
Give councils more powers to raise taxes, suggests Rayner
The Local Government Secretary signalled support for fiscal devolution, where local authorities and mayors can levy their own local taxes and handle their own budgets.
It follows clamour from council leaders and councillors to be able to impose their levies, including a demand for a higher 'tourist tax' in Liverpool.
At the end of last year, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, resisted calls from English mayors to extend their ability to raise money at a local level.
But appearing before the housing, communities and local government select committee on Tuesday, Ms Rayner, who is also Deputy Prime Minister, appeared to be more supportive of the idea.
Asked about local authorities 'crying out' for more tax-and-spend powers, Ms Rayner said: 'I think the challenge is that it's always a bit 'evolution and revolution' and I definitely want to see more push.
'We have had that, to be fair. There is some more fiscal devolution coming to some of our pathfinder mayors, they're getting more control over their budgets.
'We're un-ringfencing huge sums of money to local government at the moment, which has never been done before. Councils get a pot of money and they're told how to spend it – I think that's deeply disrespectful.'
'Councils have found themselves in hot water'
Ms Rayner went on to declare she was 'challenging the system', adding: 'Everyone says about 'Westminster' but I like to think that actually if you empower local leaders [...] my style of leadership is that you get the best outcomes from that.
'The challenges are the same so I absolutely believe we should be pushing more. But equally the note of caution that comes our way as well is that sometimes where there have been the brakes taken off, for example in local government where audit was taken away, councils have found themselves in hot water.
'And therefore there has to be a balance, and some guardrails.'
Liverpool introduced a £2 tourist tax on hotel stays for overnight visitors in June, although Labour councillors in the city are pushing the Government to go further and allow them to extend the fee across the whole city.
Last year, The Telegraph revealed that individual ministers were in favour of introducing such a policy nationally.
In a private meeting with mayors in December, Ms Reeves was reported to have said that people were already paying enough tax in the wake of her first Budget.
She was also said to have expressed fears about the potential consequences of more fiscal devolution for the hospitality sector.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour lays the ground for September tax bombshell as Rachel Reeves looks to fill £50billion black hole in nation's finances
Labour is laying the ground for tax reforms this autumn that could spell misery for millions. From September the Chancellor will be attempting to prepare the country for a difficult Budget that could be held in November, according to reports. Rachel Reeves must find £50 billion in tax rises or spending cuts to balance the books, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said this week. However, she has vowed to stick to her pledge to not raise income tax, national insurance or VAT – and will also keep her fiscal rules preventing more borrowing. The NIESR said higher-than-expected public sector borrowing and weaker economic growth had left the Chancellor with an 'impossible' choice. The Bank of England also warned that it is likely to slow the pace of interest cuts as soaring food prices caused by Labour's tax increases threaten to drive inflation to 4 per cent this year. Ms Reeves has already begun meetings with Sir Keir Starmer to draw up a plan for the Budget, according to The Guardian. One tax that is almost certain to feature is a rise in gambling levies. The Chancellor said on Thursday: 'We've launched a review into gambling taxes. We'll set out our policies in our budget later this year.' The Bank of England (pictured) also warned that it is likely to slow the pace of interest cuts as soaring food prices caused by Labour's tax increases threaten to drive inflation to 4 per cent this year Taxes Reeves could hike to fill the black hole Gambling taxes: A think-tank said it could raise £3.2billion. Continue freeze on income tax thresholds: Thresholds normally rise in line with inflation but were frozen by the Tories until 2028. Extending this could potentially raise £8billion a year. Hiking National Insurance: The Chancellor already broke her promise not to increase this measure at the last Budget. Scrapping Lifetime Isa: The Treasury Committee is looking into whether Lifetime Isas – which provide a tax-free nest egg – are fit for purpose. Pension tax relief: Ms Reeves once wrote applying a flat rate of pensions tax relief of 33 per cent – currently 20 per cent – would be 'a welcome boost for basic-rate taxpayers'. Another option that could be under consideration is to target a subsidy paid to High Street banks that costs taxpayers £20billion. Lenders currently receive interest payments of 4 per cent on reserves – which amount to almost £600billion – they have to hold risk-free at the Bank of England. 'The Treasury is on the hook to send the Bank of England over £20billion a year to cover its losses,' said Dominic Caddick of the New Economics Foundation. Yesterday, Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride accused Ms Reeves of 'economic mismanagement'. He added: 'The Chancellor is planning yet more tax raids to plug the gaping black hole she has created – and it's hardworking savers and pensioners who'll pay the price. 'Rachel Reeves is taxing your future to fund her failure.'


Sky News
32 minutes ago
- Sky News
Friday night's anti-migrant protests in Norwich were peaceful - but anger is bubbling
Outside the Best Western Brook Hotel in Norwich around 300 anti-migrant protesters sang along to Sweet Caroline, Neil Diamond's song about good times never feeling so good, but that wasn't their message for the migrants living inside the hotel. In a town where average rents have increased faster than the rest of England, and hospital waiting times are some of the worst in the country, many who turned out complained about the cost of housing asylum seekers. Stuart, a Norfolk businessman holding a giant St George's flag, said: "I see my company paying north of a hundred thousand pounds a year in tax and the money is not going back into our system, back into our NHS, when it takes two million pounds a year to keep one hotel open." In a theme that we've seen in protests across the country, residents also spoke of their fears for women and girls. Protester Karen Williams said: "I have seen with my own eyes school children being hassled from illegal males from this hotel. Being followed, asked for their phone numbers." A man who didn't want to be named added: "That hotel could be full of terrorists. We don't know where they're from, they're undocumented males, all of a certain age. We've been invaded." Many wore T-shirts with slogans saying they were not far-right. Although a large portion of the crowd cheered when the name Tommy Robinson was hailed from the stage. The day had been dubbed "Abolish Asylum Day" with a call to action for protesters to come out across the country. Here, around 80 counter protesters also arrived on the scene and police used their vans and two lines of officers to create a green zone in the car park to separate the opposing groups. The hotel curtains were closed but no doubt the migrants inside could hear as on one side, a group determined to get rid of them, chanted, "whose streets, our streets", and sang Rule Britannia, while the other side's chants assured them: "Refugees are welcome here." Counter protester Stuart said: "It's unfair that these people are going to be intimidated like that and I want to show that not everybody in the UK thinks this way." Hayley, holding a banner which read, "save our kids from fascists", said: "I live in this area, and I see these people every day and they do nothing wrong whatsoever. "They genuinely are very sweet people who don't deserve what's happening." Another counter protester, Cate, said: "They [migrants] are not who they are made out to be." "I would trust them any day - far more than I would those people," she added, nodding towards the anti-migrant protesters. Organisers on both sides said they came in peace, and peaceful it was. But there is a bubbling anger. The Brook Hotel was taken over by the Home Office nearly three years ago and protests here, that only began this summer, are seeing their numbers grow.


The Herald Scotland
35 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Alexander Isak set to miss opener as Newcastle ‘not in position' to refuse sale
Howe revealed that talks with Isak, the subject of a rejected £110million bid from Liverpool, are ongoing, but he does not expect any resolution before the season's opener. Thank you to the 30,782 inside St. James' Park this evening for your fantastic support 👏 We'll see you tomorrow! 🖤🤍 — Newcastle United (@NUFC) August 8, 2025 The Magpies' head coach said: 'I'd want Alex to be playing today, I'd want him training tomorrow. We would love the player to be with us – let me make that absolutely clear. There's no part of me that doesn't want that outcome. 'But I don't see that changing before Aston Villa, the current situation we're in.' Isak has cut a lonely figure at the Magpies' training ground since his return to Tyneside having been ordered to work away from the main group following his non-appearance for the club's pre-season trip to Singapore and South Korea. His indication that he wants to explore his options this summer, coupled with Liverpool's bid – Newcastle value him at closer to £150m – have created a tense stand-off. Isak's unhappiness has left the club with a major decision to make – cash in now and make a significant profit on a man who cost them £63m three summers ago, or try to persuade him that his future remains on Tyneside and that he should sign a new contract to replace his existing deal, which has three years still to run. Asked if the club could simply dig in their heels and refuse to sell their star frontman, Howe said: 'I don't think it's that straightforward, otherwise we'd have done that a long time ago. I don't think we're in a position to do that currently. 'I don't want to go into too much detail because I don't think that's right. I think I've said enough.' Liverpool boss Arne Slot refused to comment on the Premier League champions' pursuit of the Swede at his press conference on Friday morning as the Magpies continue to work on potential signings after a frustrating summer to date. RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko's decision to opt for Manchester United rather than Newcastle represented a fresh blow and while they are working on other targets, their need is mounting by the day. The club's failure to date to land potential signings – they have recruited Anthony Elanga and Aaron Ramsdale, who saved a penalty against the Spanish side on his debut, but have missed out on Hugo Ekitike, Sesko, James Trafford and Joao Pedro – has prompted suggestions that Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, which owns an 85 per cent stake, is not as engaged as it once was. However Howe, who admitted the Isak situation has unsettled a previously united squad, was unequivocal in his denial. He said: 'The owners are very much engaged, as much as they always have been. 'This has been a challenging period where there'll be a lot of different opinions on different subjects, but can assure everybody connected with Newcastle that the owners are very much behind the project and fighting every day for the club.'