Gillibrand apologizes to Mamdani over ‘jihad' comments
Mamdani has declined to condemn people using the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' even though he said he doesn't use it himself, and once rapped his support for the 'Holy Land Five' who were convicted for running a charity that funded Hamas.
Gillibrand said that Jewish New Yorkers were alarmed by Mamdani's past statements. And when Lehrer noted that there's no evidence of Mamdani himself supporting Hamas or violent jihad, she reacted defensively and said she would like to sit down with Mamdani and talk through the issues with him. Gillibrand also said he should denounce the phrase 'globalize the intifada.'
The senator's comments and tone were met with outrage from Mamdani supporters, some of whom protested outside her office and called for her resignation. They even earned her an apparent rebuke from Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul: 'No one should be subjected to any comments that slur their ethnicity, their religious beliefs, and we condemn that anywhere it rears its head in the state of New York.'
The statement from Hochul came after she was asked by a reporter to 'comment on the racism [Mamdani] is already facing, including from New York's own Kirsten Gillibrand.'
Gillibrand had previously backed away from her comment, with her office releasing a statement Friday saying she 'misspoke.'
Gillibrand and Mamdani had previously spoken by phone on Wednesday when she congratulated him the day after winning the Democratic mayoral primary.
Mamdani campaign spokesperson Andrew Epstein confirmed the Monday night call, adding that the apology was accepted and the two agreed to 'set a path to move forward productively.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
a few seconds ago
- Business Insider
Why congressional stock-trade ban efforts are about to heat up
Get ready to hear a lot more about banning congressional stock trading. A top Trump administration official says he's going to start pushing for a ban. Two House Republicans are, in different ways, gearing up to force a vote on the issue. And all the while, lawmakers keep failing to report millions of dollars' worth of stock trades on time. "We've got to move," Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas said on Fox Business earlier this month, saying that while he had given House GOP leadership "grace" as they worked to get the "Big Beautiful Bill" through Congress, that time is now over. "I'm going to demand that we vote on this, this fall." It all comes after an explosive Senate hearing on a stock trading bill last month, where Republicans went after one another over whether President Donald Trump himself should be banned from trading stocks. That led to Trump branding Sen. Josh Hawley as "second-tier," though the Missouri Republican later told BI that he was able to smooth things over with Trump later. "He told me he wants a stock trading ban," Hawley said in July. "He remains committed to getting a stock trading ban, so we'll work with him to do that." Potential House drama over a 'discharge petition' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican known for challenging her own party's leadership, has said she'll start the process of forcing a vote on a stock trading ban when lawmakers return from the August recess. "I won't sit idly by while members of Congress trade stocks, especially those on committees with direct influence over relevant industries," Luna wrote on X last month. "That's corruption at its core, and it needs to stop." Luna has said she'll try to use what's known as a "discharge petition" to bring up a stock trading ban bill authored by Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee. Under that process, the bill would have to be brought to the House floor for a vote — with or without the support of House leaders — if Luna is able to collect signatures from 218 members, a majority of the 435 seats in the House. Not everyone who supports a stock trading ban is on board with Luna's approach. Roy, the co-sponsor of a different stock trading ban bill that has bipartisan support and has been around for years, told Fox Business that a discharge petition is "not the best way" to get it done. "I want the speaker, and Republicans, to control this," said Roy. "Republicans need to control the floor, do our job, bring this to a vote." Roy has been working with a bipartisan group that includes Democratic Reps. Seth Magaziner of Rhode Island and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York to put forward a consensus stock trading ban bill. But after months of discussions, they have yet to release legislative text. That's led Luna to largely dismiss their effort. "Allegedly, there were 'talks' happening? With who?" Luna wrote on X on Thursday. "They were never going to bring a VOTE to the floor. I don't care if this upsets people." The Florida congresswoman's effort is worth taking seriously: she has used this legislative tool before to bring up a bill on proxy voting over the objections of Speaker Mike Johnson, bringing the House to a halt for a full week in April. Lawmakers keep reporting trades late Johnson has said he's supportive of a stock trading ban — though he has "sympathy" for arguments against it. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries began forcefully supporting it this year in the wake of well-timed tariff trades by some lawmakers. Even Trump has backed it, though some Republicans are wary of applying the bill's restrictions to him. This week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got in on the action, saying he himself would begin pushing for a ban on lawmakers trading individual stocks. "I don't think we have the perfect bill yet," Bessent told Bloomberg this week. "But I am going to start pushing for a single-stock trading ban." Meanwhile, several lawmakers in have been found in violation of the STOCK Act in recent weeks, disclosing millions of dollars worth of trades long after the 30-45 day deadline for doing so. Rep. Lisa McClain of Michigan, the fourth-highest ranking House Republican, was late to disclose over 500 trades made by her husband from March 2024 through June 2025, totalling at least $1.5 million. Republican Rep. Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania failed to disclose that his wife sold between $750,000 and $1.5 million in NVIDIA stock last year. And Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma was late in disclosing millions of dollars made by him and his wife since 2023. Lawmakers are only required to disclose asset ranges on their reports, so we don't know the exact value of the trades. Those lawmakers and their spokespeople blamed errors made by third-party financial managers and lack of awareness of the trades for the late disclosures. A spokesperson for McClain told BI that the congresswoman "promptly filed the necessary paperwork immediately after being made aware of the transactions made in managed accounts and remains committed to transparency and adherence to all House financial disclosure rules and regulations." "I take compliance with all House rules seriously and expect the same from those managing my accounts," Meuser told BI through a spokesperson. "This was a simple, automatic filing that should have occurred without error. The mistake was made solely by my brokerage and benefited me in no way." Mullin's office did not respond to BI's request for comment, but a spokesperson told NOTUS that the senator doesn't trade himself, but relies on a third-party broker.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In Gaza, tribal fighters and diplomats eye the same prize
Gazan resident Mahmoud Hamdan says that Palestinians, caught between Israel and Hamas, have 'no clear political alternative' As Israel moves to seize Gaza City, dismantle Hamas, and keep a long-term military presence, local medical staff reported at least 48 dead Tuesday in strikes across Gaza City and Khan Yunis. Five more people, including two children, have died of starvation and malnutrition in Gaza in the past 24 hours, the territory's health ministry said. Critics warn that Netanyahu's Oct. 7, 2025, deadline for seizing Gaza City could uproot thousands more residents and further deepen the political vacuum left by Hamas' retreat and the Palestinian Authority's 18-year absence. That gap is already being contested on the ground: clan-based militias are stepping into governance roles, mediating disputes and escorting aid convoys in parts of the Strip. Rooted in Bedouin and clan traditions, these kinship systems have long mediated disputes, distributed aid and maintained social order when formal government structures faltered. The war has brought them back to the forefront, operating as de facto municipal authorities in many neighborhoods. A Hamas-free pocket in eastern Rafah — controlled by the clan-based 'Popular Forces' of Yasser Abu Shabab — has emerged as an example of an alternative local order. Its future is uncertain, but the enclave is drawing attention as both an anomaly and a possible preview of postwar governance. The Yasser Abu Shabab – Popular Forces Facebook page — followed by more than 30,000 people — describes the group as 'The voice of truth against terrorism for a safe homeland for all' and labels its feed as the group's 'media office.' Operating in the eastern sector of Rafah, near the Gaza–Egypt border, the group showcases its activities through frequent online updates. In a July 30 video, Abu Shabab said his forces carried out a 'special operation' evacuating dozens of civilians from Deir al-Balah, Nuseirat and Khan Yunis to 'safe areas' under their control in eastern Rafah. The group said it spent months building the refuge to shelter Gazans 'still suffering from Hamas' looting and repression.' On July 31, it said its fighters 'secured and imported dozens of trucks' carrying flour and other supplies, and on Aug. 6, it reported escorting 'a large number of trucks' loaded with food, flour and cooking oil out of its territory. Hamas's replacement Omar Salim, 22, a student from Rafah, told The Media Line that Yasser Abu Shabab and his fighters were one of the few realistic options for ending Hamas' rule. 'What Yasser Abu Shabab's popular forces are doing is probably the best option we've got right now. We just want peace — we don't want to be ruled by armed groups like Hamas that drag us into war. We're sick of it,' Salim said. 'Sure, they still need to get better organized, but they're working on it. These days, a lot of families are moving into areas controlled by the popular forces because they feel safer there than in the neighborhoods where Hamas militias are still around.' In Deir al-Balah, Ibrahim Ahmed, 36, who worked at a local mobile phone shop until the 2023 war began, described the chaos and deprivation now gripping Gaza as 'mired in uncertainty,' with many 'grappling with anxiety about what lies ahead.' People rush to stockpile food and medicine, he said, 'but soaring prices and persistent shortages complicate these efforts.' Ahmed told The Media Line he sees no alliances among the warring factions. 'Israeli forces have largely subdued Hamas, which now clings to a mere handful of weapons, primarily to instill fear among civilians and quash dissent,' he said. 'Hamas' claims about readiness to resist an Israeli takeover of Gaza City are hollow media posturing — a facade for maintaining their waning influence.' He added that the Palestinian Authority 'appears increasingly irrelevant,' while armed groups like Abu Shabab 'navigate freely within Israeli-controlled territories' and avoid conflict with Israeli forces. 'This dynamic suggests Israel may turn to these clans during a potential period of military governance, positioning them as a counterbalance to both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority,' Ahmed warned. 'Mr. Netanyahu and the Israeli military are cultivating a new power structure. But Gaza risks descending into civil war and chaos.' Meanwhile, Hamas' feared counterintelligence Sahm unit continues to kill, torture, maim and intimidate Palestinians in Gaza, with the group posting graphic images and videos of its actions on a Telegram channel believed to be operated from Belgium. The footage shows detainees beaten, bound and in some cases executed, as the unit seeks to stamp out suspected dissent or collaboration. Other Facebook videos last week showed a convoy of masked, rifle-waving fighters patrolling a Gaza neighborhood. On the platform — one of the few spaces where Gazans can safely vent about the suffering caused by Israel's war and Hamas' grip on their streets — users mocked the fighters' covered faces and apparent comfort amid civilian hunger and deprivation. Mahmoud Hamdan, 41, a father of three from Gaza City, said a military operation to reclaim the city is 'unlikely to unite factions; instead, it may deepen divisions, fragment communities and increase violence.' 'Palestinian civilians suffer the most,' Hamdan told The Media Line, 'trapped between Israel and Hamas, with no control or refuge in their homes amid the chaos.' He sees 'no clear political alternative' — neither from clan factions nor possible Arab troop involvement. In his view, the main aim is 'strengthening Netanyahu's power,' with the prime minister 'manipulating the situation with Hamas to justify his controversial political moves.' Hamdan's fears of Gaza sliding toward civil war come as even some of Hamas' staunchest foreign patrons signal a shift. Pivoting from years of alignment with Hamas, Qatar and Turkey — two of the movement's most reliable political and financial backers joined other Arab and Muslim-majority states on July 29, 2025, in a joint declaration urging the group to return control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority and disarm. At the same time, a new technocratic governance plan is being advanced by former Israeli intelligence operative Ari Ben-Menashe, now a Montréal-based lobbyist, who is positioning West Bank businessman Samir Hulileh to lead a transitional administration under an Arab League framework acceptable to the Trump administration — if not all elements of the Netanyahu cabinet. That includes far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has openly called for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the resettlement of the Strip with Jewish Israelis, a vision sharply at odds with any internationally backed governance arrangement. The Hulileh concept envisions securing $53 billion in Gulf and European reconstruction funding, expanded border crossings, and up to 1,000 aid trucks a day — a top-down blueprint dependent on Arab and US endorsement. Hulileh, 68, is a Ramallah-based economist and former senior Palestinian Authority official with no political or professional ties to Gaza. Born in Kuwait in 1957, he earned a master's in economics from the American University of Beirut. He later served as CEO of the Palestine Development and Investment Company, one of the largest investment holding firms in the territories. A close confidant of US-Palestinian billionaire Bashar Masri, founder of Rawabi and head of Massar International, Hulileh has been involved in major West Bank development projects. Masri's investment network and political connections, including with the Trump administration, could help secure foreign capital and diplomatic support for the plan. Speaking to the Palestinian Ajyal radio on Tuesday, Hulileh said, 'In July 2024, I received a call from a Canadian contractor who was working closely with the US administration and the Pentagon on their search for moderate Palestinian figures.' Hulileh added, 'I then reached out to President Mahmoud Abbas informally, hoping to gain his essential support and endorsement for the initiative,' saying 'Israel firmly rejected the proposal, as did several Arab states that were expected to provide financial backing.' The Palestinian presidency has rejected the idea, saying it would aid Israeli efforts to separate Gaza from the West Bank. While Hulileh's candidacy reflects a top-down, internationally backed vision for Gaza's governance, Yasser Abu Shabab's 'Popular Forces' is a homegrown operation run through Gaza's tribal networks. Azzam Shaath, a political analyst from Deir al-Balah, told The Media Line the rise of Abu Shabab stems from 'the exceptional circumstances created by the Israeli war on the Strip.' He argued that Israel has tried to cultivate tribal and local leadership as alternatives to Hamas and the Palestinian Authority but 'has failed to produce any credible Palestinian civil body capable of managing aid or leading Gaza after the war.' Shaath said Israel works with Abu Shabab 'to sow further instability, dismantle Hamas' rule and create the illusion of viable Palestinian alternatives.' In reality, he views the group as 'a temporary, reactive phenomenon that will likely fade once the war ends and Palestinian factions agree on a unified governing committee.' 'As long as the conflict drags on, Abu Shabab will keep a limited foothold by exploiting the security vacuum and the absence of formal governance.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Redistricting California: Newly proposed congressional maps released
The Brief The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has submitted a proposed map of California's redrawn congressional districts. The move by Newsom, and state Democrats, counters similar efforts underway in Texas. The new maps will likely be decided by California voters in a Nov. 4 special election. LOS ANGELES - A day after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced plans to redraw California's congressional districts, in response to a similar attempt by Republicans in Texas, a proposed map of the new districts was released. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee submitted the following congressional map to the California state legislature for consideration. Key points and differences Below is a breakdown of the key points of the new map from the DCCC. The submitted map is consistent with criteria laid out by the California's Citizen Redistricting Commission. It keeps districts more compact than in the current Commission-drawn map, which helps to keep more communities and neighborhoods together. It splits fewer cities than the current map (57 in submitted map versus 60 in current map). It minimizes changes to the 2020 Commission map to impact as few residents as possible. The submitted map leaves 8 districts untouched and, in 20 districts, fewer than 10% of residents are impacted. Communities of interest are protected, with necessary splits in San Jose, Sacramento, and Los Angeles (all cities that were split by the commission) done so along neighborhood boundaries and/or city council district lines. View the newly proposed congressional maps here View the current congressional maps here What they're saying "We will not stand by as Republicans attempt to rig the election in their favor and choose their voters. It's increasingly clear that Republicans will do anything to protect their narrow majority because they know they can't win on their disastrous legislative record which has raised costs and rips away healthcare for millions, all to give the ultra-wealthy a tax break," DCCC Executive Director Julie Merz said in a statement. The new map will be put forth to voters in a special election, with the California legislature set to take up the issue next week to call a Nov. 4 vote. PREVIOUS COVERAGE:Newsom unveils plan for redistricting California According to Politico, if the redistricting happens, three seats that are currently considered 'safe Republican' would change to 'safe Democratic' and one more would switch to 'lean Democratic'. Those seats currently belong to Republicans Doug Lamalfa, Ken Calvert, Darrell Issa, and Kevin Kiley. Reason for redistricting The backstory The move to redistrict California is a direct response to a Republican-led effort in Texas, pushed by President Donald Trump, as his party seeks to maintain its slim House majority after the midterm election. Texas lawmakers are considering a new map that would help them send five more Republicans to Washington, but Democrats have so far halted a vote by leaving the state to prevent their GOP colleagues from meeting Trump's demands. "We can't stand back and watch this amok or this bankruptcy disappear. We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear, district by district, all across this country, not just in Texas, but in Missouri, where J.D. Vance went just a week ago in Indiana, in places like Ohio and places like Florida. We need to stand up, not just California. Other blue states need to stand up," Newsom said during a press conference Thursday in Los Angeles. There are 435 seats in the U.S. House and Republicans currently hold a 219-212 majority, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states give legislators the power to draw maps but some, like California, rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. California Democrats already hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. The Source Information for this story came from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and previous FOX 11 reports.
