logo
Crypto divide in the Senate: Democrats clash as Trump pushes forward on Stablecoin Bill

Crypto divide in the Senate: Democrats clash as Trump pushes forward on Stablecoin Bill

Time of India20-05-2025

Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The US Senate took a historic step towards regulating stablecoins Monday night, May 19 but the debate on the chamber floor extended far beyond digital finance.While the official focus was on establishing a framework for dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies, the subtext was unmistakable: President Donald Trump's growing influence over the future of crypto loomed large over the proceedings.The procedural vote passed handily, 66 to 32, a moment some hailed as historic, the first serious bipartisan movement toward regulating crypto. But if the tally suggested unity, the speeches and side-glances told another story. Trump's unapologetic crypto boosterism hovered over every word, with many Democrats visibly wrestling with the optics of backing legislation that could hand the president another perceived win.Also read: Bitcoin trades above $106,000 as market shrugs off US credit downgrade; Ethereum, Chainlink jump over 7% Sixteen Democrats crossed the aisle to push the bill forward. Senators like Kirsten Gillibrand, Cory Booker, and Adam Schiff, all prominent voices on tech and finance, stood behind the legislation. It wasn't a casual endorsement. Each one knew the risks: Trump's fingerprints on the crypto world are everywhere, from family-linked ventures to rumored backdoor lobbying.Gillibrand, co-sponsoring the bill with Tennessee Republican Bill Hagerty, praised the effort as a necessary evolution. 'This framework moves us out of the Wild West and toward something that could actually work,' she told reporters before the vote. But even her optimism couldn't disguise the unease within her party.On the Republican side, opposition came not from Trump loyalists but from libertarian purists like Rand Paul and Jerry Moran, who've long bristled at federal control over decentralized tech. Their no-votes were predictable. The real theater was unfolding among Democrats.Senator Elizabeth Warren delivered the night's sharpest blow. In a speech that drew murmurs even from seasoned staffers, she accused 'the President' of using crypto to launder influence and line his own pockets. She never said 'Trump,' but no one was confused. 'This bill,' she said, 'doesn't just unlock stablecoins. It opens the door to unchecked corruption, national vulnerability, and financial chaos.'On the floor, cameras caught her in a quiet but charged exchange with Gillibrand. A few words, a sharp gesture, a clenched jaw, it was the kind of moment that defines Senate lore.Also read: JPMorgan Chase to offer clients access to Bitcoin, despite CEO Dimon's continued criticism Even Democrats who voted yes felt the pressure. Senator Mark Warner, instrumental in shaping the compromise text, gave a carefully worded statement afterward. 'The Trump family's history with crypto raises serious red flags,' he said. 'We have to acknowledge that. But turning our backs on the technology won't make the risk disappear. This bill gives us guardrails — finally.'With Senate support now secured, attention shifts to the GOP-held House, where Trump allies are expected to move quickly. A similar version of the bill already passed the House Financial Services Committee, clearing a path for final passage, and a signature from a president who has loudly cheered crypto's rise.For the crypto industry, which has spent years pushing for clarity, the moment feels like a vindication. But for lawmakers caught between innovation and integrity, it's a tightrope walk. The legislation may rein in stablecoin volatility and establish oversight, but it also legitimizes a market closely tied to a president known for bending or ignoring the rules.If the bill becomes law, it won't just mark a win for crypto. It will cement Donald Trump's place in its future. And for many on the Senate floor Monday night, that was the real vote they were casting, one not just about digital currency, but about the currency of power.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Daily Briefing: Trump claims credit again; what India' GDP estimates show; meet 3 Florence Nightingale awardees; and more
Daily Briefing: Trump claims credit again; what India' GDP estimates show; meet 3 Florence Nightingale awardees; and more

Indian Express

time31 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Daily Briefing: Trump claims credit again; what India' GDP estimates show; meet 3 Florence Nightingale awardees; and more

Good morning! Donald Trump does it again—claiming credit for halting the escalating India-Pakistan conflict. Speaking at the Oval Office and in Pittsburgh later on the same day, the US President reiterated that his administration brokered the ceasefire (on May 10) to stop the hostilities that 'could have turned out into a nuclear disaster'. Meanwhile, New Delhi remains firm on its stance that 'No third party was involved' since the beginning. 'I am glad… India's industry, the manufacturing activity, have all been so good during Q4.' On Friday, the Government released two data sets on the provisional estimates of India's economic growth in the fourth quarter (Q4, January to March), and for the financial year (2024-25 or FY25). Based on this, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said India has sustained the fastest-growing economy tag for the fourth year now, thanks to firm industrial growth in manufacturing. The data: India's real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) gained strength, picking up pace to 7.4 per cent in the fourth quarter. The full-year growth rate, however, is estimated to have slowed to a four-year low of 6.5 per cent for financial year 2024-25. This has stayed resilient, remaining at the same level as the second advance estimate of 6.5% released February-end. What the data show: Now, GDP is calculated by adding up all the expenditures made in the economy. Linked to it, the Gross Value Added (GVA) looks at the supply side capturing the true momentum of the economy. It measures the contribution of each sector and excludes the effects of taxes and subsidies, which can distort GDP figures. For FY 25, the real GVA grew by 6.4 per cent, losing a step over the 8.6 per cent growth in FY24. No sector has recorded growth at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) anywhere close to 6 per cent since 2019-20. The manufacturing GVA has registered a slower growth rate (CAGR of 4.04 per cent) than even agriculture and allied Udit Misra explains, could help our understanding of the high urban — in particular, youth — unemployment in the country. Why are the estimates 'provisional'? They will be revised over the next few years. GDP estimates go through several revisions for any fiscal year. Looking ahead, economists see a slightly slower growth in FY26 amid heightened uncertainty around global trade policies. Boosting manufacturing growth has been a cornerstone for all governments. It is now the new battleground globally with the US, Europe, and China locked in a trade war to protect domestic manufacturing. Meet the Nightingales: Also on Friday, 15 nurses—auxiliary nurse midwives and women health workers—from across India were conferred the Florence Nightingale Award by President Droupadi Murmu. Of these awardees, four each are from the North-East and union territories, and two from the national capital. Anonna Dutt brings the stories of a trio: Leimapokpam Ranjita Devi, Banu M R and Major-General Sheena P D. Pakistan has done that and much more – under pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This is part of the conditionality linked to an Extended Fund Facility (EFF) loan from the global body. The 37-month EFF was approved in September last year and provides for a total disbursement of $7 billion to Pakistan. Harish Damodaran breaks it down, in contrast with India. 'Is it not commonplace today to decide who is a Pakistani…? Don't we witness the othering of communities not just on the basis of religion, but also on the basis of the size of their eyes? So, one 'belongs' only on the sufferance of those who claim to own this nation' Columnist Suhas Palshikar's latest piece, he says, is in response to Yogendra Yadav's spirited exposition of 'Indian' nationalism, in the hope of expanding the scope of the debate. He agrees with Yadav's point that Indian nationalism is under assault today. But highlights that it's not so much about whether 'I/we forgot' it, but that it was stolen. 'Karate Kid: Legends': While there may be no surprises in its story curve, Shalini Langer, in her review, writes the martial arts drama film running in theatres now has the moves. It also lands its karate kid on his feet. Because: 'There are few greater pleasures than watching Jackie Chan do his thing. Pair him up with Ralph Macchio, and it could be Karate Kid from 40 years ago all over again.'

'9th Time In 20 Days': Jairam Ramesh Asks PM Modi To 'Speak Up' On Trump's Ceasefire Claims
'9th Time In 20 Days': Jairam Ramesh Asks PM Modi To 'Speak Up' On Trump's Ceasefire Claims

News18

time36 minutes ago

  • News18

'9th Time In 20 Days': Jairam Ramesh Asks PM Modi To 'Speak Up' On Trump's Ceasefire Claims

Last Updated: On Friday, Trump reiterated that he had stopped India and Pakistan from engaging in a full-blown conflict and averted a nuclear confrontation The Congress is at it again. Two days after questioning the silence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Donald Trump's claims of having brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, the Grand Old Party once again asked PM Modi to 'speak up" as the US President repeated his assertions. On Friday, Trump reiterated that he had stopped India and Pakistan from engaging in a full-blown conflict and averted a nuclear confrontation. 'We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster, and I want to thank the leaders of India and Pakistan, and I want to thank my people. 'Also, we talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons. They're great leaders in those countries, and they understood and they agreed, and that all stopped, and we're stopping others from fighting. Also, because ultimately, we can fight better than anybody, we have the greatest military in the world. We have the greatest leaders in the world…" The US President's statement gave fresh ammo to the Congress, with party MP Jairam Ramesh saying it was the '9th time in 20 days" that Trump had repeated the sequence of events but the prime minister had maintained silence on the issue. This is the 9th time in 20 days, across 3 countries and 3 cities. Donaldbhai keeps repeating the same sequence of events of how he got the 4-Day India-Pakistan war to stop – US intervention and the use of the trade instrument to stop nuclear escalation. The equivalence of India… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) May 31, 2025 'This is the 9th time in 20 days, across 3 countries and 3 cities. Donaldbhai keeps repeating the same sequence of events of how he got the 4-Day India-Pakistan war to stop – US intervention and the use of the trade instrument to stop nuclear escalation. The equivalence of India and Pakistan gets reiterated yet again. President Trump's Commerce Secretary has made exactly the same claims in his submission to the New York-based Court of International Trade on May 23rd. But Donaldbhai's friend Mr. Narendra Modi continues to ignore his claims with absolute silence. Why doesn't the PM speak up?" Ramesh asked on X. This is not the first time Ramesh has trained his guns on the government's radio silence on the issue. Earlier, the Congress leader said: 'Our Prime Minister does not want to hear about tariffs; our Prime Minister only wants to hear 'Tareef' (praise). So, the PM is silent on this. The Prime Minister has not said anything." He also slammed the US President for hyphenating India and Pakistan, saying: 'India's economy has increased 10 times in comparison to Pakistan's economy, but both of them have come in the same boat. How can this happen?" THE CEASEFIRE India, in retaliation for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people, launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, pounding terror launchpads linked to outfits such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad in Pakistan and PoK and killing more than 100 terrorists. A rattled Pakistan responded with attempts to launch a military action, resorting to cross-border shelling, drone assaults, and even military strikes. However, India's air defence system and armed forces thwarted these attempts. After four days of intense cross-border fighting, India and Pakistan arrived at a ceasefire understanding on May 10, with Trump announcing the truce. WHAT TRUMP SAID The US President had claimed that India and Pakistan agreed to reach a 'full and immediate" ceasefire after mediated talks, claiming that he used 'trade to a large extent" to broker the ceasefire. 'I said let's make a deal, let's do some trading. Let's not trade nuclear missiles. Let's trade the things you make so beautifully. And they both have very powerful leaders, strong leaders and it all stopped. Hopefully it will remain that way," he had said. However, the external affairs ministry slammed Trump's offer to mediate on Kashmir and his claim of having used trade to prevent a 'nuclear war", saying that the military action under Operation Sindoor was 'entirely in the conventional domain". While addressing a press briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, 'I refer to you the position made clear on May 13. From the time Operation Sindoor commenced on May 7, the issue of trade or tariff did not come up in any of these discussions. External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar had also clarified it was established directly through DGMOs." Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: May 31, 2025, 09:04 IST News politics '9th Time In 20 Days': Jairam Ramesh Asks PM Modi To 'Speak Up' On Trump's Ceasefire Claims

Musk vows to stay Trump's 'friend' in bizarre black-eyed farewell
Musk vows to stay Trump's 'friend' in bizarre black-eyed farewell

New Indian Express

time39 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Musk vows to stay Trump's 'friend' in bizarre black-eyed farewell

WASHINGTON: Billionaire Elon Musk bade farewell to Donald Trump in an extraordinary Oval Office appearance Friday, sporting a black eye, brushing aside drug abuse claims and vowing to stay a "friend and advisor" to the US president. As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, the Republican hailed Musk's "incredible service" and handed him a golden key to the White House. But Trump insisted that Musk was "really not leaving" after a turbulent four months in which his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. "He's going to be back and forth," said Trump, showering praise on the tech tycoon for what he called the "most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations." South-African born Musk, wearing a black T-shirt with the word "Dogefather" in white lettering and a black DOGE baseball cap, said many of the $1 trillion savings he promised would take time to bear fruit. "I look forward to continuing to be a friend and advisor to the president," he said. But many people were more interested in the livid black bruise around Musk's right eye. Speculation about the cause was further fueled by accusations in the New York Times Friday that Musk used so much of the drug ketamine on the 2024 campaign trail that he developed bladder problems.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store