Will forcing MPs to use public healthcare make it better?
Another day, and yet another suggestion from ActionSA that public officials should be forced to use public services, as if that will somehow make those services better.
If it's not public officials being forced to use public transport, it's that they must send their kids to public schools.
The latest from the Herman Mashaba camp is that public servants should use public healthcare services.
One can nearly hear the internal laughter of Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi at the idea (one that he has publicly supported). Presumably, he has no problem supporting it, given that he's doubling down on the National Health Insurance (NHI). It would be pretty silly to advocate for the eventual blending of private and public healthcare, but demand that his ilk continue to be allowed to use private healthcare.
Perhaps that was the strategy of ActionSA all along: getting Motsoaledi to admit a personal lust toward private healthcare. If that was the reason, it's gone down as well as a quirky Helen Zille tweet.
ALSO READ: Bara hospital: The good, bad and ugly
However, the actual idea of forcing public officials to use public services to create some sort of political investment incentive is not just stupid, it's divorced from any South African context. Maybe that would work in a country where there's some sort of honour, even if it's among thieves, but this is South Africa. This is the country where we dare not even introduce self-service checkouts at grocers because we know how disastrous that would be.
So not only do we have to embrace the imposed moniker of 'Plastique?' but we also have to accept that for the right people, the public purse will get them anything from a fire pool to a trip to the Cannes Film Festival.
How is it that despite the Department of Health never having any money, there are still so many awesome doctors in public hospitals? There may be no medicine for the plebeians, but the lights are still on, and if somebody important or a friend of a friend gets rushed in, throwing somebody out of the ICU to make way for them wouldn't be an issue.
The problem has never been that we don't have the facilities to deal with sick people. The problem has always been that we don't have enough facilities to deal with all the sick people who are not politically important.
ALSO READ: 'I could die before surgery': Cancer patient lost in Gauteng hospitals backlog
I don't think Motsoaledi cares which hospital he ends up in. He could be in a rural clinic in Limpopo, but if they had to fly in the best medical team and equipment, best believe they'll do it. Whether they'd do that for Sam Nje is less likely.
You're dealing with a class of people who can walk into any school and bump their kids straight into the classroom on the day school starts, while the rest of us have to apply in utero just to get on the waiting list. This is why forcing them to use public services is hardly going to make the public services any better.
Remember that strange aunty in your family? The one whose house had a great lounge that nobody was allowed in because it had to be preserved in case the Queen, Nelson Mandela and the Pope decided to come visit — simultaneously.
That's all you'll create when you force public servants to use public services: the white elephant room that will remain vacant in case the deputy minister of transport gets hit by a taxi nearby.
It's a sad state of affairs that one feels the need to incentivise public servants to serve the public. It's an even sadder state of affairs when trying to create those incentives is a losing battle. Maybe the answer should be to appoint public servants who are enthusiastic about public service in the first place. I wonder if they thought about that.
NOW READ: Tshwane mayor faces outrage for Weskoppies Hospital power cut
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Trump tariffs threaten thousands of Eastern Cape manufacturing jobs — but mitigating action can be taken
The announcement by US President Donald Trump that South African goods will be subject to 30% import tariffs from 1 August is the latest addition to the clamour of alarm bells about the viability of manufacturing in the Eastern Cape, potentially putting thousands of jobs on the line. The reality is that a number of countries will now have significant cost advantages over South Africa, including countries on this continent, while other countries have the flexibility to absorb the tariffs. In addition, this will strengthen countries with lower tariffs that we did not compete with in the past. And if imports from South Africa are replaced with products made by new US manufacturers, there will be an oversupply of these products in the global marketplace. Analysis by the Nelson Mandela Bay (NMB) Business Chamber indicates that thousands of direct and indirect jobs in manufacturing in the Eastern Cape are at risk from the impacts of the new US tariffs. This is in terms of reduced competitiveness and economies of scale of SA manufacturing against more favourable locations worldwide, as well as the knock-on effects on other trading relationships and the responses of other countries in an escalating global tariff war. Such job losses will have a vast socioeconomic impact, given that each employed breadwinner supports an estimated 10 other people in extended families and communities. Alarm bells over the loss of manufacturing capacity and employment in NMB have been ringing for some time, as evidenced by the downsizing of operations and outright plant closures. This has been particularly evident in the tyre industry, where over the past few years we have seen Bridgestone and ContiTech closing factories, while Goodyear is restructuring its operations, which may result in the closure of its plant in Kariega. Over recent years, we have also seen the restructuring and, in some instances, the closures of catalytic converter and seat manufacturing companies. Automotive sector faces crisis On the vehicle manufacturing side, General Motors left South Africa at the end of 2016, resulting in the Chevrolet brand leaving the market and job losses at the company, suppliers and dealers. Alongside this, vital community support initiatives in the education and housing areas disappeared. Mercedes-Benz, which exports vehicles to the US, has suspended production at its operations for six weeks until the end of this month. This follows a restructuring last year that saw the plant shed 700 jobs. The NMB Business Chamber's Enabling Environment Barometer indicates that more direct and indirect jobs are at risk, while several manufacturers have imposed hiring freezes. Deindustrialisation is not in itself the issue. The shift from heavy industry and manufacturing to the services sector and high-tech, innovation-oriented businesses is a natural progression in advanced, maturing economies, especially where services are exported, which is not necessarily the case in South Africa. The country is in line with global trends in developed economies of a declining contribution of manufacturing to GDP and employment. However, in our developing economy with rising unacceptably high levels of unemployment (the Eastern Cape has the second-highest unemployment rate in SA, which recently rose by 2.7 percentage points to 39.3%), this is not a sign of positive economic progress; it is a trend that urgently needs to be reversed. Deindustrialisation in South Africa stems from a weakening economy characterised by increasing costs of production and doing business, inefficiencies in logistics and infrastructure, and a lack of basic service delivery. The enabling policy environment is also lagging in incentives to support local manufacturing in general, and particularly the shift to new energy vehicle technologies and e-mobility solutions, all of which are exacerbated by the US tariffs and their knock-on effects. Multinationals can move production between facilities around the globe, which gives them the most competitive base from which to operate. This becomes a barometer — the greater the number of multinationals closing or downsizing, the bigger the systemic problems in a region. Why Nelson Mandela Bay and the Eastern Cape can't afford to fail The economy of Nelson Mandela Bay and the Eastern Cape is in a vulnerable position, as the region remains centred on manufacturing, with the automotive sector the foundation of deep value chains and a surrounding ecosystem of component manufacturing, logistics providers and suppliers of indirect goods and services. The strength of the automotive sector and its investment in innovation and technology, and the skills associated with it, bring immense value to the area. Alongside this, manufacturing in other sectors, such as beverages, pharmaceuticals and agro-processing, has emerged in NMB. Given the economic knock-on impact of manufacturing, the sector's contribution to the Nelson Mandela Bay economy is probably far greater than its direct contribution of 25%. Similarly, the approximately 64,000 jobs in the metro directly linked to the automotive sector, representing more than 40% of auto manufacturing employment in South Africa, have an estimated multiplier effect of four additional jobs in direct supply chains and sectors such as retail, tourism and property. The SA automotive industry is highly export-oriented, with almost two-thirds of local vehicle production destined for export markets and more than 50% of that emanating from Eastern Cape manufacturers. South African manufacturers need to retain these levels of exports to maintain the economies of scale that enable competitiveness, which in turn supports local vehicle manufacturing and employment. However, manufacturers that do completely knocked down (CKD) vehicle manufacturing, where the entire vehicle is assembled from imported or locally made parts, are losing ground to the rapid rise of cheap fully assembled vehicles and the semi-knocked-down (SKD) assembly of vehicles that are imported partly assembled. Sales of locally built vehicles have declined from 46% of domestic vehicle sales in 2018 to 37% last year, and five of the 10 top-selling passenger cars in the local market are now from brands that do not do CKD assembly in South Africa. Due to its deep value chains and interconnectedness with component manufacturers, and the surrounding network of local suppliers of goods and services, as well as the ripple effect into other sectors, CKD manufacturing supports far greater levels of investment, employment and localisation of manufacturing than does SKD assembly. Policy reform While addressing the issues of ineffective service delivery, crumbling infrastructure, logistics bottlenecks and safety and security are critical to ensuring an enabling environment for business, the other key to reversing deindustrialisation lies in reforming the policy landscape. Attempting to protect local manufacturing through retaliatory tariffs is not the solution, as this is likely to result in further rounds of counter-tariffs and impacts on South Africa's trade relationships with the US and other countries — an unproductive approach with few likely positive outcomes. Rather than using tariffs to eliminate external competition, South Africa needs to be looking at how to support and strengthen local manufacturing through incentives that encourage investment in CKD over SKD manufacturing, localisation of components, and give local operations a competitive advantage over other locations within a multinational brand. Moreover, we need to reduce complexity and make it as easy as possible to retain and attract investment to our country. Incentives should be structured to attract and encourage new investment without imposing massive bureaucratic challenges. Alongside efforts to improve SA's trade offer to the US, we need to explore and strengthen other trading partnerships, particularly with BRICS countries, the European Union and Southeast Asia, to diversify our markets. We should be driving towards finalising the rules of origin for vehicles to activate the potential under the African Continental Free Trade Area agreement. Exports to BRICS markets currently generally comprise unbeneficiated raw materials and agricultural products. SA's exports to the European Union and the US represent greater diversity and integration, and more opportunities for job creation that are backed and supported by trade agreements. SA needs to be a source of high-margin value-added products and beneficiated minerals, not a source of low-margin minerals. We must do everything possible to retain and strengthen our manufacturing capabilities so that we can create and unlock downstream employment opportunities. Manufacturing is the bedrock of the Nelson Mandela Bay and Eastern Cape economy. The economic future of this region depends on strategic action to ensure that we offer a competitive value proposition for manufacturing, in terms of the basic enabling environment and forward-thinking policy. Our business community wants this to happen and is not simply whining about the issues; rather, we will continue to roll up our sleeves to take action and be part of the solution to retain investment and employment in NMB. The chamber remains positive that we can realise the potential of the Bay of Opportunity as a diversified manufacturing and export hub for Africa, if we start now. This requires a multi-stakeholder response centred on speed and taking action. DM
The South African
6 hours ago
- The South African
Why launch an inquiry instead of action? Presidency responds
President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to launch a judicial commission of inquiry rather than act immediately on explosive claims of criminal infiltration in the South African Police Service (SAPS) has sparked public debate. Many are asking: Why not take decisive action now? Speaking to ENCA , presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said, 'We are a country underpinned by the rule of law. I cannot make an allegation against you and expect you to be held accountable without due process.' Ramaphosa announced the inquiry on Sunday evening at the Union Buildings in Tshwane, tasking Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga with leading the process. The commission will investigate claims of deep criminal infiltration in SAPS, intelligence, and related justice institutions, including involvement by police officials, politicians, and alleged links to a Gauteng drug cartel. The inquiry follows damning public claims by KZN SAPS commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who said a drug syndicate had compromised key law enforcement figures. Mkhwanazi accused Mchunu of attempting to halt investigations, saying the minister ordered the disbanding of the political killings task team and the withdrawal of over 100 dockets. Despite these serious accusations, the presidency insists that accountability must be driven by evidence, not outrage. 'These allegations are grave,' Magwenya said, 'and therefore require a competent mechanism to investigate and recommend decisive action.' Ramaphosa appointed law professor and former Gauteng MEC for Community Safety, Firoz Cachalia, to be the acting police commissioner while Mchunu is away. 'The president wanted to bring someone from outside Parliament with the right experience,' Magwenya explained. 'Cachalia chairs the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council and is well-versed in both law and security matters.' The president expects interim findings from the commission within three to six months, with a final report going to Parliament and the Chief Justice. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
TimesLIVE
7 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'South Africans tired of commissions of inquiry': parties on Ramaphosa's response to Mkhwanazi allegations
Political parties have cautiously welcomed President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to establish a commission of inquiry to look into explosive allegations by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, saying previous inquiries yielded little results. Addressing the nation on Sunday evening, Ramaphosa announced he was placing minister of police Senzo Mchunu on special leave, and said and that Prof Firoz Cachalia would act as police minister. Ramaphosa also announced he has established a judicial commission of inquiry chaired by acting deputy chief justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to investigate allegations relating to the infiltration of law enforcement, intelligence and associated institutions within the criminal justice system by criminal syndicates. This comes after explosive allegations levelled against Mchunu by Mkhwanazi last Sunday. Mkhwanazi accused Mchunu of interfering with police investigations and of overstepping his role when he ordered the disbandment of the political killings task team. ActionSA said it sees no logic in yet another commission of inquiry carrying out work that law enforcement and agencies like Ipid should be doing, especially while the R1bn Zondo commission report into state capture gathers dust as those who committed treason continue to evade justice. DA leader John Steenhuisen welcomed the new appointment made by Ramaphosa, but also expressed concern over the decision to establish a commission of inquiry. In an interview with Newzroom Afrika, Steenhuisen said many South Africans are sceptical about commissions of inquiry after the Zondo inquiry produced no convictions, even after people were named. He added that the public's trust might deteriorate if there is another inquiry that yields no consequences. GOOD party secretary-general Brett Herron said the appointment of a commission, while well-intentioned, is too slow, too cumbersome and too costly. 'We have walked this road before, most notably with the Zondo commission, and we have seen that a commission of inquiry cannot replace a criminal investigation. The Zondo commission produced volumes of prima facie evidence, which the investigating authorities were then required to investigate before any decision to prosecute could be made,' he said. Herron said allegations made by Mkhwanazi demand an urgent and credible criminal investigation, not another year-long process the outcomes of which might never be acted on. RISE Mzansi welcomed the establishment of a commission of inquiry. The party feels that a judicial commission of inquiry is important because the SAPS and the minister cannot investigate themselves. 'The establishment of this inquiry insulates the process from political contamination,' said Makashule Gana, RISE Mzansi National Assembly caucus whip and member of the portfolio committee on police. Meanwhile Mchunu has welcomed Ramaphosa's decision to place him on special leave, saying he fully supports the process. 'I welcome and respect the president's decision and pledge my commitment to the process. Honour and integrity are the virtues I personally subscribe to and which we all need to make efforts to uphold. I stand ready to respond to the accusations against me and account to the citizens of the republic, fully and honestly so,' Mchunu said in a statement.
