Campaigners and industry respond to ‘once-in-a-generation' water reform report
The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry.
Mr Keil said: 'The commission has set out significant changes to the regulatory system.
'But water companies have always had the freedom to do what's right by their customers – and many have made bad choices.'
Mr Keil said affordability must be a key focus of reform, with households already struggling following this year's sharp rise in water bills.
'More people are turning to CCW to complain about not being able to afford their bill,' he said.
'Over two in five households have told us they've cut spending on essentials like food to make ends meet.
'The case for a single social tariff for water has never been more urgent.'
He welcomed recommendations to make the existing voluntary ombudsman scheme mandatory, saying: 'We're delighted the commission has recommended building on our work at a time when we're seeing more people turn to us for help.'
But River Action chief executive James Wallace accused the commission of falling short, saying it had 'blinked' when faced with a chance to break with the past.
'This was a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reset a broken and corrupted system,' he said.
'Instead, we've been handed vague policy nudges that leave the current failed privatised water company model intact.'
Mr Wallace said nothing less than 'a credible plan to rescue Britain's rivers, lakes and seas' was needed, including a clear path to bring 'failing companies like Thames Water into public control'.
He called on the Government to put Thames Water into special administration as a 'powerful statement of intent', warning: 'Our water is our life-blood and not for sale.'
Water UK, the trade body for the water companies, welcomed the commission's findings, calling reform 'long overdue'.
A spokesperson said: 'Everyone agrees the system has not been working.
'These recommendations should establish the foundations to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas.'
Richard Benwell, a member of the Independent Water Commission's expert advisory group and chief executive of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said a 'culture of rule-breaking and non-compliance' was harming rivers and wetlands, and called for a more powerful and independent environmental regulator.
He welcomed the proposal for new regional water authorities but warned reforms would fall short without proper funding and a clear steer from Government.
'Reforming regulators without fixing resourcing and remit would be painting over cracks,' he said.
Ali Morse, water policy manager at The Wildlife Trusts, said the report offered 'strong recommendations' for more integrated, regionally driven planning, but warned time was running out to act.
'The commission has set the framework – now the Government must act with purpose,' she said.
Gary Carter, national officer at the GMB union, said the report confirmed what the union had argued for years – that water privatisation had been a 'disastrous failure'.
He accused company bosses of profiting while the water infrastructure 'crumbles through lack of investment' and sewage pollutes rivers.
'It's a disgrace – and one Ofwat has overseen,' he said.
'Now is the time to fundamentally reform the water sector and renationalise this vital resource.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Keir Starmer 'must be living in cuckoo land' says reader
He says he is 'as proud as hell' of Labour's first year in office. He must be living in cuckoo land. Labour has trashed the economy, reneged on every election pledge, apart from his comment about Welsh Labour. He said the way Labour has run Wales is a blueprint for how they will run the UK. Well, Labour in Wales has spent 25 years running the country into the ground. Spending billions on worthless schemes and plans, just one example buying Cardiff Airport, spending expected to be by 2030, nearly £400million. Labour has patiently proved they cannot run the Welsh economy, so far, buying Cardiff Airport was an insane idea. Since 2013, over £180 million of taxpayers' money spent on it, with a current loss of £61million. If this was a private organisation, they would have gone into receivership. Labour's Senedd leaders since 2013 should hold their heads in shame. R Brafing, Wales
South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
New £800 million fund launched to support projects in Wales
The fund, linked to onshore wind energy developments, is part of a £3 billion investment by Bute Energy in new energy park sites across the country. It aims to generate long-term social and economic benefits while supporting the Welsh Government's 2030 net zero targets. Catryn Newton, director of community investment and communications at Bute Energy, said: "With the guidance and expertise of the trustees, money from the new Community Benefit Fund will undoubtedly transform the places, spaces, experiences, and the lives of those nearby the new energy parks developed." The fund will be managed by an independently governed charity, with a board of trustees currently being recruited. Trustees will oversee the distribution of grants to communities located near the energy parks, with funding guided by local panels. The first site to benefit will be Twyn Hywel in Caerphilly. Ms Newton said: "The charity is seeking exceptional individuals to join the new board of trustees at this pivotal moment, as they will help shape and govern the bold new model of grant-making and social investment in Welsh communities." The fund will provide £7,500 per megawatt of a park's energy generation capacity, with funding allocated based on the number and size of turbines at each site. A quarter of the grant funding will be ring-fenced to address the cost of living crisis, potentially supporting new community-owned energy projects. Trustees will play a central role in ensuring the fund delivers 'systemic, place-based change'.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
A new water regime must still reward private investors
The weekend's torrential Yorkshire rain amid a hosepipe ban offered a handy metaphor for the chaos that has befallen the privatised UK water industry. Sir Jon Cunliffe's Independent Water Commission report – aiming for a 'fundamental reset' to restore public confidence, clean our waterways and ensure future supply – is welcome for the clarity of its central conclusion: that unfit-for-purpose Ofwat and a jumble of other regulators should be replaced by a single body with more teeth and comprehensive oversight of the sector. So far, so good. Cunliffe – a veteran of the Treasury, the Bank of England and Brussels – can also be applauded for his bureaucratic cunning in tabling no fewer than 88 recommendations, in the hope that perhaps eight of them might actually be adopted. But one reform he was forbidden from contemplating was the renationalisation of water companies, whatever the alleged extent of their failures and dividend-gouging under foreign and private-equity ownership. And that means future investment in leak-free pipes and reservoirs, supply to new housing and elimination of sewage slicks remains dependent on the willingness of private investors to put capital at risk – a mechanism widely misunderstood by consumers and campaigners who believe all shareholder rewards from water supply are somehow exploitative and wrong. Cunliffe's report talks about creating a stable regime that reduces uncertainty and thereby attracts 'low risk, low return' long-term investors, rather than (though he doesn't quite put it this way) the fast-buck financiers who gamed Ofwat so effectively in an era when successive governments were far less concerned with infrastructure improvement than the voter optics of lower water bills. In the Commons, Environment Secretary Steve Reed gave grudging spin about 'fair' returns for shareholders who meet their obligations. I note his previous career in educational publishing and hope he has texts in praise of capitalism on his bookshelf, because having ruled out state ownership he must now embrace investors who will naturally be sceptical of Labour promises. At least Cunliffe has given him a blueprint. Man of secrets David Alliance, who has died aged 93, was a man of secrets. An Iranian immigrant trader who started buying up Lancashire cotton mills in the 1950s, he eventually controlled, in the Coats Viyella combine of the 1990s, most of what remained of the British textile industry. That he liked to hold his cards close to his chest made him a potent deal-maker but a difficult client for his ghostwriters, of whom for a year or so I was one – though my version of his memoirs remained unpublished, eventually to be overtaken by Ivan Fallon's A Bazaar Life (2015). 'You research it,' Alliance would say with a hint of irritation when I tried to probe him about his takeover battles or his clandestine role in rescuing Falasha Jews from persecution in Ethiopia. So inscrutable was he that in the end I missed the core objective of my commission, which was a book saying that treacherous boardroom colleagues had thwarted his efforts to sustain Coats Viyella as a global competitor against cheap foreign rivals, before forcing his 1999 resignation. I suspect neither a nine-digit fortune from his second business empire in mail-order, nor a Lib Dem peerage, nor his name on what is now the Alliance Manchester Business School, brought consolation to his rather lonely later life. He seemed to have few real friends and I was never one of them, but I salute him as a remarkable entrepreneur. Sinking flagship 'The knives are out for BP's Norwegian chairman Helge Lund,' I wrote in April. This followed the energy giant's shareholder-driven U-turn, refocusing on fossil fuels and dumping the commitment to renewables for which Lund and his former chief executive Bernard Looney were largely responsible. Sure enough, Lund's own plan to step down 'most likely during 2026' has been accelerated to this October. His successor, Albert Manifold, previously ran the Irish building materials group CRH whose product range, embracing concrete, aggregates and bitumen, demonstrates a relatively low level of ambition to approach net zero any time soon. Tellingly, its share price has more than doubled over the past three years while BP's has stayed exactly where it was. Underlying that difference is the fact that CRH also led the current fashion for seeking higher valuations elsewhere by shifting its primary listing to New York in 2023. As the activist BP shareholder Elliott Management shouts about a need for decisive leadership to counter chronic underperformance, watch whether this sinking flagship of the FTSE 100 follows CRH across the pond. In one dramatic move, I fear that would nullify most of Chancellor Rachel Reeves's recent initiatives to inject new life into London's capital market. Storm warning I set off for my summer sojourn in France with a nagging concern about relative values. The Financial Times reports that the global cryptocurrency market has reached $4 trillion (£3 trillion) and is likely to go higher as funds flood in following the passage of Donald Trump's pro-crypto legislation. The market capitalisation of Nvidia, the Californian AI microchip giant, has also passed $4 trillion and here too pundits say there's further to go. Both those markers easily surpass the combined market value of the FTSE 100 – the top one hundred London-listed companies – at £2.1 trillion, which itself reflects an all-time high for the index at 9000. Yet economies flatline, inflation ticks up, government debt soars and geopolitics are in perpetual turmoil. Something surely has to give, maybe next month, maybe in the more traditional crash month of October. Ah well, fine French lunches should keep me sanguine – and, I hope, beguile you when I write about them.
