
TikTok Ban Extension Likely the Last: McCourt
Live on Bloomberg TV
CC-Transcript
00:00Frank. This is a never ending story, is it not? Well, it just does seem that it's it's taking a long time to get a deal made here. You know, you had the 270 days and then the the 275 day extensions and now another 90 days. So, yeah, it's it's been a while. But, you know, I've learned to be very patient, to hang around the group. A lot of good things get done when that happens. And, you know, my sense is and this is not a you know, this is purely purely my opinion, but I think this is the last extension. I think 90 days, not 75 days, is significant. And I think something gets done within the next 90 days or not. But does it involve you? Have you been on the phone with the vice president? Have you been involved in the negotiations? We are. You know, we were very much involved during the the first extension and less so during the second. Things have been relatively quiet, as a matter of fact. So I don't know if I should draw any inferences there, but it's been it's been fairly quiet overall. Look, I still love our chances, Caroline, because, look, the legislation is very, very clear on what it mandated. Our our bid, as far as I know, is the only bid that actually qualifies that actually meets the criteria in that legislation where we completely disentangle from the Chinese technology. So said Frank, I want to get really detailed on this because on the other side of the table in this bidding process, there is a coalition of different individuals and technology companies whose proposal, as I understand it, is outside what's legislated for. In other words, some element of co-location of data and licensing. The algorithm, which you just explain how your bid is distinct from that. Yeah, well, and I think you've hit the nail on the head in what we are, We're not looking to help co-host the data or to use the Chinese algorithm where we are. You know, Project Liberty is about empowering individuals, not exploiting them. So we're not interested in scraping people's data, surveilling, surveilling them. Right. Spying on them, scraping their data, aggregating it, and then micro profiling people and then using a black box algorithm to manipulate them. That's not what we're interested in. And that's why tech talk is so attractive to us, because we can not only solve the national security issue, but we can move the user base and the data onto this new clean made in America stack, which doesn't rely on Chinese technology, doesn't surveil on people, and as a matter of fact, empowers people to permission the use of their data and get paid for it. This is going to be the new Internet. It's going to happen sooner or later. How many more days can go by where we're going to read about another horror story that is occurring with the current Internet technology, which is highly exploitive and highly predatory. The current model is not sustainable, in my opinion. It's going to change. We believe the sooner it changes, the better. Frank As the extensions keep coming and the process continues, does the price for tick tock go up or down or stay the same? Well, from our perspective, it stays the same because what we what we were buying. Assuming the user base stays the same and there's no change in the numbers as far as the value to others, I can't I really can't comment on that and I'd only be speculating. But, you know, our our our view is we can put a really clear value on tick tock, a us tick tock with the current user base, with the data, with the brand, without the algorithm. Frank, we asked you and we thank you for being so transparent about your conversations with the administration. What about with China? What about with Bytedance? Because we understand much of the elongation of the process is they don't want to let go of the algorithm and they want to keep it intact. Caroline I think that's a really important question you're asking. I don't think any of us know what China's ultimately going to do here, and I think it's a big if in this whole transaction. It's I think one thing we do know is they're not going to let us go with the algorithm or with the IP. So any chance of a deal, in my opinion, would be a deal that disentangled from their technology and, and, you know, deal with disentangled from their technology. I mean, why not make the deal then? Because the the if there's not going to be a deal and the only option you shut down, why not sell the pieces in parts for a lot of money and and achieve their objective, which is no sharing of their technology. So I think that we just don't know if they're even going to let us chip to go without the algorithm. We're betting they will. And that's been our bet from day one. But we'll see. And what about the mood music of the userbase? When this all first came to light under the Biden administration, there was fierce opposition from many of those users. But actually the US public at large actually wanted to get rid of TikTok. But now it feels as though we've moved the other way. Where is general public consensus on whether we want to kick out TikTok or not? You know, I think it shifts and moves. I think right now what's happened is that because, you know, this is the third extension, people are a bit anesthetized and you're not sure what's going to happen. And so are are kind of not as it's it's not as front and center on the minds of the user base as it was when it was threatened to be shut down with with the legislation. By the way, I believe us Tik Tok is going to be sold. The shutdown, the legislation is is very clear and something's going to give here. And I you know, again, I said earlier and I have no, I please, I have no no proof of this, but I, I just have a gut feel. This is the last extension. Something's going to happen during this 90 days. So, Frank. Sorry to interrupt you. So you've also you basically opened the door to a third path, which we we discussed less, which is that the president could indeed decide, you know what I don't want to go with. I've a better and I will shut down us tick tock or tick tock in the US. Just just explain, you know how you you've been transparent contact with the administration has been limited in this period. But but that seems a possibility. Yeah, I think it is a third possibility. And this is again, I've said from the beginning, I think when push comes to shove or or when they see that this, this process has come to a conclusion. Tick tock will be solved without the algorithm. But you're quite right. And it may be shut down on the US side and and or China may just not allow it to be sold. These are all distinct possibilities. So there is there is uncertainty here. But look. Project Liberty is continuing to build the technology on board users and and create this alternative Internet, which we think is a we need now. The bottom line is we have an Internet that's broken, but nobody's not going to use it until there's an alternative. So our goal is to build that alternative and then and then actually migrate users and build and by the way, built new apps in this new world to integrate user base there. So who would not? And if given the choice of an Internet, that's surveillance you've scraped your data and and it basically exploits you versus an Internet where you're positioning the use of your data, you get paid for your data if it's a commercial use case that it's used for and you're in charge of you again, you're at the center. What? Right now we have an Internet where the platforms are at the center. We're all just commodities. We need an Internet where we're at the center, we have agency. Again, we're in charge, and we're respected, quite frankly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
US resumes visas for foreign students but demands access to social media accounts
The Trump administration also singled out Harvard University for additional screening for visas last month, describing it as a pilot program for wider measures. Trump has said Harvard should cap its foreign enrollment at 15 percent. Advertisement In a notice made public Wednesday, the State Department said it had rescinded its May suspension of student visa processing but said new applicants who refuse to set their social media accounts to 'public' and allow them to be reviewed may be rejected. It said a refusal to do so could be a sign they are trying to evade the requirement or hide their online activity. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Students around the world have been waiting anxiously for US consulates to reopen appointments for visa interviews, as the window left to book their travel and make housing arrangements narrows ahead of the start of the school year. On Wednesday afternoon, a 27-year-old Ph.D. student in Toronto was able to secure an appointment for a visa interview next week. The student, a Chinese national, hopes to travel to the US for a research intern position that would start in late July. 'I'm really relieved,' said the student, who spoke on condition of being identified only by his surname, Chen, because he was concerned about being targeted. 'I've been refreshing the website couple of times every day.' Advertisement Students from China, India, Mexico, and the Philippines have posted on social media sites that they have been monitoring visa booking websites and closely watching press briefings of the State Department to get any indication of when appointment bookings might resume. 'Under new guidance, consular officers will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting of all student and exchange visitor applicants,' the department said in a statement. 'To facilitate this vetting' applicants 'will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to 'public,'' it said. 'The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country.' In internal guidance sent to consular officers, the department said they should be looking for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' International students in the US have been facing increased scrutiny on several fronts. In the spring, the Trump administration revoked permission to study in the US for thousands of students, including some involved only in traffic offenses, before abruptly reversing course. The government also expanded the grounds on which foreign students can have their legal status terminated. As justification for the expanded vetting, the cable cited two recent executive orders from President Trump, one focused on preventing hostile foreign actors from entering the country and one intended to combat antisemitism. Advertisement The cable also said it is important to protect American institutions of higher education from those who would 'steal technical information, exploit US research and development, and spread false information for political or other reasons.' The Trump administration also has called for 36 countries to commit to improving vetting of travelers or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department says the countries have 60 days to address US concerns or risk being added to a travel ban that now includes 12 nations.


Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Vance defends Gabbard as 'critical part' of Trump team after president dismissed Iran nuke threat comments
Print Close By Diana Stancy Published June 18, 2025 Vice President JD Vance insists Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is still an essential team member in Trump's "coalition" after President Donald Trump said he "didn't care" what she'd previously told lawmakers about Iran's nuclear threat. "DNI Gabbard is a veteran, a patriot, a loyal supporter of President Trump and a critical part of the coalition he built in 2024," Vance said in a statement Wednesday to Fox News Digital. "She is an essential member of our team, and we're grateful for her tireless work to keep America safe from foreign threats." TRUMP BLOWS OFF GABBARD DOWNPLAYING IRAN NUKE THREAT, BUT WH STILL SAYS PRESIDENT AND INTEL CHIEF ARE IN SYNC Vance and Gabbard have both historically been outspoken leaders of the non-interventionist camp making up the Trump administration. Both historically have backed a foreign policy doctrine that supports minimal interference with other nations' affairs. By comparison, other, more hawkish members of Trump's Cabinet, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have historically backed military intervention in foreign conflicts. Vance has publicly supported Trump as the administration contemplates next steps to address Iran, though. Vance said Tuesday that while those worried about foreign intervention are right to be concerned, Trump has "earned some trust on this issue." "And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals," Vance said in a Truth Social post Tuesday. "Whatever he does, that is his focus." Vance's statement of support for Gabbard comes after Trump appeared to discount Gabbard's March Senate Intelligence Committee statements, when she said she believed Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. Gabbard told lawmakers in March the intelligence community assessed that Iran was "not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003," she said. ISRAEL-IRAN CONFLICT: LIVE UPDATES She did add that "Iran's enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons." "Iran will likely continue efforts to counter Israel and press for U.S. military withdrawal from the region by aiding, arming and helping to reconstitute its loose consortium of like-minded terrorist actors, which it refers to as its axis of resistance," she said during the March hearing. Additionally, Gabbard released a video June 10 in which she stated the world was "on the brink of nuclear annihilation." Politico reported that Trump told associates at the White House that Gabbard was out of line and believed the video was an attempt to prevent him from endorsing Israel attacking Iran. Alexa Henning, Gabbard's deputy chief of staff, said in a post on X Tuesday that Politico's story was "total clickbait." HOW CLOSE WAS IRAN TO A NUCLEAR WEAPON BEFORE ISRAEL'S STRIKE ON TEHRAN? Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One Monday he believed Iran was "very close" to obtaining a nuclear weapon. When asked specifically about Gabbard's March testimony, Trump stood firm in his assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities. "I don't care what she said," Trump said. "I think they were very close to having one." Still, an official with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said in a statement to Fox News Digital Wednesday that Gabbard and the president are aligned on Iran. "Just because Iran is not building a nuclear weapon right now doesn't mean they aren't 'very close' as President Trump said on Air Force One," the official said. "POTUS and DNI Gabbard's statements are congruent." Gabbard wasn't invited to Camp David in Maryland to convene with other military officials and Cabinet members in June. However, she was in the White House's Situation Room Tuesday as Trump kept an eye on updates in the Middle East. A White House official told Fox News Digital Tuesday that Trump and Gabbard's views and statements on the matter are consistent with one another, noting that Gabbard said in March that she believed Iran had the capability to build a nuclear weapon. VANCE DEFENDS TRUMP'S IRAN POSITION AMID 'CRAZY STUFF ON SOCIAL MEDIA' Trump told reporters Wednesday at the White House he hadn't decided yet whether he would engage the U.S. in strikes targeting Iran but said that the coming days or the "next week is going to be very big." "Yes, I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate," Trump told reporters Wednesday. "And I said, 'Why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction? Why didn't you go?' I said to people, 'Why didn't you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You could have done fine. You would have had a country.' It's very sad to watch this." Fox News' Emma Colton contributed to this report. Print Close URL
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
$88 Million Worth of Jewelry Was Sold at Christie's This Week. How Does That Happen?
There was history on offer—a stone with ties to Marie Antoinette's daughter, a carved emerald connected to Mughal emperors and English queens—and iconic examples of signed jewels—Van Cleef Mystery Set brooches, Cartier Art Deco, JAR—so the market was certainly optimistic about the Magnificent Jewels auction at Christie's New York on June 17. But then the results started coming in: $14 million for the Marie-Thérèse pink diamond; $11.3 million for the Blue Belle sapphire (above), the carved emerald necklace for $6.2 million, the ruby and diamond Van Cleef Mystery Set brooch for $1.5 million, almost three times more than its high estimate. 'This sale is bananas!' in the words of one jewelry world insider present. By the end, one hundred percent of the lots had been sold, and a record for highest total ever for a various owner jewelry auction at Christie's America, had been achieved. How, amid economic and historical uncertainly, does something like this happen? Rahul Kadakia, Christies International Head of Jewelry, points to several factors. 'The results from our New York Magnificent Jewels auction were a true testament to the perfect sale—featuring the ideal curation for resounding success: legendary stones, storied treasures, celebrated provenance, and exceptional rarity and quality. The outcome speaks volumes about the appetite of collectors to acquire extraordinary jewels,' he says. 'From magnificent Mughal masterpieces to regal gems and exceptional private collections, the sale roared to life and maintained its momentum for four electrifying hours. The energy in the room was palpable from the very first lot, with spirited bidding from clients in the saleroom, on the phones, and online. A remarkable 80% of lots sold above their high estimates—a clear reflection of the excitement. It was the good old-fashioned live auction room at its finest.' There had been talk even before the sale of jewelry's legendary resilience. There was the Bain & Co 2024 report found jewelry 'the most resilient core luxury category in 2024,' up 2 percent and $32.2 billion in sales, while other segments of the industry were down. Then, of course, there are the stories of jewels hidden during times of crisis or smuggled out of chaos sewn into slips and hidden in hairdos. The jewels at the sale, many with histories that spanned centuries and with tales of survival through conflict and conquest, certainly fit this narrative. As one visitor to the preview noted: 'If these jewels can make it through it all, maybe so can we.' You Might Also Like 12 Weekend Getaway Spas For Every Type of Occasion 13 Beauty Tools to Up Your At-Home Facial Game Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data