
What's up with the wacky CBOT corn spreads? -Braun
NAPERVILLE, Illinois, June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. corn supply estimates for the waning 2024-25 marketing year have been dwindling in recent months, though a notable rebound is expected for 2025-26.
But the futures market might not be reflecting these trends, leading many to wonder if old-crop stockpiles are actually larger than the government has predicted.
Normally, that supply trajectory might put Chicago futures in an inverse, where old-crop corn is pricier than new-crop. But so far this month, CBOT July corn has traded at an average of around 3 cents per bushel cheaper than December corn , reflecting a small carry in the market.
Analysts think the U.S. Department of Agriculture on Thursday will trim its forecast for 2024-25 U.S. corn ending stocks to 1.392 billion bushels, rendering stocks down 21% on the year. In past Junes, such a decline in corn stocks has been associated with July-December inverses exceeding 50 cents.
The closest comparison in terms of stock declines would be 2018, when July-December corn traded at a 21-cent carry during the first two weeks of June. At that time, U.S. 2017-18 ending stocks were pegged to ease 8% on the year, but the actual estimate was more than ample at 2.1 billion bushels.
This demonstrates that contracting year-on-year supplies can be associated with market carry in June. Additionally, there are examples (2008, 2018) where this carry existed despite a reduction in stock estimates over the previous several months.
Still, the current setup may suggest that either July futures are too cheap versus December, old-crop stocks are being understated, or some combination of both.
Given the present market structure, what might this mean for old-crop corn stocks – and trade expectations – moving forward?
If old-crop stocks are too low, it may not come to light on Thursday. There is no relationship between the old-new crop futures spread and the trend in USDA's old-crop ending stock estimates from May to June.
Fast-forward to June 30, when USDA publishes its June 1 stock survey, and the chance for a bearish bomb increases. Since 2008, whenever July-December corn traded near flat or in a carry during early June, analysts underestimated June 1 corn stocks about 73% of the time.
On the flip side, analysts underestimated June 1 corn stocks in just one out of six years when old-new crop corn featured a strong inverse relationship.
Since 2008, there is also a 73% hit rate for final corn ending stocks to be the same or higher than was estimated in June whenever July-December corn traded near flat or in a carry during early June.
This same early June spread, however, does not suggest that final ending stocks will be bearish as the trade has gone on to both underestimate and overestimate September 1 corn stocks.
The outcome is still wide open for the end of September, when USDA will publish final 2024-25 corn ending stocks. But right now, CBOT corn for expiration in mid-September is the cheapest of the bunch.
July-September corn is trading at an inverse averaging 12 cents per bushel so far this month, which is unusual given the slight carry in July-December. The historical relationship between these spreads suggests that one or both are a bit out of sync.
With multiple anomalies in the futures market setup having been identified, this might simply mean that 2025 is an outlier year. And if that's the case, historical odds may be increasingly less reliable from here.
Karen Braun is a market analyst for Reuters. Views expressed above are her own.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
NextEra workers net $45 million from sales of company stock
June 12 (Reuters) - NextEra Energy (NEE.N), opens new tab employees realized $45 million in gains from selling company stock in their retirement plan during 2024, reversing heavy losses from the previous two years, the utility disclosed on Thursday. America's largest renewable power company is among several U.S. energy and utility companies that continue to promote big, concentrated bets on company stock in worker retirement plans. The strategy is largely out of favor among U.S. companies, which mostly have diversified their retirement portfolios to avoid heavy losses tied to one investment, according to research by Vanguard Group. NextEra shares accounted for $1.8 billion, or about one-third of the $5.4 billion in total investments in the company's retirement savings plan, the company disclosed in an annual report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In 2024, NextEra employees realized gains because the company's total return that year was 21.5%. But in 2023, employees took heavy losses from their stock sales. They realized losses of nearly $162 million that year, NextEra SEC disclosures show. Realized losses from employee stock sales totaled $65.5 million in 2022. NextEra was not immediately available for comment.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump to attend AI and energy summit in Pittsburgh
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and executives from the tech and energy sectors will appear at an artificial intelligence and energy summit in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on July 15, the office of the state's U.S. Senator Dave McCormick said on Thursday. McCormick's inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit will be held at Carnegie Mellon University, his office said in a statement. Axios reported that tech executives like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab CEO Satya Nadella and Alphabet CEO (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Sundar Pichai were on the summit's guest list. Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab CEO Darren Woods, Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab CEO Wael Sawan and Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab CEO Mike Wirth were also on that list, according to Axios. White House AI czar David Sacks, who is also expected to attend the summit, expressed concern earlier this week that regulating U.S. AI too tightly could stifle growth and cede the critical market to China. The comments indicated the Republican president's approach to AI could be centered on expanding markets abroad for U.S. AI chips and models. Democratic former President Joe Biden had emphasized policies that countered risks the chips could be diverted to China and used to bolster Beijing's military. A group of 40 state attorneys general, including Republicans from Ohio, Tennessee, Arkansas, Utah and Virginia and other states, have pushed back against Republican attempts to block states from regulating AI, saying states should develop and enforce common-sense regulation to protect consumers.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
AI companies could soon be protected from most lawsuits under new GOP bill
Artificial intelligence companies could be protected from mistakes their software makes as long as they abide by specific disclosure requirements under a new bill put forward by a Republican senator. The proposed bill aims to ensure professionals such as doctors, lawyers, financial advisers, engineers and who use AI programs retain legal liability if their work contains errors. However, AI developers would need to publicly state how their systems work. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming introduced the legislation on Thursday, dubbed the 'Responsible Innovation and Safe Expertise Act.' It would be the first of its kind if it passes, the senator's office said. The bill would not apply to self-driving vehicles or developers who act recklessly or engage in misconduct, according to NBC News. 'This legislation doesn't create blanket immunity for AI — in fact, it requires AI developers to publicly disclose model specifications so professionals can make informed decisions about the AI tools they choose to utilize,' the senator's office said in a statement to the outlet. 'It also means that licensed professionals are ultimately responsible for the advice and decisions they make. This is smart policy for the digital age that protects innovation, demands transparency, and puts professionals and their clients first.' Other lawmakers are working to jump ahead of the liability curb when it comes to businesses implementing artificial intelligence. States are working to apply standards, but part of President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' includes a clause barring them from doing so for at least 10 years. Last week, Senate Republicans suggested changing the clause to block federal funding for broadband projects to states that regulate AI, NBC News reported. Lawmakers across the aisle have previously opposed banning states from passing regulations throughout the next decade. As the AI race continues, tech CEOs have warned that enacting such policies could prevent further advancements.