Malaysia elected president of UN-Habitat Assembly for 2025-2029 term
According to the Housing and Local Government Ministry's statement, Malaysia made history when its presidency was unanimously approved by all 193 member states at the UN-Habitat Assembly in Nairobi on Friday (May 30), and the announcement was made during the Election of the Officers of the Bureau at the UN-Habitat Assembly.
The Malaysian delegation is represented by Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming, and Malaysia takes over the role from Mexico, which represented the Latin America and Caribbean region in the previous term.
During this term, Malaysia will hold the presidency and a seat on the Executive Board jointly with the United Arab Emirates to represent the Asia Pacific region.
Nga, in his acceptance speech at UN-Habitat, said Malaysia took on this role as president together with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and emphasised shared commitment that symbolised regional solidarity and urban sustainability.
"To strengthen multilateralism and the UN-Habitat Agenda, both Malaysia and the UAE call upon member states to redouble their efforts in implementing the New Urban Agenda,' he said.
Nga has said it was a strong testament to the country to be entrusted with the presidency by a United Nations body involving 193 member states.
"This is a historic breakthrough for Malaysia. It not only proves that our country has returned to the international stage under the leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, but also highlights our growing international influence. In light of this latest development, the support of the people is more important than ever.
"This is a shared glory for all Malaysians, as we continue to demonstrate our commitment and achievements in sustainable urban development, with 53 per cent of our 156 local governments now leading Voluntary Local Reviews (VLR) (to assess their progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals), putting us on track for full nationwide coverage by 2030,' he added.
Meanwhile, Director-General of the Sheikh Zayed Housing Programme (UAE), Mohammed Ibrahim Al Mansoori, expressed honour at the joint leadership with Malaysia.
"This collaboration is marked by strategic coordination and a shared purpose for a better future,' he said.
Headquartered in Nairobi, Kenya, the UN-Habitat Assembly was established in 1975 and elevated into a full programme by the UN General Assembly in 2001.
It is the highest global decision-making body on sustainable urbanisation and human settlements that convenes every four years and plays a critical role in shaping global policies for cities and communities.
As President, Malaysia will work closely with the UN-Habitat Executive Board as well as global partners to strengthen multilateral collaboration, as well as promote inclusive, climate-resilient and sustainable cities worldwide. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Malaysia proposes ASEAN monitoring team for Thailand-Cambodia conflict
PUTRAJAYA: Chief of Defence Force Gen Tan Sri Mohd Nizam Jaffar has requested Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to engage with Thai and Cambodian leaders for Malaysian teams to join the ASEAN Observer Team (AOT) in conflict zones. The AOT includes representatives from ASEAN nations and will monitor compliance with the ceasefire agreement along the 840-kilometre border. Mohd Nizam stated that logistical support for the mission is being provided by the United States. He spoke after his induction into the Hall of Fame of the National Resilience College (MKN) in Putrajaya. Following the General Border Committee (GBC) meeting, an Interim Observer Team (IOT) was formed, consisting of ASEAN defence attachés. The IOT is led by Malaysia's Defence Advisers in Bangkok and Phnom Penh. The team will first brief 75 Thai senior officers in Bangkok on necessary measures before conducting similar sessions in Phnom Penh. Their primary role is to ensure ceasefire adherence and investigate reported violations. Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to maintain current troop positions and avoid military escalation. Separately, Mohd Nizam addressed the death of a PALAPES trainee at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Skudai, confirming a completed inquiry and post-mortem. He clarified that the incident occurred during a battle inoculation exercise and denied any bullying or ragging involvement. Mohd Nizam emphasised the Armed Forces' commitment to eradicating bullying, focusing instead on rigorous training. The mother of the late trainee, Syamsul Haris Shamsudin, has requested a second post-mortem to determine the cause of death. - Bernama
Focus Malaysia
16 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
A syringe assault as a political warning
THE recent assault on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli marks a deeply troubling moment in Malaysian political history. The boy was reportedly attacked in broad daylight at a Putrajaya mall car park, where an assailant grabbed and jabbed him with a syringe before fleeing the scene. The child, accompanied by his mother, was taken immediately to UPM Hospital and remains under observation. While police have launched an investigation, the motivation behind the attack has stirred nationwide concern and rightly so. Rafizi has publicly claimed the attack was not random, but rather a premeditated warning to silence him due to his political stance and recent realignments. This unprecedented form of intimidation has elevated the conversation around the safety and security of Malaysia's elected officials and their families. One of the most pressing questions following the incident is why the attacker targeted Rafizi's son instead of his wife. Politically motivated violence often aims for symbolic value, and harming a child sends a more chilling and emotional message than targeting an adult. It is likely the assailants sought to inflict maximum psychological trauma while minimising physical confrontation. A child is defenceless, innocent, and deeply cherished, and hurting one is a heinous act that implicitly endangers the safety and well-being of the entire family. In choosing the child over the spouse, the perpetrators displayed both tactical calculation and moral depravity, aiming to strike fear not just in Rafizi but in the broader political community. Adding to the national anxiety is the uncertainty surrounding what substance was injected into the child. Authorities and medical personnel have yet to publicly disclose any findings, leaving room for rampant speculation. Could it have been a harmless agent, meant only to intimidate? Or was it a harmful chemical, drug, or toxin with long-term health consequences? Until toxicology reports are released, the full implications for the child's physical health remain unknown. The very ambiguity is part of the psychological warfare that the fear that something dangerous could have been introduced into the boy's body lingers in the minds of his family and the public alike. This method of attack as covert, invasive, and potentially biologically harmful marks a terrifying evolution in political threats in Malaysia. This raises the next logical question: Could this incident be tied to Rafizi's recent political actions or affiliations? He has made significant moves in realigning his political stance, stepping down from government while remaining an outspoken critic of both internal party dynamics and national governance issues. His vocal positions on controversial matters may have rattled certain powerful circles. In his statement, Rafizi stated that he believed the attack was a deliberate and targeted threat intended to warn him against speaking out further. If this is true, then Malaysia is witnessing a new, darker chapter of political intimidation where family members are used as pawns in a broader game of coercion. Such a brazen attack also highlights glaring concerns over the security of elected officials and their families. In most democratic societies, public figures accept a certain level of scrutiny and risk. But when their spouses and children are endangered, the balance shifts dangerously. Should the burden of protection fall on individual MPs, or should the state offer enhanced security measures to prevent such incidents? In the Dewan Rakyat, MPs have begun raising these concerns, with calls for the Home Minister to explain the state's preparedness and response. While the police reportedly responded swiftly and UPM Hospital has acted diligently, this attack illustrates a significant vulnerability in Malaysia's public safety framework particularly in high-profile areas such as Putrajaya. Although Malaysia has witnessed violent acts in the past, the nature of this attack is distinct and deeply unsettling. Historically, political violence in the country has targeted institutions or public spaces, such as the 2016 Movida Bar grenade attack or the 2024 Ulu Tiram police station assault. However, the use of a syringe on a child in a public and supposedly secure environment is unprecedented in its method and intent. Globally, there have been rare cases of political intimidation via poisoning or biological agents, but seldom have children been the direct target in this fashion. This attack, therefore, positions Malaysia within a very troubling global context, where democratic discourse is increasingly being challenged by criminal intimidation. Ultimately, the implications of this incident go beyond one politician's family. It shakes the very foundation of public confidence in safety and justice. The Malaysian public must now contend with the possibility that political disagreements can lead not just to career consequences but to physical threats against one's children. It is imperative that law enforcement agencies, intelligence units, and the political establishment take this as a wake-up call. Immediate steps must be taken to publicly identify the attackers, clarify what substance was used, and prosecute those responsible. Moreover, this should spark a larger national conversation on protecting public servants and their loved ones. In a democracy, fear must never be allowed to replace dialogue especially when that fear takes the form of a syringe in a child's arm. ‒ Aug 14, 2025 R Paneir Selvam is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geopolitical matters. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bernama
Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Malaysia Seeks To Deploy ASEAN Monitoring Team To Thailand-Cambodia Conflict Zone
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 14 (Bernama) -- Chief of Defence Force Gen Tan Sri Mohd Nizam Jaffar said he has requested Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to formally communicate with the Prime Ministers of Thailand and Cambodia to allow Malaysian teams to enter conflict areas in both countries alongside the ASEAN Observer Team (AOT). He said the AOT comprises representatives from ASEAN member states and will be deployed continuously on the ground to ensure and monitor that there are no violations of the ceasefire agreement. 'This is a heavy task because there is a border of about 840 kilometres that needs to be monitored. For this assignment, we are receiving logistical support from the United States,' he told reporters after being inducted into the Hall of Fame of the National Resilience College (MKN) here today. He said following the conclusion of the General Border Committee (GBC), the parties involved had agreed under the ceasefire agreement to form an Interim Observer Team (IOT), comprising defence attachés from ASEAN countries. Mohd Nizam said the team is led by Malaysia's Defence Advisers in Bangkok and Phnom Penh. 'The first step for this team is to hold a briefing in Bangkok for 75 senior officers from Thailand on the measures that need to be taken. 'The same will be done in Phnom Penh tomorrow and the following day before they make visits to the conflict zones,' he said. Mohd Nizam said the main mandate of the IOT is to ensure that the ceasefire is upheld and to investigate any reported violations from both sides. Thailand and Cambodia had previously agreed to strictly observe the ceasefire along their shared border, with both sides maintaining their current troop positions and not increasing military strength.
