Small fish and chips? Cod have shrunk by almost 50% over the last 30 years, study warns
But it's bad news for those who've got their heart set on a large portion.
While cod used to be giants – over a metre in length and weighing up to 40kg – today a fully-grown cod can fit neatly on a dinner plate.
In fact, the body length of the tasty fish has decreased by 48 per cent – nearly half – since 1996, experts have warned.
The shrinking population, in terms of both number and in size, is the result of human influence, they found.
In their new study, scientists have demonstrated for the first time that decades of intense fishing, combined with environmental change, have profoundly affected the genetic make-up of a fully marine species.
Their analysis involved 152 cod caught in the Bornholm Basin in the Baltic Sea, between 1996 and 2019.
They worked out how the size of cod has changed over the years, and found it had decreased significantly.
Analysis showed that while the largest fish caught in 1996 measured 115cm long, the largest in 2019 measured just 54cm long.
They also found that the length at which 50 per cent of the population reached maturity has declined from 40cm to 20cm.
Cod that grow slowly but reach reproductive maturity at a smaller size have had a survival advantage under high fishing pressure, the researchers explained.
'When the largest individuals are consistently removed from the population over many years, smaller, faster-maturing fish gain an evolutionary advantage,' Professor Thorsten Reusch, from the Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, said.
'What we are observing is evolution in action, driven by human activity. This is scientifically fascinating, but ecologically deeply concerning.'
The researchers also identified genetic changes that confirm the 'shrinking' of cod has a genetic basis and that human activities have left a measurable mark on their DNA.
'Selective overexploitation has altered the genome of Eastern Baltic cod,' Dr Kwi Young Han, first author of the study, said.
'We see this in the significant decline in average size, which we could link to reduced growth rates.
'For the first time in a fully marine species, we have provided evidence of evolutionary changes in the genomes of a fish population subjected to intense exploitation, which has pushed the population to the brink of collapse.'
The team warned that the evolutionary consequences of this could be severe.
It could mean that the fish are less able to adapt under future environmental changes, they explained.
'Evolutionary change unfolds over many generations,' Professor Reusch said.
'Recovery takes far longer than decline, and it may not even be possible.'
There has been a ban on targeted cod fishing in certain parts of the Baltic Sea since 2019, but 'there's no sign of a rebound in body size', the researchers said.
While the UK gets most of its cod from the Barents Sea and the waters around Iceland, overfishing in these areas could potentially lead to similar effects.
Writing in the journal Science Advances the team said their findings 'underscore implications for conservation policy'.
Experts have previously urged Brits to ditch white, flaky fish like cod in favour of more local varieties such as herring and mackerel.
Dr Anna Sturrock, from the University of Essex, said we should opt for species more common to our own waters instead of importing the likes of cod and haddock from other countries.
Separately, a report from the WWF has called for 'urgent' efforts to strengthen regulation of the seafood sector amid concerns our love for seafood is killing off dozens of species that rely on it for food.
The report, titled 'Risky Seafood Business', quantified the total volume of seafood eaten by Britons for the first time.
It claimed that in 2019, 887,000 tonnes of seafood was eaten by people in the UK – the equivalent of 5.2 billion portions of fish and chips.
Whitefish, including fish and chip favourites haddock and cod, accounted for almost a third of the fish consumed (29 per cent).
The vast majority (81 per cent) of this seafood was fished or farmed outside of UK waters, according to WWF.
The likes of whales, dolphins, seabirds and sharks have been directly impacted by fisheries supplying UK markets, the report warned, as one of their main food sources is being depleted.
Top tips to help you choose the most sustainable seafood
Use these five MAGIC tips to help you choose the most sustainable seafood:
Mix it up
80% of the seafood we eat in the UK is made up of five species: cod, haddock, salmon, tuna and prawns.
This puts a lot of pressure on a handful of species - but dozens of different species are caught and farmed in and around the UK. Why not mix it up and try something new?
Avoid red rated
Red-rated seafood has significant environmental concerns and should be avoided.
The species could be endangered; there could be very damaging methods of fishing or farming; or there could be illegal activity involved in catching or farming it.
Good Fish Guide
Choosing sustainable seafood can be confusing - that's why we developed the Good Fish Guide.
We do the hard work for you, making it easier to make the right choice.
Save our app to your home screen and discover the best sustainable swaps while you're eating out or shopping.
Impact
Look for low-impact fishing and farming methods to prevent significant harm to marine species and habitats.
More environmentally-friendly methods include pots, hand-diving, or pole and line fishing.
Check for ecolabels
Certified seafood usually has to meet stricter requirements for minimising environmental impact and tracking exactly where it has come from and how it was caught or farmed.
The Marine Stewardship Council 'blue tick' is probably the most well-known, which covers wild seafood. The Aquaculture Stewardship Council certifies the sustainability of farmed seafood.
Other eco-labels to look out for include GlobalG.A.P., Global Aquaculture Association Best Aquaculture Practices, Organic, and Soil Association.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Millions of people threatened by wildfires near their homes, research finds
Why you can trust Sky News The number of people whose lives or property are at risk from wildfires has surged by almost 40% in just two decades, according to new research. Analysis by an international team of scientists showed that 440 million people were threatened by fire encroaching on their homes between 2002 and 2021. And while the area affected decreased over the study period, the number of people affected each year rose by 7.7 million. Dr Matthew Jones, from the University of East Anglia, told Sky News that a combination of climate change and population movements is driving the increase. "We're seeing hotter, drier conditions, and that's leading to more fire-prone weather," he said. "We're also seeing people migrating more and more into areas that are historically fire-prone. In the western US, we see this idyllic, romantic image of living closer to nature. "And that's a trend which is putting people closer to fire-prone landscapes than in the past." The researchers analysed 18.6 million records of wildfires over 20 years. High-profile disasters in the US, Europe and Australia grab public attention, but they only account for 2.5% of the global burned area, according to results published in the journal Science. The vast majority of affected land - 85% - is in Africa. But that is falling as more savannah scrub and grassland is taken over by agriculture - a change so significant that it shows up in global totals, with a 26% fall in land burned over the study period. "The apparent increase in damaging and destructive wildfire impacts on society has until now seemed perplexing because the area burned by fires globally has been falling," said Dr Jones. He added: "By closely analysing the shifting geography of both fire and population, this study brings vital clarity - our work shows that wildfires really are becoming more frequent and intense in populated areas. "These changes bring danger to life, damage to property, and threat to livelihood." The researchers say the increasing vulnerability of human populations to wildfire underlines the urgent need for proactive measures to protect communities. That could include deliberately starting small, controlled fires to burn off vegetation, so it doesn't build up.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Gruesome pit of tortured warriors is uncovered in France after being laid undiscovered for 6,000 years
A gruesome pit of Stone Age human skeletons has been uncovered after being hidden for more than 6,000 years. Dozens of warriors came to their brutal end after being captured in northeastern France, where warfare was widespread across the region. However, rather than kill their enemies, 'victory' celebrations were held where researchers say invaders were tortured and mutilated. Dating back to between 4300 and 4150 B.C, a total of 82 human skeletons were unearthed in the pits, with some having their left arms severed or hands completely dismembered. Writing in the Science Advances journal, experts said: 'The severed upper limbs would represent war trophies removed at the battle site following the violent encounter and then taken back to the settlement for perhaps further transformation and display.' Dr Teresa Fernandez-Crespo, who worked on the findings, told Live Science that the warriors had their lower limbs fractured to stop them from fleeing. She said: 'We believe they were brutalised in the context of rituals of triumph or celebrations of victory that followed one or several battles.' Researchers also found they had suffered 'blunt force traumas' as well as signs of piercing holes through their bones, which could point to the invaders being put up on display as a warning for others. Food evidence found on their teeth suggests the tortured warriors may have come from Paris. However, chemical signatures from their remains indicate the group may have also moved around different regions. While some remains showed no signs of being mutilated, which could be the skeletons of warriors who did not survive when attempting to defend the area. Another theory put forward by scientists is that skeletons could be the result of 'collective punishments or sacrifices of social outcasts'.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Stonehenge cow tooth helps scientists understand mystery of monument
It's one of the world's greatest monuments and greatest mysteries; how and why did the famous stones of Stonehenge end up in south-west England? However, scientists say an unlikely object might help them moo-ve an udder step closer to solving the taken a closer look at a cow's tooth, which was previously found close to Stonehenge's south now believe the cow originated from Wales and could have played an important role in transporting the stones across the UK. What did experts find at Stonehenge? More than one hundred years ago, in 1924, archaeologists discovered an ancient cow's jawbone that had been carefully placed next to Stonehenge's south dated the find to the monument's very beginning, around 3000BC - however the strange discovery has puzzled historians ever since. A team of researchers from the British Geological Survey, Cardiff University and University College London decided to take a closer look at one of the teeth from the ancient wanted to understand why it had been placed there and why was the cow considered special?Scientists carried out tests on the tooth to find out what it was made of, which offered clues about the cow's diet, environment and discovered data which suggests that the cow originated from Wales, before moving to say this is the first time that they have seen evidence linking cattle from Stonehenge to Wales - and it supports the theory that the animals were used in the transportation of the enormous rocks across the country. What is Stonehenge? Stonehenge is one of the world's most famous stands on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, in south-west England, and its giant stones can be seen from miles took many hundreds of years to build, and work is believed to have began around 3000 BC, in the late Neolithic the next thousand years, people changed parts of the monument. The last changes were made in the early Bronze Age, around 1500 may never know exactly why Stonehenge was built, but it's widely believed that people gathered there for religious ceremonies.
