Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says
He took command of the police department and deployed the National Guard under laws and Constitutional powers that give the federal government more sway over the nation's capital than other cities. Its historically majority Black population wasn't electing its own city council and mayor until 1973, when Republican President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Act.
The measure still left significant power to the president and Congress, though no president has exercised the police powers before.
He activated the National Guard
The Constitution calls for the creation of the District of Columbia to serve as the federal seat of power under the jurisdiction of Congress rather than any state.
While the Home Rule Act allowed for greater local control, the president can still call up the National Guard in Washington. His administration did it during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, when members were later faulted for flying a helicopter too low over a crowd. The Guard was called out again during Trump's first term on Jan. 6, 2021, when his supporters overran the Capitol.
Trump's second-term moves in Washington come as the legal battle continues over his deployment of the National Guard in another Democratic-led city, Los Angeles, despite the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom.
His authority is less clear there, but an appeals court has so far refused to intervene. A lower-court judge was starting a trial Monday to determine whether the deployment violated another federal law.
He took over the police
Section 740 of the Home Rule Act allows for the president to take over Washington's Metropolitan Police Department for 48 hours, with possible extensions to 30 days, during times of emergencies. No president has done so before, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Washington.
Trump cited a number of recent high-profile incidents, including the killing of a 21-year-old congressional intern and the beating of a DOGE staffer during an attempted carjacking.
'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our Capitol back,' the president said.
The Democratic mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, called the takeover 'unprecedented." She said that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low, after a rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024, and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration.
He didn't specify how long it would last
It wasn't immediately clear how long the takeover might last or exactly what it might mean. It could also face challenges in court.
Congress still has power over things like the budget and laws passed by the city council, but would have to repeal the Home Rule Act to expand federal power in the district.
It's something a few Republican lawmakers have pushed to do, but such an overhaul would almost certainly run into steep resistance from most Democrats, making it difficult to achieve.
The law is specific to D.C., and doesn't affect other communities around the U.S. referred to as having their own 'home rule' powers in relationship to their state governments.
Hopkins said Trump's moves in Washington could foreshadow similar tactics in other cities. 'That should alarm everyone," she said, 'not just in Washington.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Intel CEO has an 'amazing story' days after calling for his resignation
Less than a week after demanding his resignation, President Donald Trump is now calling the career of Intel's CEO an 'amazing story.' Shares of Intel, which slid last week after CEO Lip-Bu Tan came under fire from the U.S. president, bounced higher before the opening bell Tuesday. The attack from Trump came after Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army. Cotton asked Intel if Tan had divested from the companies to eliminate any potential conflict of interest. Trump said on the Truth Social platform Thursday that, 'The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Tan was named Intel CEO in March and it is unclear if he has divested his interests in the chip companies. Tan said in a message to employees that there was misinformation circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems and said that he'd 'always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.' After a Monday meeting with Tan at the White House, Trump backed off his demand that Tan resign without hesitation. 'I met with Mr. Lip-Bu Tan, of Intel, along with Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Shares of Intel rose gained more than 3% in premarket trading. The economic and political rivalry between the U.S. and China are increasingly focused on computer chips, AI and other digital technologies that are expected to shape future economies and military conflicts. Michelle Chapman, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What we know about Sheppey beach 'murder' as three teens arrested over death of man in 40s
Three teens have been arrested after the man, in his 40s, died following an altercation on the Isle of Sheppey on the north Kent coast on Sunday. Three teenagers have been arrested after a man was found dead at a seaside resort in Kent. Kent Police said the man, in his 40s, died after being attacked during an altercation on the Isle of Sheppey on the north Kent coast on Sunday. Three teenagers have been arrested on suspicion of murder and are in custody pending further enquiries, the force said. As investigations continue, police appealed for anyone with any information to contact them. What we know Kent Police said they were called to the Warden Bay Road area of the Leysdown-on-Sea resort on the Isle of Sheppey at around 7pm on Sunday, 10 August following reports of an "altercation" involving a small group of people. A man in his 40s was assaulted, sustaining serious injuries, the force said. Officers attended along with paramedics and an air ambulance was called to the scene, but the man was pronounced dead. His next of kin has been informed, the force said. Three teenagers - a 16-year old girl and two boys, aged 14 and 15 - have since been arrested on suspicion of murder. Detectives are appealing for witnesses and anyone with information that may assist the investigation should call Kent Police on 01622 690690 quoting 10-1384. In the aftermath of the attack, a cordon was set up around the scene and specialist officers were seen, along with a sniffer dog, as they searched for evidence. Locator map What eyewitnesses said According to locals, the area was busy with people enjoying the Sunday sunshine at the time of the attack. One local man, referred to as 'Dean', was credited as "the island hero" for trying to save the man's life. Andrew Owen claims someone ran past Dean before he saw the man lying on the ground after having allegedly been hit in the head with a concrete slab. Another local resident was surprised that her afternoon walk was disrupted, as she thought the helicopter sent last night was the coast guard, which they 'get a lot' at this time of year. What the rules around naming child suspects The identity of defendants and witnesses under the age of 18 who are subject to criminal proceedings in youth courts is protected by automatic reporting restrictions under Section 49 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. If a child is charged with an offence and is facing criminal proceedings in adult courts – magistrates' and crown courts – then magistrates and judges have legal powers to grant anonymity to a child defendant, witness or victim under Section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Both of these laws ban the press from publishing a child defendant's name or any detail which could lead to them being identified while the reporting restrictions remain in place. These automatic restrictions technically begin once court proceedings are active – which is when a suspect has been charged and is appearing in court for the first time. But media organisations typically do not identify any child arrested on suspicion of a crime, having considered their ethical and other legal responsibilities, because there is the prospect this could then lead to prosecution and court proceedings where the reporting restrictions in question will activate. Press regulator IPSO advises editors to 'generally avoid naming children under the age of 18 after arrest for a criminal offence but before they appear in a youth court unless they can show that the individual's name is already in the public domain, or that the individual (or, if they are under 16, a custodial parent or similarly responsible adult) has given their consent', adding: 'This does not restrict the right to name juveniles who appear in a crown court, or whose anonymity is lifted.' If restrictions are imposed, or automatic restrictions apply, child defendants remain anonymous throughout legal proceedings and the rulings can be challenged after the court case has ended. If a child is convicted of a crime, having either pleaded guilty or been found guilty after a trial, magistrates and judges have powers to lift reporting restrictions so the defendant can be identified in some circumstances, including if this is considered in the public interest. Media may try to challenge the anonymity order if identifying the child could help to maintain public confidence in the justice system, or deter others from offending, by allowing full details of the case to be reported. There could be a strong public interest in lifting reporting restrictions when the convicted child had been involved in significant disorder so the public can be satisfied an offender has been brought to justice, or if the case involved serious offences which undermined the public's confidence in the safety of their communities, for example. Click below to see the latest South and South East headlines


American Military News
25 minutes ago
- American Military News
Trump deploys Nat'l Guard in DC, takes federal control of DC police
President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he is deploying the National Guard in Washington, D.C., and placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control to address staggering crime rates in the city. 'This is liberation day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back. We're taking it back. Under the authorities vested in me as the President of the United States, I'm officially invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, you know what that is, and placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control,' Trump said, adding, 'In addition, I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order, and public safety in Washington, DC, and they're going to be allowed to do their job properly.' Last year, Washington, D.C. had the fourth-highest homicide rate in the country at 27.3 per 100,000 residents. The staggering rate was nearly six times higher than New York City and also higher than Atlanta, Chicago, and Compton. 'We're the most beautiful, potentially, capital in the world. we always had. But people come from Iowa, they come from Indiana, they come and then they get mugged. Not going to happen. Keep coming, because within — by the time you get your trip set, it's going to be safe again, and it's going to be clean very quickly,' Trump continued. 'We're going to replace the medians that are falling down all over the roads. We're going to replace the potholes. We're going to put a nice new coat of asphalt over the top. No, we don't have to rip the road out and spend seven years building a new road because they cut everything, because some designers said, well, we need a quarter of an inch more turn for safety reasons.'