logo
‘I've met the Chinese ambassador over MEC Meyer's ban' – Western Cape Premier Winde

‘I've met the Chinese ambassador over MEC Meyer's ban' – Western Cape Premier Winde

Daily Maverick08-05-2025

South Africa-China relations once again came under the spotlight in the Western Cape Legislature as the fallout over the banning from China of MEC Ivan Meyer continues.
Western Cape Premier Alan Winde says he has met both MEC Ivan Meyer and Chinese officials over the ongoing fallout in the provincial legislature over Meyer's ban from visiting China, after a trip to Taiwan.
Winde revealed this during a debate in the legislature on Thursday, 8 May on Meyer's ban, which dates back to January.
Two weeks ago, the African National Congress (ANC) staged a walkout in support of its caucus member Rachel Windgovel, who was asked to leave the sitting after she refused to apologise for claiming Meyer's trip to Taiwan 'betrayed' South Africa.
Meyer was not physically present in the chamber on Thursday and has remained silent on the issue. It came up during a mini-debate, after ANC leader of the opposition Khalid Sayed asked if Meyer's trip potentially jeopardised trade relations with China.
Winde told members of the legislature: 'I have had a meeting with the Chinese ambassador on this specific subject, also with the consul general.'
He also said he had discussed the issue with Meyer, who serves as MEC of Agriculture, Economic Development and Tourism. Winde did not go into any further details.
Winde said Meyer's trip was 'not an official engagement conducted on behalf of the Western Cape government or any of its entities'.
Winde continued, 'It was conducted strictly in his personal and private capacity and not as a member of this government… If the honourable member probably realises that, it was the ANC that actually made his father a consul general in that country, and, of course, then you find personal relationships.'
Meyer's father, Piet Meyer, was a member of the Western Cape executive who also served as an ambassador to Taiwan. He died in 2020.
Trade relations
During the debate, Winde said, 'We deeply value our ties and friendship with the People's Republic of China, especially our long-standing regional partnership with Shandong province.'
He said the partnership with China was the first of its kind for an SA province.
'Our relations with China have benefited the Western Cape not only in terms of trade and investment, but also in terms of sustainable development, innovation and entrepreneurship at large.'
The ANC's Sayed said, 'The recent visit to Taiwan by MEC Meyer does, in fact, run the risk of jeopardising and straining the Western Cape's and indeed South Africa's vital diplomatic trade and investment relations with the People's Republic of China, especially considering South Africa's official foreign policy position regarding the One China policy'.
In response, the DA's Bennedicta van Minnen said, referring to Sayed: 'Just eight days ago, the honourable member proudly showed footage on X of himself engaging with Russian representatives, recklessly risking our trade relations with Europe and the United States.'
Personal vs public roles
During the debate, the Good party's Brett Herron said there was a fundamental principle: 'When you are an elected official, the lines between your personal and public life are inevitably blurred. This is not just a matter of perception; it is a matter of responsibility.'
Herron said Meyer, in his government role, held a position of trust.
'His foremost duty is to protect and advance the economic interests of this province. So how can that duty be effectively carried out if he is personally banned from entering China, our largest trading partner in Asia?'
'If the MEC visited Taiwan in a personal capacity, the question of what exactly happened, or how egregious was his behaviour, to lead to a ban? On the other hand, if he met with Taiwanese officials, the trip cannot fall under the banner of a personal visit.'
Herron continued: 'Let us be clear: China is not just another market. It is a key player in our province's export strategy, tourism potential and foreign investment pipeline. Being banned from engaging directly with Chinese officials and business representatives places MEC Meyer in a compromised position. It limits his ability to build relationships, attract investment and promote trade, all of which are critical functions of his portfolio.'
Ferlon Christians from the African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP) questioned why the ANC wanted to have a political debate on the issue, as the trip had been in Meyer's private capacity.
'How can we … tell members you cannot go to China, you cannot go to America because you're a member of the house, or you are the executive, you cannot do that?' he said.
The controversy dates back to January 2025, following a Daily Maverick report about Meyer and his family being barred by the Chinese embassy in Pretoria from visiting China, Hong Kong and Macao.
The embassy said at the time that it regarded Meyer's visit as 'blatantly violating' Beijing's One China policy.
The issue emerged as South Africa instructed the Taiwan representative office to vacate its Pretoria premises and relocate to another city.
Beijing rigorously applies a One China policy, insisting that any country that recognises China must not in any way give diplomatic recognition to Taiwan. At the end of 1997, South Africa switched recognition from Taiwan to China, but formally agreed to allow Taiwan to continue an official presence in Pretoria under the name 'Taipei Liaison Office'. DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Financial tips for UK expats moving back to South Africa
Financial tips for UK expats moving back to South Africa

IOL News

time12 hours ago

  • IOL News

Financial tips for UK expats moving back to South Africa

Explore the financial implications for UK expats returning to South Africa, including tax residency, pension arrangements, and property considerations. Learn how to optimise your finances for a smooth transition back home. Image: Supplied. South Africa faces many challenges, but a clear trend is emerging of expats returning home. Stats SA's Migration Profile Report for South Africa, released last year, shows that since 2000, the number of South Africans in the UK has grown from 136,720 to 247,336. But in a move that some have dubbed 'reverse emigration', many are heading back. The top reasons for coming back range from missing the South African lifestyle and family and friends, to the bad weather and high cost of living in the UK. The UK is significantly more expensive than South Africa, especially when it comes to housing, eating out, and labour costs. For the same income, South Africa offers families better homes, an affordable lifestyle, and access to good schools. Here are the financial implications for expats returning to South Africa. Ensure your finances are in order before you move back A move between countries shifts tax residency, so you will need to determine your tax residency status in both the UK and South Africa, as this will impact how your income and worldwide assets are taxed. Be aware that South Africa taxes residents on their worldwide income while non-residents are taxed only on South African-sourced income. It is important to familiarise yourself with the UK-South Africa DTA to avoid being taxed twice on the same income. It is a good idea to monitor the GBP/ZAR exchange rate to plan the timing of your transfers. The Rand can be volatile, so it may be a good idea to work out your income and capital needs in South Africa and transfer only the amount that you are planning to spend there. Remember that retaining funds offshore can hedge against a weakening currency. Make sure you review your UK pension arrangements before you leave. Several UK pension providers will not accept SA residents on their platform or, when you become a non-resident in the UK, will not allow you to make further changes to your existing UK pension. This could have a material impact on your retirement planning. It's also a good idea to make sure you understand the tax treatment of your UK investments in South Africa, including potential liabilities for Capital Gains Tax or foreign dividends. A question that comes up often is 'Should I retain my ISAs?' Unfortunately, ISAs are not tax-free in South Africa, which has its own version of an ISA called a Tax-Free Savings Account. When moving to a new country, it's best to review the product wrappers you are currently using, as well as what options you have available in South Africa. Many clients benefit from restructuring their investments and tax optimising strategies when it comes to cross-border financial planning. If you have a UK property, you will need to decide whether to sell, rent out, or retain your UK property. Be aware of tax implications, such as Capital Gains Tax and rental income tax in both countries. Buying property in South Africa is fairly straightforward, but make sure that you do your due diligence before any large purchase. Getting set up with a bank account can be difficult without being physically present and able to provide proof of residence in South Africa. Once you have the required supporting documents, the process of opening an account is relatively easy. Many South African bank providers offer offshore accounts. The money required to be held in these accounts is much higher than a local bank account, but it can provide additional flexibility for holding non-Rand assets. * Adshade is the wealth advisor at Sable International. PERSONAL FINANCE

Kursk Under Fire, Truth Under Siege
Kursk Under Fire, Truth Under Siege

IOL News

time13 hours ago

  • IOL News

Kursk Under Fire, Truth Under Siege

By Gillian Schutte On 5 June 2025, I attended the Russian-hosted international online press symposium titled 'Liberation of Kursk Region', a teleconference convened to present first-hand accounts, evidence, and legal testimony on the attacks carried out by the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and foreign mercenaries during incursions into the Kursk Region. It was a sobering exercise in counter-memory — one that exposed the ideological filters through which Western media interprets war, and how it strategically erases certain kinds of suffering. The event brought together a panel of experts, eyewitnesses, and officials to report on the nature of these violations. Each presentation revealed both the physical damage inflicted on the Russian civilian population, as well as the deeper injury of denial — a refusal by the Western bloc to recognise the legitimacy of Russian civilian grief. The eyewitness accounts shared by three Kurskites were harrowing. One described watching elderly neighbours die when their home was shelled. Another spoke of civilians being shot at close range. A third, fighting tears, recounted the rape of women during the brief occupation of their village. These testimonies were the lived memories of war and trauma, delivered with quiet devastation. Rodion Miroshnik, Ambassador-at-Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, provided a comprehensive briefing on what Russia identifies as crimes committed by the Kiev regime. He detailed the shelling of border villages, destruction of non-military infrastructure, use of foreign mercenaries, and the discovery of banned Western-supplied munitions, including cluster bombs and white phosphorus, in civilian zones. Miroshnik cited ongoing investigations by the Russian Investigative Committee into violations of international humanitarian law — all allegedly ignored by the institutions tasked with upholding these laws. According to Miroshnik, several communities in the Kursk Region suffered not only bombardment but were also subject to brief occupations by AFU-aligned forces. During these episodes, civilians were reportedly displaced, forcibly taken into Ukrainian territory, and subjected to psychological trauma. Families returning to liberated areas faced destroyed homes, contaminated land, and unexploded ordnance, with little to no humanitarian intervention from the international community. Igor Kashin, Head of the Special Projects Department in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, presented a legal analysis of these findings. His tone was forensic. He itemised the breaches of the Geneva Conventions and other international protocols, explaining how evidence had been submitted to various global institutions — including the UN and the ICC — yet no meaningful action had followed. Olga Kiriy, a Russian filmmaker and documentarian, delivered a visual account of the devastation. Her footage showed razed schools, burning residential blocks, and civilians returning to ghost towns, still wearing the shock of war on their faces. In one of her documentaries she shows a Ukranian soldier admitting to the rape of women by himself and his unit. Her presentation conveyed what words could not: the raw aftermath of military violence on people who remain unseen and unspoken in the official Western narrative of the conflict. Ivan Konovalov, military analyst and historian, contextualised the attacks on Kursk within a broader framework. He explained that the AFU operations were tactical provocations — designed to destabilise border regions and provoke retaliation, which could then be framed by NATO-aligned media as further proof of Russian aggression. He pointed out that these attacks coincided with deliveries of new Western weaponry to Ukraine, raising serious questions about the complicity of foreign governments and arms manufacturers. The testimonies shared during the teleconference dismantled the binary framework imposed by Western media, where Ukraine is valorised as a struggling democracy and Russia is reduced to a caricature. The reality conveyed by the speakers was more complex and far more disturbing. Russia, too, has civilians. Its towns and villages are not abstract zones on a geopolitical map but home to people who have suffered death, displacement, and the terror of war. Yet these accounts are absent from global headlines. They are not debated in parliaments, nor dissected on primetime panels. Instead, they are swiftly relegated to the realm of 'disinformation' — a catch-all term used by liberal institutions to shut down inconvenient truths. This is the machinery of narrative warfare — where facts are not weighed for their truth, but for their utility to power. The West's information order sustains itself through omission, selective moral outrage, and the assumption that some lives matter more than others. As a South African journalist who has long documented structural injustice, I recognise this silencing. It follows a pattern familiar to the Global South — where international law is invoked as a weapon rather than a principle; where invasions by Western powers are called interventions, but defensive operations by others are framed as crimes; and where victims must pass ideological litmus tests before they are deemed worthy of empathy. The suffering in the Kursk Region demands recognition. The use of banned munitions against civilians, the forced displacement of families, and the destruction of non-military infrastructure all constitute grave breaches of international law. That these acts are committed using Western weapons, under the cover of Western media silence, reveals a moral crisis at the heart of the liberal order. The conference was more than a forum for Russian voices. It was a reminder that truth is not owned by the powerful. It must be spoken even when it is buried. The people of Kursk have lived through war. They have returned to broken homes and haunted fields. Their testimonies exist. Their pain is real. And their silence is manufactured by design. If the term 'liberation' is to have meaning, it must include liberation from the monopolies that determine whose pain is legitimate. It must disrupt the asymmetry of grief that defines the West's geopolitical posture. We owe that to the people of Kursk. We owe it to all communities whose trauma is edited out of history to suit imperial narratives. And we owe it to ourselves, if we are to resist becoming complicit in the global machinery of selective justice. *Gillian Schutte is a South African writer, filmmaker, and critical-race scholar known for her radical critiques of neoliberalism, whiteness, and donor-driven media. Her work centres African liberation, social justice, and revolutionary thought. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.

Dr Tshenuwani Farisani remembered as a dedicated public servant
Dr Tshenuwani Farisani remembered as a dedicated public servant

Eyewitness News

time14 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Dr Tshenuwani Farisani remembered as a dedicated public servant

JOHANNESBURG - Anti-apartheid activist and reverend Dr Tshenuwani Farisani is being remembered as a dedicated servant of the people, who committed his life to uplifting disadvantaged communities. President Cyril Ramaphosa delivered the eulogy at Farisani's funeral, held at the University of Venda in Thohoyandou, Limpopo, on Saturday. Farisani passed away on Thursday at the age of 76, after battling an undisclosed illness. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa pays tribute to anti-apartheid activist and reverend, Dr Tshenuwani Farisani As a long-serving member of the African National Congress (ANC), he represented the party in Parliament and went on to become the speaker of the Limpopo Provincial Legislature in 2004. In 2022, the Farisani Foundation was established, with a focus on education, economic empowerment, agriculture, technology and information. The foundation has played a vital role in helping children in remote rural areas access quality education. President Ramaphosa said Farisani was a visionary who was committed to fighting poverty and empowering poor communities. 'Dean Farisani soon became attracted to liberation theology, and its message that the true Christian faith demands active resistance to all forms of oppression and solidarity with the poor.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store