logo
Sam Altman says the term ‘AGI' is losing meaning amid high-stakes AI race

Sam Altman says the term ‘AGI' is losing meaning amid high-stakes AI race

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) may have been every tech bro's chant, but OpenAI CEO Sam Altman thinks that the term is increasingly becoming passé.
Rapid advances in the AI race are making it harder to define the concept of AGI which has led to the term losing its relevance, Altman said in an interview with CNBC. 'I think it's not a super useful term,' the ChatGPT frontman was quoted as saying in response to a question about whether the company's latest GPT-5 model moves the world any closer to achieving AGI.
Loosely defined, AGI refers to a form of artificial intelligence that could enable a system to perform any intellectual task at the same level of humans or even beyond it. Achieving this level of AI capability in a way that is safe and benefits all of humanity, has been OpenAI's core mission for years.
Altman, who has previously suggested on multiple occasions that the Microsoft-backed AI startup is nearing AGI, has shifted stance more recently and attempted to downplay the significance of AGI. Instead, he has emphasised another concept called artificial superintelligence (ASI).
The problem with AGI is that there are multiple definitions being used by different companies and individuals. One definition is an AI that can do 'a significant amount of the work in the world,' he said. However, that has its issues because the nature of work is constantly changing, according to Altman.
'I think the point of all of this is it doesn't really matter and it's just this continuing exponential of model capability that we'll rely on for more and more things,' he added.
The promise of AGI is said to be a major factor in AI companies like OpenAI successfully raising billions of dollars and receiving staggeringly high valuations. Based on its latest funding round, OpenAI is worth $300 billion and the company is reportedly gearing up for a share sale at a valuation of $500 billion.
To be sure, AGI continues to be a major goal for OpenAI. But Altman believes that progress should be measured differently.
'We try now to use these different levels … rather than the binary of, 'is it AGI or is it not?' I think that became too coarse as we get closer,' Altman had said during a talk at the FinRegLab AI Symposium in November last year. He has further said that AI-driven breakthroughs in fields such as mathematics and science will be achieved in the next two years or so.
Earlier this month, OpenAI unveiled GPT-5, its latest large language model (LLM) that is freely accessible by ChatGPT users globally. OpenAI has said that the AI model is smarter, faster, and more useful, especially when it comes to writing and coding-related tasks as well as answering health-related queries.
However, the launch of GPT-5 has drawn criticism, with some saying that the AI model only offers marginal improvements over its predecessors such as GPT-4o.
Accepting that GPT-5 is not at AGI-level yet, Altman said at a media roundtable, 'The idea that you have a system that can answer almost any question, do some tasks, and write software for you at PhD levels of expertise… most people, if they heard that five years ago, would have said, 'absolutely impossible.''
'The impact this is having on education, health care, productivity, economic growth, scientific discovery, and the like is 'quite special,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High school maths trumps Olympiad gold medalist AI models: Google Deepmind CEO answers why
High school maths trumps Olympiad gold medalist AI models: Google Deepmind CEO answers why

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

High school maths trumps Olympiad gold medalist AI models: Google Deepmind CEO answers why

Google Deepmind chief executive Demis Hassabis said that advanced AI models like Gemini can surpass benchmarks like the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) but struggle with basic high school maths problems due to inconsistencies. "The lack of consistency in AI is a major barrier to achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), " he said on the "Google for Developers" podcast, adding that it is a major roadblock in the journey. Artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is generally understood as software that has the general cognitive abilities of human beings and can perform any task that a human can. He also referred to Google CEO Sundar Pichai's description of the current state of AI as "AJI", or artificial jagged intelligence, where systems excel in certain tasks but fail in others. Road towards AGI The Deepmind CEO said just increasing data and computing power won't suffice to solve the problem at highlighted that rigorous testing and challenging benchmarks can precisely measure an AI model's accurate progress."We need better testing and new, more challenging benchmarks to determine precisely what the models excel at and what they don't." Also Read: AI helps Big Tech score big numbers Not just Google ET reported that artificial intelligence (AI) agents, hailed as the "next big thing" by major tech players like Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic, are expected to be a major focus and trend this year. OpenAI launched Operator, its first AI agent, in January this year, for Pro users across multiple regions, including Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the UK, and most places where ChatGPT is October, Anthropic launched an upgraded version of its Claude 3.5 Sonnet model, which can interact with any desktop application. This AI agent can perform desktop-level commands and browse the web to complete tasks. Also Read: ETtech Explainer | Artificial general intelligence: an enabler or a destroyer

Older US borrowers face rising student loan delinquency: How to avoid default under Trump's crackdown
Older US borrowers face rising student loan delinquency: How to avoid default under Trump's crackdown

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Older US borrowers face rising student loan delinquency: How to avoid default under Trump's crackdown

The Trump administration is cracking down on unpaid student loans: Here's how it's hitting older borrowers and how they can avoid default. (AI Image) The Trump administration has intensified efforts to collect on unpaid student loans, placing older borrowers in the US at heightened risk of financial penalties. Nearly 1 in 5 student loan holders aged 50 and above are now classified as "seriously delinquent," meaning they are 90 days or more behind on their payments. According to data released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and reported by CNBC, around 18% of older borrowers became seriously delinquent in the second quarter of 2025. This marks a significant increase from approximately 10% in 2019. By comparison, 8% of borrowers aged 18 to 29 and 11% of those aged 30 to 39 fell into the same category during the same period. Older borrowers face growing repayment challenges Older Americans are increasingly struggling to meet their student loan obligations as the Trump administration resumes federal collection activities. Many of these borrowers either took out loans to fund their children's education or returned to school later in life but did not experience the expected financial return, as reported by CNBC. "Being delinquent on student loan debt is difficult for people who are approaching their retirement years," said Lori Trawinski, director of finance and employment at AARP, in a statement to CNBC. "People end up having to make extremely difficult choices." Risk of garnishment increases after delinquency Borrowers who fall behind on payments do not immediately face the most severe consequences. According to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz, as quoted by CNBC, federal loan holders are considered in default after missing payments for over 270 days. For private loans, default may be declared after 120 days of non-payment. While delinquency can affect credit scores, default triggers harsher collection methods. The US Department of Education may garnish up to 15% of a borrower's disposable wages, CNBC reported. Although the department has paused garnishment of Social Security benefits since May 5, no formal regulation has been issued to prevent such actions in the future. Trawinski noted to CNBC that while wage garnishments are expected to begin later in the summer, there is still uncertainty about whether Social Security offsets will resume. Options available to avoid default Financial advisors stress the importance of exploring federal repayment plans to avoid default. Douglas Boneparth, a certified financial planner and member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council, stated that income-driven repayment plans can "significantly lower monthly payments and prevent default," as reported by CNBC. Borrowers can use tools on to estimate payments under different plans. The Income-Based Repayment plan remains available, though recent legal and legislative changes have limited other options, according to CNBC. In addition to repayment plans, borrowers can apply for temporary relief such as forbearance or economic hardship deferment. Boneparth cautioned, as quoted by CNBC, that "requesting a temporary forbearance can buy time, but ideally, borrowers should aim for an affordable, sustainable payment plan." The Education Department continues to encourage borrowers to take proactive steps to avoid default, especially those who remain employed and may soon be subject to wage garnishment. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off
GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off

Nearly four decades ago, when the personal computer boom was in full swing, a phenomenon known as the 'productivity paradox' emerged. It was a reference to how, despite companies' huge investments in new technology, there was scant evidence of a corresponding gain in workers' efficiency. Today, the same paradox is appearing, but with generative artificial intelligence. According to recent research from McKinsey & Company, nearly eight in 10 companies have reported using generative AI, but just as many have reported 'no significant bottom-line impact'. AI technology has been racing ahead with chatbots like ChatGPT, fueled by a high-stakes arms race among tech giants and superrich start-ups and prompting an expectation that everything from back-office accounting to customer service will be revolutionised. But the payoff for businesses outside the tech sector is lagging behind, plagued by issues including an irritating tendency by chatbots to make stuff up. That means that businesses will have to continue to invest billions to avoid falling behind — but it could be years before the technology delivers an economywide payoff, as companies gradually figure out what works best. Call it the 'the generative AI paradox,' as McKinsey did in its research report. Investments in generative AI by businesses are expected to increase 94 per cent this year to $61.9 billion, according to IDC, a technology research firm. But the percentage of companies abandoning most of their AI pilot projects soared to 42 per cent by the end of 2024, up from 17 per cent the previous year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 technology and business managers by S&P Global, a data and analytics firm. Projects failed not only because of technical hurdles, but often because of 'human factors' like employee and customer resistance or lack of skills, said Alexander Johnston, a senior analyst at S&P Global. Gartner, a research and advisory firm that charts technological 'hype cycles,' predicts that AI is sliding toward a stage it calls 'the trough of disillusionment.' The low point is expected next year, before the technology eventually becomes a proven productivity tool, said John-David Lovelock, the chief forecaster at Gartner. That was the pattern with past technologies like personal computers and the internet — early exuberance, the hard slog of mastering a technology, followed by a transformation of industries and work. The winners so far have been the suppliers of AI technology and advice. They include Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, which offer AI software, while Nvidia is the runaway leader in AI chips. Executives at those companies have bragged how AI is reshaping their own work forces, eliminating the need for some entry-level coding work and making other workers more efficient. AI will eventually replace entire swaths of human employees, many predict, a perspective that is being widely embraced and echoed in the corporate mainstream. At the Aspen Ideas Festival in June, Jim Farley, the chief executive of Ford Motor, said, 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US' Whether that type of revolutionary change occurs, and how soon, depends on the real-world testing ground of many businesses. 'The raw technological horsepower is terrific, but it's not going to determine how quickly AI transforms the economy,' said Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist and co-director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Initiative on the Digital Economy. Still, some businesses are finding ways to incorporate AI — although in most cases the technology is still a long way from replacing workers. One company where AI's promise and flaws are playing out is USAA, which provides insurance and banking services to members of the military and their families. After several pilot projects, some of which it closed down, the company introduced an AI assistant to help its 16,000 customer service workers provide correct answers to specific questions. USAA is tracking its AI investments, but does not yet have a calculation of the financial payoff, if any, for the call center software. But the response from its workers, the company said, has been overwhelmingly positive. While it has software apps for answering customer questions online, its call centers field an average of 200,000 calls a day. 'Those are moments that matter,' said Ramnik Bajaj, the company's chief data analytics and AI officer. 'They want a human voice at the other end of the phone.' That's similar to an AI app developed more than a year ago for fieldworkers at Johnson Controls, a large supplier of building equipment, software and services. The company fed its operating and service manuals for its machines into an AI program that has been trained to generate a problem summary, suggest repairs and deliver it all to the technician's tablet computer. In testing, the app has trimmed 10 to 15 minutes off a repair call of an hour or more — a useful efficiency gain, but hardly a workplace transformation on its own. Fewer than 2,000 of the company's 25,000 field service workers have access to the AI helper, although the company is planning an expansion. 'It's still pretty early days, but the idea is that over time everyone will use it,' said Vijay Sankaran, the chief digital and information officer at Johnson Controls. The long-term vision is that companies will use AI to improve multiple systems, including sales, procurement, manufacturing, customer service and finance, he said. 'That's the game changer,' said Sankaran, who predicts that shift will take at least five years. Two years ago, JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, blocked access to ChatGPT from its computers because of potential security risks. Only a few hundred data scientists and engineers were allowed to experiment with AI Today, about 200,000 of the bank's employees have access to a general-purpose AI assistant — essentially a business chatbot — from their work computers for tasks like retrieving data, answering business questions and writing reports. The assistant, tailored for JPMorgan's use, taps into ChatGPT and other AI tools, while ensuring data security for confidential bank and customer information. Roughly half of the workers use it regularly and report spending up to four hours less a week on basic office tasks, the company said. The bank's wealth advisers are also employing a more specialized AI assistant, which uses bank, market and customer data to provide wealthy clients with investment research and advice. The bank says it retrieves information and helps advisers make investment recommendations nearly twice as fast as they could before, increasing sales. Lori Beer, the global chief information officer at JPMorgan, oversees a worldwide technology staff of 60,000. Has she shut down AI projects? Probably hundreds in total, she said. But many of the shelved prototypes, she said, developed concepts and code that were folded into other, continuing projects. 'We're absolutely shutting things down,' Ms. Beer said. 'We're not afraid to shut things down. We don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's a smart thing.' McAfee, the M.I.T. research scientist, agreed. 'It's not surprising that early AI efforts are falling short,' said McAfee, who is a founder of Workhelix, an AI-consulting firm. 'Innovation is a process of failing fairly regularly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store