Tariffs won't hit defence deals with US, says MEA
Government officials indicated to the panel that purchase of Russian oil will continue and that President Vladimir Putin's upcoming India trip or any possible trip of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to China are not part of any calibration but are pre-planned engagements.
In the first government briefing to a parliamentary panel after the US imposed 50% tariffs on India, commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal informed the panel that the sixth round of trade negotiations between India and the US is scheduled and the US has not called off the discussions to be held in New Delhi.
US President Donald Trump last Wednesday signed an executive order doubling India's tariffs to 50% by announcing an additional 25% duties over Russian oil purchase. The additional 25%, due to take effect on August 27, puts India on a par with Brazil when it comes to facing the highest levy of 50%.
The commerce ministry also told the panel that as part of the export diversification strategy, focused efforts are being made to tap the potential of India's existing trade agreements with partners such as the UAE, Australia, ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and Mauritius.
'Preparations are underway to leverage opportunities under the new FTA partnerships such as the UK as soon as the agreements come into force. Efforts are likewise being intensified to speedily conclude ongoing negotiations, such as with the EU, on the basis of mutually beneficial and balanced trade principles,' said a functionary who attended the meeting.
Misri replied to a lot of questions from the members who asked him about Pakistan army chief Asim Munir's statements against India at an event in the US and what prompted Trump to impose extra tariffs on India.
At a black-tie dinner in Washington DC, Munir said the Indus River 'is not the Indians' family property' and claimed Pakistan had 'no shortage of resources to undo the Indian designs to stop the river', according to The Dawn cited by news agency ANI.
On Munir's statement, the standing committee chairman and Congress lawmaker Shashi Tharoor said it was discussed in the meeting. 'Yes, the question of General Munir's statement on American soil has been brought up. Our concern was expressed about the misuse of a friendly country's soil to say something about us in this manner. But at the same time, the fact that nuclear sabre-rattling is something the Pakistanis like to do has been dismissed by the MEA in a statement that was issued just about the time that our meeting was beginning.'
Briefing the standing committee discussions, Misri told the lawmakers that the Centre has not received an official denial from the US regarding the next round of trade talks, functionaries said.
He also explained how India's relationship with the US is 'multidimensional' and constitutes a strategic partnership. He pointed out that during the past few months, the US had extradited Tahawwur Rana, one of the closest associates of David Coleman Headley, who was one of the masterminds of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks that killed 166 people.
Misri highlighted how the US also proscribed The Resistance Front, which had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack, as a terror organisation, and that the US backed the UNSC resolution against the Pahalgam terror attack.
Speaking to the media after the meeting, Tharoor said the meeting discussed 'the importance of the Indo-US relationship, despite this particular problem. The commerce secretary also assured us that the process of dialogue is ongoing. I feel the committee has left feeling fairly satisfied that many of the issues that were on the minds of people are issues that our senior colleagues in government are thinking about and have given us credible responses to.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
PSU banks write off loans over Rs 5.82 lakh cr in last 5 years: MoS Finance
Agencies Representative image Public sector banks (PSBs) have written off bad loans of about Rs 5.82 lakh crore in the last five financial years, Parliament was informed on Tuesday. During 2024-25, the loan write-off of PSBs was at Rs 91,260 crore, compared to Rs 1.15 lakh crore in the previous fiscal, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha. The write-off was highest at Rs 1.33 lakh crore during 2020-21, declining to Rs 1.16 lakh crore in the following year and to Rs 1.27 lakh crore in 2022-23. In contrast to write-offs, PSBs have recovered around Rs 1.65 lakh crore over the last five years. Recovery is around 28 % of the total write-off in the previous five financial years. Banks write off NPAs, including those in respect of which full provisioning has been made on completion of four years, as per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines and policy approved by banks' Boards, Chaudhary said. "Such write-off does not result in waiver of liabilities of borrowers and therefore, it does not benefit the borrower. The borrowers continue to be liable for repayment, and banks continue to pursue recovery actions initiated in these accounts," he said. Further, he said, recovery in written-off loans is an ongoing process and banks continue pursuing their recovery actions initiated against borrowers under the various recovery mechanism available to them, such as filing of a suit in Civil Courts or in Debts Recovery Tribunals, and filing of cases in the National Company Law Tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, etc. Replying to another question, Chaudhary said that more than Rs 21.68 lakh crore has been disbursed under Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) across the country over the last five years. In response to another question, Chaudhary said, according to provisional data provided by the RBI for the financial year 2024-25, Scheduled Commercial Banks have recovered a total of Rs 32,466 crore through actions initiated in 2,15,709 cases under the SARFAESI Act.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India Inc files ECB intent worth $3.48 billion in June, shows RBI data
In June 2025, Indian companies, including non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), filed proposals with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to raise $3.48 billion through External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs). Of this, $2.73 billion was through the automatic route and $750 million through the approval route, according to RBI data. Among the prominent firms filing intent in June were Mumbai International Airport Ltd, seeking $750 million to refinance an earlier ECB to be raised through the international capital market, and Tata Electronics Pvt Ltd, applying for a $400 million facility from a commercial bank for seven years to build a new project. Adani Airport Holdings Ltd, engaged in warehousing and support activities for transportation, applied for $150 million for on-lending and sub-lending activity, with a credit facility duration of 42 months. Agratas Energy Storage Solutions Pvt Ltd, a manufacturer of electrical equipment, is looking to raise $100 million from a commercial bank to import capital goods. State-owned power sector company NTPC Ltd filed intent through the approval route to raise $750 million for infrastructure development. It plans to tap the overseas branch of an Indian commercial bank for a long-term loan with a duration of 64 months. Among financial services firms, Muthoot Fincorp Ltd applied to raise $70 million for on-lending and sub-lending operations, while IIFL Home Finance Ltd is seeking $100 million from a multilateral agency for on-lending activities.
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Bombay HC's BIG verdict: Aadhaar, PAN or Voter ID alone do not make an Indian citizen
The Bombay High Court has said that possessing documents such as an Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter ID is not enough to determine Indian citizenship. The court emphasised that citizenship is determined strictly under the provisions of the Citizenship Act, 1955 — not through identity documents meant for service access or identification. The verdict came while refusing bail to Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, who the prosecution claims is a Bangladeshi national who entered India illegally more than a decade ago. Authorities allege he crossed the border without valid travel papers, obtained fraudulent Indian documents, and used them to pose as a citizen. Justice Amit Borkar noted that the Citizenship Act of 1955 is the 'main and controlling law' for deciding nationality in India. The Act lays down who can be a citizen, how citizenship can be acquired, and under what circumstances it can be lost. 'Merely having documents such as Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter ID does not, by itself, make someone a citizen of India,' the court ruled. 'These documents are for identification or availing services, but they do not override the legal requirements of citizenship.' The bench underlined the importance of distinguishing lawful citizens from illegal migrants, warning that allowing forged identities undermines national sovereignty and enables individuals with no legal status to wrongfully access benefits meant for citizens. The Bombay High Court denied Sardar's bail request, citing ongoing verification of his Aadhaar by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and concerns that he may abscond. Justice Borkar pointed out that the charges went beyond overstaying — they involved deliberate concealment of identity and the creation of forged documents to claim citizenship benefits. Police also indicated they are investigating whether Sardar's case is linked to a wider organised network involved in illegal immigration and identity fraud. When India's Constitution was drafted, the country had just undergone Partition, triggering large-scale migration. The framers created constitutional provisions to clearly define who would be considered a citizen at the start of the Republic, and gave Parliament the authority to legislate on citizenship thereafter. The Citizenship Act, passed in 1955, remains the definitive statute on the matter — and bars illegal migrants from obtaining citizenship through most legal routes. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court on Tuesday endorsed the Election Commission of India's (ECI) view that Aadhaar should not be considered conclusive proof of citizenship, stating that it must be independently verified. A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was hearing petitions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the Bihar electoral roll. 'The EC is correct in saying Aadhaar cannot be accepted as conclusive proof of citizenship. It has to be verified," Justice Kant told advocate Kapil Sibal, who was appearing for the petitioners, as reported by LiveLaw. The Bombay High Court's ruling serves as a clear reminder: identity documents are not proof of nationality. For citizenship claims, the law — not paperwork — is the final authority.
