India, Brazil Discuss Agro-Tech & Food Security At BRICS Agriculture Summit
New Delhi, April 21 (KNN) Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan recently visited Brazil to attend the 15th BRICS Agriculture Ministers Meeting, where he emphasised the importance of promoting soybean production and exports in India.
During his visit, Minister Chouhan expressed his intention to provide Indian farmers with access to global agricultural technologies.
He emphasised that joint international efforts are essential for strengthening global food security, according to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.
The Minister particularly highlighted concerns regarding small farmers in India, stating that global food security cannot be achieved without protecting and empowering smallholder farmers.
Minister Chouhan called for strengthened collaboration in agricultural technology, innovation, capacity building, and trade facilitation to benefit farmers and agricultural enterprises across nations.
At the BRICS platform, Chouhan advocated on behalf of India, focusing on global food security, the empowerment of small farmers, agricultural innovation, technological cooperation, and strengthening partnerships with BRICS countries.
During the visit, Minister Chouhan held bilateral meetings with Brazil's Minister of Agriculture and Livestock, Carlos Henrique Baquetta Favero, and Minister of Agricultural Development and Family Agriculture, Luiz Paulo Teixeira.
These discussions centered on enhancing cooperation in agriculture, agro-technology, rural development, and food security.
He also met with 27 members of Brazil's agribusiness community in Sao Paulo to explore possibilities for collaboration in agricultural trade, production technology, food processing, biofuel, technological innovation, and supply chain integration.
Minister Chouhan visited soybean production facilities, tomato farms, and other agricultural institutes in Brazil to observe advanced technologies in mechanisation, irrigation, and food processing.
While India currently imports soybean oil, both countries are now exploring opportunities for investment and technology transfer to boost soybean production and processing capabilities in India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Everyone feels unsafe': Border panic as Indian forces kill Myanmar rebels
Flies hovered over the blackened and swollen bodies of men and boys, lying side-by-side on a piece of tarpaulin, in blood-soaked combat fatigues, amid preparations for a rushed cremation in the Tamu district of Myanmar's Sagaing region, bordering India. Quickly arranged wooden logs formed the base of the mass pyre, with several worn-out rubber tyres burning alongside to sustain the fire, the orange and green wreaths just out of reach of the flames. Among the 10 members of the Pa Ka Pha (PKP), part of the larger People's Defence Forces (PDF), killed by the Indian Army on May 14, three were teenagers. The PKP comes under the command of the National Unity Government (NUG), Myanmar's government-in-exile, comprising lawmakers removed in the 2021 coup, including legislators from Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party. It mostly assists the PDF – a network of civilian militia groups against the military government – which serves, in effect, as the NUG's army. The Indian Army said that on May 14, a battalion of the country's Assam Rifles (AR) paramilitary force patrolling a border post in the northeast Indian state of Manipur, killed 10 men armed with 'war-like stores' who were 'suspected to be involved in cross-border insurgent activities'. The battalion, the Indian Army said, was 'acting on specific intelligence'. The Indian soldiers were stationed at the border in Chandel, a district contiguous with Tamu on the Myanmar side of the frontier. Manipur has been torn by a civil war between ethnic groups for the past two years, and Indian authorities have often accused migrants from Myanmar of stoking those tensions. However, disputing the Indian version of the May 14 events, the exiled NUG said its cadres were 'not killed in an armed encounter within Indian territory'. Instead, it said in a statement, they were 'captured, tortured and summarily executed by' Indian Army personnel. For nearly five years since the coup, political analysts and conflict observers say that resistance groups operating in Myanmar, along the 1,600km-long (994 miles) border with India, have shared an understanding with Indian forces, under which both sides effectively minded their own business. That has now changed with the killings in Tamu, sending shockwaves through the exiled NUG, dozens of rebel armed groups and thousands of refugees who fled the war in Myanmar to find shelter in northeastern Indian states. They now fear a spillover along the wider frontier. 'Fighters are in panic, but the refugees are more worried – they all feel unsafe now,' said Thida*, who works with the Tamu Pa Ah Pha, or the People's Administration Team, and organised the rebels' funeral on May 16. She requested to be identified by a pseudonym. Meanwhile, New Delhi has moved over the past year to fence the international border with Myanmar, dividing transnational ethnic communities who have enjoyed open-border movement for generations, before India and Myanmar gained freedom from British rule in the late 1940s. 'We felt safe [with India in our neighbourhood],' said Thida. 'But after this incident, we have become very worried, you know, that similar things may follow up from the Indian forces.' 'This never happened in four years [since the armed uprising against the coup], but now, it has happened,' she told Al Jazeera. 'So, once there is a first time, there could be a second or a third time, too. That is the biggest worry.' On May 12, the 10 cadres of the PKP arrived at their newly established camp in Tamu after their earlier position was exposed to the Myanmar military. A senior NUG official and two locals based in Tamu independently told Al Jazeera that they had alerted the Indian Army of their presence in advance. 'The AR personnel visited the new campsite [on May 12],' claimed Thida. 'They were informed of our every step.' What followed over the next four days could not be verified independently, with conflicting versions emerging from Indian officials and the NUG. There are also contradictions in the narratives put out by Indian officials. On May 14, the Indian Army's eastern command claimed that its troops acted on 'intelligence', but 'were fired upon by suspected cadres', and killed 10 cadres in a gunfight in the New Samtal area of the Chandel district. Two days later, on May 16, a spokesperson for India's Ministry of Defence said that 'a patrol of Assam Rifles' was fired upon. In retaliation, they killed '10 individuals, wearing camouflage fatigues', and recovered seven AK-47 rifles as well as a rocket-propelled grenade launcher. Five days later, on May 21, the Defence Ministry identified the killed men as cadres of the PKP. The ministry spokesperson further noted that 'a patrol out to sanitise the area, where fence construction is under way along the [border], came under intense automatic fire', with the intent 'to cause severe harm to construction workers or troops of Assam Rifles to deter the fencing work'. Speaking with Al Jazeera, a retired Indian government official, who has advised New Delhi on its Myanmar policy for a decade, pointed out the dissonance in the Indian versions: Did Indian soldiers respond proactively to intelligence alerts, or were they reacting to an attack from the rebels from Myanmar? 'It is difficult to make sense of these killings. This is something that has happened against the run of play,' the retired official, who requested anonymity to speak, said. The contradictions, he said, suggested that 'a mistake happened, perhaps in the fog of war'. 'It cannot be both a proactive operation and retaliation.' Al Jazeera requested comments from the Indian Army on questions around the operation, first on May 26, and then again on May 30, but has yet to receive a response. Thura, an officer with the PDF in Sagaing, the northwest Myanmar region where Tamu is too, said, 'The [PKP cadres] are not combat trained, or even armed enough to imagine taking on a professional army'. When they were informed by the Indian Army of the deaths on May 16, local Tamu authorities rushed to the Indian side. 'Assam Rifles had already prepared a docket of documents,' said a Tamu official, who was coordinating the bodies' handover, and requested anonymity. 'We were forced to sign the false documents, or they threatened not to give the corpses of martyrs.' Al Jazeera has reviewed three documents from the docket, which imply consent to the border fencing and underline that the PDF cadres were killed in a gunfight in Indian territory. Thida, from the Tamu's People's Administration Team, and NUG officials, told Al Jazeera that they have repeatedly asked Indian officials to reconsider the border fencing. 'For the last month, we have been requesting the Indian Army to speak with our ministry [referring to the exiled NUG] and have a meeting. Until then, stop the border fencing process,' she said. Bewildered by the killings, Thida said, 'It is easy to take advantage while our country is in such a crisis. And, to be honest, we cannot do anything about it. We are the rebels in our own country — how can we pick fights with the large Indian Army?' Above all, Thida said she was heartbroken. 'The state of corpses was horrific. Insects were growing inside the body,' she recalled. 'If nothing, Indian forces should have respect for our dead.' Angshuman Choudhury, a researcher focused on Myanmar and northeast India, said that conflict observers 'are befuddled by these killings in Tamu'. 'It is counterintuitive and should not have happened by any measure,' he said. The main point of dispute, the border fencing, is an age-old issue, noted Choudhary. 'It has always caused friction along the border. And very violent fiction in the sense of intense territorial misunderstandings from groups on either side,' he said. When New Delhi first moved last year to end the free movement regime, which allows cross-border movement to inhabitants, Indigenous communities across India's northeastern states of Mizoram, Nagaland, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh were left stunned. Members of these communities live on both sides of the border with Myanmar – and have for centuries. Political analysts and academics note that the border communities on either side reconciled with the idea of India and Myanmar because of the freedom to travel back and forth. Erecting physical infrastructure triggers a kind of anxiety in these transnational communities that demarcation on maps does not, argued Choudhary. 'By fencing, India is creating a completely new form of anxieties that did not even exist in the 1940s, the immediate post-colonial period,' Choudhary said. 'It is going to create absolutely unnecessary forms of instability, ugliness, and widen the existing fault lines.' Last year, the Indian home minister, Amit Shah, said that border fencing would ensure India's 'internal security' and 'maintain the demographic structure' of the regions bordering Myanmar, in a move widely seen as a response to the conflict in Manipur. Since May 2023, ongoing ethnic violence between the Meitei majority and the Kuki and Naga minority communities has killed more than 250 people and displaced thousands. The state administration has faced allegations of exacerbating the unrest to strengthen its support among the Meitei population, which the government has denied. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government and the Manipur state government, also under the BJP, have blamed the crisis in Manipur in part on undocumented migrants from Myanmar, whom they accuse of deepening ethnic tensions. Now, with the killings in Tamu, Choudhary said that Indian security forces had a new frontier of discontent, along a border where numerous armed groups opposed to Myanmar's ruling military have operated — until now, in relative peace with Indian troops. The deaths, he said, could change the rules of engagement between Indian forces and those groups. 'Remember, other rebel groups [in Myanmar] are also watching this closely,' he said. 'These issues can spiral quickly.'
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
The global economy faces many headwinds, but the aviation industry is expected to defy them
The global economy may be facing an uncertain 2025 in light of trade tensions and geopolitical conflicts, but there's a bright spot that investors can take solace in: aviation. The profitability of the aviation industry is expected to improve in 2025, despite global gross domestic product growth being forecast to drop to 2.5% in 2025 from 3.3% in 2024, according to the International Air Transport Association. In a report released on Monday, the IATA said revenue, operating profits and net profits of the industry are expected to increase from 2024, although some of those were lower than projections made in December. For example, net profits for the industry are projected at $36 billion for 2025, up from the $32.4 billion earned in 2024, but slightly lower than the December projection of $36.6 billion. The aviation industry's net profit margin is also forecast to rise to 3.7% in 2025, from 3.4% the previous year. Total revenues are projected to hit a record high of $979 billion, 1.3% higher than the previous year, but down from the $1 trillion in its last forecast. The IATA attributed the better results mainly to two factors: lower jet fuel costs and greater efficiency. It expects passenger load factors will reach an all-time high in 2025 with a full-year average of 84%, "as fleet expansion and modernization remains challenging amid supply chain failures in the aerospace sector." PLF shows how efficiently an airline is filling its seats. Jet fuel costs are expected to average $86 per barrel in 2025, down from $99 in 2024, the IATA noted, saying it will translate into a total fuel bill of $236 billion, $25 billion lower than the $261 billion incurred in 2024. "Recent financial data show minimal fuel hedging activity over the past year, indicating that airlines will generally benefit from the reduced fuel cost. It is not expected that fuel will be impacted by trade tensions," IATA said. Airline CEOs told CNBC that airlines are holding up despite the uncertainty. Air India CEO Campbell Wilson told CNBC's Monica Pitrelli at the World Air Transport Summit over the weekend that 2025 has been "a year of surprises" for the airline, "whether it's politics, tariffs, geopolitics, [or] closer to home, some conflict issues."India and Pakistan recently closed their airspace to each other's aircraft after military strikes carried out by both sides in May. Pakistan planes are banned from Indian airspace till June 23, and Indian planes are barred from Pakistan till June 24. "Uncertainty is not helpful for business, but the underlying fundamentals of this market ... and the upside we see ahead of Air India is driving us forward, because we think there's massive opportunity to be realized," Wilson added. He said India is the third-largest air travel market in the world, and estimated that it's growing at an annual growth rate of 8% to 10%. "So if Indians start traveling... at the intensity of China, it's going to absolutely explode in volume internationally," he said. Adrian Neuhauser, president and CEO of Colombian flag carrier Avianca, said in an interview Sunday "When the world sneezes in any way ... Airlines just get sick very quickly."However, he said, Avianca's passenger load factors are still holding up and revenue has improved. "So the concern is there, but as of today, we're still seeing the numbers be there." North America is expected to generate the highest absolute profit among all regions in 2025, and the Asia-Pacific region is set to see the largest demand growth in 2025, with revenue per passenger kilometer projected to grow 9% year on year, the IATA said. Revenue passenger kilometers, or RPK, is a measure of the volume of passengers carried by an airline. The metric is used to assess airline performance and passenger demand. The IATA said that "if an airline sees a consistent increase in RPKs on a particular route over several months, this might prompt the carrier to increase flight frequency or deploy larger aircraft to meet growing demand — potentially boosting revenue and market share." It attributed strong passenger demand in the Asia-Pacific to the relaxation of visa requirements in several Asian countries, especially China, Vietnam, Malaysia and IATA did note, however, that the economic landscape poses some challenges, with the GDP forecast for the region, particularly China, having been lowered.
Business Upturn
4 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Steel shares fall after Trump doubles US tariffs: JSW Steel down 1.29%, Tata Steel down 0.98%, SAIL down 1.20%, Jindal Steel down 0.57%
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 2, 2025, 09:28 IST Shares of leading Indian steel manufacturers came under pressure on Monday, June 2, after former US President Donald Trump announced a significant hike in import tariffs on steel and aluminium. The Nifty Metal index fell 0.87% to 9,113.65. Among major losers: JSW Steel declined 1.29% to ₹980.65 Tata Steel slipped 0.98% to ₹159.44 SAIL (Steel Authority of India) dropped 1.20% to ₹127.63 Jindal Steel & Power was down 0.57% at ₹943.45 The pressure came after Trump, during a speech in Pennsylvania, vowed to double existing tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50%. In a later post on Truth Social, he confirmed the hike would come into effect on June 4 under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act, citing national security risks. India exported $4.56 billion worth of steel and aluminium products to the US in FY25, including $3.1 billion in value-added steel articles. The US is a key market for Indian steelmakers due to its high consumption and favorable pricing environment. Experts believe the tariff hike could directly impact Indian exporters and potentially lead to trade diversion. Industry leaders, including those from JSW Steel and AMNS India, have called for proactive trade measures to protect domestic interests amid the shifting global landscape. Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Stock market investments are subject to market risks. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
