
'Integrate immigrants': How Europe can deal with its population challenge
Europe's population is changing
The European Union's population is expected to steadily decline from 2026 due to fewer births and immigration no longer compensating for the fall in the birth rate.
However there will be major differences across the different parts of Europe, according to a paper published by Bruegel, an economic policy think tank in Brussels.
Another key trend in Europe's changing population is that there will be a higher proportion of elderly people in the years to come.
'By 2050, 35 per cent of the EU population is projected to be over 65. This compares to only 21 per cent in 2022, so there is really substantial change coming,' says David Pinkus, Bruegel affiliate fellow and co-author of the research.
'The fastest growing part of the population are those over 85, which brings specific challenges for social policies such as long-term care,' he adds.
Four groups of countries
In their paper, David Pinkus and Nina Ruer analysed the two main factors of population change in Europe, the difference between the number of births and deaths (natural change) and the difference between the number of people moving to European countries and those leaving (immigration and emigration).
They classified EU countries into four groups based on their immigration history. Both Western Europe (including Austria, Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Ireland) and Northern Europe (Denmark, Sweden and Finland) switched from emigration to immigration regions in the 1950s.
Southern Europe (Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Cyprus and Malta), historically an emigration region, started to experience significant immigration in the 1990s, but faced a new wave of departures around the 2008 financial crisis.
Eastern Europe (Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Croatia, Slovenia, Romania and Bulgaria) was closed to migration during the Cold War, and experienced a major emigration wave since joining the EU.
'At the regional level, natural change is going to be negative in all four country groups, and net migration is set to be positive,' Pinkus told The Local.
'However, in the east and the south the total population change will still be negative. This is due in the east to high negative natural population change and to relatively low net migration… while in the south it's because of very high negative natural population change but also quite strong positive net migration,' he added.
The demographic outlook in the east especially is 'concerning', the report says, as 'rapid population decline will most likely cause workforce shortages and economic stagnation' and this will be coupled with 'brain drain and high outward migration of young and skilled individuals'.
Sweden's population growth
On a country level, population is projected to grow by 2050 in Austria, Spain, Sweden, Belgium, Cyprus, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, as well as Iceland and Norway.
Only Sweden, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Cyprus (and outside the EU, Norway and Iceland) are expected to have a natural population growth in the period 2023-2050, while net migration is projected to increase in all countries, except for Latvia, Lithuania and Romania.
France and Germany will be close to net zero population growth. All other countries will face population decline.
Ageing population
The European population is also ageing. The share of people aged 85 and above in the EU will more than double, from the current 3 per cent to 6 per cent by 2050 and nearly 8 per cent by 2070. All EU member states will also experience 'substantial increases' in the percentage of their population aged 65 and above by 2050.
'This is a great achievement but it also brings challenges because a larger share of elderly compared to the workforce means that there will be more people that will need not only pensions but also long-term care services, and a smaller set of people who can potentially provide these services,' Pinkus said.
Smaller labour force
At the same time, 22 out of 27 EU countries will see a decline in their working-age population (20 to 64 years old), the report argues.
The under-20 age group will also decline between 2023 and 2050, except in Sweden, Malta and Luxembourg. This could lead to 'imbalances in the labour market' that could be compensated by people working longer, higher participation of women in the work force and more immigration, the report says.
Regional disparities within countries are also likely to widen as rural areas will be 'more vulnerable to depopulation' due to 'limited economic and employment opportunities and inadequate access to essential services such as education, childcare and healthcare.'
Policy changes
'We have written this paper under the assumption that the goal of maintaining the current labour force is a good one and that population decline would be undesirable' because it will make it difficult to maintain the current structures of European economies and societies, Pinkus said.
This is also the view of most EU governments and the European Commission, the report says. In this regard, the authors recommend that Western and Northern European countries adopt policies to support the integration of immigrants into the labour force and for rural development.
Southern countries should strengthen family-friendly policies and opportunities for young people, as well as improve immigrant integration and regional infrastructure.
Eastern countries should focus on retaining talent, attracting immigrants in sectors with labour shortages and ensuring work-life balance to increase the participation of women and older workers in the labour force.
Pension reforms and attracting more people in the long-term care sector will also be key, Pinkus says.
'The long-term care sector today largely relies on informal care, which means care inside the family very often provided by women. There needs to be more support for informal carers and it will also be important to reduce the reliance on informal care or, as more people need care, women will be particularly disadvantaged'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local Italy
2 days ago
- Local Italy
Italy holds referendum on citizenship and workers' rights
A non-EU adult resident without marriage or blood ties to Italy must currently live in the country for 10 years before they can apply for citizenship -- a process which can then take years. The referendum proposal, triggered by a grassroots campaign led by NGOs, would cut this to five years, putting Italy in line with Germany and France. Campaigners say around 2.5 million people could benefit from the reform, which is being backed by the centre-left Democratic Party. Meloni, whose far-right Brothers of Italy party has prioritised cutting illegal immigration even while increasing the number of legal work visas for migrants, is strongly against it. She said Thursday that the current system "is an excellent law, among the most open, in the sense that we have for years been among the European nations that grant the highest number of citizenships each year". More than 213,500 people acquired Italian citizenship in 2023, double the number in 2020 and one fifth of the European Union total, according to EU statistics. More than 90 percent were from outside the bloc, mostly from Albania and Morocco, as well as Argentina and Brazil -- two countries with large Italian immigrant communities. Ministers agreed in March to restrict the rights to citizenship of those with blood ties to Italy from four to two generations. Meloni and her coalition partners have encouraged voters to boycott the referendum, which will only be valid if 50 percent of eligible voters plus one participate. Even if it passes, the reform will not affect the migration law many consider the most unfair, that children born in Italy to foreign parents cannot request nationality until they reach 18. Prominent rapper Ghali, who was born in Milan to Tunisian parents, has been an outspoken advocate changing the law for children, but nevertheless urged fans to back Sunday's vote as a step in the right direction. "With a 'Yes' we ask that five years of life here are enough, not 10, to be part of this country," he wrote on Instagram. Interests of workers Under Italy's constitution, a referendum can be triggered by a petition signed by at least 500,000 voters. This week's ballot includes one question on citizenship and four others on increasing protections for workers who are dismissed, in precarious situations or involved in workplace accidents. The changes are being pushed by the left-wing CGIL trade union. "We want to reverse a culture that has prioritised the interests of business over those of workers," CGIL general secretary Maurizio Landini told AFP. The Democratic Party is also backing the proposals -- even if it introduced some of the laws the CGIL wants to repeal while in office in the past. The proposals are notably aimed at measures of the so-called Jobs Act, passed a decade ago by the government of the Democratic Party prime minister, Matteo Renzi, in order to liberalise the labour market. Supporters say the act boosted employment but detractors say it made work more precarious. Under new leadership, the Democratic Party -- which is polling at around 23 percent, behind Meloni's Brothers of Italy at about 30 percent, according to an SWG survey this week -- is seeking to woo working-class voters by backing the referendum reform.


Local Italy
4 days ago
- Local Italy
Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe
Airline passengers in the EU enjoy the world's most generous system of compensation if their flight is delayed or cancelled. However these rights seem set to decrease after the European Council agreed to an overhaul of compensation rules, following intense lobbying from the airline industry. The agreement to extend delay times and cut compensation levels was made at a European Council summit, despite opposition from Germany and Spain. Controversially, the Council bypassed discussions with the European Parliament and made its decision legally binding using a process that has not been deployed in more than a decade. However the European Parliament can still make changes to the new rules - it has four months to respond with a proposal that must be backed by a majority of 361 MEPs. So what changes? The ruling doesn't scrap all the customer protections, but it changes the rules on compensation payments - changing both the payment amounts and the delay time after which compensation rules kick in. Under current EU Air Passenger Rights Regulation rules, passengers can claim between €250 and €600 in compensation if a flight is delayed by at least three hours, if the delay is the fault of the airline. Under the agreed changes, compensation will only be due after a four-hour delay for flights of less than 3,500 kilometres. For longer flights, airlines would be obliged to pay compensation if flights land at least six hours late, compared to the current three-hour standard. Under the new rules, €300 compensation will apply for delays of more than four hours – while €500 will be payable for delays of more than six hours involving flights of more than 3,500km. In exchange for the higher delay thresholds, airlines will have to streamline the complex and obfuscatory compensation process - in which many airlines make it very complicated to claim financial compensation but very easy to claim airline vouchers. There is also a strengthening of the rights for passengers with a disability. And what doesn't change? Other compensation rules remain unchanged, especially around the 'extraordinary circumstances' definition which covers whether airlines have to provide any compensation at all. Compensation for delays or cancellations is not paid if the problem is due to 'extraordinary circumstances' – the exact definition of this in the legislation is vague but it generally applies to situations like extreme weather, political instability, security risks or problems with air traffic control. Strikes are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances, neither are routine mechanical problems or staff shortages. The rules cover airlines that are registered in the EU – such as the Ireland-based Ryanair – or flights taking off from an EU or Schengen zone country. Since Brexit the rules no longer apply to the UK, but the British government has mostly "copied and pasted" it into UK legislation. Also unchanged are rules on flight cancellations and airlines responsibility to provide food, accommodation and alternative travel for passengers whose flights are delayed or cancelled. In truth this is not well policed - passengers are often simply told to make their own arrangements for accommodation and alternative travel and submit compensation claims to the airline later. Airlines do, however, routinely provide refreshments, usually in the form of food vouchers to passengers whose flights are delayed. Why the change? In a word - lobbying. Airlines had argued that the compensation payments were too high, especially for budget airlines where the compensation may be higher than the cost of the ticket. Airlines also said that they were unable to provide a replacement aircraft and crew within three hours in many European locations, and that this can lead to additional flights being cancelled because high compensation payments have already been incurred. When does this happen? The change is not immediate, first the European Parliament has four months to stage any objections and if no objection is received, then an introduction date will be set.


Local Italy
4 days ago
- Local Italy
Italy's Meloni 'completely against' easing citizenship rules as key vote nears
'Citizenship laws in Italy are excellent and also very inclusive,' Meloni said as the country prepared for a key vote on reducing the current 10-year residency requirement for naturalisation claims to five years. 'I'm completely against' the proposed citizenship reform, she added, noting that Italy has long been 'among the European countries that grant the highest number of citizenships every year". The Italian premier's words came three days after she said she would go to her polling station but not vote in any of the June 8th-9th referendums, including the citizenship vote, sparking cries of outrage among members of the opposition. Meloni defended her decision to abstain from voting on Thursday, saying that abstention was 'a right for everyone'. "I don't agree with the subjects of the referendums and, as has always been the case in the nation's history, when you don't agree, abstention is also an option," she said. proposed labour and citizenship reforms, publicly called on supporters to boycott the upcoming vote. Under Italy's voting laws, referendums must meet a voter turnout (or quorum) of over 50 percent for their results to be considered valid. If this threshold is not met, the results are automatically void, regardless of the outcome. Senate Speaker Ignazio La Russa said in late May he would "campaign to ensure that people stay home" on polling day to prevent the referendums from reaching the required turnout. MP Grazia Di Maggio also encouraged abstention, saying that 'Italians will have better things to do [than voting] on June 8th and 9th'. The government's attempts to boycott the upcoming referendums have prompted vehement reactions from opposition members. The leader of the centrist +Europa party, Riccardo Magi, condemned the hard-right coalition's 'coordinated strategy' to sabotage the referendums, saying it showed 'a lack of awareness of the institutions and role they hold'. Italy needs 'a democratic rebellion' to fight abstentionism, he added.