More households want to go full electric but lack spark
More than one in three households are considering upgrading to electricity-only to save money and the environment, a study has found, and the number of people resisting the switch has fallen.
But many Australians remain confused about efficiency ratings and potential savings from energy upgrades, and those aged over 35 are more likely to take action.
Origin Energy and the REA Group revealed the findings from the second PropTrack Origin Australian Home Energy Report on Wednesday, which also found efficient lighting and solar panels were among the most popular ways to save energy.
The report comes after the re-elected Labor government committed $2.3 billion to cut the price of solar batteries by 30 per cent, although renewable energy groups say the program could cast a wider net.
The research, which surveyed more than 4800 Australians, found more than half (56 per cent) planned to improve their home's energy efficiency in the next five years, and 40 per cent would consider an all-electric household upgrade.
The number of people who would not consider disconnecting gas and swapping to electricity also fell from 31 per cent in 2024 to 28 per cent.
But the study also identified widespread confusion, with two in five reporting they did not know how to improve their household's energy efficiency and most respondents (71 per cent) saying they were unfamiliar with the Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme.
People who were confident about energy-efficient upgrades were more likely to invest in them, REA Group senior economist Eleanor Creagh said, indicating greater education was needed.
"It does clearly highlight there's a gap in consumer knowledge, not just around rating systems but also around many energy-related terms," she told AAP.
"Those who did respond that they had a good grasp of those key terms, they were significantly more likely to have made upgrades, to have shifted energy behaviours, to plan further energy improvements, and to have higher projected budgets."
The study also found most households (70 per cent) had tried to reduce energy use and Australians aged over 35 were more likely to invest in energy upgrades.
Efficient lighting and solar power were the most popular energy upgrades, while glazed windows and home batteries were among the least popular, but Ms Creagh said that could shift with financial incentives from state and federal governments.
"Financial motivations were behind a lot of the decisions people were making in terms of energy-efficient upgrades in the home," she said.
Interest in home batteries had already started to soar after the incoming Labor government's commitment to reduce their cost by 30 per cent from July, Solar Citizens Heidi Lee Douglas said.
But the scheme should be extended to more households, she said, to ensure the greatest benefit.
"People in apartments and people in rental (homes) might feel like they're locked out of batteries," she said.
"We'll be putting pressure on Labor to come up with policies that support electrification and rooftop renewables for the rest of Australia."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Budget, ferries, AFL stadium could crash Tasmanian government
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has threatened to send voters back to the polls for an early election after Labor secured enough support to pass a no-confidence motion on the Liberal leader's management of the state's finances. Opposition Leader Dean Winter tabled the motion in state parliament on Wednesday morning, bringing to a head an intense political dispute about Rockliff's handling of the budget, the bungled rollout of new Spirit of Tasmania ferries, privatisation of assets and a proposed new AFL stadium.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Chalmers goes on the attack over super tax ‘lies'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has brushed away criticism of his proposal to tax paper profits for wealthy superannuant, claiming media reporting on the issue does not indicate Australians are genuinely concerned and accusing the Coalition of lying. Since Labor's election win, scrutiny has grown on the government's plan to raise the earnings tax from July 1 on superannuation balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent. Labor announced the policy more than two years ago, but it has yet to go through the Senate. Chalmers pushed back at suggestions the government could win support for the change from the Liberal and National parties, saying the Coalition – which has opposed the proposal – was not serious about negotiating. 'I think we should resist the temptation to think that because overwhelmingly, two media outlets don't like this change, to assume that the concern is kind of broadly and deeply felt in the Australian community,' Chalmers said in a press conference in Canberra on Wednesday, in his firmest defence of his policy to date. Reporting on the policy, projected to about $2.7 billion per year initially, has been led by The Australian, owned by News Corp, and the Australian Financial Review, owned by this masthead's owner Nine Entertainment. Loading The most controversial element of the policy is that unrealised capital gains on assets held in super, such as property or farms, will be valued and taxed each year. The unorthodox practice has raised questions about the principle of asking superannuant to settle a tax bill for assets from which they have not yet banked an actual gain. Chalmers said tax concessions for super account holders remained generous, and claimed Coalition MPs were lying when they claimed politicians on defined benefits pension schemes, such as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, would not be captured by the tax. He said under existing law, long-serving MPs such as Albanese could not pay for any extra tax liability out of their super until they reached pension age. But they would be charged interest on their deferred tax.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Chalmers goes on the attack over super tax ‘lies'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has brushed away criticism of his proposal to tax paper profits for wealthy superannuant, claiming media reporting on the issue does not indicate Australians are genuinely concerned and accusing the Coalition of lying. Since Labor's election win, scrutiny has grown on the government's plan to raise the earnings tax from July 1 on superannuation balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent. Labor announced the policy more than two years ago, but it has yet to go through the Senate. Chalmers pushed back at suggestions the government could win support for the change from the Liberal and National parties, saying the Coalition – which has opposed the proposal – was not serious about negotiating. 'I think we should resist the temptation to think that because overwhelmingly, two media outlets don't like this change, to assume that the concern is kind of broadly and deeply felt in the Australian community,' Chalmers said in a press conference in Canberra on Wednesday, in his firmest defence of his policy to date. Reporting on the policy, projected to about $2.7 billion per year initially, has been led by The Australian, owned by News Corp, and the Australian Financial Review, owned by this masthead's owner Nine Entertainment. Loading The most controversial element of the policy is that unrealised capital gains on assets held in super, such as property or farms, will be valued and taxed each year. The unorthodox practice has raised questions about the principle of asking superannuant to settle a tax bill for assets from which they have not yet banked an actual gain. Chalmers said tax concessions for super account holders remained generous, and claimed Coalition MPs were lying when they claimed politicians on defined benefits pension schemes, such as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, would not be captured by the tax. He said under existing law, long-serving MPs such as Albanese could not pay for any extra tax liability out of their super until they reached pension age. But they would be charged interest on their deferred tax.
