Taiwan Plans More Cash Handouts To Boost Declining Birth Rate
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Taiwan's government plans to expand subsidies for in vitro fertilization (IVF) in hopes of raising the island democracy's birth rate, which is among the world's lowest.
Why It Matters
Roughly two-thirds of the world's population now live in places where fertility—births expected per woman—is below the 2.1 replacement level, according to the French Institute for Demographic Studies, as lifespans lengthen and the cost of living rises.
In 2024, Taiwan recorded about 135,000 births—a record low and the ninth straight annual decline—as more couples delay or forgo children. The island also joined South Korea and Japan as a "super-aged society," with people aged 65 and older comprising about 20 percent of the population. Officials warn of the long-term economic impact of these demographic trends, but some say much more needs to be done.
Newsweek reached out to Taiwan's National Development Council via written request for comment.
What To Know
Taiwan's Health Promotion Administration (HPA) is planning to implement higher subsidies for IVF to ease the financial burden on prospective parents. IVF is the process in which eggs are fertilized with sperm outside the body and then implanted in the uterus to achieve pregnancy.
Under the subsidy program introduced in 2021, eligible couples can receive up to NT$100,000 ($3,340) for the first IVF cycle and NT$60,000 for subsequent treatments.
A dog looks on from a stroller as people walk past the National Theater in front of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei on April 5, 2023.
A dog looks on from a stroller as people walk past the National Theater in front of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei on April 5, 2023.
Sam Yeh/AFP via Getty Images
Most patients require three to four IVF cycles to achieve pregnancy, with cumulative chances of success rising across repeated attempts.
Under the proposed increase, subsidies for treatments two to six would be brought up to the first-cycle level, HPA Director-General Shen Ching-fen told reporters Tuesday, per Taiwan's Central News Agency.
As in many countries, the age at marriage and at first birth has crept upward in Taiwan, and the likelihood of pregnancy rapidly declines for women aged over 35.
HPA data from 2022 show a per-cycle pregnancy rate—the probability that a single IVF cycle results in pregnancy—of about 32.6 percent at age 30, falling to about 19 percent at age 40.
What People Have Said
Chen Shih-cheng, former health minister and now a minister without portfolio at Taiwan's executive branch, the Executive Yuan, warned in a May article for CommonWealth Magazine that Taiwan's pro-natal measures are insufficient and investments lag behind countries like Japan and France.
He called for swift action, or "it will be too late."
"Both international research and local experience show that cash subsidies are not ineffective—but they are insufficient," he said.
"The government may believe it is offering adequate support, but many families still face heavy financial burdens. Policy must evolve from easing the burden, to eliminating it—or even reversing it."
What's Next
The HPA said additional details would be announced after the subsidy scheme is approved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Drinking Rate Plunges to Record Low in US, New Poll Shows
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Alcohol consumption among U.S. adults has fallen to its lowest recorded level in nearly 90 years, with 54 percent saying they drink, down from 58 percent a year ago, according to Gallup's latest annual survey. Why It Matters Gallup has tracked alcohol consumption among U.S. adults since 1939. The latest figure falls below the previous record low of 55 percent in 1958. The poll also found that a majority of Americans, 53 percent, believe that moderate drinking is bad for one's health. Alcohol can lead to many health problems, including liver diseases and increased risk of some cancers. Mixed drinks are displayed at a bar in Baltimore on February 8, 2023. Mixed drinks are displayed at a bar in Baltimore on February 8, 2023. AP Photo/Julio Cortez What To Know The latest Gallup survey, conducted July 7-21, found that a smaller share of Americans are drinking alcohol than at any point in the poll's history. In the mid-1970s, the share peaked at 71 percent for three consecutive years starting in 1976. Since then, drinking rates have generally trended downward, averaging about 60 percent, with periodic rises and dips. In 2022, 67 percent of adults said they drank alcohol, which Gallup noted as an outlier, followed by 62 percent in 2023, 58 percent in 2024 and 54 percent this year. The poll found that the decline in drinking is disproportionately among women, down 11 percentage points since 2023, to 51 percent, whereas men are down 5 points, at 57 percent. Along party lines, 61 percent of surveyed Democrats drink compared with 46 percent of Republicans. A record-low 54% of Americans say they consume alcohol. — Gallup (@Gallup) August 13, 2025 The survey also found that 53 percent of Americans say drinking in moderation, which is one to two drinks a day, is bad for one's health. Thirty-seven percent believe it does not make a difference. The results come as 45 percent of Americans believe moderate drinking is bad for health, according to a Gallup poll last year. That poll found drinking beliefs vary greatly among age groups, with 65 percent of young U.S. adults aged 18 to 34 believing that alcohol consumption negatively affects one's health, while 37 percent and 39 percent hold that view among those aged 35 to 54 and 55 and older, respectively. The view has shifted sharply in recent years. Between 2001 and 2011, about 25 percent of Americans said drinking was good for one's health. Women are more likely than men to view moderate drinking as unhealthy, 60 percent to 47 percent, respectively. The poll also found the lowest recorded figure of average number of drinks over the past week since 1996 at 2.8. What People Are Saying Lydia Saad, Gallup's director of social research, in the August 13 survey announcement: "The declines in alcohol consumption does not appear to be caused by people shifting to other mood-altering substances—in particular, recreational marijuana, which is now legal in about half of U.S. states." The Office of the Surgeon General, in a January 2025 announcement: "Alcohol consumption is the third-leading preventable cause of cancer in the United States, after tobacco and obesity." What Happens Next As Americans' drinking habits shift, the change is expected to affect the alcohol industry as well as the growing market for alternative beverages, driven in part by rising health concerns.
Newsweek
11 hours ago
- Newsweek
How Health Insurance Rates Could Rise In New York In 2026
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New Yorkers could see their health insurance costs increase by up to 13 percent in 2026, according to a report. Why It Matters Health insurance is a major cost for millions of Americans, and increases could add strain to peoples' finances. Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, warned in June that the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," passed by the GOP-led Congress, could further contribute to increased health insurance premiums over the coming years l. What to Know A report from the Community Service Society (CSS), a New York nonprofit, found that insurance companies in New York's Affordable Care Act marketplace are requesting higher rates for 2026 that could cause New Yorkers who get their insurance through that marketplace to pay thousands of dollars more in insurance payments. Emblem Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York is asking for the smallest increase at only one percent, according to the report. That is an average of $170 more per person. But other companies are asking for larger increases, with the Independent Health Benefits Corporation asking for a 38 percent increase, or $3,440 more in premiums per person, according to the report. United Healthcare of New York is asking for a 37 percent increase—equating to a $5,226 increase in premiums. A stock photo shows a doctor speaking to a patient. A stock photo shows a doctor speaking to a patient. pcess609/iStock via Getty Images MVP Health Plan Inc. and Fidelis are both asking for an 8 percent increase, while MetroPlus Health Plan and Anthem are asking for 10 percent. Healthfirst PHSP and Capital District Physicians Health Plan are asking for 14 percent rises, and Oscar Insurance Corporation wants a 17 percent increase, according to the report. Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. is asking for a 24 percent increase, and Excellus Health Plan is asking for a 25 percent increase, according to CSS. Peterson-KFF reported in July that individual market insurers across the country are requesting the largest premium increases in years, with some companies asking for more than 50 percent increases in ACA Marketplace plans. What People Are Saying CSS wrote in the report: "New York's individual market premiums might increase by up to 13 percent in 2026, forcing consumers to pay an extra $1,291 more annually. New York's twelve individual market carriers are requesting increases ranging from one percent by Emblem to a staggering 38 percent by Independent Health. These requests far surpass requests from carriers in other states." Governor Hochul wrote in June: "The GOP's Big Ugly bill would slash health care coverage for millions of New Yorkers and raise monthly costs by hundreds of dollars. If New York's Republican delegation won't stand up for their own constituents, I will. What Happens Next Whether these increase requests will be approved is yet to be seen. The price of health care remains a key issue facing the U.S.
Newsweek
12 hours ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court Faces Decision on LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapy
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to hear arguments this fall in a case about whether it should uphold or overturn Colorado's ban on LGBTQ+ conversion therapy. Why It Matters More than 20 states have banned conversion therapy, the practice of trying to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity through counseling. The practice has drawn scrutiny from LGBTQ+ advocates and many medical professionals who say conversion therapy does not work, lacks a scientific basis and can impose harm on minors. The nation's highest court on Tuesday announced that it will hear arguments in the case Chiles v. Salazar on October 7, 2025. The ruling could have key implications for the legality of conversion therapy in the states that have banned the practice. It has drawn concerns within the community, as some are concerned that the conservative-leaning bench could require states to allow conversion therapy. What To Know The Supreme Court case focuses on Kaley Chiles, a counselor in Colorado who challenged the state's law prohibiting the use of conversion therapy on minors. In a petition to the Supreme Court, her attorneys wrote that she is a "licensed counselor who helps people by talking with them." The petition raised a First Amendment argument, accusing Colorado of trying to ban "consensual conversations based on the viewpoints they express." Proponents of the ban on conversion therapy point to statistics showing it can harm LGBTQ+ youth. A 2020 study from the Trevor Project found that minors who underwent conversion therapy were more than twice as likely to have reported suicide attempts and more than 2.5 times as likely to report multiple suicide attempts compared to those who did not. Supporters argue that the state has the authority to regulate health care services that put minors at risk. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva/Getty Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat, argued in a filing that Court precedent "allows states to reasonably regulate professional conduct to protect patients from substandard treatment, even when that regulation incidentally burdens speech." "The Court of Appeals engaged in a straightforward application of this precedent to hold that the First Amendment allows states to regulate the professional practice of conversion therapy, like other unsafe and ineffective health care treatments, to protect minor patients from substandard professional care," he wrote. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek that the "Supreme Court's tea leaves seem to suggest that the Colorado law may be in peril." "That law proscribes alleged 'conversion therapy' by a professional counselor, whose sincere views are based on her Christian ideals and whose clients (adults and young people) actively seek her guidance because of their shared religious beliefs. To the Court, based on earlier cases, children are extremely vulnerable to the possible risks of such therapy and lack the maturity to accept or reject it," he said. However, the counselor argues that her First Amendment rights to "advise and assist her willing clients, who voluntarily wish to align their lives with their Christian faith, are unconstitutionally abridged by the broad state's law." "We shall see next year what the Court decides in this difficult case," Rossi said. Ryan Thoreson, a professor of law at the University of Cincinnati, told Newsweek he believes Colorado has strong arguments in favor of its ban, but that he is "skeptical this Court will uphold the state's conversion therapy ban in light of its recent First Amendment rulings." "The Roberts Court has been consistently solicitous toward free speech and religious exercise claims brought by conservative litigants, even when those claims undermine longstanding laws that protect LGBT people from discrimination and harm," he said. Colorado is likely to argue that it is "well-established that states can permissibly regulate the conduct of medical professionals, and can prohibit practices that fall below a certain standard of professional care." "And they can do so even when that conduct involves some amount of speech. While the state can't prevent private citizens from voicing their opinion that sexual orientation or gender identity can be changed, they can prevent licensed medical professionals from trying to promote or facilitate that change as part of their practice, especially in light of a large body of evidence showing that conversion therapy is damaging to young LGBT people's mental health," Thoreson said. Chiles, meanwhile, is likely to argue the law censors her speech based on her views about sexual orientation and gender identity. Generally, if the state is censoring speech based on content, it must pass a "heavy burden" to prove a "compelling interest in limiting the speech" and that the regulation is the least speech-restrictive way of achieving its interest, Thoreson said. Colorado likely would not be the only state affected, according to Thoreson. "What the Supreme Court decides in this case could also have seismic repercussions for state regulation of medical speech more generally. A broad First Amendment right of medical providers to say or recommend whatever they like without professional or legislative oversight, even when there is clear evidence that doing so is harmful, could open the door to pseudoscience and junk science in both medical and physical health care settings," he said. Jonathan Scruggs, senior counsel and vice president of litigation strategy at the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing Chiles, told Newsweek that children should not be "forced into one-size-fits-all options when they're looking for counseling help." "They deserve real support, not just state-approved talking points. Our client Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor in Colorado, works with her clients who voluntarily come to her with their goals to talk through what they are facing. Struggling kids deserve better than Colorado's law that pushes them toward harmful drugs and surgeries," he said. Jennifer Levi, senior director of transgender and queer rights at GLAD Law, told Newsweek there is a "real risk that the outcome indeed may be here that the court strikes down a ban on conversion therapy for minors." "What we know from well established science and research is that there is no amount of talk or pressure that can make a gay person not gay, or a trans person not transgender," Levi said. "It's really important that licensed therapists don't abuse their position of trust to push an agenda that research has shown puts kids at high risk of suicide attempts and self harm." Levi said it is "always hard to anticipate the scope of the court's decision," but it is possible the ruling could have "quite significant" implications for other states that have banned the practice. Do Americans Support Conversion Therapy? A majority of Americans are opposed to conversion therapy, according to a poll from Data for Progress, which surveyed 1,155 likely voters from June 6 to June 8, 2025. Fifty-six percent of respondents said they agreed conversion therapy should be banned, while only 35 percent said they should be allowed to take place. Sixty-two percent of Democrats, 57 percent of independents and 49 percent of Republicans believed the practice should be banned. A December 2023 report from The Trevor Project found that there were 1,320 conversion therapy practitioners operating across the country, 605 of whom were operating under professional licenses. What Have Supreme Court Justices Said About Conversion Therapy? So far, at least one justice has signaled opposition to conversion therapy bans. After the court rejected a similar case out of Washington, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, writing, "There is a fierce public debate over how best to help minors with gender dysphoria. The petitioner, Brian Tingley, stands on one side of the divide. He believes that a person's sex is 'a gift from God, integral to our very being.'" Still, the court in 2023 rejected the challenge to a Washington law prohibiting conversion therapy. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals previously ruled that the law was regulating mental health care, not the speech of the provider. The court's decision to reject that challenge left that ruling in place. In addition to Thomas, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the rejection and would have heard the case. What People Are Saying Casey Pick, director of Law and Policy at The Trevor Project, told Newsweek: "The law at the heart of this case protects young people in Colorado from dangerous, discredited practices that have been proven to cause harm and increase suicide risk. This common-sense, bipartisan state law was put in place to prevent licensed mental health professionals from using these abusive practices on Colorado's youth; it really is that simple. "This law is squarely focused on ensuring that providers with government-issued licenses do not abuse the trust placed in them to subject minors to practices that have been rejected by every medical and mental health association in the country. We know that proponents of so-called conversion 'therapy' are making every attempt to impose an ideologically driven agenda. However, we remain hopeful that the justices will side with reason, evidence, and expertise, and uphold this effort by Colorado lawmakers to protect the health and safety of young people." Jonathan Scruggs, senior counsel and vice president of litigation strategy at the Alliance Defending Freedom, told Newsweek: "All who choose to live consistent with their biological sex are entitled to the help of counselors like Kaley as they work through that process. We hope the US Supreme Court will rule on the side of free speech and allow counselors like Kaley to work with her clients without the government mandating goals it prefers." Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat, wrote in a statement in January: "In Colorado, we are committed to protecting professional standards of care so that no one suffers unscientific and harmful so-called gay conversion therapy. Colorado's judgment on this is the humane, smart, and appropriate policy and we're committed to defending." What Happens Next Oral arguments are set for October 7. The court has also been asked to weigh in on another major LGBTQ+ rights case. Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who refused to provide marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2015, has asked the court to revisit that ruling and overturn the national right to same-sex marriage. Legal experts told Newsweek that the case is a long shot, however.
