
Rise of masked officers controversial new ground in American life
New York, Jul 18 (AP) In a matter of months, it has become a regular sight around the country — immigration enforcement agents detaining people and taking them into custody, often as public anger and outcry unfold around them.
But in the process, something has disappeared: the agents' faces, covered by caps, sunglasses, pulled-up neck gaiters or balaclavas, effectively rendering them unidentifiable.
With the year only half over, the covered face — as deployed by law enforcement in a wave of immigration crackdowns directed by President Donald Trump's White House — has become one of the most potent and contentious visuals of 2025.
The increase in high-profile immigration enforcement was already contentious between those opposed to the actions of Trump's administration and those in support of them. The sight of masked agents carrying it out is creating a whole new level of conflict, in a way that has no real comparison in the US history of policing.
Trump administration officials have consistently defended the practice, saying that immigration agents have faced strident and increasing harassment in public and online as they have gone about their enforcement in service of Trump's drive toward mass deportation, and hiding their identities is for their and their families' safety to avoid things like death threats and doxing, where someone's personal information is released without their permission on the internet.
'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is," Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd Lyons said last month.
There's pushback, as expected Democrats and others, including the several state attorneys general, have pushed back, saying the use of face masks generates public fear and should be halted.
In a letter to Lyons last week, a group of Democratic senators said the stepped-up immigration enforcement in workplaces, restaurants and other sites was already causing dismay and the increasingly common sight of masked agents 'represents a clear attempt to compound that fear and chaos – and to avoid accountability for agents' actions".
In American culture, covering one's face has often gone hand in hand with assumptions of negative behaviour. Think bandits donning bandanas in cowboy movies, or robbers putting on ski masks before pulling a heist on a bank.
Even comic-book superheroes who cover their faces have been swept up in storylines in recent years that derisively refer to them as 'masks" and say their decision to hide their identities while enforcing justice is transgressive.
And the presence of masked police or paramilitary forces in other countries has been seen by Americans as antithetical to promised democracy and justice for all — and to the common-law principle of being able to face your accusers.
Mask-wearing overall in American life took another hit during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many Trump supporters scoffed at notions that protective masks would insulate people from the deadly virus and scorned people who wore them.
More recently, Trump has come out against masks, at least when they're being worn by protestors. He posted on social media last month that demonstrators wearing masks should be arrested.
Given all that cultural context, it's even more problematic that those enforcing laws be the ones with their faces covered, said Tobias Winright, professor of moral theology at St Patrick's Pontifical University in Maynooth, Ireland. He has worked in law enforcement in the US and writes frequently about policing ethics.
If 'what you're doing is above board and right," he said, 'then why conceal your identity?" Power gives different symbols different meanings For those who question why it's different for law enforcement to wear masks if protestors and non-law enforcement personnel are doing it, it's because symbols have different meanings based on the power and position of the people using them, said Alison Kinney, author of 'Hood," a book about that clothing item and the various ways people have used it.
'ICE agents are agents of the state. and they're invested with not only power but also with protections in carrying out their job," she said. 'But that job is also supposed to be public service. It's also supposed to be accountable and responsible to the public." 'And so they have a greater responsibility for transparency and accountability and making themselves known so that we can hold them accountable for the justice or injustice of their actions," she said.
Concerns over how law enforcement is held accountable to the public have come up before. Advocates pushed for officers to wear body cameras and demanded that police officers have visible names and badge numbers.
But there hasn't previously been much discussion around police masking because there isn't a history of it being done in any kind of official widespread way in the United States, outside of SWAT- or undercover-type operations, Winright said.
The most high-profile example of mask-wearing in American history for the purpose of hiding identity is also its most negative one — racist attacks carried out by the members of the Ku Klux Klan.
The masks served a purpose, of course, of keeping the wearers' identities secret, said Elaine Frantz, a history professor at Kent State University and author of 'Ku-Klux: The Birth of the Klan during Reconstruction." But they also made it easier for those wearing them to commit violent acts against others, she said.
'One thing about a mask is it kind of works like being behind a riot shield," Frantz said. 'When you have more of separation from the person you're attacking, it's easier to dehumanise that person." Winright said he hoped law enforcement mask-wearing wouldn't be normalized. There has been at least one expansion into local policing. In Nassau County, on Long Island just outside New York City, County Executive Bruce Blakeman last week signed an executive order allowing police officers to wear masks during certain types of work, including working with immigration agents.
Winright is concerned, though, that the move could strain police-community relations even more, thus putting officers at even more risk.
top videos
View all
'Wearing a mask seems to increase fear and decrease trust, and policing from federal to local in America needs trust and transparency and community relations that are positive," he said.
He added: 'The harms, the risks, are greater by wearing masks, not only to the individual officers, but to the profession itself, as well as to the United States society. It's just going to further exacerbate the us-versus-them polarisation, the lack of trust, and that's the probably the last thing we need right now." (AP) SCY SCY
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments
First Published:
July 18, 2025, 13:30 IST
News agency-feeds Rise of masked officers controversial new ground in American life
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Appeals court says California law requiring background checks for ammunition is unconstitutional
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A voter-backed California law requiring background checks for people who buy bullets is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in a blow to the state's efforts to combat gun violence. In upholding a 2024 ruling by a lower court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the state law violates the Second Amendment. Voters passed the law in 2016 and it took effect in 2019. Many states, including California, make people pass a background check before they can buy a gun. California went a step further by requiring a background check, which costs either $1 or $19 depending on eligibility, every time someone buys buy bullets. Last year, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez decided that the law was unconstitutional because if people can't buy bullets, they can't use their guns for self-defense. The 9th Circuit agreed. Writing for two of the three judges on the appellate panel, Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta said the state law 'meaningfully constrains" the constitutional right to keep arms by forcing gun owners to get rechecked before each purchase of bullets. 'The right to keep and bear arms incorporates the right to operate them, which requires ammunition,' the judge wrote. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who supported the background checks, decried the court's decision. 'Strong gun laws save lives — and today's decision is a slap in the face to the progress California has made in recent years to keep its communities safer from gun violence," Newsom said in a statement. "Californians voted to require background checks on ammunition and their voices should matter.' Chuck Michel, president and general counsel of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, called the law 'absurdly restrictive.' 'This case has been a long hard fight against overreaching government gun control, but a firearm cannot be effective without the ammunition to make it operable. The state of California continues to try to strip our rights, and we continue to prove their actions are unconstitutional.' Benitez had criticized the state's automated background check system, which he said rejected about 11% of applicants, or 58,087 requests, in the first half of 2023. California's law was meant to help police find people who have guns illegally, such as convicted felons, people with certain mental illnesses and people with some domestic violence convictions.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump says no to 'woke' Artificial Intelligence in AI action plan for US
The White House order detailing US President Donald Trump's Artificial Intelligence action plan for the country has specified his plans to prevent "woke AI" in the federal government. The US President came down heavily of DEI initiatives, saying in context of AI, it was responsible for "distortion of factual information about race or sex".(AP) The order, released on Wednesday, outlines a sweeping new plan for America's 'global dominance' in artificial intelligence. Trump signed three executive orders for this plan, and getting rid of 'woke' in AI was one of its objectives. The US President came down heavily of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, saying in context of AI, it was responsible for "distortion of factual information about race or sex". "DEI displaces the commitment to truth in favor of preferred outcomes and, as recent history illustrates, poses an existential threat to reliable AI," the White House order read. Listing out examples, Trump said an AI model recently altered the race or gender of historical figures because "it was trained to prioritize DEI requirements at the cost of accuracy", and another one refused to create images on achievements of white people, while heeding to the same request for other races. "In yet another case, an AI model asserted that a user should not 'misgender' another person even if necessary to stop a nuclear apocalypse," the order read. While Trump noted that AI models in private markets should not be regulated, he called for checking models being procured in the federal government, ensuring they do not "sacrifice truthfulness and accuracy to ideological agendas". "LLMs shall be neutral, nonpartisan tools that do not manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas such as DEI," the order read, calling for developers to make sure outputs don't include "ideological judgments" unless asked for by the end user. Trump's Artificial intelligence action plan comes in the wake of increased use of such models in daily lives, and notes that AI would play a critical role in how skills are consumed and information is shared among Americans.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Indian students flagged difficulty in obtaining U.S. student visa appointments: Govt to Parliament
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has received several representations from Indian students and their families, flagging difficulty in obtaining U.S. student visa appointments after American authorities announced an expanded screening and vetting for visa applicants, the government said on Thursday (July 24, 2025). In a written response to a query in the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh also said the MEA took up the matter with the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi as well as the U.S. Department of State. The Ministry was asked whether the government is aware of U.S. student visa issues being faced by prospective Indian students. "On 18 June 2025, U.S. Department of State (DOS) issued a press release titled 'Announcement of Expanded Screening and Vetting for Visa Applicants'. In the said press release, DOS stated that it uses all available information in its visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security," the Minister said. Under the new guidelines, the U.S. would conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications. To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas would be instructed to adjust the privacy settings on their social media profiles to "public", according to the guidelines. "Following these developments, the Ministry of External Affairs has received several representations from Indian students and their families flagging difficulty in obtaining student visa appointments. The Ministry took up the matter with U.S. Embassy in New Delhi as well as the U.S. Department of State," Mr. Singh said. While the issuance of visa is a sovereign prerogative of the state concerned, the MEA has "consistently raised" with the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi as well as the U.S. State Department in Washington DC the issues being faced by prospective Indian students in obtaining U.S. visas, he added. "The Government of India remains engaged with the U.S. Government to promote mutually advantageous and secure mobility frameworks that allow for streamlining avenues for legal mobility of students and professionals, and facilitating short-term tourist and business travel," Mr. Singh said. In a written response to a separate query, the MoS said the Indian government remains engaged with authorities in the United States on "addressing illegal immigration and human trafficking by taking strong action against the bad actors, criminal facilitators, and illegal immigration networks". In a separate query, the MEA was asked whether the government has taken cognisance of the illegal-immigration rackets operating in the country that fraudulently send Indians abroad, causing loss of money and national reputation. The Ministry issues advisories through the eMigrate portal, social media handles and other modes of publicity about the perils of fake job rackets and ways to prevent the same. "Till June 2025, a total of 3,505 illegal agents in the country have been notified on the eMigrate portal," Mr. Singh said. An awareness campaign on safe and legal migration through the eMigrate portal has been carried out by the ministry across the country by conducting workshops, training, information sessions, digital campaigns for media groups, police officials and law enforcement agencies, local administration, aspiring recruiting agents, entrepreneurs and the general public, the Minister added. "During these sessions, awareness emigration regulations, schemes beneficial for emigrants like Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana (PBBY), Pre-Departure Orientation Training (PDOT), eMigrate portal and various advisories issued by Indian embassies are brought to the notice of all stakeholders," he said.