logo
Scranton backs historical board's denial of digital billboards downtown

Scranton backs historical board's denial of digital billboards downtown

Yahoo15-05-2025
A rejected proposal for a pair of digital billboards in downtown Scranton ran counter to the example set by late Scranton native and urbanist guru Jane Jacobs, who advocated for maintaining neighborhoods, retail stores and walkability in cities, according to the city's Historical Architecture Review Board.
The board in March rejected Kegerreis Outdoor Advertising's proposal to convert the two-faced 'static' billboard signs at 320 Mulberry St. into rotating LED digital signs. That rejection went to Scranton City Council on Tuesday, in the form of a resolution from the administration of Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, for council to uphold or reverse.
Council backed HARB in a 5-0 vote — with council President Gerald Smurl, Bill King, Mark McAndrew, Jessica Rothchild and Tom Schuster in favor — to introduce a resolution accepting HARB's denial of a conversion of the static signs on the two-sided structure into digital signs, according to an Electric City Television simulcast and video of the council meeting posted on YouTube. The resolution likely would come back before council for a vote on adoption at its next meeting Tuesday at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall.
The Kegerreis firm, which recently bought the sign structure that was erected in 2012 without zoning approval, sought HARB approval in February for the conversion of the two signs into rotating LED digital signs.
At the February meeting, Scott Kegerreis said his company already had removed both static signs and installed one digital sign facing west, before the city issued a stop-work order. Kegerreis thought the prior owner received the appropriate permits from the city for the conversion of static signs to digital, but there was a 'giant miscommunication.' He said officials told him to go before HARB, and if it said yes, then the digital billboards would be permissible. HARB initially tabled the application in February for further review and then rejected it in March.
During council's meeting Tuesday, King asked council Solicitor Tom Gilbride, 'So the issue would be, if we were to grant this (digital billboard, by reversing HARB), that would just open the door to … ,' without completing the thought.
Gilbride replied, 'It would take away your right to further limit any of these LEDs signs in the historic section.'
Council then voted unanimously to accept HARB's recommendation against the digital signs at 320 Mulberry St.
Efforts on Wednesday to reach Kegerreis were unsuccessful.
HARB's decision, memorialized in a March 14 letter to Kegerreis from HARB Chairman Michael Muller, said, 'The introduction of LED display billboards is inconsistent with the historic aesthetic of the (downtown historic) district and could undermine its visual integrity.'
HARB also denied previous applications for digital signs in the historic district, Muller said. Existing digital billboards along Mulberry Street, about one or two blocks east and west of 320 Mulberry St., fall outside of the district or were installed before HARB's expanded jurisdiction over the district, and thus were never reviewed or approved by HARB.
The brightness of LED signs and their changing visuals also could distract motorists or pedestrians and pose safety concerns, Muller said.
'Billboards — particularly electronic billboards — are fundamentally designed for vehicles, not pedestrians. Unlike traditional signage that contributes to an inviting and engaging streetscape, large-scale digital advertisements prioritize the attention of drivers, reinforcing car-centric development patterns that diminish a city's walkability,' Muller said.
Moreover, the digital signs' conversion proposed for 320 Mulberry St. also 'runs counter to the broader vision for Scranton's urban environment' and walkability initiatives, and would create 'visual noise that detracts from the architectural fabric of a district and the pedestrian experience,' Muller said.
Muller cited Jacobs, a leading advocate for preserving dynamic, tightknit neighborhoods, and her landmark 1961 book, 'The Death and Life of Great American Cities,' which redefined views of urban life and led to revolutionary changes in how urban planning is taught and practiced. Jacobs 'championed the idea that cities thrive when streets are designed for people, not just cars,' Muller said. Jacobs 'argued that successful urban environments foster human-scale experiences, with visually engaging storefronts, active ground-level uses and pedestrian friendly streetscapes. Electronic billboards, by contrast, do not contribute to this kind of vitality.'
Jane Jacobs (TIMES-TRIBUNE / FILE PHOTO)
Jacobs' vision of city and neighborhood communities was shaped in part by her Scranton roots. She was born Jane Butzner in 1916 in Scranton and her family moved from Green Ridge to neighboring Dunmore when she was 5. A graduate of the former Scranton Central High School, Butzner moved at 21 to New York City's Greenwich Village and later married and wrote her groundbreaking book.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Data center developer backs off $30 billion plans for Dale Earnhardt widow's property
Data center developer backs off $30 billion plans for Dale Earnhardt widow's property

NBC News

time11 hours ago

  • NBC News

Data center developer backs off $30 billion plans for Dale Earnhardt widow's property

A Denver-based company proposing a $30 billion data center on land owned by the widow of NASCAR champion Dale Earnhardt in rural Mooresville, North Carolina, will not move forward with the project, a city official and an engineer representing the company said Wednesday. The proposal had drawn intense community backlash, including from Earnhardt's eldest son. For months, developers with Tract had said they wanted to build a data center campus in Mooresville, about 30 miles outside of Charlotte. Many residents pushed back against the proposal, citing concerns about the future facility's water and electricity usage. Others viewed the project as an encroachment on the area's close-knit feel. Mooresville Mayor Chris Carney said in a Facebook post Wednesday afternoon that Tract developers had withdrawn their proposal. Dan Brewer, an engineer representing Tract, confirmed that he had withdrawn a request for a rezoning that was needed to move the project forward. The city's commissioners had been scheduled to vote on the rezoning next month. 'My client is Tract, I was instructed to withdraw it and that's what I did,' Brewer said in a phone interview. 'That's the only comment I have.' Representatives for Tract, which had pitched the project as a boon for local tax revenue, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Tract spokesperson said last week in a statement to The Charlotte Observer that the company was 'both disappointed and surprised' by the mayor's previous comments indicating he no longer supported the project. Earnhardt was killed in a crash during the 2001 Daytona 500. When he wasn't at the racetrack, he was an avid outdoorsman, and neighbors said he used the North Carolina property at the center of the recent battle for hunting and fishing. Teresa Earnhardt, who married Dale Earnhardt in 1982, began asking city officials to rezone 400 acres of that land for a data center last fall. She didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Kerry Earnhardt, Dale Earnhardt's eldest son, blasted efforts to rezone the property on social media recently, saying his father 'would be livid for his name to be associated' with the project. At an Aug. 4 meeting, roughly 200 residents showed up, many in protest of the pending rezoning. Several of them, including Kerry Earnhardt's wife, René, urged commissioners to halt the project. Kerry and René Earnhardt posted a YouTube video Wednesday detailing their opposition to the data center. Kerry Earnhardt recalled dove hunting with his father on the property, and added that he felt compelled to speak up on behalf of his neighbors. 'The bottom line is this project does not belong where they're trying to put it,' he said. While the White House embraces data centers as critical infrastructure in the global artificial intelligence race, in a growing number of communities they're not welcome. Wednesday's announcement makes Mooresville the latest city where developers have either backed off their plans for a data center, or had their plans for a data center voted down by local leaders amid public backlash. Last week, officials in Tucson, Arizona, rejected a proposed Amazon data center. Kerry Pennell, who ordered yard signs for the campaign opposing the Mooresville project, cheered Wednesday's withdrawal. 'AI and data centers are an important part of the world we live in today, but we really need to figure out their proper place in this country,' she said. 'We can't just take rural residential land and destroy it forever.' Late last week, Carney, the mayor, cast doubts on the project's prospects because Tract hadn't said which tech company would ultimately use the facility once it was built. 'There is no request to postpone — this is a full withdrawal,' Carney wrote on Facebook on Wednesday. The mayor added that there are no other 'active' requests for a data center in Mooresville. For Donna Jones, who lives about a half mile from the proposed Mooresville site, Wednesday's retreat felt like a victory. But she's remaining vigilant — and urges her neighbors to hold onto their anti-data center lawn signs 'in the event that something else comes along.' 'You just never know what they're going to plan for the future,' she said.

Driverless cars hit a regulator gap
Driverless cars hit a regulator gap

Politico

time14 hours ago

  • Politico

Driverless cars hit a regulator gap

For Silicon Valley, the promise of the second Trump administration is that it would cull all those pesky bureaucrats impeding innovation. But sometimes, a new industry needs bureaucrats to cut red tape. The autonomous vehicle industry could soon face this catch-22. As driverless cars continue to roll out in American cities, AV companies need the help of federal regulators to deal with the landscape of safety rules. Yet my colleague Pavan Acharya reported last week that the Transportation Department's Office of Automation Safety, which helps regulate AVs, is on the verge of becoming a ghost town. The Republican-led Senate Appropriations Committee noted in a report that the office had 'lost almost all of its staff,' and encouraged the department to prioritize hiring. Silicon Valley has generally pooh-poohed regulators as getting in the way of both moving fast and breaking things. However, it's regulators who are trying to work around policies designed for analog cars, so that AVs can start operating legally within the federal highway rulebook. '[The Transportation Department] is taking away existing regulations that would stand in the way of autonomous vehicles,' said Ryan Calo, a University of Washington law professor who specializes in tech policy. 'They're trying to figure out how to revise their own code so that this is possible. Reducing personnel is just stupid.' The Trump administration has been going all out on kneecapping the bureaucratic state, cutting tens of thousands of people from the federal workforce. Tesla CEO Elon Musk's DOGE is central to these efforts, and the tech industry has cheered it on. In fact, Musk is apparently responsible for the exodus of AV regulators. The Financial Times reported in April that DOGE had dismissed about 30 people from DOT's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, many of whom were employed at its Office of Automation Safety. NHTSA has been a cloud over Musk's dream of deploying fully self-driving Teslas, recalling 2 million of its vehicles in 2023 for issues with its autopilot feature. The FT reports that Musk felt regulators were being unfair, though there were also concerns within Tesla that gutting the automation safety office could backfire. (Tesla did not respond to DFD's inquiry.) Those concerns may be merited. The Biden administration launched the safety office in 2023 specifically to help the AV industry overcome regulatory hurdles. It fields petitions from manufacturers for exemptions to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, which sets performance and design requirements for cars operating in the U.S. The industry has long complained that the Transportation Department has been slow to process the petitions. 'It takes a lot of people to work through [exemption petitions] point-by-point,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon professor who has been the architect of industry safety standards for AVs. 'It's just labor intensive.' He cautioned, however, that the department could simply relax the exemption standards to the extent that you'd need just enough staff to press a rubber stamp. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has already broadened exemptions to cover a wider range of AVs. The department just issued its first exemption under the expanded standards last week for Zoox, Amazon's robotaxi subsidiary – but the company is only allowed to test the vehicles. Getting an exemption to sell AVs or charge consumers for their services is a more rigorous process, though Duffy is working to streamline that too. When DFD asked about the Senate appropriations report, NHTSA said in a statement that it has 'aligned resources accordingly, including staff, to add engineers to the Office of Automation Safety.' Another reason why the industry might want the automation safety office to be staffed is that it could help clarify rules around AVs. With the advent self-driving cars, companies face a conundrum when it comes to state versus federal laws. The current paradigm generally has the federal government setting nationwide standards for vehicles themselves. States then determine whether someone is qualified to operate those vehicles by issuing driver's licenses and operating permits. (My colleague Christine Mui recently reported on Tesla's troubles with California permitting.) That regulatory divide gets fuzzier with AVs, especially for interstate travel, since the vehicle's AI becomes the driver. 'The design and construction of an autonomous vehicle, and driver competency is intertwined,' said Michael Brooks, executive director at the Center for Auto Safety. 'You can't really separate it into the traditional areas.' So when companies deploy a federally approved AV for a cross-country road trip, they don't necessarily know whether they're violating a patchwork of state laws. Congress could resolve the ambiguity by passing legislation that empowers the Transportation Department to override state laws, according to Brooks, but there doesn't seem to be much progress on that front. In the meantime, having more federal automation safety staff could help the department proliferate nationwide regulations in a bid to assert its authority over the states. That would give AV companies a bit more legal certainty. To be sure, staffing up the automation safety office wouldn't necessarily be a clear-cut benefit for the self-driving car industry. More regulators in general could mean more requests for data that companies would consider to be trade secrets, and more meticulous investigations of product defects. But looking past the immediate policy barriers, having enough regulators to make sure that AVs are actually safe benefits all parties involved. 'If a driverless car is involved in an accident, people are going to get nervous about them,' said Calo. 'They need a trusted expert body that's impartial, like the Department of Transportation, to be able to look at those situations in a sober ride way and determine [...] what to do about it.' STATE DEPARTMENT GETS INTO THE ONLINE SPEECH ARGUMENT The GOP campaign against social-media moderation has trickled into formal American diplomacy: The Trump administration is now saying human rights in the United Kingdom 'worsened' in 2024 due to speech restrictions, particularly those online, POLITICO's Mizy Clifton reports. The State Department on Wednesday released its annual assessment of countries' human rights practices in which it criticized the U.K. for chilling speech on social media surrounding incidents like the 2024 stabbing of three children in Southport last year. The report also targeted the country's Online Safety Act that rolled out last month, which requires platforms to verify users' ages in an attempt to prevent children from seeing violent or sexual content. The department suggested that the act could lead to 'government regulation to reduce or eliminate effective encryption (and therefore user privacy) on platforms.' The safety act has already drawn criticism for age-gating certain content, such as posts on X about violence in Gaza or Reddit content on cigars. (Wikipedia also lost a case on Monday challenging the act's identity verification rules.) A congressional free speech delegation traveled to meet with U.K. officials about the act late last month. Sen. Ted Cruz pushes for AI sandboxes Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz wants to spur the development of artificial intelligence by exempting the tech from existing regulations, according to details of a draft bill shared with POLITICO's Benjamin Guggenheim and Anthony Adragna. The bill would allow federal agencies to grant temporary waivers on their rules for companies to pilot AI systems. States have previously granted such exemptions for therapy chatbots and diagnostic tools that use the technology — an idea that tech companies love, but which critics say has some real flaws in practice. Cruz prefers a light-touch approach to AI regulation. He was one of the main advocates for including a 10-year state AI law moratorium in the Big Beautiful Bill this summer, though the provision was dropped amid Republican infighting. Cruz's new legislation dovetails with President Donald Trump's call for regulatory sandboxes in his AI Action Plan to 'rapidly deploy and test AI tools.' post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store