Meta's $14 Billion Message: The Undervalued Power Of Open Talent
Meta's $14B investment in Scale AI sends a clear message: in the new era of work, flexible access to ... More open talent is a strategic advantage, not a side bet.
When Meta invested nearly $15 billion in Scale AI, most headlines framed it as a bold play in artificial intelligence. I saw something else: a long-overdue revaluation of open talent.
In mid-2025, Meta acquired a 49% stake in Scale AI, valuing the data-labeling startup just shy of $30 billion. This wasn't about acquiring cutting-edge IP or next-gen infrastructure. It was a purchase of capacity, of access. What Meta really bought was the ability to flex.
Scale AI, at its core, is a freelance platform. Its strength lies in mobilizing tens of thousands of distributed workers to label, fine-tune, and validate the data that fuels large language models (LLMs). These aren't full-time employees. They're on-demand contributors, logging in, doing the work, and logging off. But they're vital to AI's evolution, and to Meta's ability to compete in this new era.
Meta didn't just invest in AI. It invested in a new model of work. And in doing so, it may have finally signaled to the business world what some of us have long argued: open talent platforms are not a workaround, they're a foundation.
Beneath the buzzwords and billion-dollar valuations, Scale AI's operating model looks far more like Upwork or Torc than it does OpenAI or Anthropic. Its value proposition is flexibility, speed, and global reach, offering what would traditionally be fixed labor as a dynamic, variable resource.
Yet many executives still see open talent as a side play, great for design work or overflow tasks, but not strategic. Meta's move challenges that mindset. It points to something deeper: the shift from owning talent to orchestrating it.
As explored in a recent SIA report on workforce transformation, the most forward-looking companies are already rethinking how they access and engage skills. Instead of recruiting reactively, they're building ecosystems where pre-vetted, mission-ready talent can be deployed at a moment's notice.
In uncertain times, like now, companies naturally turn to cost-cutting and restructuring. But few examine the fixed nature of their labor costs. That's a missed opportunity.
Shifting to variable labor models isn't just a cost strategy; it's a competitive one. Platforms like Torc, now integrated into Randstad Digital, show how open talent can enable rapid scaling, skill precision, and financial agility. According to the SIA report, some firms reduced interview time from a week to an hour and found 'needle-in-a-haystack' talent nearly instantly.
Meta just paid $14 billion to get that kind of leverage. That alone should prompt a reexamination of what, and who, is sitting on your balance sheet.
What makes open talent so powerful today isn't just the ability to match skills to tasks—it's the capacity to build thriving, specialized communities. In the most effective models, freelancers aren't just gig workers—they're members of an ecosystem that offers learning, career growth, and human guidance.
That's the evolution: from transaction to relationship. From matching to mobilizing. From recruiting to curating. And this requires new leadership muscles. As platforms take over the matching function, managers must learn the art of 'curatorial leadership,' engaging, advising, and enabling talent, rather than controlling it.
If your leadership team isn't already thinking about labor flexibility as a core strategic lever, it's time to catch up. Start by asking where you're relying on fixed labor that could be made variable, what skills you need access to but don't need to own, and whether your systems are designed for internal control or external adaptability.
Then act. Run a pilot. Use a platform like Torc or Topcoder not as a side project, but as a strategic test bed. Build governance, coach managers, and design feedback loops. The goal isn't just to cut costs, it's to increase speed, precision, and innovation capacity
Meta's investment in Scale AI is a milestone, not just for the AI industry, but for the future of work. It's a loud, clear signal: labor flexibility isn't peripheral. It's foundational.
We're entering an era where access beats ownership, orchestration beats control, and agility beats scale. The companies that understand this shift won't just survive, they'll lead.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
24 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
AI can empower agriculture retailers, farm supply cooperatives
DENVER, June 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — New artificial intelligence technology is enabling agricultural retailers and farm supply cooperatives to optimize their operational performance while strengthening all-important customer relationships. In addition to broad-based AI platforms that can be leveraged to simplify everyday business operations, farm suppliers now have access to AI apps specifically designed to support field agronomy and crop production. According to a new research brief from CoBank's Knowledge Exchange, AI technology offers ag retailers a new set of tools to optimize workflows, inventory management, employee performance and other key business functions. Farm supply businesses that rise to the challenge of adopting AI can also enhance their position as trusted advisors and essential partners in the ag supply chain. 'AI in agriculture can be utilized in a company's back office, front office as well as within agronomy and supply chain operations divisions,' said Jacqui Fatka, farm supply and biofuels economist with CoBank. 'Early adoption and reliable partnerships will provide an advantage for those willing to test the AI landscape. Ag retailers should research companies and pick AI partners who understand agriculture and promise value beyond just lofty ROIs.' Agricultural cooperatives and retailers serve as a critical relationship bridge between farmers and input providers. The potential erosion of those relationships due to alternative distribution models, disruptive technologies or other competing forces is one of the biggest challenges ag retailers face moving forward. Early adoption of AI can help the ag retailer sector stay ahead of competitors while maintaining and strengthening customer relationships. Fatka suggested ag retailers start with easy-to-implement, low-stakes AI applications for things like email and presentation assistance and customer interaction summaries before tackling more complex tasks. 'Testing out different pathways to gain internal acceptance can lead to greater long-term success. For instance, an easy initial test might be recording virtual meetings with CoPilot. Within minutes, it can deliver an AI-generated summary of the meeting with key takeaways, immediate action items and future tasks.' Ag retailers can also start leveraging AI to optimize workflows for standard business functions like human resources, accounting, operations and sales. Using AI to evaluate and streamline these functions offers a high return on investment relative to the efforts required to build or implement such tools. Fatka stresses, however, that companies should establish guardrails for the use of customer information and understand privacy changes with the use of AI tools. While AI is unlikely to eliminate ag retail jobs, it can help simplify tasks and reduce human error or bias. In addition, as labor continues to be a challenge for many rural enterprises, it can provide continuity during labor turnover. AI can also help agronomists and other staff cover more acres or customers. Apps like AgPilot enable agronomists to interact with AI verbally while traveling between customers, allowing them to input crop protection recommendations and smoothly advance potential sales from one stage to another. 'The stakes are high for agribusinesses operating in an environment where margins are tight,' said Fatka. 'However, ag retailers will need to ensure AI costs do not outweigh the benefits. The cost of experimentation is minimal and delaying a trial adoption of these promising tools could result in missed opportunities for growth.' Read the research brief, How AI is Empowering Agriculture Retailers. About CoBank CoBank is a cooperative bank serving vital industries across rural America. The bank provides loans, leases, export financing and other financial services to agribusinesses and rural power, water and communications providers in all 50 states. The bank also provides wholesale loans and other financial services to affiliated Farm Credit associations serving more than 78,000 farmers, ranchers and other rural borrowers in 23 states around the country. CoBank is a member of the Farm Credit System, a nationwide network of banks and retail lending associations chartered to support the borrowing needs of U.S. agriculture, rural infrastructure and rural communities. Headquartered outside Denver, Colorado, CoBank serves customers from regional banking centers across the U.S. and also maintains an international representative office in Singapore. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
CNET
25 minutes ago
- CNET
Fed Rate Cuts Unlikely This Summer. Are Lower Mortgage Rates Still Possible?
The Fed's interest rate decisions impact mortgages, but the relationship isn't straightforward. Tharon Green/CNET There's a wild amount of uncertainty in today's economy, but one thing is clear: The Federal Reserve isn't planning to lower interest rates this summer. Mortgage rates, which have been stuck near 7% for the past several months, are likely to stay higher for longer. On June 18, Fed officials voted to leave borrowing rates unchanged for a fourth consecutive meeting. Holding interest rates where they are allows the central bank to evaluate how President Trump's unpredictable tariff campaign, immigration policies and federal cutbacks affect both inflation and the job market. Often, what the central bank simply says about future plans can cause a stir in the housing market. Mortgage rates are driven by bond investors and a host of other factors, i.e., not directly determined by the Fed. "The mortgage market reacts fast to uncertainty, and we've got no shortage of it this summer," said Nicole Rueth, of the Rueth Team with Movement Mortgage. Why is the Fed not cutting interest rates? The Fed sets and oversees US monetary policy under a dual mandate to maintain price stability and maximum employment. It does this largely by adjusting the federal funds rate, the rate at which banks borrow and lend their money. When economic growth is weak and unemployment is high, the Fed lowers interest rates to encourage spending and propel growth. Reducing interest rates could also allow inflation to surge, which is generally bad for mortgage rates. Keeping rates high, however, increases the risk of a job-loss recession that would cause widespread financial hardship. If unemployment spikes -- a real possibility given rising jobless claims -- the Fed could be forced to implement interest rate cuts earlier than anticipated. "The Federal Reserve is in one of the trickiest spots in recent economic history," said Ali Wolf, Zonda and NewHomeSource chief economist. What is the forecast for interest rate cuts in 2025? On Wednesday, markets eyed the Fed's Summary of Economic Projections, which outlined two 0.25% rate cuts in 2025, unchanged from earlier estimates. But that's far from guaranteed. The updated forecast suggests that tariffs will push prices higher, suggesting that consumers have not yet felt the full effect of these import duties. "Everyone that I know is forecasting a meaningful increase in inflation in the coming months from tariffs, because someone has to pay for the tariffs," Fed Chair Jerome Powell said during a June 18 press conference. Inflation could prompt the central bank to forgo one (or both) of its projected rate cuts, which would keep mortgage rates high. Though Powell remains noncommittal on any specific time frame, financial markets still see a potential interest rate cut coming as early as this fall. Most housing market forecasts, which already factor in at least two 0.25% Fed cuts, call for 30-year mortgage rates to stay above 6.5% throughout 2025. "Average rates are likely to stay in the 6.75% to 7.25% range unless the Fed signals multiple cuts and backs up their policy with data," Rueth said. What factors affect mortgage rates? Mortgage rates move around for many of the same reasons home prices do: supply, demand, inflation and even the employment rate. Personal factors, such as a homebuyer's credit score, down payment and home loan amount, also determine one's individual mortgage rate. Different loan types and terms also have varying interest rates. Policy changes: When the Fed adjusts the federal funds rate, it affects many aspects of the economy, including mortgage rates. The federal funds rate affects how much it costs banks to borrow money, which in turn affects what banks charge consumers to make a profit. Inflation: Generally, when inflation is high, mortgage rates tend to be high. Because inflation chips away at purchasing power, lenders set higher interest rates on loans to make up for that loss and ensure a profit. Supply and demand: When demand for mortgages is high, lenders tend to raise interest rates. This is because they have only so much capital to lend in the form of home loans. Conversely, when demand for mortgages is low, lenders tend to slash interest rates to attract borrowers. Bond market activity: Mortgage lenders peg fixed interest rates, like fixed-rate mortgages, to bond rates. Mortgage bonds, also called mortgage-backed securities, are bundles of mortgages sold to investors and are closely tied to the 10-year Treasury. When bond interest rates are high, the bond has less value on the market where investors buy and sell securities, causing mortgage interest rates to go up. Other key indicators: Employment patterns and other aspects of the economy that affect investor confidence and consumer spending and borrowing also influence mortgage rates. For instance, a strong jobs report and a robust economy could indicate greater demand for housing, which can put upward pressure on mortgage rates. When the economy slows and unemployment is high, mortgage rates tend to be lower. Read more: Fact Check: Trump Doesn't Have the Power to Force Lower Interest Rates Is now a good time to get a mortgage? Even though timing is everything in the mortgage market, you can't control what the Fed does. "Forecasting interest rates is nearly impossible in today's market," said Wolf. Regardless of the economy, the most important thing when shopping for a mortgage is to make sure you can comfortably afford your monthly payments. More homebuying advice
Associated Press
28 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Here's why
NEW YORK (AP) — More and more celebrities are looking to attach their names to your phone. Or rather, wireless services that could power it. From cosmetics to snacks and signature spirits, brands launched or co-owned by high-profile figures are just about everywhere you look today. But several big names are also venturing into the market for mobile virtual network operators — or MVNOs, an industry term for businesses that provide cell coverage by leasing infrastructure from bigger, more established carriers. U.S. President Donald Trump's family was the most recent to join the list with the launch of Trump Mobile this week. Here's what to know. Which big names have entered the phone business? On Monday, The Trump Organization (currently run by the president's sons Eric and Donald Jr.) unveiled Trump Mobile. The company says this new business will offer cell service, through an apparent licensing deal with 'all three major cellular carriers' in the U.S., and sell gold phones by August. Trump Mobile marks the latest in a string of new Trump-branded offerings — which already span from golden sneakers to 'God Bless the USA' bibles — despite mounting ethical concerns that the president is profiting off his position and could distort public policy for personal gain. 'This raises a real question about a conflict of interest,' said Ben Bentzin, an associate professor of instruction at The University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business. As the sitting president, Trump appoints leadership for the Federal Communications Commission — and the family's new phone venture exists under this regulatory authority. All of this sets Trump Mobile apart from other big names that have recently ventured into the wireless business. Still, its launch arrives as a growing number of celebrities tap into this space. Just last week, actors Jason Bateman, Sean Hayes and Will Arnett launched SmartLess Mobile, a name that mirrors the trio's 'SmartLess' podcast. Now live across the contiguous U.S. and Puerto Rico, SmartLess Mobile runs on T-Mobile's 5G Network. Another wireless provider with ties to fame is Mint Mobile. While not launched by celebrities, Ryan Reynolds purchased an ownership stake in Mint in 2019. Mint's parent, the Ka'ena Corporation, was later acquired by T-Mobile in a deal worth up to $1.35 billion. Beyond names of famous people, well-known brands that weren't traditionally in the phone business have also got in on the action over the years — particuarly outside of the U.S., Forrester Research senior analyst Octavio Garcia Granados notes. He points to Walmart's 'Bait' mobile plan in Mexico, for example, as well as Italian soccer club AC Milan launching its own mobile SIM cards for fans. 'The MVNO market is not new,' said Garcia Granados. 'What's new is the development on how it's consumed and the (ease) for brands to launch such plans.' MVNOs have also emerged outside of high-profile brands or launch teams. Bentzin points to Straight Talk and Cricket — which are now owned by Verizon and AT&T, respectively. Still, traditional celebrity endorsements are common across the board. And in recent years, 'influencer marketing' has been 'the fastest growing area of advertising and promotion,' he notes. What are these cell services offering? Why were they launched? For Trump Mobile, the pitch seems to be all about having an 'all-American service' while also tapping into the fan base of the president. The company noted Monday that it chose to unveil Trump Mobile on the 10th anniversary of Trump launching 'his historic presidential campaign.' The name given to its flagship offer, The 47 Plan, and the $47.45 monthly fee make reference to the president's two terms. And a mock-up of the planned gold phone on the company's website shows Trump's 'Make America Great' slogan on the front screen. According to the company, Trump Mobile's 47 Plan will include unlimited calls, texts and data through partner carriers, as well as free roadside assistance and telehealth services. It also says the new phone, called the 'T1 Phone,' will be available for $499 in August — but notes that this device won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile. Still, the company emphasized that these phones will be built in the U.S. Experts have since shared skepticism about that being possible in two months. And beyond the future T1 Phone, others stress that a monthly cell service fee of just under $50 is pricey compared to other MVNO options today. 'It's not actual lower pricing. It's really trading on the fan base, if you will, of Trump,' said Bentzin. SmartLess Mobile and Mint Mobile, of course, don't carry these same political ties. And the wireless plans offered by both boast less expensive offerings. T-Mobile-owned Mint advertises 'flexible, buy-in-bulk' plans that range from $15 to $30 a month. Each option includes unlimited talk and text nationwide, but vary depending on plan length and data amount. Mint, founded in 2016, says it started 'because we'd had enough of the wireless industry's games' — and promises to help consumers avoid hidden fees. SmartLess Mobile's plans also start at $15 a month. Depending on the data amount purchased, that base fee can rise to $30 — but all of its plans similarly offer unlimited talk and text using T-Mobile's network. When launching last week, SmartLess underlined that its goal is to help people stop paying for the data they don't use, noting that the majority of data used by consumers today happens over Wi-Fi. 'Seriously, if your phone bill knew how often you're on Wi-Fi, it would be embarrassed,' Hayes said in a statement for SmartLess Mobile's June 10 launch. What's the demand? MVNOs have proven to be attractive acquisitions to big wireless carriers over the years. But whether or not the star factor promises significant demand has yet to be seen for the market's most recent entrants. For the more established Mint Mobile, Reynolds' investment is a success story. The 25% stake that the actor reportedly owned in 2023, when the company announced that it would be acquired by T-Mobile, was estimated to give him a personal windfall of over $300 million in cash and stock. And since that deal closed, Reynolds has remained in his creative role for Mint and as the face of many campaigns — helping the brand continue to attract new customers. It's no surprise that the potential of such business returns might attract other celebrities to make similar investments, Bentzin notes. Still, newer ventures are untested. And 'as the market becomes more crowded, it could be harder and harder to pick off individual consumers,' he added. Beyond a high-profile name, quality of service and what consumers can afford is also critical. 'The competition battleground here is brand and price,' Bentzin said. Still, if the marketing is right and product meets consumer needs, experts like Garcia Granados note that MVNOs can be a profitable business, for both the brands that start them and the telecommunications giants — like T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T — offering this 'wholesale' access to their infrastructure. As a result, he said, such high-profile ventures become 'a catalyst for others to follow.' ______ AP Business Writer Bernard Condon contributed to this report from New York.
