Google Maps users are baffled after spotting a mysterious FACE on a mountain top in Chile - as one claims it could be an 'alien base'
But the latest sighting is one of the strangest yet.
Eagle–eyed Google Maps users have spotted a mysterious face on a mountain top in Chile.
The face is located on a remote island right at the south of the country – and some viewers claim it could be an ' alien base'.
Scott C Waring, a UFO hunter who spotted the face, asked: 'Are these aliens?
'The oldest aliens in our universe might be seen as angels or demons with such powers...or even god or gods.'
While Mr Waring believes this could be an alien base, not everyone is convinced.
In fact, scientists say there is a much simpler explanation for this confounding illusion.
Mr Waring spotted the face at the coordinates 55°32'35"S, 69°15'56"W while scouring Google Maps.
He posted a video to YouTube revealing his finding, and many excited alien hunters were quick to comment.
'I found some in Antarctica I couldn't work out what they were or are at first I thought they were like some sort of digital error or random digital program issue but now I'm starting think your right and these could be like those ancient nasca glyphs but good find mate,' one user commented.
Another added: 'This is truly the most significant find to date! Bravo!'
And one wrote: 'You are the best. Thank you very much for your efforts.'
There's a very good reason why all sorts of geological structures get mistaken for faces or skulls.
When faced with a structure containing intricate and varied patterns, the brain turns this noisy, dynamic information into patterns and objects that we can understand.
The brain gets this right most of the time, but sometimes certain predispositions cause errors which disturb our perceptions.
Dr Robin Kramer, an expert on face perception from the University of Lincoln, told Daily Mail: 'Our face detection system has evolved to be great at detecting faces and it makes more sense to err on the side of caution by occasionally seeing faces where there aren't any, rather than missing faces where there are.'
Scientists call this phenomenon pareidolia, which is a bias towards seeing meaningful patterns in inanimate objects.
'Face pareidolia explains why we might see faces in geological structures, as well as pretty much anything else,' Dr Kramer added.
Scientists think that we evolved this sensitivity towards faces because it helped our ancestors find friends and spot enemies.
For hunter-gatherers, it was better to briefly mistake a bush for your neighbour's animal than miss someone sneaking up on you.
Professor Kevin Brooks, a psychologist at Macquarie University, told Daily Mail: 'We tend to classify anything vaguely face-like as a face until proven otherwise – it's safer that way.
'Evolutionary psychologists speculate that we evolved this mechanism to help our survival, and increase our chances of passing on our genes, bringing forth another generation of people who are also good at face detection.'
Some people are more sensitive to faces and so might experience more pareidolia in their daily lives.
Dr Susan Wardle, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health, told Daily Mail that pareidolia isn't 'usually' a sign of any psychological or neurological issues.
However, a high rate of pareidolia might be a sign of someone's bias towards believing in the paranormal.
A Finnish study conducted in 2012 found that people with religious or paranormal beliefs were much more likely to see faces in random stimuli.
This could explain why alien hunters seem to find faces or patterns in geological features so frequently.
Dr Wardle concludes: 'Most people who see faces in things recognise that the faces are not real.
'Issues can arise when people interpret visual patterns to have meaning that they do not, or when they have difficulty distinguishing true perceptions from illusory ones.'
WHY DO WE SEE FACES IN INANIMATE OBJECTS?
Pareidolia is the psychological response to seeing faces and other significant and everyday items in random stimuli.
It is a form of apophenia, when people see patterns in random, unconnected data.
There have been multiple occasions when people have claimed to see religious images and themes in unexpected places.
On the red planet, one of the most famous is the 'face on Mars' spotted by one of the Viking orbiters in 1976.
This was later proven to just be a chance alignment of shifting sand dunes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘A bellwether of change': speed of glacier shrinking on remote Heard Island sounds alarm
Glaciers on a remote Australian sub-Antarctic island are shrinking rapidly, losing almost a quarter of their size in just 70 years, with researchers fearing glaciers on a neighbouring peninsula may have already disappeared. Analysis of aerial photographs and maps going back to 1947 were combined with satellite data to track melting on 29 glaciers on the uninhabited wilderness of Heard Island, 4,100km south-west of Perth and 1,500km north of Antarctica. Scientists said global heating was the most likely cause of the dramatic ice losses. Between 1947 and 2019, the island had warmed by 0.7C, while the area covered by glacial ice fell from 289 sq km to 225 sq km. The most dramatic changes were recorded on the island's east, in particular on Stephenson glacier, which has retreated almost 6km since 1947. In the last 20 years, the glacier retreated on average 178 metres a year, the research, published last week in the scientific journal the Cryosphere, found. 'Glaciers are extremely sensitive to small changes in temperature. As the air warms the ice surface gets closer to melting point,' said Prof Andrew Mackintosh, one of the paper's authors and chief investigator at Monash University's Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF). 'I've got no doubt the increase in temperature is primarily responsible for driving the glacier retreat. This shows that no place is free from the influence of climate change.' On the neighbouring Laurens peninsula, where there are 11 small glaciers, the losses were even more dramatic. The 10.5 sq km of glacier ice that was there in 1947 was at just 2.2 sq km in 2019, the final year of data for the research. 'One or two of those glaciers may have already disappeared now,' said Dr Levan Tielidze, the paper's lead author and research fellow at SAEF. 'They are small glaciers, but it's a sign of what will happen in the future to the larger glaciers on Heard. These findings are a bellwether of change for our global climate system.' Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter SAEF is now using climate models to understand what could happen to the island's glaciers in the future under different levels of greenhouse gas emissions. Mackintosh said: 'Although this mapping shows stark glacier retreat and further ice loss is unavoidable, whether we retain glaciers or lose most of them entirely is up to humans and the greenhouse gas emission pathway we follow. 'It might also mean the difference between a future where biodiversity is devastated, or one where key parts are secured.' Heard Island made headlines earlier this year when Donald Trump listed it as being subject to a 10% trade tariff, despite nobody actually living there. The pristine world heritage-listed island includes Australia's only active volcano, Big Ben, and is a magnet for seabirds such as penguins, petrels and albatross, as well as elephant seals and unique slow-growing cushion plants. Dr Justine Shaw, an associate professor at SAEF with the Queensland University of Technology, visited the island in 2003. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion 'It is an absolutely mind-blowing place – a glaciated island,' she said. 'You're on a beach surrounded by elephant seals with king penguins all around and then swooping down from the mountain are sooty albatross calling at each other. 'There's this incredible wildlife and you have your feet in black volcanic sand. And it's right at the southern limit of where plants can grow.' The island has only one weed and no other invasive species, she said, which made it a perfect place to study the impact of climate change on the island's biodiversity. Shaw said the glacial retreat could be generating risks for the unique plant life – a combination of cushion plants, a cabbage, and the insects that live on them. More bare ground exposed by the retreating glaciers created a chance invasive plants could take hold, she said. The appearance of a growing lagoon at the bottom of Stephenson glacier could also be destabilising the ground used by birds for nesting. 'The lagoon that's growing there is opened up to the sea. That will cause erosion,' she said. The government's Australian Antarctic Program this week announced two scientific visits to the island later this year – the first expeditions in more than 20 years. Shaw is organising a team of scientists to travel on the expedition to study the island's unique combination of insects and plants that she said existed nowhere else on Earth. While she was not surprised the glaciers were retreating, she added: 'What's amazing is the rate of the melting – it is so rapid.'
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Stephen Hawking's chilling alien doomsday prediction spreads as scientist issues alarming warning
Stephen Hawking's chilling warning to humanity may be coming true after a renowned scientist claimed a 'hostile' encounter with alien life could be months away. Hawking, the famous theoretical physicist who died in 2018, warned the world that making contact with alien life could end in disaster for the human race. The late professor believed that actively seeking out extraterrestrials would bring on a deadly invasion, similar to how cultures on Earth have wiped out less advanced civilizations in the past. 'The extraterrestrials would probably be far in advance of us, 'Professor Hawking said in 2004. 'The history of advanced races meeting more primitive people on this planet is not very happy, and they were the same species. I think we should keep our heads low.' He advocated for more passive searches for intelligent life, such as listening for alien radio signals, rather than actively broadcasting our presence to the universe. Hawking's grim message was recently revisited by an international team of researchers studying the so-called 'intelligence trap.' This concept has suggested that overconfidence could lead to disastrous consequences. In this case, successfully contacting a UFO could draw the attention of a malevolent species that destroys humanity. Hawking's words have gained even more traction after a respected Harvard astrophysicist suggested that the mysterious object barreling toward Earth this December could be a hostile UFO. Professor Avi Loeb and other scientists have conducted multiple studies involving interstellar object 3I/ATLAS since it was discovered approaching our solar system in late June. Although some astronomers have declared 3I/ATLAS to be a giant comet, Loeb contended there are signs it was artificially created, including its extremely unusual course that will make close passes by Venus, Mars, and Jupiter. This led Loeb to warn that such a craft and the beings who control it would have one of two motives for visiting our solar system, one being harmless and the other being hostile. 'The consequences, should the hypothesis turn out to be correct, could potentially be dire for humanity, and would possibly require defensive measures to be undertaken (though these might prove futile),' Loeb wrote in a study on the pre-print server arXiv on July 17. 3I/ATLAS is expected to pass within 223 million miles of Earth on December 17, speeding through the solar system at more than 41 miles per second (roughly 150,000 miles per hour). 'The late Stephen Hawking believed that direct contact with advanced alien civilizations would inevitably lead to the colonization of Earth by aliens,' US and Iranian researchers wrote in the Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering in 2024. The study examining Hawking's warning explained how the 'intelligence trap' suggests that highly intelligent individuals may be prone to cognitive biases, such as overconfidence or relying on past experiences, leading to flawed decision-making. While some scientists believe there are immeasurable benefits of contacting aliens, the study authors supported Hawking's cautious stance, claiming that broadcasting Earth's location to other worlds could be a 'tactical mistake.' Prior to his death from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) at the age of 76, Hawking added that humans should also be hesitant about answering any signals sent to Earth. In 2016, Hawking said Gliese 832c, a planet 16 light years away, could be home to intelligent life. However, if we were to meet an advanced civilization, he warned it could turn out similar to when the Native Americans first encountered Christopher Columbus. 'Gazing at the stars, I always imagined there was someone up there looking back', Hawking said during the film titled 'Stephen Hawking's Favorite Places.' 'As I grow older, I am more convinced than ever that we are not alone,' the theoretical physicist continued.
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Google Maps users are baffled after spotting a mysterious FACE on a mountain top in Chile - as one claims it could be an 'alien base'
From UFOs buried in the Sahara Desert to mysterious doorways in Antarctica, Google Maps users have made dozens of wild discoveries over the years. But the latest sighting is one of the strangest yet. Eagle–eyed Google Maps users have spotted a mysterious face on a mountain top in Chile. The face is located on a remote island right at the south of the country – and some viewers claim it could be an ' alien base'. Scott C Waring, a UFO hunter who spotted the face, asked: 'Are these aliens? 'The oldest aliens in our universe might be seen as angels or demons with such even god or gods.' While Mr Waring believes this could be an alien base, not everyone is convinced. In fact, scientists say there is a much simpler explanation for this confounding illusion. Mr Waring spotted the face at the coordinates 55°32'35"S, 69°15'56"W while scouring Google Maps. He posted a video to YouTube revealing his finding, and many excited alien hunters were quick to comment. 'I found some in Antarctica I couldn't work out what they were or are at first I thought they were like some sort of digital error or random digital program issue but now I'm starting think your right and these could be like those ancient nasca glyphs but good find mate,' one user commented. Another added: 'This is truly the most significant find to date! Bravo!' And one wrote: 'You are the best. Thank you very much for your efforts.' There's a very good reason why all sorts of geological structures get mistaken for faces or skulls. When faced with a structure containing intricate and varied patterns, the brain turns this noisy, dynamic information into patterns and objects that we can understand. The brain gets this right most of the time, but sometimes certain predispositions cause errors which disturb our perceptions. Dr Robin Kramer, an expert on face perception from the University of Lincoln, told Daily Mail: 'Our face detection system has evolved to be great at detecting faces and it makes more sense to err on the side of caution by occasionally seeing faces where there aren't any, rather than missing faces where there are.' Scientists call this phenomenon pareidolia, which is a bias towards seeing meaningful patterns in inanimate objects. 'Face pareidolia explains why we might see faces in geological structures, as well as pretty much anything else,' Dr Kramer added. Scientists think that we evolved this sensitivity towards faces because it helped our ancestors find friends and spot enemies. For hunter-gatherers, it was better to briefly mistake a bush for your neighbour's animal than miss someone sneaking up on you. Professor Kevin Brooks, a psychologist at Macquarie University, told Daily Mail: 'We tend to classify anything vaguely face-like as a face until proven otherwise – it's safer that way. 'Evolutionary psychologists speculate that we evolved this mechanism to help our survival, and increase our chances of passing on our genes, bringing forth another generation of people who are also good at face detection.' Some people are more sensitive to faces and so might experience more pareidolia in their daily lives. Dr Susan Wardle, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health, told Daily Mail that pareidolia isn't 'usually' a sign of any psychological or neurological issues. However, a high rate of pareidolia might be a sign of someone's bias towards believing in the paranormal. A Finnish study conducted in 2012 found that people with religious or paranormal beliefs were much more likely to see faces in random stimuli. This could explain why alien hunters seem to find faces or patterns in geological features so frequently. Dr Wardle concludes: 'Most people who see faces in things recognise that the faces are not real. 'Issues can arise when people interpret visual patterns to have meaning that they do not, or when they have difficulty distinguishing true perceptions from illusory ones.' WHY DO WE SEE FACES IN INANIMATE OBJECTS? Pareidolia is the psychological response to seeing faces and other significant and everyday items in random stimuli. It is a form of apophenia, when people see patterns in random, unconnected data. There have been multiple occasions when people have claimed to see religious images and themes in unexpected places. On the red planet, one of the most famous is the 'face on Mars' spotted by one of the Viking orbiters in 1976. This was later proven to just be a chance alignment of shifting sand dunes.
