Michigan legislators, mayors propose $800M plan for new, renovated housing
Lansing Mayor Andy Schor said his city has made many of the recommended changes already, including reducing mandated parking spaces for developments, changing to form-based city codes that look primarily at how the building fits into the city rather than what goes on inside and allowing for alternative dwelling units, like tiny homes.
The plan has yet to be adopted by state legislators, who have not yet finishing negotiating this year's state budget.
Schor said if the Legislature adopts the Municipal League's plan, he expects Lansing would qualify for the funds, which would be up to $100,000 for a new home or $30,000 to make repairs, up to 30% of the repair costs.
The idea is to incentivize more than 10,000 new homes over five years of the plan, said Dan Gilmartin, executive director and CEO of the Michigan Municipal League. He said the proposal mirrors one adopted by Ohio as well as a plan that is getting unanimous support from a federal Senate banking committee.
If the plan is adopted at $160 million a year, it would mean $800 million over five years, impacting up to 2,000 homes a year.
The MML's proposals outline a number of suggested local zoning reforms or other changes and would offer financial incentives, up to $100,000 for a new home, to reimburse communities and developers, said Jennifer Rigterink, assistant director of state and federal affairs for the League.
The plan is designed to preempt efforts by the state Legislature to have state-wide zoning reforms, said state Rep. Mark Tisdel, R-Rochester Hills.
Tisdel described the MML's offer as a "carrot," rather than the stick of code enforcement, that would help communities adopt changes by offering financing help for projects that qualify.
The League's list of options is like a menu and the money would be available for communities that adopt half of the reforms.
That means that the cities, village and townships in state Rep. Samantha Steckloff's district - she's a Farmington Hills Democrat - would be able to say no many of the reforms but still be able to get the incentives.
Steckloff said having the option of adapting the reforms and rejecting some of them will help gain the support of a variety of communities, from rural to urban and wealthy to struggling.
The proposal would include:
MI Home Readiness: $5 million a year for incentive grants to help communities change their zoning ordinances to encourage more development.
MI Home Grant: $95 million in the first two years, increasing to $145 million for the last three years, and used for grants to fill funding gaps in housing development or rehab projects.
MI Home Fund: $50 million in the first two years to create a revolving loan fund that can use grant money to fund gaps in housing development or rehab projects.
MI Home Employer: $10 annually to continue the Employer-Assisted Housing Fund
The money would go toward projects that are sold or rented to people making 120% or less of the area's median income and must be kept at those attainable prices for at least a decade.
Brian Farkas, director of workforce housing for Allen Edwin Homes, said his company typically builds about 850 homes a year in Michigan but has recently pledged to increase that by 30%, using existing incentives like tax-in-lieu of fees.
Over a decade, that means around 2,500 more homes, he said.
If the MML's proposal is adopted, Farkas said he expects Allen Edwin Homes would ramp up their production "further and faster."
Contact Mike Ellis at mellis@lsj.com or 517-267-0415
This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: Michigan legislators, mayors propose $800M plan for new, renovated housing
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
New Report Says American Consumers Are Ready To Embrace Chinese EVs
A new report by a group that advises U.S. auto dealer groups suggests American consumers are open to buying cheaper electric vehicles from Chinese automakers. The semi-annual report from Dave Cantin Group says American consumers and dealers expect Chinese companies will made advances into the U.S. market – because such vehicles are more affordable. The report, published in a partnership between DCG with Kaiser Associates, was posted publicly on Wednesday. 'Affordability is the dominant theme at the midpoint of 2025, and it has implications across nearly every other issue facing the automotive industry,' DCG President Brian Gordan said in a statement. 'Affordability is reshaping purchase decisions, driving interest in cheaper Chinese vehicles, and making any manufacturing to pass on tariff costs to consumers virtually impossible without the risk of losing market share.' The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is in the midst of a trade war with China. Already, there are tariffs that make it difficulty to import Chinese vehicles. Regardless, the Chinese auto industry is expanding globally. The Trump administration has unleased tariffs across various countries. Tariffs are not a transfer of funds from one country from another. Instead, tariffs are levied against importers of goods. Those costs are often passed on to U.S. consumers. Despite tariffs, the Chinese auto industry represents a competitive threat to U.S. automakers. In June, Terry J. Woychowski, president, automotive of Caresoft Global, a Michigan-based engineering services company, said Chinese auto advances presented an 'existential threat' to established automakers. Chinese automakers can develop new models in 14 to 18 months compared with 36 to 48 months for traditional automakers, Woychowski said in June. Such traditional auto companies are 'three to five years behind from a technology standpoint,' he said. China automakers can produce EVs for about $30,000 each. The DCG report says 40% of American consumers 'say they would consider a Chinese-made vehicle and 75% of dealers expect Chinese brands within in the market with a year.' Traditional automakers are taking notice of the auto threat from China. Earlier this month, Ford Motor Co. said it plans to invest around $5 billion to reset its EV program with more affordable vehicles produced more efficiently, at lower cost, The DCG report also makes the following points: --Consumers 'are staying in their favorite segments but within budget – opting for smaller versions of trucks, SUVs and crossovers or lower trims to stay within budget,' according to the report. --Automakers absorbed financial hits from tariffs during this year's second quarter. Meanwhile, auto dealers 'whose profits are less dependent on new-vehicle markets, are leveraging strong parts and service revenue, finance and insurance products' plus used-vehicle sales to increase profit margins. DCG said the report 'draws on proprietary consumer and dealer survey data' and other information.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of benefiting from billions in U.S. government contracts while paying little to no federal taxes. Warren Accuses Musk Of Dodging Taxes On Monday, Warren took to X, formerly Twitter, and said that "Elon Musk's SpaceX is worth over $350 BILLION – after receiving billions in government contracts – but could be paying LESS in taxes than you." She blamed Donald Trump's tax reforms, saying Republicans "rigged the tax code with loopholes for billionaire corporations" and demanded "no more corporate handouts." Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Her remarks followed a New York Times report that SpaceX has avoided paying federal income tax on about $5 billion in taxable income since its founding in 2002 by using a legal tax strategy known as a net operating loss carryforward. The provision, expanded indefinitely under Trump in 2017, lets companies offset future income with earlier losses. Musk Previously Defended Tesla's Tax Strategy Musk currently has a net worth of $375 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index, making him the wealthiest individual on Earth. In February earlier this year, Musk and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) VP of Finance Sendil Palani denied claims that Tesla evaded taxes, saying that the company legally carried forward past losses under IRS provisions. At the time, Musk acknowledged Tesla didn't pay U.S. federal income tax for several years, including 2024, since most profits come from overseas sales, but highlighted the need for comprehensive tax reform to address excessive Revenue Soars, Taxes Stay Low Documents reviewed by the publication show that more than 75% of SpaceX's revenue in 2020 and 2021 came from federal contracts. Despite that reliance on taxpayers, SpaceX paid only minimal taxes — including $483,000 to foreign governments and $78,000 in state taxes in 2021. SpaceX's business is also booming. Revenue is expected to reach $15.5 billion in 2025, double the $7.4 billion reported in 2023. Starlink, its satellite internet service, now generates more revenue than its rocket division, with 2.5 million users and $8 billion in 2023 sales. Warren Broadens Criticism Of Musk Warren has previously also targeted Musk over what she describes as conflicts of interest and misuse of government influence. In June, her office released a report titled "130 Days of Elon Musk," alleging more than 100 abuses of power during his time as a Trump administration adviser. She has also criticized the Pentagon for awarding Musk's AI startup xAI a $200 million contract just days after its chatbot Grok was caught making antisemitic remarks. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo Courtesy: Sheila Fitzgerald On UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc.
Key Points Quantum computing offer an intriguing opportunity given its potential to revolutionize many industries. D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. are early-stage businesses with promising innovations. However, both companies are seeing volatile sales across quarters, and neither is profitable. 10 stocks we like better than D-Wave Quantum › The quantum computing sector offers an exciting new area to invest in. Quantum machines can perform sophisticated calculations beyond the capabilities of current classical computers. This tech could transform industries such as medicine and artificial intelligence. But among the bevy of businesses in the field, which are worthwhile long-term investments as the nascent industry grows? Two to consider are D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) and Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT), which also refers to itself as QCi. Between D-Wave and QCi, one looks like the better quantum computing stock. Read on for an exploration of both businesses to understand which one and why. Untangling D-Wave Quantum's business performance D-Wave produces income primarily through subscriptions to its quantum systems via the cloud and professional services to support customers in the use of its technology. In 2025, D-Wave's sales have been on a roller coaster. It generated $15 million in the first quarter after selling one of its quantum computers. In Q2, revenue was $3.1 million, a 42% increase from 2024's $2.2 million as the company picked up $1 million to upgrade the device sold in the first quarter. This sales volatility could continue for some time as D-Wave grows its business. An encouraging sign is 92% year-over-year growth in its Q2 bookings to $1.3 million. Bookings represent customer orders received in the quarter that are expected to produce revenue when the orders are fulfilled. However, D-Wave isn't turning a profit. Its Q2 operating loss of $26.5 million was a 42% increase from the previous year. That's a concerning trend given its Q2 revenue of just $3.1 million. Fortunately, D-Wave has stockpiled a record high $819.3 million in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet. It exited Q2 with total assets of $843.6 million versus total liabilities of $149.3 million. This enables the company to maintain operations in the short term on its path to revenue growth. Quantum Computing Inc.'s budding business QCi uses light particles, called photons, to perform calculations in its quantum computer chips. It sells these chips, other hardware, and professional services to generate revenue. The company is in an early stage of its business lifecycle with sales coming primarily from research grants and proof-of-concept projects. As a result, its sales are small, and prone to substantial swings. For example, in 2024, QCi generated revenue of $373,000, a 4% year-over-year increase. But through the first half of 2025, sales plunged 52% to $100,000. QCi's technology has the potential to generate long-term revenue growth. Photons can be used in a wide range of light sensing, imaging, and other optical applications. Nevertheless, until QCi can gain traction with a larger group of customers, sales will continue to struggle. And that does not bode well for its business viability, because the company is not profitable. The company exited Q2 with an operating loss of $10.2 million against revenue of $61,000 as research and development costs more than doubled year over year to $6 million. QCi's saving grace is that, like D-Wave, it amassed a large war chest to fund operations in the short term. Q2 total assets were $426.1 million with cash and equivalents of $348.8 million. Total liabilities in the quarter were $30.1 million. Deciding between D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. In choosing between D-Wave Quantum or QCi, an important consideration is share price valuation. Since both are not profitable, the way to get at this is using the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue generated over the trailing 12 months. The chart shows QCi's P/S multiple is far above D-Wave's, and the disparity is so great, QCi shares look overpriced. Consequently, D-Wave stock is the better value. This, combined with promising sales and bookings growth, makes D-Wave a more attractive investment than its rival. At QCi's current phase of development, it's a highly speculative stock given the low revenue, high costs, and limited commercial sales. This doesn't mean D-Wave shares are a bargain, since its sales multiple is quite high as well. Another factor to consider is that the quantum computing industry is in its early stages. Quantum computers are prone to calculation errors, because the atomic particles in these machines are sensitive to the slightest environmental disturbances, such as a minor temperature change. So while D-Wave is the better choice versus QCi, any investment in a pure-play quantum computer company is a risk. And it could take years before a scalable quantum device is possible. Some estimates predict that won't happen until 2040. Given these factors, only investors with a high risk tolerance should consider investing in D-Wave. Should you invest $1,000 in D-Wave Quantum right now? Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,466!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,633!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,077% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc. was originally published by The Motley Fool