Says This Will Happen Next.

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

The Stock Market Has a Serious Problem (Besides President Trump's Tariffs). History Says This Will Happen Next.

Key Points The U.S. stock market faces two serious problems: tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and a historically high valuation. Recent economic data suggests President Trump's tariffs have led to weakness in the labor market and higher producer prices. The S&P 500 currently trades at 22.5 times forward earnings, a valuation that has always (eventually) led to a sharp decline in the index. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › U.S. stocks have been unusually volatile this year. The benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) dropped more than 10% in two days in early April after President Trump outlined sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs. Those rapid losses led to the third largest weekly spike in history in the Cboe Volatility Index as economists warned of dire consequences from the abrupt shift in U.S. trade policy. However, Trump softened his stance on tariffs to some degree and the U.S. stock market staged a remarkable comeback. The S&P 500 surged 26% during the three-month period that ended July 10, something the index had only accomplished five times before. Since then, stocks have continued to grind through record highs even as warning signs have appeared. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Specifically, recent data suggests the labor market is weakening and wholesale inflation is worsening because of Trump's tariffs. In addition, the S&P 500 currently trades at an elevated valuation that has inevitably led to sharp declines in the past. Here's what investors should know. The jobs market is weakening and wholesale inflation is worsening Nonfarm payrolls (the number of workers in the U.S. economy excluding farm employees) increased 73,000 in July, missing the consensus estimate of 110,000. However, downward revisions to numbers from May and June were more alarming, subtracting 258,000 workers from the economy. That means May through July was the worst three-month period for U.S. jobs growth since the pandemic. Nationwide Chief Economist Kathy Bostjancic commented, "The cracks in the labor market have widened substantially and add further pressure on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates." But that was before another problem cropped up. Wholesale inflation, as measured by the Producer Price Index, notched a month-on-month increase of 0.9% in July, much higher than the consensus estimate of 0.2%. That was the fastest monthly increase in wholesale prices in three years, and higher wholesale prices usually lead to higher consumer prices. Indeed, several major retailers have either already raised prices or plan to raise prices because of tariffs, including Walmart, Costco, Target, and Home Depot. That puts the Federal Reserve in a tricky position. The U.S. economy is moving toward a dreaded situation known as stagflation, where economic growth stagnates as the labor market weakens and inflation worsens. The Federal Reserve usually corrects labor market weakness by lowering interest rates, but it usually corrects high inflation by raising interest rates. So stagflation is a lose-lose scenario. Here's the bottom line: Uncertainty surrounding tariffs has caused U.S. companies to hire employees more slowly. Meanwhile, tariffs have pushed producer prices higher, and at least some cost increases will be passed along to consumers. Those problems could hurt corporate earnings and drag the stock market lower in the coming months. But investors are facing another serious problem. The S&P 500 trades at a historically expensive valuation The S&P 500 currently trades at 22.5 times forward earnings, a substantial premium to the 10-year average of 18.5 times forward earnings. Importantly, the benchmark index has only exceeded 22 times forward earnings during two periods since 1985, and both incidents eventually led to a sharp decline: Dot-com bubble: The S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio drifted above 22 in the late 1990s as investors chased richly valued internet stocks. However, the dot-com bubble eventually burst and the index declined 49% from its high by October 2002. Covid-19 pandemic: The S&P 500's forward P/E ratio surpassed 22 in 2021 as pandemic-driven stimulus programs and supply chain disruptions pushed inflation to a four-decade high. The Fed raised interest rates aggressively and the index declined 25% from its high by October 2022. Here's the big picture: President Trump's tariffs have raised the average tax on U.S. imports to its highest level since the 1930s, and recent data suggests the labor market is weakening and wholesale inflation is worsening as a result. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 trades at a valuation that has always eventually led to a severe decline. That does not necessarily mean the U.S. stock market will crash this time around, but investors should be prepared for that outcome. Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now? Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $654,781!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,076,588!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,055% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store