logo
Suella, Jacob, even Liz? Inside Reform's unofficial plan to bag a Tory big beast

Suella, Jacob, even Liz? Inside Reform's unofficial plan to bag a Tory big beast

The Guardian20-07-2025
At last year's GB News Christmas party, Suella Braverman was the centre of attention. The former home secretary is popular in rightwing media circles, but it wasn't her straight-talking brand of conservatism that was topic of the evening, rather it was the growing whispers about what some thought was her imminent defection to Reform UK.
'It was like a panto – everyone saying: 'Oh yes you will', and her saying: 'Oh no, I won't',' says one Reform party guest. 'We all thought she was just biding her time until the right moment.'
The chatter had been given fresh impetus by the fact that Braverman's husband, Rael, had joined Nigel Farage's party. With Reform soaring in the polls and talk of defections rife across Westminster, the 'Suella moment' seemed to be approaching.
Officially, Reform UK insists there is no concerted mission to attract Tory defectors, with no joiner too grand to not be directed to an online 'defection portal' which has been set up to vet new members.
In reality, insiders say, there has been a scattergun campaign to bring senior Tories onboard; an operation that could yet have more success when MPs head back to their constituencies for the summer recess and meet the reality of Reform's popularity with disillusioned voters.
The headhunting so far has largely been driven by personal connections with Farage, Richard Tice and other senior figures, based on political friendships forged in the crucible of the Brexit leave campaign and the green room of GB News.
Success has come with the recruitment of the former Tory chair Sir Jake Berry, the former cabinet minister David Jones, Andrea Jenkyns and Marco Longhi, as well as a steady flow of local councillors and Tory activists.
But the big-name Tory rightwingers who are often linked to Reform, including Braverman, Jacob Rees-Mogg and Liz Truss – have so far resisted the entreaties of their former colleagues who have made the leap.
Reform's patience in waiting for them, it seems, is not limitless.
This week, for example, appeared to be the point at which Reform turned on Braverman: the party suddenly ratcheted up the attacks on her record, and that of the Conservatives more widely, over their role in a government cover-up of a scheme to resettle thousands of Afghans exposed by a dangerous data leak.
'We weren't not going to go in studs up just because someone might defect to us in future,' says one Reform insider.
Zia Yusuf, the party's cost-cutting chief, publicly condemned the former home secretary, and Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said any minister at the time was a 'traitor' for not speaking up about the scheme in the Commons.
In response, Rael Braverman quit, saying he could not be in a party 'led' by Yusuf, while Braverman herself released a statement explaining why she was bound by a superinjunction against speaking out.
Reform sources say the party had ultimately got fed up with Braverman, and that senior figures are increasingly sceptical that Conservatives tainted by former administrations are actually useful to the party.
Conservatives who are thinking about changing rosettes are often tight-lipped about their plans, but those who have already joined less so. Jenkyns, the former Conservative MP who is now Reform's Lincolnshire mayor, says most defectors 'didn't take much persuading, they were fed up with the Conservatives', but that Braverman had come up with 'lame excuses' for staying.
One Tory who knows Braverman says her reluctance to defect is partly out loyalty to her association and partly her family's history with the party. At the same time, they suggest that many Reform-inclined Tories are waiting to see what happens if there is enough momentum to oust Kemi Badenoch as party leader, with persistent mutters about November as the likely date of an attempted coup.
They also scoffed at the idea that Reform would turn their noses up at Braverman if she did decide to cross over.
Some in Reform are, indeed, still sympathetic to Braverman, with one senior politician saying: 'She's had a really tough couple of days and there is a lot of flak flying around. This Afghan thing is awful. We are calling for a judge led inquiry and it is just difficult for everyone.'
There are differences of opinion within Reform about the issue of defections, and whether taking MPs from their less popular rival parties is helpful.
Sources in the party say they have turned down plenty of former Tory MPs who want a shot at getting their old seats back and make lists of unrealistic demands about what they would want from Reform.
With an attitude of 'they need us more than we need them', Reform is sifting applicants through its portal in a vetting and interview process run by the party's 'head of discipline and defections', the former Vote Leave activist Tom Waterhouse.
In terms of Tory big beasts, Farage is believed to draw the line at the idea of accepting Truss if she were to approach the party, with Reform insiders briefing that she is too toxic.
However, Rees-Mogg would appear to be a different matter, despite his obviously posh Conservative pedigree. Yusuf has been complimentary about the Tory former MP in recent days, saying he is a 'high intelligence, highly educated, high integrity person' for having claimed that ministers could have spoken about the Afghan leak superinjunction in parliament, contrary to Braverman's claims.
Rumours have been swirling for months that he has been tapped up for a Reform-backed run at his old seat, now called North East Somerset and Hanham, if there were to be a byelection triggered by Dan Norris, the incumbent MP who was suspended from Labour after his arrest in April over allegations of rape and child sexual abuse. But Rees-Mogg denies ever considering or discussing defection, saying he is staying in the Tories.
Since Brexit, it has become increasingly common for Tories and Reform figures to mingle at the same events, parties and media outlets, driving a common sense of politics, purpose and friendship.
Jones, the former Conservative cabinet minister who defected two weeks ago, says he was not approached as part of an arm-twisting campaign but took the decision alone. 'I came to the conclusion entirely on my own,' he says. 'I realised I spent quite a lot of the last parliament unhappy with what my own government was doing, which made me realise that if they were Conservatives, I was no longer a Conservative …
'I knew Nigel but I had no contact with them at all until after I left the Conservatives. I met him on a few occasions and worked with him and Richard Tice on Leave Means Leave … I knew his views were very close to my views. A lot of senior people in Reform have a Conservative background and it's natural that our paths would cross.'
Berry, the other recent defector, has attracted more scepticism within Reform circles, as a former remainer and an advocate of net zero. Matthew Goodwin, the academic and GB News presenter, wrote this week: 'Why is Reform welcoming a former Tory who had a front-row seat to the striking failures of the dominant regime in this country and yet concluded, as recently as July 2024, during a contest for the leadership of the Tory party, that the answer to Britain's problems is … ultra-liberal Tom Tugendhat?… I mean, how do you go from believing that the next prime minister of this country should be Tom Tugendhat to thinking, only one year later, that the next prime minister should be Nigel Farage?'
Asked on GB News about his route to Reform, Berry acknowledged going on a 'journey' and saying he came to think the country was broken. He has long had regular slots on GB News and TalkTV, mingling with some of his new colleagues.
The question now is whether further big-name defections are coming. Acknowledging some of the concerns about admitting Tories, a senior Reform UK source said the party knew it had a 'balancing act' to maintain as it sought to eat into traditional Labour support.
'We obviously don't want to be 'Tories 2.0'. We're not 'Tories 2.0' but the more defections we take, it looks like that. So it's pretty much done,' the Reform source said in relation to defections from sitting Tory MPs.
'We've got lots of high-quality people who have been around the block and succeeded in life who are, for the first time in their life, saying they are prepared to put their heads above the political parapet and stand. They are, frankly, of a higher quality than most current Conservative MPs, so we don't want a bunch of Tory has-beens coming ahead of them.'
Meanwhile, Farage also has the job of trying to keep his existing MPs, party officials and backers onside as his ex-deputy Ben Habib and former party MP Rupert Lowe attempt to peel off his supporters for new ventures on the right.
Reform watchers say there are tensions not just over defections but the direction of policy and personalities, with some saying the big egos knocking around HQ are a 'ticking timebomb'. The recently defected Jones says such rumours do not bother him: 'After all, I've just come from the Conservatives. It's politics.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer accuses Palestine Action of targeting Jewish-owned businesses
Starmer accuses Palestine Action of targeting Jewish-owned businesses

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer accuses Palestine Action of targeting Jewish-owned businesses

Palestine Action has targeted Jewish-owned businesses, Sir Keir Starmer has claimed. The Prime Minister made the comments at a meeting of Labour's national executive committee (NEC), saying that the now banned protest group had a history of 'targeting Jewish-owned businesses'. The comments were first reported by Ann Black, an NEC member, who said she had passed on concerns about the Government decision to proscribe Palestine Action to the Prime Minister. She added that Sir Keir insisted that the ban on the group was 'not intended to stifle debate on Palestine'. This weekend, a large-scale protest is expected to take place in London in support of Palestine Action, with police warning that anyone 'showing support' for the group faced arrest. A source told The Times that Sir Keir said at the NEC meeting: 'It's not just the RAF bases, they've planned and attacked Jewish-owned businesses.' He reportedly went on to say there were 'some incidents that were well known, and others that were not'. Earlier this week, an activist allegedly associated with Palestine Action was remanded in custody accused of vandalising two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. It is estimated that the full cost of repairing the two planes will be around £7m. A spokesman for the Prime Minister said: 'Those who seek to support this group may not yet know the true nature of this organisation. 'But people should be under no illusion, this is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group, and we're also clear that their activities do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across this country who continue to exercise their fundamental right to protest on different issues.' Some backbench Labour MPs openly spoke out against the Government's decision to proscribe the group under antiterrorism laws when the Home Secretary announced the move in July. Clive Lewis said that in Britain there had been a 'long history… of direct action which pushes the boundaries of our democracy'. Richard Burgon said that the move risked 'criminalising thousands of volunteers and supporters'. The Prime Minister has also been forced to defend his announcement last week of a plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September, unless Israel meets certain conditions.

Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire
Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire

Sky News

time21 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire

Donald Trump could meet Vladimir Putin in person as early as next week to discuss a ceasefire in Ukraine, a White House official has said. They said the meeting would be conditional on the Russian president meeting his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Sky News's US partner network NBC News reported. It came days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or face severe economic penalties, which could also target countries buying its oil. Earlier in the day, Mr Putin held talks with Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, with the meeting lasting around three hours. In a post on Truth Social, Mr Trump said Mr Witkoff "had a highly productive meeting" with Mr Putin in which "great progress was made". He said he had updated America's European allies and they will work towards an end to the Russia-Ukraine war "in the days and weeks to come". Mr Zelenskyy later said he and Mr Trump spoke on the phone after the meeting. He said "European leaders also participated in the conversation" and "we discussed what was said in Moscow". He added: "Our common position with our partners is absolutely clear: The war must end. We all need lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it started." He later said: "It seems that Russia is now more inclined to agree to a ceasefire." He added that the pressure on Moscow "is working", without elaborating, and stressed it was important to make sure Russia does not "deceive us or the United States" when it comes to "the details" of a potential agreement. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

Moment former Tory justice minister Chris Philp finds huge boat of illegal migrants crossing the Channel
Moment former Tory justice minister Chris Philp finds huge boat of illegal migrants crossing the Channel

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Moment former Tory justice minister Chris Philp finds huge boat of illegal migrants crossing the Channel

Former Tory justice minister Chris Philp has poked holes at Labour's new migrant returns deal after witnessing two 'massively packed' small boats entering UK waters while French officials 'made no attempt' to stop them. Mr Philp, who now serves as shadow Home Secretary, today posted a series of videos taken aboard a chartered ship in the English Channel. After seeing one migrant boat being 'shadowed' by a French warship and then another just ten minutes later, the incandescent politician said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'. He said: 'On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick in, I watched French ships escort illegal migrants straight into British waters. 'Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.' Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But a determined Mr Philp explained he would spend the day trying to discover 'if the Government really has sorted out' the issue of illegal migrants arriving in the UK from across the English Channel. Within minutes, he is informed that French patrol vessel Minck had turned directly towards the shore of Calais in anticipation of a migrant boat getting ready to leave. He said: 'So you can see the migrant boat in the water absolutely rammed full of illegal immigrants crossing the Channel and we see right next to it a French warship shadowing it across, making no attempts to stop it at all. 'That French warship has been with it about three hours now. They could have stopped that illegal migrant boat near the French shore if they had chosen to, like the Belgians do, the Australians do. 'They could have stopped it, but instead they are shadowing it across, escorting it into British waters.' He added that within the next two hours the migrants would reach British waters. Within minutes, Mr Philp then spotted a second migrant boat, with around 80 people aboard. 'The Government's new deal they announced is obviously having no effect whatsoever. '[The migrants] are clearly not deterred by the government's deal. I can see the evidence in front of my eyes,' the politician added, before witnessing UK Border Force vessel Typhoon approaching the French warship to pick up the migrants. Mr Philp added: 'They should return all the people - if you return all the people then they won't attempt the crossing in the first place.' He witnessed the scenes on the first day of Labour's new migrant returns deal, which had already suffered a bumpy introduction after one minister appeared to contradict the terms of the treaty. Cabinet minister Lisa Nandy said on Wednesday that small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France. However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place. Asked whether human rights challenges amounted to a loophole in the plan, Culture Secretary Ms Nandy said: 'That's not the case at all. 'The deal that we've struck will allow… us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. 'Those claims will be heard in France.' She told Sky News: 'I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.' However, the treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron confirmed the new deal last month after a Downing Street summit The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full. It will include cases which cannot be formally 'certified' by officials as 'clearly unfounded'. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Not everyone will fall within the scope of certification. 'No doubt there will be examples where people who file a human rights claim will fall outside the scope of certification and that would have to be heard.' It was a narrower interpretation of the circumstances than those set out by Ms Nandy, and legal proceedings could take months or even years to wrap up. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed. The Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, has published an analysis of the new measures which says: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeatedly refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs' 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.' Meanwhile, the French interior ministry led by Bruno Retailleau - who signed the treaty alongside Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - declined to answer questions about the deal. It is unclear whether the Home Office had detained any of the new arrivals for possible removal to France. Officials had previously described how migrants would be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate in Kent, for initial screening. Those selected would be sent to short-term detention facilities for further screening, and then on to an immigration removal centre. Under the terms of the treaty the UK must hand France the names of those to be removed within 14 days of their arrival. The French government then has up to 28 days to respond. Labour's deal with France came a year after Sir Keir scrapped the Tories' Rwanda asylum scheme as one of his first acts in office. The Rwanda deal, designed to deter Channel crossings and save lives, was ready to finally get off the ground after more than two years in legal limbo.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store