logo
Trump transforms congressionally mandated health offices into ghost towns

Trump transforms congressionally mandated health offices into ghost towns

Politico11-05-2025
The Trump administration's purge of the health department is cutting so deep that it has incapacitated congressionally mandated programs and triggered legal challenges.
The administration insists the cuts are a lawful 'streamlining' of a 'bloated' agency, but federal workers, Democratic lawmakers, state officials and independent legal experts say keeping offices afloat in name only – with minimal or no staff – is an unconstitutional power grab.
While agencies have some discretion over how to fulfill Congress's demands, the upheaval inside the Department of Health and Human Services has claimed a host of programs the agency is required by Congress to maintain — cuts that are especially vulnerable to lawsuits and could upend Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s goal of slimming down a workforce he has repeatedly said is rife with waste, fraud and abuse.
A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration's sweeping layoffs at several agencies, including HHS, saying that cooperation of the legislative branch is required for large-scale reorganizations.
Kennedy eliminated thousands of jobs in early April, paralyzing programs across the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and particularly in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, that monitored health threats, researched cures and investigated everything from toxic fumes in fire stations to outbreaks of gonorrhea.
The layoffs at NIOSH have halted the National Firefighter Cancer Registry, Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, Health Hazard Evaluation Program, Respirator Approval Program and Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program. All are required by law, but their government websites explain they are no longer operating because of the layoffs.
'If the law requires you, the executive, to do this work, you have, in a back door way, thumbed your nose at Congress by firing the people who are actually necessary to get that work done,' said Max Stier, the president and CEO of the nonpartisan, nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, whose mission is supporting the federal workforce. 'The executive branch is supposed to execute — the name says it all. It doesn't have the right to determine where money is spent and how much money is spent. '
HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon told POLITICO that 'critical initiatives under NIOSH will remain intact.'
'The Trump Administration is committed to taking care of coal miners and firefighters, who play a vital role in supporting this nation,' Nixon said. 'HHS remains fully committed to supporting American families and delivering critical services as part of its reorganization to better serve the nation's health.'
The CDC was aware, however, that the moves could be legally problematic. In early April, Trump's Department of Government Efficiency team — which pushed federal agencies across the government to slash their workforce by thousands — flagged to the agency's leadership that many programs on the chopping block were mandated by Congress, and that cutting them posed a 'litigation risk,' according to a memo sent to CDC and viewed by POLITICO.
And while the administration has pledged that 'essential services…will remain fully intact and uninterrupted,' and have repeatedly claimed that core programs will transfer to the yet-to-be-created Administration for a Healthy America, or AHA, interviews with staff and public notices on the CDC's website show that the programs are no longer operational.
'The idea that you can have a program with no people in it and no money in it, and that somehow, then you have not eliminated it — that's just smoke and mirrors,' a high-level CDC official, granted anonymity for fear of retaliation, told POLITICO. 'AHA, apparently, is where programs go to die.'
The 'confidential' DOGE memo, lists 'statutory minimum requirements' for several CDC offices, including NIOSH, and details which programs are mandated by Congress and for which the health secretary has discretion. Some workplace health and safety programs, DOGE stressed, only have to be maintained 'to the extent feasible.'
'We could argue this delegation is no longer feasible,' the document says. 'But there is a significant risk that a court would disagree.'
Days after the memo was sent, the Trump administration eliminated most or all of the staff running several programs mandated by Congress, bringing their work to a halt. Some employees were brought back in early May, but told their jobs would be gone again in the coming months.
The budget request the White House sent Congress on May 2 proposed slashing more than a quarter of HHS' budget, a reduction of tens of billions of dollars, while allocating $500 million to the new 'AHA' office that Kennedy said will take over many of the programs impacted by cuts. The budget also urges Congress to get rid of 'duplicative, DEI, or simply unnecessary programs,' including the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control — which the DOGE memo said the department is legally required to maintain.
Some congressionally mandated programs saw their entire staff dismissed, including the firefighter cancer registry that was created by legislation President Donald Trump signed in his first term. Micah Niemeier-Walsh, vice president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 3840, said she and every other member of the National Firefighter Registry for Cancer team received notices that their jobs would be eliminated this summer.
The cancer registry, along with NIOSH's Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, Health Hazard Evaluation Program, Respirator Approval Program and Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program, all state on their government websites that they are no longer operating because of the layoffs.
'I don't know how they're planning on actually doing … a meaningful scientific study, like it's supposed to be, if there aren't any scientists to work on that study,' Niemeier-Walsh said.
Other programs lost most but not all of their staff, but federal workers said those layoffs have left those who remain unable to do their work.
An official in NIOSH's National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, granted anonymity out of fear of retaliation, said all but seven of the more than 75 workers in that office were given layoff notices, rendering it 'no longer functioning.' A notice on the lab's website reads: 'Due to the reduction in force across NIOSH, no new respirator approval applications can be accepted.'
The official warned that the cuts have not only wiped out their ability to test and certify new types of respirators — as required by Congress since 2001 — but also to inspect the thousands of breathing masks the lab already approved. The official predicted this will lead to an influx of shoddy or counterfeit respirators and the loss of the public's trust in NIOSH's certification.
Beyond the laws requiring these programs exist, there are federal laws that require workers wear NIOSH-approved protective gear, including health care workers who use filtering facepiece respirators and firefighters who use self-contained breathing apparatuses.
Stier, an attorney, believes these Trump administration cuts go 'beyond their legal institutional authority.' But stopping the layoffs and preventing new ones 'really requires the courts to do their jobs, and Congress, to stand up to an executive invading their prerogatives,' he said.
The American Federation of Government Employees sued the Trump administration over the cuts along with other unions representing federal workers and local government officials. They argued last week that 'only Congress has the power to change the federal government in the ways the President has directed.'
Senior U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco agreed, noting in her Friday ruling, which blocked Trump's executive order, that while the President may reorganize the executive branch, 'he must do so in lawful ways and, in the case of large-scale reorganizations, with the cooperation of the legislative branch.'
The Department of Justice appealed the ruling and the next hearing is scheduled for May 22.
Nearly two-dozen Democratic state attorneys general have also sued over the 'evisceration of the Department's statutorily mandated work promoting public health' in a Rhode Island federal court. Their complaint points in particular to cuts that have shuttered the CDC's Atlanta-based lab that analyzes samples of sexually transmitted infections from around the country, citing a notice the agency posted on April 11 listing nearly 100 kinds of tests that are 'no longer performed at CDC' — including those for gonorrhea, chlamydia and syphilis.
Some lawmakers, including those who drafted the legislation that created and funded the now-gutted programs, are also pushing back.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) sponsored the 1992 bill that created the CDC's Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System when he served in the House. Every employee working on the program, which tracks the safety and success rates of every fertility clinic in the country, was put on administrative leave in April and told they would lose their jobs this summer.
'Congress has the power of the purse,' Wyden said. 'This law has been on the books — I've watched it carefully over the years … It is stunning that somebody would call himself essentially Mr. Fertilization and then walk back [this] program,' he added, referencing Trump's campaign statements in support of IVF.
Wyden joined with a dozen Democratic colleagues on a letter to Kennedy on Thursday demanding answers by May 16 to several question about cuts to the CDC team, including the justification for each worker's termination, whether and when they will be reinstated, whether Elon Musk was involved in the decision to cut the team, and what will happen to the data IVF clinics continue to submit to the now-shuttered office.
Some Senate Republicans, including Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Shelly Moore Capito of West Virginia, are also telling administration officials and the public that they oppose the cuts, casting them as harmful to their constituents and a violation of Congress' power. But other lawmakers, while expressing fear about the impact of the layoffs on workers in their states, said they trust the president to make things right without Congress' involvement.
West Virginia Republican Sen. Jim Justice told POLITICO that he's 'concerned' but not 'super nervous' about the layoffs in NIOSH's Morgantown office that have hampered the congressionally-mandated program which has screened coal miners for black lung disease for more than 50 years.
'There is just plain no way that Donald Trump is going to do something to endanger the health of our coal miners — especially at the same time that we're asking more of them,' he said, citing Trump's call to increase domestic coal production. 'Even if the jobs left us, which we don't want to believe, I do believe they're going to be merged into another organization. It may look a little different, but it will serve the purpose.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"South Park" Somehow Went Even Harder In On Trump, And This Time It's Raunchier
"South Park" Somehow Went Even Harder In On Trump, And This Time It's Raunchier

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"South Park" Somehow Went Even Harder In On Trump, And This Time It's Raunchier

South Park returned on Wednesday to hit President Donald Trump below the belt with multiple depictions of his 'teeny tiny' penis. Warning: Spoilers below. The episode also skewered tech CEOs and government leaders for bribing Trump with golden 'gifts,' again depicted Trump's bedroom lover as none other than Satan himself, and reduced Vice President JD Vance to a miniature sidekick who offers to bring his boss a 'cumrag.' Related: That 'cumrag,' tragically, turns out to be longtime South Park fan-favorite character Towelie. Much of the episode focuses not on Trump, but on Randy Marsh ― Stan's dad ― and his marijuana farm, which struggles after his workers are hauled off in a federal raid. He sends Towelie to D.C. to lobby Trump for marijuana reclassification. Towelie finds the city overrun with military troops, as Trump has called in the National Guard, just as he has done in real life in a move critics have dismissed as a 'stunt.' Related: Towelie also finds a statue of Thomas Jefferson in the Capitol is now a statue of Trump, with a very small penis. Likewise, the statue of Abraham Lincoln at the Lincoln Memorial is also a statue of Trump, again with a tiny penis. When Towelie reaches the White House to meet Trump, an aide warns visitors to 'avoid staring directly into his penis.' There, Towelie joins a line of CEOs and officials who offer Trump 'gifts' and assure him that his penis isn't small. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, for example, brings the president a gold-plated VR headset. Related: Trump dismisses him as 'a little bitch.' Apple CEO Tim Cook shows up to give Trump a small sculpture ― something he did for real earlier this month. Trump takes the gift and goes to his bedroom, where he promptly tears off all his clothes and hops into bed with Satan. 'Hey Satan! Look at what some dipshit tech CEO gave me,' he tells Satan. 'I was thinking maybe we could try to shove it up your ass.' Towelie is there to lobby Trump to reclassify marijuana, but ends up as a gift to Trump instead. By the end of the episode, Satan finds Towelie in a White House bathroom, covered in white stains, begging for help. 'Please,' Towelie pleads with Satan. 'I wanna get out of here.' 'So do I,' Satan replies. 'But there is no escape from this place.' Related: South Park has so far been biweekly since returning last month, and that pattern will continue ― at least for now ― as the next episode is set to air Sept. 3 on Comedy Central. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian
What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian

Axios

time14 minutes ago

  • Axios

What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian

Politics & Policy A White House official told Axios that President Trump intends to expand his review of American museums for "woke" ideology beyond the Smithsonian Institution. Why it matters: The size and scope of Trump's inquiries represents an unprecedented level of museum oversight in the nearly 250 years of American democracy, historians say. It also represents an escalation of the president's attack on cultural institutions. Here's what historians and curators fear could happen if Trump reframes museums through his perspective. What exactly does the president have in mind? Trump said that the "Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL" on Truth Social earlier this week. He then directed his attorneys to conduct a comprehensive review of the museum system, similar to the process officials have conducted at colleges and universities. What they're saying:"President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable," a White House official told Axios. "He will start with the Smithsonian and then go from there," they continued. Reality check: The Smithsonian is not a federal agency under control of the president, according to the institution. It's an independent institution, governed by a Board of Regents, which is composed of seventeen members, including the Vice President. Trump has no authority over private museums. Yes, but: The president could freeze the federal funding that some private museums receive, the way he has for schools that don't align with his anti-diversity views on education. What does Trump's perception of American history look like? Trump claims that there has been a "widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history" over the past decade. He insists that these efforts "undermine" America's achievements by casting its founding principles as "inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed." Historians say the administration's singular, sanitized approach to the past, focusing solely on America's positive moments misses out on the nuance of American history and excludes the lived experiences of Black, Indigenous, Latino, and LGBTQ+ people. Friction point:"That is anti-democratic," Beth English, executive director of the Organization of American Historians told Axios, referring to the administration's push to stifle and sanitize information, debate and historical facts. "It's not education, right?" English questioned. "It begins to kind of veer into the space of indoctrination, selecting, sort of a selective memory of what is and isn't going to be part of our national story." Why is Trump's push to install political appointees to review museums problematic? Curators said distilling history into accurate, engaging examples that the public can understand requires a level of expertise that an untrained political appointee likely lacks. The majority of curators at national museums have PhDs, or have been trained in museum studies through rigorous degree programs and research. "It's not like people are creating exhibitions to tell a story, to win a political agenda," Omar Eaton-Martinez, former board president of the Association of African American Museums said. "People are actually curating exhibitions based on scholarship that is supported by evidence," he continued. Don't museums reframe and reevaluate history all the time? Historians say museums expanding their collections isn't evidence of nefarious behavior, but rather, it's simply how the static nature of history grows. Zoom out: Collections have increasingly included the perspectives of sociologists, psychologists and other social scientists over the past few decades, in addition to more thorough reviews of census records, genealogy, oral histories, archeology, objects, and images. "We're constantly building on prior scholarship to help ask more nuanced questions about a topic," Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association said. "We're always peeling back the layers of the onion, so to speak." Black, Indigenous and Latin scholars have been digging into their respective histories for centuries, and those experiences have been recognized and incorporated into museums in recent decades. That includes history that was once ignored, such as the burning of records in thriving Black neighborhoods such as the massacres in Tulsa, Oklahoma or Rosewood, Florida; the forced removal of Indigenous nations from one part of America to another during the " trail of tears"; and urban renewal projects to upgrade cities that ultimately gentrify communities of color. What funding and programs has Trump already taken aim at? The Trump administration has taken aggressive action to reduce the staffing and funding available for the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS,) the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the National Endowment for the Arts. Stunning stat: IMLS's acting director testified in court that the administration cancelled roughly 92% of the agency's Grants to States. Only 100 grants remain out of the original 1,200 managed by the institute prior to Trump's executive order. The president also attempted to fire Kim Sajet, the director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, earlier this year due to her support of diversity initiatives, despite not having the authority to do so. The Smithsonian has legal authority over personnel decisions, but Sajet eventually decided to step down in the weeks following Trump's announcement. What other times has an American museum pivoted after political influence? An exorbitant amount of debate goes into exhibit decision-making, so museums have already determined the best way to display potential controversies. When museums modify exhibits, it's typically due to public pressure, and has never been under significant force from the president. Case in point: The Smithsonian's 90s exhibit on Enola Gay, the B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb, sparked opposition from veterans and members of Congress on how to interpret the bomb's dropping and America's role in World War II. The bottom line:"These kinds of controversies exist frequently, and that's a good thing, because public debate about the nation's past is healthy," James Grossman, former executive director of the American Historical Association told Axios. "But the President of the United States has no business telling museums what to exhibit, telling teachers what to teach, and has no business telling Americans what to think," Grossman continued.

Thank you, Massachusetts millionaires!
Thank you, Massachusetts millionaires!

Boston Globe

time14 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Thank you, Massachusetts millionaires!

It's time to thank the people involved in the millionaires tax — including the millionaires — without whom Massachusetts would not continue to be among the 'Our state thrives on eds and meds, and those are things particularly under the axe,' said Phineas Baxandall, research director at the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center. 'It's fortuitous that some counterbalance from the Fair Share income has been there.' For the second year in a row, revenues from the surtax have Advertisement The Fair Share Amendment specifies that revenues collected on taxable income — not assets — above $1 million be spent only on education and transportation. In the fiscal year just ended, revenues from the surtax Now other high-income states — which tend to be blue states — are A cautionary note: Proponents of the Fair Share Amendment intended that its benefits be used to enhance programs in education and transportation, not substitute for shortfalls. 'These investments have been life-changing for individuals and communities,' said Max Page, president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association, a central player in the Raise Up coalition that fought for the surtax. 'That's why I am concerned that it not become simply a way to backfill cuts by Trump.' Advertisement The idea, he said, 'was not just to prevent cuts; it was always to build a better society.' After voters in Massachusetts passed a hefty cigarette tax in 1992, legislators It's difficult to know whether the surtax is driving rich people from the state. But A state that invests in its future is a state that believes in itself. Despite serious headwinds from Trump's baneful policies, Massachusetts is working to stay a healthy, brainy, welcoming place, a place that values innovation, a clean environment, and world-class health care and education. A place where everybody — from multimillionaires on down – wants to live. Renée Loth's column appears regularly in the Globe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store