logo
Thorny nature reforms threaten to entangle new minister

Thorny nature reforms threaten to entangle new minister

West Australian17-05-2025

With a reputation as a savvy negotiator, Australia's new environment minister will need all his political nous to navigate the competing interests in the politically fraught portfolio.
Reviving long-promised nature law reforms are top of Murray Watt's to-do list, but that will not be the only challenge of the gig.
The fate of contentious resources projects also await the attention of the Queensland senator, who was picked to replace Tanya Plibersek after she was shifted to the social services ministry.
His most pressing priority will be picking up where his predecessor left off on installing a national environment watchdog and overhauling flawed federal laws at a time when more than 2000 species are listed as threatened.
Laws designed to protect "matters of national environmental significance" from development are considered too weak by some and too stringent by others.
Responding to the 2020 Samuel review that declared the legislation ineffective and outdated, the Albanese government agreed to substantial reform.
But the so-called "nature positive plan" hit a roadblock as the election neared, when a deal Ms Plibersek squared away with the cross bench for a federal environmental protection agency was scuttled by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
He faced criticism for caving to West Australian mining interests but denied the move was done to appease industry.
National co-convenor of the Labor Environment Action Network, Felicity Wade, described the mining industry as "pretty recalcitrant" ahead of the election, before which the coalition was initially tipped to win back a swathe of seats.
"There was a perception that a change of government was possible and their preparedness to be a constructive reform participant evaporated," Ms Wade told AAP.
The Labor group's members are hopeful the party's thumping election victory will bring industry back to the table.
"There are productivity and efficiency gains to be gained through this legislation, but not at the expense of the environment," Ms Wade said.
Early indications suggest the mining lobby also wants the issue on the agenda.
Minerals Council of Australia chief executive officer Tania Constable committed to working collaboratively to reform environmental laws to provide "faster, clearer decisions" after the ministerial reshuffle.
Environmental groups, meanwhile, consider reforms of the "broken" laws long overdue, with Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive Kelly O'Shanassy calling for the issue to be knocked over in the first 12 months.
"There can be no more delays, caving to lobby groups and carving out industries," she said.
The newly appointed environment minister is no stranger to competing priorities and has delivered on thorny issues before, such as ending live sheep exports.
Australian Council of Trade Unions president Michele O'Neil described Senator Watt as a "frank, fair and skilled negotiator who got things done", based on her dealings with him as workplace relations minister.
"He makes sure he is on top of the detail, listens to varied perspectives and keeps his eye on the objectives," she said.
Senator Watt has already indicated that legislating a federal environment watchdog will be one of the top priorities for the recently returned government, planning a trip to Western Australia in the coming week to meet with the premier and mining figures.
He told The Guardian in a post-appointment interview that he was weighing up ditching the "nature positive" title from its law reform in favour of "terms that Australians can understand and buy into".
The support of the Greens, now under the leadership of Queensland senator Larissa Waters, will still be needed to pass any legislation in the new parliament, unless the coalition can be brought on board.
In the previous term, the minor party fought to broaden the reforms to include climate and forest protections.
But deals with the coalition also cannot be ruled out.
The new opposition leader, Sussan Ley, was the environment minister in the job when the Samuel review was commissioned.
Ms Wade said the opposition leader was "thoughtful" in her response to its findings and made an attempt at legislating national standards.
"Her party limited her ability to act, the million-dollar question is whether they have learnt and will respect the mandate of the Albanese government this time round," she said.
The incoming Greens leader said Labor had a choice between working with the minor party to deliver laws that genuinely protected nature or siding with the coalition to continue the status quo.
"Do they want to do a proper job, or do they want to stick with (former coalition prime minister) John Howard's laws from last century?" Senator Waters said after her appointment to the role.
Australian National University honorary associate professor and Biodiversity Council member Peter Burnett was hopeful Labor remained committed to its environmental protection agenda.
"Now we wait to see if the government announces any change of direction," he said.
Legally enforceable environmental standards were foundational to the reforms and would prevent subjective ministerial decision-making, Assoc Prof Burnett added.
Basing decisions on standards - such as no land clearing in critical habitat for threatened species - and an independent EPA to enforce the rules would temper the potential for political arm-twisting.
He was critical of the way consultation was handled early in Labor's first term, taking too long and ultimately leaving the government short on time to deliver its legislation.
"Now it's the task of the new minister to try and get a major reform through in what is a relatively tight timeframe of a parliament," Assoc Prof Burnett said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labor left with ‘no choice' but to force super tax after weak GDP figures in March, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien declares
Labor left with ‘no choice' but to force super tax after weak GDP figures in March, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien declares

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Labor left with ‘no choice' but to force super tax after weak GDP figures in March, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien declares

Labor has been left with 'no choice' but to go after citizens' earnings with its proposed super tax as slow growth plagues the nation and hurts tax revenue, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien has declared. Join to watch the full interview with Ted O'Brien on Business Weekend at 11am (AEST). The Albanese government's proposal to double the tax rate on funds in super balances above $3m and target unrealised gains could soon be legislated as the Greens' approval is all the bill needs to go through the Senate. It comes as recent GDP figures showed Australia was headed back towards per capita recession territory with growth slumping to just 0.2 per cent in the March quarter. The super tax proposal has faced fierce backlash from the Opposition, economists and leaders in the business community. Mr O'Brien is among those and tore into the Albanese government's fiscal management on Sky News' Business Weekend. 'The only reason they're doing it is they've lost all discipline on fiscal responsibility,' the shadow treasurer said. 'Debt (and) deficits (are) going out of control and they've got no ambition for the Australian economy.' He criticised Treasurer Jim Chalmers who lauded the 0.2 per cent growth, arguing the uncertainty from Donald Trump's trade war meant any growth was a decent outcome. 'We heard it last week from the Treasurer after the national accounts came out. What, 0.2 per cent growth in the quarter? Seriously? Lower than last time!' Mr O'Brien said. 'At a yearly basis it's running at less than half of the long-run average of growth and the Treasurer is happy about that. '(There is) no ambition for growth of the Australian economy and when you have no ambition and you overspend, you have no choice but to go after the earnings, the money of your own citizens. 'That's what this super tax does.' Labor's plan to tax unrealised capital gains has drawn backlash from Aussies concerned about small businesses, farmers and startups as many put assets in their self-managed super funds or use it as a low tax investment vehicle. Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson said by forcing Aussies to pay taxes on paper gains it will hinder investment in Australia. 'Both Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers - and probably most of the government - are gaslighting the Australian people by saying: 'Look, this will only impact a very small percentage of people that pay the additional tax',' Mr Wilson told Sky News. 'That's correct, but what it'll do is actually impact about how $4.2 trillion in superannuation is invested. 'We anticipate that the money will come out of self-managed super funds (SMSF), which is about $1.1 trillion, and billions of that will go into the housing market and push house prices up . ' He cautioned Aussies who use their SMSF as a low tax investment vehicle will be discouraged from funding projects and businesses in the Australian market. 'People won't want to take risk on their superannuation in the self-managed super funds,' Mr Wilson said. 'The angel investors and the startups and the small companies in Australia that find it hard to raise capital, particularly at this point in time - that tap's going to be turned off.'

Coastal village wins 10-year fight to stop housing sprawl
Coastal village wins 10-year fight to stop housing sprawl

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Coastal village wins 10-year fight to stop housing sprawl

Cape Paterson Residents and Ratepayers Association spokesman John Coulter said the decision was a big win for the community. The group had argued against the development at planning panels for the better part of a decade. The group was sometimes accused of having a not-in-my-backyard mentality, Coulter said, but he noted that existing development of 240 homes on the western side of town was already adding to traffic concerns and pressure on unsealed roads. Another key complaint has been the environmental effects of developing the landscape north of the town. New reports were introduced as part of the state's review late last year but those in favour of the development argue they were never given a fair chance to rebut the findings. 'It's not just about keeping the village feel of the township. It was the environmental concerns and traditionally ... That's mostly what we do,' Coulter said. 'We do revegetation of the foreshore. We work with Parks Victoria … It's a real struggle sometimes to have to get involved in this planning stuff because it's incredibly complex. Loading 'There is a sense of relief that we've got to the end of that process, and that we've got an outcome that the community has been asking for a long, long time.' Cape Paterson is among many coastal communities facing development pressure as more Victorians seek a sea change, often creating political headaches. In 2018, Victorian Labor attacked the Coalition for allowing a 'grossly expanded' town boundary at Cape Paterson. It went on to win the encompassing state seat of Bass from the Liberals for the first time since it was created and local MP Jordan Crugnale holds it on a razor-thin margin of 0.2 per cent. The state government declared the Bass Coast a distinctive area and landscape, a process to provide greater protection from development, and in 2022 proposed tighter boundaries for several towns as part of this program. Cape Paterson's boundary was not tightened, sparking a backlash from the residents' association. At the time, the government defended the decision by saying it was made after two rounds of public engagement, and informed by existing planning scheme policies and technical studies. An independent panel was tasked in 2023 with reviewing the Bass Coast planning policy. A renewed campaign in 2024 reignited debate over the Cape Paterson boundary expansion after the local council publicly opposed it and Crugnale advocated for a review. In December, the Allan government agreed to re-open Cape Paterson's boundary to public feedback until the end of January 2025. Peak bodies for the property sector and landowners wrote to Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny urging her not to wind back the boundary, arguing it was not the correct process for such a change and would cast doubt on the reliability of long-term planning. Kilkenny ultimately decided in favour of the community campaign, releasing a new draft plan for the Bass Coast this week that revokes expansion of the Cape Paterson boundary north of Seaward Drive. 'We can build more homes, while also protecting what makes our regions so special,' a state government spokesperson said. 'The Bass Coast is one of Victoria's most environmentally significant regions. This draft policy will help set a clear long-term plan that provides certainty to council, developers, and local communities about where more homes can be built while protecting the environment.' The consultation process received more than 1000 submissions, and the government said most of those supported tightening the boundary to protect the dune landscape and green space. Kilkenny's decision was made public at the same time as a conflicting report from the 2023 independent panel. That report, which had previously not been released, assessed one large area proposed to be subdivided north of Seaward Drive and found the boundary could remain. This was also the view of the planning minister at the time of the review. 'The committee supports the position of the proponent [planning minister] that the area defined for residential growth in Cape Paterson be upheld,' the report said. The report found further work to refine the boundary was 'unnecessary', that the boundaries were not a 'green light for urban development at any cost', and rules still required landscape character and environment to be considered in any development seeking approval. Bernard Collins, from development consultants Beveridge Williams, has been advising one group of prospective developers. He said their clients did everything asked of them as part of the process and had prepared the site so it was ready for future development and to become an established part of the town. 'As a planner, it's concerning where perhaps due process is not fully followed in considering the future, structural future growth of townships,' Collins said. 'Orderly planning requires an orderly process. If that's not followed it causes doubt at many levels of the development process.' Narracan MP Wayne Farnham, the opposition's shadow assistant minister for planning, accused Kilkenny of obstructing and interfering with a 'strategic evidence-based planning process'. 'The Allan Labor government talks a big game when it comes to their plans to build 800,000 homes, but their inconsistent approach makes it hard for homebuyers to get into the market, and hard for builders to deliver projects,' he said. 'This decision flies in the face of every strategic planning process, every recommendation and every cultural and environmental study done on the site.' Victorian executive director of the Property Council Cath Evans said the decision 'contradicts the evidence-based process that had been followed for more than a decade'. 'The sudden change not only undermines trust in long-term planning but also sets a concerning precedent for future developments,' she said. 'This could result in driving away further investment and development urgently needed to meet our state's ambitious housing targets.' A Bass Coast Shire Council spokesperson said an assessment had confirmed there was still enough supply to meet council's obligations for housing without needing the northern land.

Go bold: calls for Australia to lead on ocean health
Go bold: calls for Australia to lead on ocean health

West Australian

time2 hours ago

  • West Australian

Go bold: calls for Australia to lead on ocean health

Conservation groups are urging Australia to back a moratorium on deep-sea mining ahead of a major United Nations oceans conference. More than two dozen countries want a ban, pause or moratorium until more is known about sea floors well below the surface, with concerns the emerging industry could disrupt ecosystems and the ocean's ability to act as a carbon sink. Deep-sea mining proponents say demand for critical minerals will ramp up as economies decarbonise. Greenpeace Australia Pacific, World Wide Fund for Nature-Australia, the Australian Marine Conservation Society, and the Save Our Marine Life alliance are also pushing the government to ratify the high seas biodiversity agreement by September. Australia was a founding signatory to the agreement in 2023 and the re-elected Albanese government has promised to ratify its commitment "as quickly as possible". The all-important treaty aims to better protect the two-thirds of marine habitat outside state jurisdiction and secure the necessary 60 ratifications will be a key talking point at the UN conference that starts on Monday. Environment Minister Murray Watt will join other policymakers, scientists, First Nations groups and environmental groups at the five-day event in Nice, France, as leader of the cross-government delegation. Australia has positioned itself as a leader in ocean protection, with 52 per cent of domestic waters now within marine park boundaries. But only about a quarter is fully protected from extractive industries, with the conservation alliance pushing Australia to go further and aim for 30 per cent instead. Stepping up on climate action is the final ask, with the World Meteorological Organization reporting record-high sea surface temperatures in the southwest Pacific in 2024. Bleached corals, fish kills and toxic algal blooms have been linked to marine heatwaves and high ocean temperatures around Australia. "Australia's oceans are at a tipping point, facing rising threats from climate change, habitat loss and industrialisation," Australian Marine Conservation Society chief executive Paul Gamblin said. "The Albanese government was elected on promises of progress - now is the time to deliver." On Friday, the federal government promised $30 million for a Traditional Owner-led program to protect the Great Barrier Reef. The aim is to build on First Nations' knowledge to improve the quality of the freshwater flowing into the reef by restoring wetlands and other measures.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store