&w=3840&q=100)
Sebi moots lighter regulatory framework for AIFs with accredited investors
In a consultation paper issued on Friday, Sebi suggested that such accredited investors (AI-only schemes) could be allowed certain flexibilities, given that accredited investors are deemed to have the knowledge, financial capacity and risk appetite to make informed investment decisions without the same level of regulatory safeguards required for retail participants.
The proposal includes exemptions from requirements such as maintaining pari-passu rights among investors, NISM certification for key investment team members, and the current limit of 1,000 investors per scheme, the regulator said.
These schemes could also extend their tenure by up to five years, subject to investor approval, and in the case of trust-structured AIFs, managers could take over certain responsibilities currently mandated for trustees, it added.
The regulator also said the move is in line with its long-term vision of gradually shifting from the present 'minimum commitment threshold' metric to 'accreditation status' as the primary criterion for determining investor sophistication in AIFs.
However, both metrics would co-exist for now to avoid disruption in the industry, it added.
Sebi noted that while the number of accredited investors remains modest, recent relaxations and proposed process improvements, including leveraging KYC registration agencies and streamlining accreditation norms are expected to boost participation.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has invited public comments on the proposals till August 29.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Best Mutual Funds: These 6 value schemes delivered over 20% annualised returns in past 3 years
Best Mutual Funds: Before investing in a mutual fund scheme, investors typically examine its past few years' returns and compare them with those of other schemes in the same category. The past performance of mutual funds sets the tone for their future performance. A high-performing fund, for instance, is likely to garner a lot of contributions from new investors, whereas a low-performing fund fails to gain traction over time. Here, we list out the high-performing value schemes that delivered over 20 per cent annualised returns in the past three years. Let us first understand what a value mutual fund is. Value mutual funds refer to those schemes which follow a value investment strategy with at least 65 per cent in stocks. These funds identify securities that are currently undervalued but are seen to perform well in future after their value is unlocked. There are a total of 24 value schemes with total assets under management (AUM) of ₹ 2.01 lakh crore, according to the latest AMFI (Association of Mutual Funds in India) data as on July 31, 2025. Value Fund 3-year-returns (%) Axis Value Fund 21.45 HSBC Value fund 23.84 ICICI Pru Value 21.05 JM Value Fund 23.34 Nippon India Value 21.19 Quant Value Fund 22.98 (Source: AMFI; regular returns as on 13 August 2025) As we can see in the table above, JM Value Fund delivered over 23 per cent annualised returns in the past three years, while HSBC Value Fund gave 23.84 per cent returns. Other schemes which have delivered high returns include Axis Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund. Notably, past returns do not guarantee future returns. This means just because some scheme has given exceptional returns in the past, it does not mean it will continue to deliver similar returns in the future as well. Other factors that investors are supposed to consider before making an investment decision include the reputation of the fund house, whether the scheme is active or passive, past performance of the fund manager (in the case of an active scheme), and the overall macroeconomic scenario that prevails, among others. Note: This story is for informational purposes only. Please speak to a SEBI-registered investment advisor before making any investment-related decision. For all personal finance updates, visit here
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Sebi's AIF rule changes give fund managers more time—but add new challenges
The landscape for Alternate Investment Funds (AIFs) in India is undergoing significant change with recent regulatory amendments from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). These changes aim to resolve long-standing challenges in managing unliquidated assets while giving fund managers more operational flexibility. At the same time, they introduce new complexities that will require careful oversight to ensure investor confidence is not undermined. This article examines the opportunities and challenges these reforms bring, and how Sebi can further strengthen its framework. The changes The Sebi amendments provide flexibility for AIFs by allowing more time to maximise asset valuation. These changes improve outcomes for both fund managers and investors. Increased flexibility for fund management: One of the most notable changes introduced by Sebi is the option for AIFs to enter a "dissolution period" to manage unliquidated investments within their existing schemes. This allows funds to extend their lifecycle in a structured manner, offering fund managers more time and flexibility to dispose of these assets. In the past, funds with unliquidated investments often struggled to wind down promptly, leading to costly administrative and legal burdens. By eliminating the need to create separate liquidation schemes, the dissolution period simplifies operations and provides an efficient path to closing out investments that would otherwise remain stranded. The ability to manage residual investments within the existing fund structure also helps mitigate the risk of distress sales. Fund managers now have the latitude to wait for favourable market conditions or work through complex resolutions without the pressure of an impending deadline, which could result in more favourable outcomes for investors. One-time extension for liquidation: Sebi has also introduced a one-time extension for AIFs with liquidation periods that have either expired or were set to expire before 24 July 2024. This extension is a crucial lifeline, particularly for funds facing illiquid markets or assets that are difficult to sell. It enables fund managers to avoid hasty liquidations that might lead to suboptimal returns. For investors, the extension could result in better outcomes, as fund managers will have the necessary time to work on maximizing the value of their investments, instead of rushing into sales that could lead to unnecessary losses. The challenges Sebi's changes often aim to improve market integrity and protect investors, but they can indeed bring challenges. Balancing these challenges is crucial to ensuring that the regulatory environment supports both market efficiency and investor protection. Transparency concerns: While beneficial for fund managers, extending the holding period raises transparency issues. Delayed disclosures regarding the asset quality and performance of these unliquidated investments could erode investor trust. Sebi must enforce stringent monitoring and ensure that investors remain fully informed, even during extended holding periods. Limited investor options in distribution: Investors may face limited choices when it comes to receiving returns from unliquidated assets. If investors are unwilling to accept in-specie distribution (where they receive the unliquidated asset directly), the investment may be written off. This approach could be detrimental to investors who are not prepared to manage such assets themselves, highlighting the need for more diverse exit options. Valuation complexities: Accurately valuing unliquidated investments is a challenging task. The inherent subjectivity in assessing the worth of illiquid assets can lead to discrepancies between perceived and actual values, increasing the potential for disputes. Ensuring accurate, transparent valuation mechanisms will be crucial to avoiding conflict and ensuring fair outcomes for all stakeholders. Suggested next steps In the evolving landscape of fund management, ensuring transparency and flexibility for both investors and fund managers is crucial. To enhance this dynamic, Sebi could consider the following measures: Standardized exit options: Sebi could explore standardized exit mechanisms for investors who are unwilling to accept in-specie distribution. Facilitating secondary market transactions for illiquid assets or establishing more structured exit strategies could provide greater flexibility to investors. Clearer guidelines on dissolution procedures: Providing more explicit guidelines for entering and exiting the dissolution period would offer clarity for fund managers and investors alike. This could reduce confusion and ensure that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the process. Periodic review of the dissolution period: Sebi ould commit to reviewing the effectiveness of the dissolution period after a certain time. This would allow for adjustments to be made based on market feedback and performance, ensuring that the system remains responsive and effective. Simplified consent mechanisms: Streamlining the consent process—perhaps through electronic voting or reducing the consent threshold—could make it easier for fund managers to make critical decisions without unnecessary delays. Simplified procedures would reduce administrative burdens and improve the agility of fund management. The success of these reforms hinges on addressing potential transparency issues and creating more robust exit options for investors. With further refinements, these amendments could catalyse even greater growth and innovation in India's AIF industry, while maintaining investor confidence and market integrity. Priyesh Chheda is founder of Arbour Investments.
New Indian Express
6 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Cyberattacks: Sebi chief Pandey calls for stronger defence
MUMBAI: With the rising incidents of public falling victims to cyber crimes, Securities and Exchange Board chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey has called for constant vigilance, regular incident-response drills, and forensic readiness to protect stock exchanges and investors from such escalating online threats. Speaking at a cybersecurity training programme at the Sebi-run National Institute of Securities Markets (NISM) near here on Thursday, Pandey, according to the speech shared by Sebi late last night, warned that even the perception of vulnerability can unsettle markets, irrespective of the immediate financial losses. Recalling the July 2010 Nasdaq breach, where hackers had gained accessed to a system used by corporate boards to share confidential documents, he noted that while trading was unaffected, the incident 'deeply shook the confidence of the market in general and investors in particular.' On July 18, attack a Russian cyber hack had compromised the world's largest tech-stocks listed trading platform primarily targeted the exchange's directors desk portal but not limited to it. Sebi has, in recent years, strengthened cybersecurity norms, mandated regular cyber audits, and tightened reporting on technical glitches across exchanges, clearing corporations, depositories, and market intermediaries, Pandey said, adding 'safeguarding these market utilities is essential for capital formation, investor trust, and economic resilience.' Reeling out the numbers of cyberattacks in the country, he said such attacks are no longer rare as the country has seen over 2 million security incidents in 2024, according to CERT-In, nearly double the pre-pandemic levels. 'A small glitch in a trading algorithm can trigger market disruption in milliseconds. A misconfigured server can give malicious actors a way in. A compromised account can lead to damaging data leaks,' Pandey said, citing the August 2012 Knight Capital trading fiasco that caused $440 million in losses due to faulty trading software.
