Russian government advisers warn of corporate bankruptcies wave
MOSCOW, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Russia could face a wave of corporate bankruptcies this year as the share of enterprises with risky levels of debt in total corporate revenue doubled in 2024, a leading think tank advising the government said in a research note.
The warning emphasizes the scale of high inflation and slowing growth, which have made President Vladimir Putin concerned about distortions in Russia's wartime economy.
"The Russian economy is facing the threat of a large-scale surge in corporate bankruptcies," TsMAKP researchers wrote.
They said that by the end of 2024, the share of companies represented in total corporate revenue, that had interest payments at a risky level of two-thirds of adjusted earnings, was likely at 20%.
The Russian central bank hiked its benchmark interest rate to 21% last year, the highest since the early 2000s, to fight inflation which hit 9.5% in 2024, exceeding the government's and the central bank's forecasts.
Many companies have complained about high interest rates, which raise their borrowing costs. Russia's largest mobile operator, MTS, in November blamed an 88.8% drop in third-quarter net profit on increased interest expenses.
The state-owned monopoly Russian Railways is facing a $4 billion rise in interest payment costs this year.
TsMAKP researchers also pointed to a surge in the share of firms experiencing non-payments from their counterparties for supplied goods and services, which rose to 37% of total revenue in the third quarter of 2024 from about 20% in 2021-23.
They said many firms preferred to deposit cash at banks amid high interest rates or buy risk-free bonds, which also offer attractive interest, while withholding payment to suppliers.
The research indicated that in the current high interest rate environment, the share of companies with working capital profitability that was lower than the risk-free interest rate also doubled to 66% of total corporate revenues.
This was stifling investment, the researchers said.
"A slowdown in the dynamics of investments in production facilities and a reduction in the potential for economic growth are already being factored in," researchers said, projecting a fall in investments to 1.7-2.0% this year from 7% in 2024.
here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
What will be in Britain's $2.7 trillion spending review?
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will reveal her first multi-year spending review on Wednesday, dividing up more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public money between her ministerial colleagues and setting their budgets until 2029. Below is what the government has already announced in the days preceding the announcement: Reeves will allocate 86 billion pounds to fund research and development. The package, funding everything from new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries to artificial intelligence breakthroughs, will be worth more than 22.5 billion pounds a year by 2029/30, driving new jobs and economic growth, the government said. The government will invest a further 14.2 billion pounds to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant in eastern England. The funding takes the total government commitment to 17.8 billion pounds, with 3.6 billion invested before the review. It also pledged 2.5 billion pounds for a programme to develop a fleet of small modular nuclear plants over the next four years and named Rolls-Royce SMR as its preferred bidder. Britain says new nuclear projects will replace ageing plants, boost energy security, help it reach climate targets and create new jobs. Reeves has committed 15.6 billion pounds towards transport projects in cities outside London that have long suffered from underinvestment. Most of the investment was earmarked by the previous, Conservative government. Reeves has reversed her previously-announced cuts to winter fuel payments to pensioners, a move that would restore payments to 9 million pensioners and cost the government 1.25 billion pounds. Britain will invest more than 6 billion pounds in its submarine building capacity, supporting firms such as defence group BAE Systems and engineering multinational Rolls-Royce. The investment, which will cover the four-year spending review period, will help companies deliver the increase in submarine production rate announced by the government. Tax rises are not an option as Reeves has said she only intends to change tax policy once a year, and she has barely any room to borrow more without breaking what she has often said is an "ironclad" commitment to new fiscal rules. Reeves has promised to increase spending on policing in the review, but has not disclosed by how much. She is also expected to announce an investment of 4 billion pounds to build new prisons as the government scrambles to tackle an overcrowding crisis. The finance minister is expected to confirm 39 billion pounds in funding for a new programme to build affordable homes over the next decade - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with current support. ($1 = 0.7399 pounds)
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will divide up more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public spending on Wednesday in a speech she hopes will foster a sense of national renewal and make clear the year-old Labour government's political priorities. In an address to parliament due after 1130 GMT, Reeves will set out day-to-day budgets for government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030. Reeves set the overall total for spending in an October budget, financing her plan with the biggest tax rise in a generation and looser fiscal rules that make it easier for her to borrow to cover long-term investment. The choices she announces on Wednesday must start paying off quickly if Labour is to achieve its goals of boosting Britain's growth rate and improving the quality of overstretched public services. "This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it," Reeves is expected to tell parliament, according to speech extracts released by the finance ministry. Reeves said the government would "invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off." Among the projects announced on Wednesday was likely to be a 39 billion-pound 10-year programme to build lower-cost housing - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with existing support, the finance ministry said. Since its sweeping election victory last July, Labour has seen its popularity slide. The right-wing Reform Party led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is now ahead of it in the polls and outperformed it in English local elections last month. While Britain's economy recorded the fastest growth of the Group of Seven advanced economies in the first quarter of this year, the International Monetary Fund has forecast that in coming years it will lag behind the United States and Canada and barely outperform the euro zone. Official data on Tuesday showed the jobless rate had hit its highest in nearly four years - which the opposition Conservatives blamed on Reeves' October decision to place the main burden of tax rises on employers and boost workers' rights. Discussions between Reeves and government ministers have continued into this week over how big a slice their departments will receive of a pie whose size was set last year. Plans announced so far include 86 billion pounds on research and development, 16 billion pounds on public transport, 4 billion pounds on a new nuclear power station, 6 billion pounds on nuclear submarines and 4 billion on prisons. The final spending increases are unlikely to be shared out equally. Capital-intensive plans to raise defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product, announced by Starmer in February, mean other departments will see no real-terms increase in the pace of investment after this year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimates. Day-to-day spending on public services is due to rise by an average of 1.2% a year on top of inflation between 2026-27 and 2028-29, while capital budgets will increase by an average of 1.3% in real terms through to 2029-30, according to the IFS. Both rates of growth are much slower than in the current financial year, when investment spending is set to jump by 11.6% and current spending rises by 2.5%. For day-to-day spending, increasing the health budget by 2 percentage points more than the average - as was typical when Labour was last in power before 2010 - would mean real-terms cuts of 1% a year for other departments, the IFS said. Chris Jeffery, head of macro strategy at Legal & General, Britain's largest asset manager, said the fact that the overall spending total was known limited the impact for investors. Instead, financial markets would be most focused on whether any proposed cuts looked realistic for the departments affected. "If they're imposing really large real-terms cuts in spending, then I think the market will come to the conclusion that these are less likely to be delivered than if they are less aggressive," he said. ($1 = 0.7409 pounds) ($1 = 0.7410 pounds)
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Starbucks accelerates new staffing model to all North American stores
June 10 (Reuters) - Starbucks (SBUX.O), opens new tab CEO Brian Niccol told Reuters on Tuesday that he would accelerate the rollout of the coffeehouse chain's new staffing and service model, aiming for all 18,000 North American stores by summer's end, rather than the initial plan for just a third of U.S. stores by year-end. Niccol says the model is a foundational element of his turnaround strategy for the company, as he bets on an improved in-store customer experience to reclaim the sales growth that has eluded Starbucks in recent quarters. Niccol said early tests of the model have sped up service times and grown sales, without providing specifics. 'We've learned, and now we know what we need to do, so let's scale it,' he told Reuters at the company's three-day leadership summit in Las Vegas on Tuesday. The Green Apron model includes in-store technology to more efficiently sequence orders, as well as a dedicated barista for drive-through orders. Starbucks rolled out the service changes to 700 stores initially. During the company's April 29 quarterly earnings call, Niccol said it would be introduced in a third of U.S. stores by year-end. Niccol took over as Starbucks CEO in September with a plan to return the chain to its coffeehouse roots, focusing on the in-store experience and away from a reliance on mobile and to-go orders, in what the company calls "Back to Starbucks.' The goal is to get baristas to get customers their orders in four minutes or less. He did not share any financial figures about the cost of the Green Apron model's deployment, but said the company would host an investor day in 2026. The Las Vegas summit, the company's first since 2019, is hosting more than 14,000 managers and other company leaders. Analysts and investors have wondered how long Niccol will need to turn the company around. Shares have gained 11% over the last five years, compared with an 88% rise in the broad-market S&P 500. TD Cowen recently downgraded its rating of Starbucks to "hold" from "buy", saying in part that it believed Niccol's turnaround would take longer than expected to deliver results. Niccol said the transition will take time. Starbucks has not issued annual guidance, and Niccol told investors in an earnings call earlier this year that earnings-per-share 'shouldn't be used as a measure of our success' at this stage, instead pointing to in-store metrics like average wait times for orders. He said the transition's effect on earnings would be temporary. On Tuesday, he emphasized his goal isn't to achieve short-term performance solely through cost reduction. As Starbucks increases investments in its labor and elsewhere, Niccol said he would be "ruthless" in cutting expenses not related to the company's turnaround. 'We have to be critical of where we're spending if it's not driving toward the Back to Starbucks strategy and growth programs.'
