Reform pledges to scrap Online Safety Act over free speech concerns
Addressing a press conference at Reform's headquarters in Westminster, Mr Yusuf said: 'We will repeal this Act as one of the first things a Reform government does.'
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
Reform UK's Zia Yusuf said the Online Safety Act did not protect children, but pushed them to more dangerous parts of the internet (Lucy North/PA)
This includes introducing age verification for websites and ensuring algorithms do not work to harm children by, for example, pushing such content towards them when online.
Failing to comply with the new rules could incur fines of up to £18 million or 10% of a firm's global turnover, whichever is greater.
But Mr Yusuf said greater take-up of VPN services, which can enable internet users to circumvent the new rules, showed the legislation did not protect children and in fact made them less safe.
He said: 'Sending all of these kids onto VPNs is a far worse situation, and sends them much closer to the dark web, where the real dangers lie.'
He also criticised sections of the legislation that allow ministers to direct regulator Ofcom to modify its rules setting out how companies can comply with requirements to crack down on illegal or harmful content, saying it was 'the sort of thing that I think (Chinese president) Xi Jinping himself would blush at the concept of'.
During the press conference, Reform leader Nigel Farage acknowledged that his party did not have 'a perfect answer' for what could replace the Online Safety Act, but said his party had 'more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country but in the world' and would 'make a much better job of it'.
Former detective Colin Sutton has agreed to join Reform UK as a police and crime adviser (Lucy North/PA)
A Labour Party spokesperson said repealing the Online Safety Act would 'scrap vital protections for young people online and recklessly open the floodgates to kids being exposed to extreme digital content'.
They added: 'Reform offers anger but no answers. They won't say what they would do instead to keep people safe. Farage would give children access to material on suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography. He is simply not serious.'
Reform's announcement came during a press conference on crime, at which Mr Farage unveiled retired Metropolitan Police detective Colin Sutton as an adviser on police and crime.
Mr Sutton, who retired from the police in 2011, led the investigations into serial killer Levi Bellfield and serial rapist Delroy Grant during a 30-year career.
He is expected to stand for Reform at the next general election, and said he would push for Reform to commit to opening at least 300 public-facing police buildings along with recruiting 30,000 new officers.
Mr Sutton said he would also back getting rid of diversity initiatives in the police, saying: 'If you need some help, if you need police officers, if you need help quickly, do you actually care who comes through the door?'
The event was also attended by American conservative media pundit Ann Coulter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
China's top leaders vow support for economy, crackdown on disorderly competition
BEIJING, July 30 (Reuters) - China's top leaders have pledged to support an economy facing various risks by managing disorderly competition among firms and beefing up capacity management in key industries in the year's second half, the official news agency Xinhua said. Chinese leaders have signalled they will rein in price wars among producers as expectations grow for a new round of factory capacity cuts in a long-awaited but challenging campaign against deflation, a move that could pose risks to economic growth. In the second half of the year, China will keep policy stable while boosting flexibility, looking to stabilise employment, companies, the market, and expectations, Xinhua said on Wednesday. It was citing a summary of the proceedings of a meeting of China's Politburo, a top decision-making body of the ruling Communist Party, whose July gathering sets the economic course for the rest of the year. "At present, China's economic performance still faces many risks and challenges," the agency quoted the Politburo as saying, adding that authorities would accurately assess the situation and strengthen awareness of potential risks. China will continue to pursue a more proactive fiscal policy and an "appropriately loose" monetary policy, the summary showed, but made no mention, unlike the April meeting, of interest rates or reserve requirement ratio cuts. Top leaders said issuance and use of government bonds would be accelerated, with more efficient use of funds. China will unleash the potential of domestic demand and take steps to boost consumption, Xinhua said. It will promote technological innovation to drive development of new quality productive forces and speed cultivation of emerging pillar industries that are globally competitive, while curbing disorderly competition among firms. "Disorderly competition among enterprises must be governed according to laws and regulations," the summary read. "Capacity management in key industries should be advanced." Analysts believe that stimulating consumer demand remains key to effectively fighting deflation.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘The UK needs a new voting system first': Readers react to Corbyn's new left-wing party
Public reaction to Jeremy Corbyn's new left-wing party has been mixed, with many Independent readers more concerned about the UK's electoral system than the party itself. While some welcomed the alternative to what they see as a 'Tory-lite' Labour government, most agreed that the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system makes it almost impossible for smaller parties to succeed – and risks splitting the left vote. 'Until the electoral system is changed to proportional representation (PR), the dog's breakfast that is British politics will continue,' wrote one commenter. Others feared the move could hand power to a Tory-Reform coalition, with one reader warning: 'If you think Johnson and Truss were bad, wait until you see what Farage and Jenrick manage to destroy.' Although Corbyn remains popular among younger voters, many readers questioned the strategy behind launching a new party now. 'This is a disaster waiting to happen,' one said. 'The left is already fragmented and needs unity, not further splits.' Some saw the move as a protest rather than a serious political project, while others argued it could force Labour to shift left or adopt PR. Here's what you had to say: No real left in the UK I certainly don't like the Conservatives, and I dislike Reform UK even more. The problem with the current Labour government is that they are Tory lite. I cannot see Corbyn ever being PM. Starmer is sadly too authoritarian – hence the jailing of peaceful protesters. Personally speaking, I would like to see a combination of the Lib Dems and Greens in power, but there is almost zero chance of that happening. The Lib Dems are much more to the left than Labour. Christopher1959 Do you think the UK's voting system needs to change? Let us know in the below. Until the system changes, expect a mess Although it is excellent to have more choices for the electorate to choose from, unfortunately, because of the first past the post electoral system (FPTP), this only "waters down" the anti-Tory/Reform vote, because those right-wing parties and their "supporters" will stick together. Don't forget the Lib Dems, who command a fair old share of the electorate – but not enough for a majority. That could result in permanent right-wing governance! Until the electoral system is changed to proportional representation (PR), the dog's breakfast that is Brit politics will continue, with either "one or t'other", or, as I said, because of the watering down of the centre and left-wing vote, a permanent Tory/Reform bunch in power! Blue3Lee It's a step, but PR must come first A step in the right direction – offering a wider choice to the electorate, many of whom feel they have a Hobson's choice at the moment. But it won't work as an alternative under FPTP. To succeed, a genuine form of PR would have to come first – freeing voters to vote for their real preference rather than simply to prevent an alternative. Corbyn won't be around for too much longer and would, I think, willingly step back once a more genuine left-of-centre Labour-type alternative is available. Strangely Enough Finally, some choice outside the centre I think the public now having a slightly right-wing party in Reform and a slightly left-wing party with Corbyn to vote for is a positive thing, given the centrist WEF Lab/Con Blairites we've had since 1997. GaryGlass New parties need deep pockets to survive I have two principal thoughts on this: First, this isn't the first time that a "splinter" party has been formed in the UK. Regrettably, almost none have survived contact with FPTP for long, other than the Green Party and niche outfits like George Galloway's "Respect" party. Second, to have any chance of electoral survival, let alone making a difference, this putative political party must have serious (pots of money) backing. If this party subsequently shows sufficient support, I suspect that the chances of any form of proportional electoral system being brought in will recede even further, because of the increasing electoral threat to the current government. Nobrandloyalty Corbyn's party won't win, but could push Labour Whilst this new party will definitely not win the election and will probably get few MPs, the threat of a split in the left vote – letting in Reform on an even lower percentage than Labour got last year – will hopefully motivate Labour to change some policies. Possibly even encourage them to manifesto-promise PR/electoral reform to tempt people back into tactical voting for them in 2029 – so they can have better chances for the JC party in 2034. Someone182 A split left could hand power to Farage I remember how the SDP were going to "change politics in the UK forever". They did – the Tories lurched even further to the right and kept winning elections. I do not like Starmer, however, splitting the Labour vote is going to give us a Tory/Reform coalition. If you think Johnson and Truss were bad, wait until you see what Jenrick/Farage manage to destroy. Moonraker2025 New parties are pointless without PR The UK needs a new voting system before it needs more parties. These small new party initiatives don't work out within the current system. Corbyn's lifelong main political goal is to run a protest movement – and that's what this will be. – ItReallyIsNot FPTP stops Corbyn from being a threat If it wasn't for our FPTP electoral system, Corbyn would be a serious threat, I believe. Polheg Reform will benefit most from Corbyn's move Corbyn's new party will take votes from Labour but is unlikely to win more than a handful of seats. The prime beneficiaries will be Reform. It was a serious mistake for Labour to expel Corbyn, since it was always obvious that he commanded a lot of support from the left and would be in a position to retaliate. Musil A fragmented left is a disaster in waiting Corbyn to the rescue – just when we need some kind of ruthless pragmatic unity in the face of 'Euphemism' – and in waltzes Corbyn and a further split of 5 to 10 per cent at most. It seems that more than ever, a further counterproductive split among an already fragmented centre/left, in the face of a determined, well-organised, highly coordinated and highly effective far right, is an absolute disaster waiting to happen. I genuinely cannot see a way out of this. Jim987 Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day's top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click 'log in' or 'register' in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
What Nigel Farage gets right (and wrong) about crime stats
'Britain is lawless,' Nigel Farage declared last week as his Reform Party launched a six-week-long campaign on crime. Painting a picture of a country in desperate need of tougher justice, he argued Britain was 'facing societal collapse' due to the scale of the problem, claiming total crime is now 50 per cent higher than it was in the 1990s. But not everyone agrees with his assessment. Indeed, Farage's claims have seen him become embroiled in a war of statistics, most notably with Fraser Nelson, the former editor of The Spectato r. On Monday, he took aim at the Reform leader, accusing him of peddling a 'narrative … in spite of the facts'. Farage isn't fighting with me. He's fighting with 25 years of crime data, hospital A&E admissions data and more. But perhaps it's a test: can he get this Lawless Britain narrative going - in spite of the facts? — Fraser Nelson (@FraserNelson) July 28, 2025 Nelson's view, which conflicts with the one articulated by Farage, is that the rate of crime in Britain is near record lows. The reality, however, is more nuanced than either man presents. While it's true that Britain is far less crime-ridden than 30 years ago, it is currently in the midst of a 'petty' crime wave – one which leaves victims feeling powerless and abandoned by the authorities. Nelson's argument is based on the Crime Survey for England and Wales – a study carried out by the Office for National Statistics since the 1980s. Through interviews with more than 30,000 people, it attempts to capture the true amount of crime in society, whether or not it is reported to police. It shows that since the mid-1990s, the estimated number of crimes, excluding fraud, in England and Wales has plummeted from 19.8 million to 4.6 million a year. Statistically, based solely on the survey (which has not historically included fraud, cases of which have exploded in recent years), Nelson is correct in saying that crime has plummeted. Farage, for his part, has called the survey 'discredited as a means of measuring crime'. This is unfair, although as he pointed out at a press conference on Monday, it certainly has its flaws. For example, the survey doesn't ask respondents about crimes against businesses, such as shoplifting, and those undertaking the research only interview households – effectively excluding crime-vulnerable groups such as the homeless, tourists or students living in halls. Researchers have also faced issues in recent years with uptake, and certain crimes – such as sexual or domestic abuse – are difficult to measure this way. However, the survey does have a consistent methodology, meaning it is a helpful tool in monitoring trends of the most common, victim-based crimes, from criminal damage to pickpocketing. In many ways, the fall in offending it appears to have captured isn't overly surprising. Within the overall reduction of crime, around 40 per cent comes solely from a downturn in burglaries and car theft. That may in turn be attributable to the fact that the past 30 years has witnessed an explosion in personal security technology, from CCTV cameras to Ring doorbells to car alarms and cheaper, better door locks. A further 25 per cent of the fall in offences is accounted for by a reduction in violent crime, which includes everything from serious physical assault to being abused in the street. Historically, a large proportion of this type of crime has involved alcohol. Its decline may have much to do with young adults now drinking less, pub numbers being in decline and nightclubs facing tighter regulation on security measures. Farage, for his part, prefers to cite police recorded crime when making the point that Britain has become 'lawless'. 'There are some significant rises in crimes of all kinds, particularly crimes against the person,' he told reporters last week. That is true. But statistics recorded by police don't actually show overall rates of crime increasing. In fact, excluding fraud, they show offences to be at a four-year low and comfortably below levels recorded in the early 2000s. And even when fraud is included, figures are still down year on year since 2023. Although the level of crime recorded by police is indeed higher now than it was in the 1990s, it is not 50 per cent higher, as Farage has stated. Compared with 1997, the year with the lowest rate of offences in that decade, overall crime has risen by 38 per cent. Historic trends in police recorded crime are also impacted by the fact that the police are getting better at recording crime. It is easier for victims to log offences and people are increasingly willing to report certain types of crime, particularly sexual and domestic abuse. For example, reported rape offences have increased from 16,000 to 72,000 since 2010. Five years ago, coercive control did not exist as an offence; now police log some 50,000 cases each year. But where Farage is undoubtedly correct is that some types of crime are surging. There were more than 530,643 shoplifting offences – equivalent to three thefts every minute of the working day – in the year ending March 2025, according to figures released last week. This was a 20 per cent increase from the previous 12 months and by far the highest annual figure ever recorded. That data is not recorded in the crime survey – a fact Farage has been keen to point out. Police recorded crime also picks up on the record amount of theft-from-the-person offences, which cover pickpocketing and bag snatching. There were more than 150,000 such crimes last year. Unlike shoplifting, this type of crime does also feature in the Crime Survey, which has 'snatch theft' (picture criminals on mopeds grabbing phones) at a 20-year high and personal theft at its highest level in a decade. Together, both sources of data do indeed paint a picture of a petty theft crime wave sweeping the nation. The two datasets diverge when it comes to violent crime, however. Police record that violent crime has been heavily influenced by more reporting of offences such as stalking and harassment. The Crime Survey is a less reliable measure of these types of offence, but effective at capturing the extent of less serious violent crimes, such as affray. Certain 'high-harm' crimes are undoubtedly better recorded through the police's own figures – and have also seen recent surges. Knife crime, for example, has jumped back to almost 50,000 cases annually over the past few years. The frequent visceral images we see of the victims of this kind of crime also add to the sense of lawlessness of which Farage speaks. Ultimately, the differing sources Nelson and Farage cite are both valid when interpreting crime. But only when looked at together and, most importantly, when asking 'what type of crime is on the rise' do we get the full picture. Farage's argument goes beyond statistics, however, and points to the broader sense that victims are being failed. 'Over the past 20 years, witnessing and experiencing crime has become normalised, with Britons feeling helpless and an overworked police force struggling to keep up,' he said last week. Ironically, the Crime Survey (which also asks people about their views on policing and personal safety) backs him up on this. In 2024, for the first time in the survey's history, fewer than 50 per cent of respondents said they were satisfied with police performance. Just 12 per cent regularly saw 'bobbies on the beat' in their neighbourhood, a fall of two thirds from the figure recorded in 2010. And the proportion of people feeling like local crime is increasing is now at its highest on record. Moreover, the police's ability to solve crime has plummeted over the course of a decade. Overall, just 7.3 per cent of offences result in a charge, compared with 15 per cent in 2015. Telegraph analysis shows that, for personal theft, the figure falls to just 0.7 per cent. Fewer than 2 per cent of bike thefts conclude with an offender being charged. All the while, prisons are at capacity, with more lenient sentences being used in an attempt to free up space. Last year, the proportion of people sent to jail after being convicted for possession of a knife slumped to a record low.
