House panel votes to aim some Iowa Tuition Grant funds for high-demand jobs
A bill that would put half of Iowa Tuition Grant dollars toward degrees relating to high-demand jobs will move to the House floor. (Photo illustration via Getty Images)
A bill that would reserve half of state-funded grant dollars for private-university students seeking degrees in high-demand job fields passed through the Iowa House Higher Education Committee Tuesday with worries lingering about possible impacts on students and faith-based degree programs.
The Iowa Tuition Grant program offers need-based scholarships to students attending Iowa's private universities, with a maximum award amount of $8,500 in the 2024-2025 academic year. Currently funded at more than $52 million, Gov. Kim Reynolds has recommended state allocations of nearly $53.8 million for fiscal year 2026, according to the Iowa Budget Report.
House Study Bill 62 would require half of that amount to go to students enrolled in majors that relate to high-wage and high-demand careers, determined by a list that would be developed by Iowa Workforce Development and the Iowa Association of Independent Colleges and Universities.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'This concept obviously still needs some work yet here, but I would like to keep this vehicle alive as we are approaching the funnel to keep this conversation going,' said Rep. Taylor Collins, R-Mediapolis.
Under the Legislature's self-imposed 'funnel' deadline, most policy bills need to clear a committee in the House or Senate by the end of this week to be considered eligible for further debate. There are exceptions to the rule and some bills may be revived after missing the deadline.
Rep. Jennifer Konfrst, D-Windsor Heights, agreed with Collins's statement about the legislation still needing work, saying the Legislature needs to look hard at any unintended consequences of the bill before it could become law.
Private university leaders and lobbyists voiced concerns during the bill's subcommittee meeting that these changes would disproportionately impact faith-based institutions and hurt low-income students who need the Iowa Tuition Grant the most.
Konfrst said she worries most about putting salaries, which can be fluid, in code and what could happen to students who enter college undecided about what major to pursue.
While Konfrst said she knows the intent behind the bill, to focus education more on workforce needs, she added she has many questions about its implementation and potential impacts.
'I can go on about the idea of critical thinking and the importance of other majors. I know some of (grant dollars) go toward this, so I'm not going to get into an argument about that, but I had a boss who once said that the people who only know how will always work for the people who also know why,' Konfrst said. 'And you learn why in college, you learn a lot of this stuff not just from business classes or high needs classes, but from others, and so I think we need to make sure we're not excluding those majors.'
The bill will move ahead to the House floor with a 7-3 vote.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
14 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse. The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state. But in the Senate, it exposed a rift within the party over how to protect property rights. It also provoked loud opposition from members of Iowa's powerful ethanol industry, which argued the project is essential for Iowa's agricultural dominance, for farmers and for construction jobs. Even with the relief from Reynolds' veto, Summit will likely have to readjust plans after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. Summit's permit application was also rejected in South Dakota. The project has permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota but faces various court challenges. The Iowa bill would have prohibited the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limited the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increased the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company. Those provisions would likely have made it less financially feasible for a company to build a carbon dioxide pipeline. As the legislative session wound down, a dozen Republican senators insisted their leaders bring the House-approved bill to the floor for a vote after several years of inaction. The stalemate ended in a long and divisive debate among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there. The pipeline's many critics have for years begged lawmakers for action. They accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches. Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well. But as debate in the state Senate seemed inevitable, dozens of Summit employees and leaders and members of the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and labor unions made a big showing as well. The pipeline was proposed to carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market. The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits. Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a May 12 statement after the vote that a majority of the Iowa Senate 'turned their back on Iowa agriculture.'
Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A bill to let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit cleared the North Carolina legislature on Wednesday, however the path to joining the majority of U.S. states with similar laws remains uncertain. The GOP-backed legislation faces a likely veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, as well as pushback from a handful of Republicans who voted against the legislation in the state House. House Speaker Destin Hall acknowledged those concerns after Wednesday's vote. 'I would imagine that — math being math — that it's probably a low percentage relative to other bills,' Hall told reporters. If the bill becomes law, North Carolina would become the 30th state in the country to legalize permitless carrying of a concealed handgun, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. North Carolina would also be one of the last states in the Southeast to implement that legislation. The legislation allows for eligible people with valid identification over the age of 18 to carry a concealed handgun. More than half of states with permitless concealed carry set their age limit at 21 and older, while the rest have the legal carrying age at 18, according to the NCSL. Currently, a person must be 21 and older to obtain a concealed handgun permit in North Carolina. To qualify, an applicant must pass a firearms safety training course and not 'suffer from a physical or mental infirmity that prevents the safe handling of a handgun,' according to state law. Approving permitless concealed carry has been a goal of gun-rights activists in North Carolina for years, with House Republicans historically supportive of the idea. Some see it as the next step after Republican lawmakers successfully eliminated the permit system that required sheriffs to conduct character evaluations and criminal history checks for pistol applicants in 2023. Conservative advocates for the bill say it would strengthen Second Amendment rights for North Carolinians. Republican lawmakers also disputed that the bill would make the state more dangerous, as 'law-abiding citizens' would be the only people that would benefit from the permit elimination, not criminals, Republican Rep. Brian Echevarria said. 'Rights to keep and bear arms are constitutionally inseparable,' Echevarria said. 'If a person cannot own a firearm, they cannot bear a firearm.' The bill's passage tees up one of the first opportunities for a likely veto from Stein if he stays aligned with his fellow Democrats in the legislature. Stein has a more powerful veto stamp than his predecessor Roy Cooper , after Republicans lost their House supermajority last year that allowed them to override vetoes and enact their legislative agenda with relative ease. Now, House Republicans would need to count on a Democrat to join in their override efforts. Reaching that goal seems especially daunting, considering all of the present House Democrats — and two Republicans — voted against the bill. The governor's office didn't respond to a request for comment on the legislation, but House Deputy Democratic Leader Cynthia Ball said in a committee Tuesday that Stein was opposed to it. Several Democratic legislators said it would make communities unsafe by loosening who can carry a concealed handgun without training. Democrats also raised issue with the age limit set in the bill, saying it would put guns in the hands of young people who aren't yet mature enough to have one. 'Do you not remember when you were 18? We are prone and so susceptible to peer pressure, we are hotheaded, we are emotional,' Democratic Rep. Tracy Clark said on the House floor after retelling her personal experience of losing two friends in college to gun violence. Those seeking a permit for their concealed handgun — such as for the purpose of traveling with a firearm to a state that requires a permit — would still be able to do so. The bill also heightens the felony punishment for those who assault law enforcement officers or first responders with a firearm. A separate bill that makes gun safety courses available at North Carolina community colleges for people 18 and up passed in a near-unanimous House vote directly after the concealed carry permit repeal legislation was approved. ___ Associated Press writer Gary D. Robertson in Raleigh contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Hints at Thawing of Trump-Musk Feud
Elon Musk shakes hands with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025, days before a feud erupted between them over social media. Credit - Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images The President of the United States and the world's richest man may be tired of fighting. After Elon Musk wrote Wednesday on X that he regretted some of the things he posted about President Donald Trump the week before, Trump hinted he was ready to move on. It was 'very nice' Musk expressed regret, Trump told the New York Post in a phone interview Wednesday morning. Trump's White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavit echoed that sentiment speaking with reporters Wednesday afternoon. 'The President acknowledged the statement that Elon put out this morning and he is appreciative of it. We are continuing to focus on the work of the American people,' Leavitt said. Last week, Trump publicly threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts as a feud between the two men unfolded on social media spat. Musk's companies SpaceX and Tesla have benefited from tens of billions in subsidies, contracts and tax breaks over the years. But it appears Trump hadn't yet followed through on that threat. Asked if Trump had moved to block government funds going to Musk's companies, Leavitt said, 'No efforts have been made on that as far as I'm aware.' The very public breakup between Trump and Musk began last week over Musk's opposition to the massive tax-and-spending bill that Republicans are trying to push through Congress. The bill is the centerpiece of Trump's domestic agenda. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the current version of the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. As both men attacked one another, Musk claimed Trump wouldn't have won the 2024 election without him and, in what Musk described as 'the really big bomb,' wrote in a post on X—without evidence—that Trump is named in the case files of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and suggested that was the reason the full files have not been made public. Musk's message was later deleted. Then early Wednesday, Musk posted on X: 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' Contact us at letters@
