logo
Housing and affordability top long list of voter concerns in massive Yellowhead riding

Housing and affordability top long list of voter concerns in massive Yellowhead riding

CBC25-04-2025

In a riding as large and geographically diverse as Yellowhead, the challenge candidates face on the campaign trail isn't just pounding the pavement across more than 83,600 square kilometres. It's also appealing to a riding with a wide range of industries and interests.
Yellowhead covers a large section of western and central Alberta, including Banff, Canmore, Jasper, Hinton, Edson, Rocky Mountain House, Carstairs and Sundre. Across the region, large groups of voters in different towns feel a close connection to a wide range of issues: tourism in mountain towns, preserving national parks, wildfire mitigation, environmental policy, oil and gas development, as well as forestry and agriculture.
The riding as it stands is a new beast to federal politics in Alberta, after its boundaries were redrawn ahead of the 2025 election to take in Banff and Canmore, as well as portions of several counties in central Alberta.
Housing and affordability concerns
But even with sometimes wildly diverging points of view among constituents, political watchers and candidates all cited housing and affordability as the top issues on voters' minds throughout Yellowhead.
Rocky Mountain Outlook editor Greg Colgan says that with roughly 24,000 people living in the Bow Valley and more than four million tourists visiting per year, full-time residents want to know how the federal government can alleviate infrastructure pressures that stem from the booming tourism industry and offer help to develop more housing. But these interests can conflict, he noted.
"This area is tourism-based, it's heavily reliant on it. But there's also that friction happening between permanent residents that are feeling the push of having simply too many tourists, in some people's minds, compared to people who feel that there's still room to grow," said Colgan.
One positive around the new riding boundaries is that it gives a stronger, united voice to mountain towns like Jasper, Banff and Canmore that now all sit in the same electoral district, Colgan said. The result could allow the communities to more effectively advocate for problems they share.
Support for oil and gas is also a high priority in Yellowhead, said Simon Ducatel, a Sundre-based editor at The Albertan newspaper. But he has also noticed a lot of concern locally with protecting water from potential contamination created by coal mining.
Meanwhile, Alberta's relationship with the federal government is also an issue that somewhat divides voters in the area, Ducatel says, with some recognizing the importance of constructively working with Ottawa, while others argue the province has been treated poorly by the federal government.
"While conservatives in this area are a majority, they are by no means a monolith," Ducatel said.
Yellowhead's candidates
Traditionally, Yellowhead has fit the mould of a safe Conservative seat in Alberta. The Conservative Party has never received less than 60 per cent of the riding's vote since it formed in 2003.
But the riding's reputation as a safe seat made it all the more surprising when current MP Gerald Soroka was challenged for the nomination and supplanted by accountant William Stevenson, ahead of this spring's campaign.
Soroka, a politician who has worked in the area for more than two decades, served as the riding's MP since 2019, following a 12-year stint as mayor of Yellowhead County. Stevenson's political experience, on the other hand, is mostly in behind-the-scenes financial roles within the party.
Stevenson did not respond to multiple interview requests from CBC News for this story.
"As an accountant, farmer and father, William understands the issues that matter most to constituents, including affordability and crime," the Conservative Party's website says about Stevenson.
Looking to improve its fortunes in Yellowhead after a fourth place finish in 2021, the Liberals tapped Michael Fark, Jasper's director of recovery since last year's wildfire, to run in the riding.
Fark said he wants to see more meaningful work to find compromises and solutions in politics, after seeing the consequences that can come from political decisions that lose sight of the reality of situations that voters face on the ground.
"I feel that we should be holding our elected officials to a higher standard and expect more from them in terms of their understanding of the consequences in the decisions that they take," Fark said.
With a goal to focus on common causes that unite the riding across the region and across party lines, Fark argued that rural Alberta hasn't had strong representation federally for a long time from any political party.
"That is being felt quite seriously in people feeling that their views and their concerns are not heard and they're not respected," Fark said. "And that is having a consequence in terms of what we see in the discussions in Alberta, specifically around talks of separation."
Fark added the Liberal Party has to recognize there's legitimate cause for frustration in Alberta with how the party's policies have impacted Western Canada and rural Alberta in particular, and reflect on the policy decisions that have contributed to this issue.
Earlier this month, he expressed concern about his party's promise to drop national park admission fees this summer, arguing there needs to be a plan to make up for the revenue loss that will come from this decision.
Yellowhead Liberal candidate raising concerns over promise to make national parks free
2 days ago
Duration 1:59
Liberal Leader Mark Carney plans to drop national park admission fees this summer. The campaign promise has been met with concern in the Rocky Mountains, including from Yellowhead Liberal candidate Michael Fark. He has questions about how the idea will be implemented.
The riding's NDP candidate, Avni Soma, said she plans to play the long game in Yellowhead.
Soma, who co-founded the company Farm Box, has been building relationships across the riding for more than half a year. She notes the NDP needs to start campaigns early in ridings that typically don't vote them into office, like Yellowhead, and work to develop support over time.
"To build support anywhere in rural Alberta is a long-term game. So even if I don't get in this time, I'm in it again next time. Those signs you see? You're going to see them up again in four years. Shifting a narrative takes a long time," Soma said.
Soma's campaign generated headlines earlier this month when her election signs in the Sundre area were vandalized with slurs. The NDP candidate said the vandalism came from larger political frustrations rather than issues with her specifically, and she said she was grateful to receive support from the Town of Sundre and its residents condemning the vandalism afterward.
The last two decades have largely been kinder to the NDP than to the Liberals in Yellowhead, as the New Democrats picked up more votes in 2019 and 2021, and consistently finished second behind the Tories in three federal elections between 2006 and 2011.
But in 2021, it wasn't the Liberals or the NDP that finished second in the riding. It was the People's Party of Canada.
The PPC received more than 12 per cent of the vote in Yellowhead, the highest percentage the party received in any Alberta riding in that election. Former Independence Party of Alberta leader Vicky Bayford is looking to build on that support this spring.
She argued the Yellowhead MP will likely need more than one local office and should hold regular town halls to keep up with what's affecting constituents across the entire riding.
And while Bayford agrees the cost of living and housing are major issues throughout Yellowhead, she notes what sets her party apart is a will to disengage from global organizations like the United Nations and World Health Organization.
"[Voters] want more say and not less say. They want policies to be people-driven, and not driven by people who have no interest in their communities," Bayford said.
Amid discussions around protecting Canadian sovereignty this election, Bayford wants to see a smaller government, more investment in Canada's Armed Forces and more support for businesses and entrepreneurs. She'd also like to see Alberta take on more responsibility with its own pension plan, police force and through more say on immigration.
She added that she wants the federal government to negotiate with Alberta on Senate reform and cancelling equalization. But because she believes a Conservative or Liberal government in Ottawa would never do this, Bayford argues Alberta should hold a referendum on its independence.
"If I am elected and there is a yes vote in a referendum, I will use my voice for the people to advocate for the government to approach the secession negotiations in good faith," Bayford said.
Dale Heath of the Christian Heritage Party of Canada rounds out the candidate list Yellowhead voters will have to choose from this spring.
From his experience covering the region, Colgan said he'd be shocked if the Conservatives lost Yellowhead, given the longtime support for conservative candidates in the riding. But he credits Fark's reputation and intelligence, as well as Soma's active campaigning and relationship building, as boosting both parties' profiles.
While it's odd to see the incumbent replaced in this election with Soroka sidelined, Colgan doesn't expect it to have a large impact on how voters cast their ballots.
The federal election is scheduled for Monday, April 28.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tories support Liberal defence spending hike, but still want a budget
Tories support Liberal defence spending hike, but still want a budget

Toronto Sun

time34 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

Tories support Liberal defence spending hike, but still want a budget

"All of this will require a budget," Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre told reporters Conversative Leader Pierre Poilievre addresses reporters on Donald Trump's tariffs in the foyer of West Block in Ottawa, Ont. on Tuesday, March 4 2025. Photo by Bryan Passifiume / TORONTO SUN OTTAWA — While the Tories support the PM's plans to greatly bolster Canada's defence spending, they still want figures in black and white. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Speaking to reporters ahead of Question Period on Monday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre renewed his calls for the Mark Carney Liberals to release a budget sooner rather than later. 'All of this will require a budget,' Poilievre said. 'A budget that not only puts this money forward, clearly identifies where it comes from, but cuts waste and bureaucracy, consultants, foreign aid, corporate welfare and other areas so that the necessary increase in the military does not come as an inflationary burden on the backs of Canadian taxpayers.' Intense backlash to the government's decision to forego a budget this year prompted the PM to walk back his previous assertions, promising one in the fall. The Conservatives have said they prefer to see one tabled before the House of Commons rises for the summer next week — tabling a motion in the House of Commons on Monday calling for exactly that. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'This prime minister says that he wants to be held to account based on what Canadians are paying for their groceries,' Tory MP Michael Barrett said during Monday's Question Period. 'But instead of putting forward a budget, or bringing down grocery prices, he's introduced a half-trillion dollars in what we can only assume is more inflationary spending.' Quietly released last month during the visit of King Charles, the federal government's main estimates outlined a spending plan worth $487 billion. Read More Poilievre said he stands ready to work with other parties to meet the goal of putting Canada first and defend our sovereignty. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'Conservatives support rebuilding our military,' Poilievre said during Monday's news conference. 'After another lost decade of Liberals cuts and mismanagement and back-office bureaucracy, of boondoggles and wasted money on bungled projects, our military has never been weaker.' Poilievre reaffirmed his party's calls for a strong Canadian military with a tangible presence in the north — including at least one permanent base, new fighter jets and surveillance aircraft, and new ships including icebreakers. Filling CAF's massive recruitment gaps is also a priority, he said. bpassifiume@ X: @bryanpassifiume RECOMMENDED VIDEO Olympics Columnists Celebrity Olympics Canada

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees
British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

Winnipeg Free Press

time7 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

LONDON (AP) — The British government on Monday reversed its unpopular plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had signaled the u-turn last month after a loud outcry from the public and some members of his Labour Party who thought the relatively modest 1.5 billion-pound ($2 billion) savings were too politically costly. Treasury chief Rachel Reeves, who canceled the payment for home heating on all but the poorest retirees after Labour came to power last summer, said the benefit would be restored to 9 million people, or three-quarters of pensioners, in England and Wales whose incomes are below 35,000 pounds ($47,500). Reeves said the move was necessary last year because the previous Conservative government had left public finances in a dire state. 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government,' Reeves said. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' The payments are worth between 200 and 300 pounds ($271 and $406) a year. The reversal will cost the government 1.25 billion, Reeve said. Canceling the payments for most people last winter was blamed for contributing to Starmer's swift decline in popularity after his party came to power in a landslide. He was blamed for punishing elderly people on limited incomes who struggled to make ends meet during a cost-of-living crisis. Labour fared poorly in local elections in England last month, with many party representatives blaming the removal of the winter fuel payment. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, quickly pounced on Starmer's about-face. 'Keir Starmer has scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making,' she said. 'This humiliating u-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologize for his terrible judgment.'

Kelly McParland: Poilievre needs to earn an extension as leader
Kelly McParland: Poilievre needs to earn an extension as leader

National Post

time2 days ago

  • National Post

Kelly McParland: Poilievre needs to earn an extension as leader

Canada's federal Conservatives are stuck with a dilemma as they consider whether to do anything different in the next two years than they did in the last two. Article content At the centre of the dilemma are a host of riddles. As in, did they actually lose the last election? Sure, they didn't win, but did they lose lose? Like, did Canadians actually reject them, or did something else happen that got in the way of the victory they anticipated? Article content Article content Article content If they did lose, what do they do about it? And if they didn't lose lose, what do they do about that? Article content Article content Depending on the answers to those questions is another of equal weight: do they head into the future with the same team of decision-makers who didn't quite win if they maybe didn't lose? And how do you answer that question when you don't know what the future holds, given that one complaint against the current leader is that he didn't respond effectively enough when the playing field changed? Article content As far as Pierre Poilievre is concerned, there's nothing to decide. 'We had the biggest vote count in our party's history, the biggest increase in our party's history, the biggest vote share since 1988 and we're going to continue to work to get over the finish line,' he replied when asked. That same argument is on offer from other Conservatives keen on moving past the vote that left them once again in second place. Article content The 'nothing to see here' case goes like this: In any previous election dating back 40 years the Tory results would have put them in power, likely with a majority. The fact this one didn't was the result of unprecedented exterior factors, specifically, the timing of Justin Trudeau's departure and the coinciding emergence of a U.S. president even his most fervent detractors didn't foresee as being quite this nuts. Alarmed and unnerved, voters opted for continuity and incumbency over the very real practical policies they'd been firmly embracing until then. Article content It's not a bad argument, but also not entirely convincing. In the Liberal bastion of greater Toronto, it sounds a lot like the local NHL team's annual excuses for once again failing to deliver the goods. 'Hey, at least we did better than our last collapse,' doesn't quite cut it. Article content Article content To its credit, the conservative universe isn't ready to simply roll over and accept the excuses. In this the party shows itself once again to be more independent-minded than the rival Liberals, who — after refusing to give themselves the power to oust Justin Trudeau, and living to regret the fact — made the same decision over his replacement. A majority of the caucus voted not to accept the rules of the Reform Act, meaning Prime Minister Mark Carney knows he can rule as he sees fit, safe in the knowledge the minions can't get rid of him. Would any other party in the democratic world vote to remain minions? Article content Conservatives not only adopted the Reform rules, but are discussing whether Poilievre should face a leadership review. A decision could be made as early as this month, with a review to take place next spring. It's possible they'll reject the option, but it would be a mistake. The world a year from now may look a lot different than it does today. Given the level of international uncertainty and the daily madhouse in Washington, it would be a shock if it didn't. Locking themselves into a recently-defeated leader when circumstances could easily demand an entirely different set of calculations would not be a show of confidence but an act of denial.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store