Studying bullfighting, will see what can be done to legalise it: Goa CM Pramod Sawant
MLAs across party lines on Thursday pressed for the legalisation of bullfighting. The MLAs cited Tamil Nadu govt's decision to allow
Jallikattu
(a traditional bull-taming sport) to persuade Goa govt to make bullfighting legal.
Chief minister Pramod Sawant said, 'Jallikattu is not a fight between two bulls. But I understand the sentiments of MLAs.' He said, 'The high court is monitoring bullfighting. We will study, and thereafter we can see what can be done.'
Mandrem's MGP MLA Jit Arolkar said that bullfighting has taken place from the Harappan era and is considered a tradition in the coastal belt of Goa. He has moved a private member's bill seeking legislation to allow bullfighting only on special days like feasts, jatras, birthdays, or village festivals.
'People give bulls more care than they offer to their own children,' Arolkar said.
'Humans have pedicures done. Similarly, bull owners give pedicures to their animals.'
Arolkar related an anecdote to underscore the value people attach to their bulls. A woman from her constituency had contacted him to help her son find a job, he said. But in the end, he said, 'She told me to forget about her son and take care of her bull, which is idle at home and has not been in a bullfight for two years.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
This is the reality.'
Independent Cortalim MLA Antonio Vas said, 'When I had one bull, I was known as the Cortalim fighter. After the high court banned bullfighting, I stopped keeping bulls.' He added, 'We have to come together to legalise bullfighting in the state.'
Leader of the opposition Yuri Alemao said, 'Looking at the CM's reply, he is firm about not legalising bullfighting.'
Alemao said, 'The CM should tell us whether there will be a discussion on the bullfighting bill.
A former BJP CM had said that they wanted to legalise bullfighting.'
Benaulim's AAP MLA Venzy Viegas said that the traditional sport must be preserved. St Andre's RGP MLA Viresh Borkar said the assembly should provide bullfighting with the status of a sport, and a stadium should be constructed to host the fights.
Fatorda's GFP MLA Vijai Sardesai said govt should form an expert committee to safeguard human life and amend the relevant state act. Sardesai said that govt has to take the 'double-engine approval' and present a strong case in court. 'The
Goa assembly
has the full right to pass an amendment,' Sardesai said.
Siolim's BJP MLA Delilah Lobo said precautions should be taken to avoid the loss of human life during bullfights.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion
The government and the Opposition crossed swords in Parliament during a discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. There was unanimity in praising India's armed forces, but there was little common ground beyond that. Operation Sindoor was India's military response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, on April 22, 2025, which claimed 26 lives. The elimination of three terrorists behind the attack, just before the parliamentary debate, helped the government's case. It told Parliament that these terrorists were Lashkar-e-Taiba members from Pakistan. The Narendra Modi government's strident approach seeks to change the behaviour of Pakistan and reassure its domestic audience. The success of this approach is debatable and the Opposition sought to put the government on the spot on both counts. A demonstrated willingness to use force against Pakistan in the event of a terrorism incident is a definitive turn in India's strategy, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) takes pride in that. But there is no evidence yet that it is working though there has been chest thumping around it by the ruling party. The discussion in Parliament barely addressed the implications of this approach, which is being touted as the new normal. The Opposition and the government agreed on the need to punish Pakistan, and also disagreed on who would do it better. The government claimed success in meeting its objectives of launching a military operation and denied that it had acted under pressure in ending the war. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi demanded a pointed response to repeated claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that he mediated the ceasefire but the Prime Minister evaded a direct response on it. The government contradicts itself when it says that the operation was a success, and that it is continuing. It is also exasperating to hear a party that is now in its eleventh year of uninterrupted power, blame people who passed away decades ago for any challenge that India faces now. There was little self-reflection regarding the lapses that led to the terrorism incident, and whether and how the government plans to address them. The government had sent joint teams including several MPs from the Opposition abroad to garner support for India in the aftermath of the operation, but that sign of statesmanship was a short-lived aberration, as it turns out. The world is changing rapidly and India's capacity to navigate those changes will be largely determined by its own character. Questioning the patriotism of political opponents is an easy route to take to evade tough questions, but the BJP must realise that such an approach has diminishing returns.
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Delhi court dismisses defamation case filed by AAP's Satyendra Jain against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj
A Delhi court on Thursday dismissed an appeal filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyendar Kumar Jain in a defamation case against Bharatiya Janata Party MP Bansuri Swaraj, citing that merely repeating information already in the public domain does not amount to defamation. The court also criticised the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which had initially posted on X the information shared by the BJP MP, saying that the central agency holds the responsibility of sharing only accurate and non-misleading information with the public. Special Judge Jitendra Singh of the Rouse Avenue Courts observed that sufficient ground does not exist for taking cognisance of the offence as defined and punishable under Section 356 of the BNS. The case filed by Mr. Jain is based on 'defamatory' comments about him during a television interview by Ms. Swaraj. The AAP leader stated that during the interview, Ms. Swaraj allegedly claimed that ₹3 crore in cash, 1.8 kilograms of gold, and 133 gold coins were recovered from the AAP leader's house. The ED also shared this information on its social media handle. Mr. Jain alleged that the statement made on TV had damaged his reputation. Mr. Jain had challenged a trial court order that rejected his criminal defamation complaint against the BJP MP earlier this year. In a strongly worded message, the court said that it is incumbent upon an investigative agency such as the ED to act impartially and uphold the principles of fairness and due process. 'Any dissemination of information, including but not limited to official social media platforms, must be accurate, non-misleading, and free from sensationalism,' the court said. 'The presentation of facts in a manner that is misleading, scandalous, or inten to defame or politically prejudice an individual would not only undermine the integrity of the agency but may also amount to an abuse of power and violation of the individual's fundamental rights, including the right to reputation under Article 21 of the Constitution,' it said. While dismissing the defamation case, the court added that there was no 'willful misrepresentation or malicious intent' of the accused, hence Ms. Swaraj cannot be held liable for the alleged offence of defamation. 'If at all any statement is perceived as defamatory, the liability, if any, would lie with the source agency, i.e., the ED, which originally disseminated the information. The proposed accused, being a secondary communicator of officially released material, cannot be fastened with criminal liability, especially in the absence of intent to harm the reputation of the Complainant,' it added.
Hans India
4 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP Registers Major Victory in Three-Tier Panchayat Elections
The results of the recently concluded three-tier Panchayat elections in Uttarakhand are steadily being received. According to the latest updates, BJP-supported candidates have been declared victorious on 125 out of a total of 358 district panchayat seats. Meanwhile, Congress-backed candidates have secured 83 seats, receiving significant support from voters. In addition, 150 independent candidates have also emerged victorious in the elections. A majority of these independent winners are seen leaning towards the Bharatiya Janata Party, with several publicly announcing their support for the BJP. As a result, a large portion of the overall winning candidates are considered to be BJP-aligned. The vote-counting process is nearing completion, and the Election Commission is expected to release the final results soon. The electoral process across the state was conducted peacefully and in an orderly manner, with effective cooperation from the administrative and security agencies.
