logo
Blink and you pay: The 10-minute tomato and cola might cost more than you think

Blink and you pay: The 10-minute tomato and cola might cost more than you think

Time of India07-07-2025
A few months ago, buying a bunch of bananas or a packet of sugar at 10pm with just a few taps on your phone felt like magic. For many in India's big cities, 10-minute
grocery delivery
became a habit — a small luxury that promised speed and ease. But now, that convenience is coming at a cost, ToI reported.
More and more users of
Swiggy Instamart
,
Blinkit
, and Zepto are noticing that their bills have started to creep up — not because of the items themselves, but because of the quiet add-ons. From handling fees to rain surcharges, small cart penalties to surge pricing, consumers say they are now paying up to ₹50 extra on every small order.
The growing list of charges includes a fixed handling fee of ₹10 to ₹21, along with GST, delivery charges, small cart fees, rain fees, and surge pricing when applicable. While people still enjoy the convenience, many shoppers are going back to comparing prices — both offline and across different online platforms — before opening their
quick commerce
apps.
What once gave these platforms an edge over neighbourhood kiranas — better prices and delivery speed — is now being undone by their rising fee structures. Delhi-based consumer Urvashi Sharma said, "I buy fruits and vegetables from local vendors now. Fruits, for example, tend to be cheaper by ₹30-40. Tomatoes and peas usually are cheaper online, but if you add handling and delivery fees, it comes to the same amount."
Market researcher Satish Meena, adviser at Datum Intelligence, said that earlier, customers didn't think twice before placing frequent, small orders. But now they're more cautious — often delaying purchases or clubbing them together to avoid paying extra fees again and again. This shift in behaviour could hurt the gross order value (GOV) of these platforms and slow the movement of goods, which in turn increases the cost of running their dark stores.
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
Quick commerce apps stack up extra fees to curb losses
"Consumers are finding quick commerce a bit expensive, but convenience is still the winner. The platforms are trying to move consumers to planned purchases through plans like Super Saver and Maxxsaver, but there's a long way to go," Meena said.
Fee structures are not just increasing — they are also becoming harder to track.
Swiggy
and Zepto typically waive delivery fees if the order is worth around ₹200 or more. But Blinkit requires customers to spend at least ₹500 for free delivery. The platforms did not comment on their pricing policies.
Even the fixed fees aren't all that fixed. Swiggy's Instamart can charge anywhere between ₹10 and ₹15 depending on the order value. Zepto usually charges ₹21 for larger orders and ₹13 for smaller ones. Blinkit's handling fee is typically ₹11. Rain fees and surge fees are generally ₹15 and ₹30, respectively, and can be added when demand spikes or weather worsens.
For companies still running at a loss, these added charges help improve their financials. But for customers placing last-minute or small-sized orders — the kind that built the quick commerce habit in the first place — the rising costs are hard to justify.
Mumbai-based professional Nandini Paul said that even though she pays for premium services like
Swiggy
One and
Zepto Daily
to get discounts and benefits, she often ends up paying more than she would on Blinkit for the same basket. "Despite paying for Swiggy One membership and Zepto Daily to avail discounts and other benefits, I often end up paying higher prices on the platforms for the same cart compared to Blinkit," she said.
Another customer pointed out the illusion of discounts and free delivery. "There are hidden charges on quick commerce platforms and an illusion of discounts. These days, I think, if I had more time, I would directly shop from the market. But the fact that I can shop anytime of the day is a plus," the consumer said.
A recent
JM Financial
research note said most quick commerce platforms have increased the minimum order value needed to get free delivery. In a comparison of 11-item orders across
Instamart
, Zepto, Blinkit, and DMart Ready, Blinkit turned out to be the most expensive, while DMart Ready was the cheapest.
According to a report by Bain, quick commerce companies have improved their financials by increasing the value of each order, cutting supply chain costs, and boosting profit margins. They have done this by sourcing goods directly from farmers and producers, and by earning more through ads and platform fees. But to keep growing in a profitable way, these firms will have to change their business strategies for smaller towns and cities, deal with more competition, and make supply chains more efficient. The market is also shifting to a two-speed model, where a few products will be delivered in under 15 minutes, while a wider range will arrive within an hour.
As quick commerce expands into more cities and begins selling larger items like consumer electronics, the logistics will become more complicated. How well these platforms manage those challenges will decide how much of the overall e-commerce market they can capture.
The sector remains crowded, and while there is space for both kiranas and online platforms, one question continues to trouble consumers — how much is too much to pay for convenience?
(with ToI inputs)
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC says Hyatt's India operations are taxable under PE norms
SC says Hyatt's India operations are taxable under PE norms

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

SC says Hyatt's India operations are taxable under PE norms

In a ruling that has significant implications for multinational companies operating in India, the Supreme Court Thursday held that UAE-headquartered Hyatt International Southwest Asia , which provides hotel consultancy and advisory services in India as part of its business operations, has a fixed place Permanent Establishment (PE) in India for tax purposes. Upholding a Delhi High Court order that ruled against the hotel company, a bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan dismissed various the appeals by Hyatt International Southwest Asia Ltd, while affirming the findings of the HC that Hyatt had a fixed place PE in India within the meaning of Article 5(1) of the DTAA, and that, the income received under the strategic oversight services agreements (SOSA) is attributable to such PE and is, therefore, taxable in India. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Public Policy Leadership PGDM Finance Design Thinking Cybersecurity CXO Technology Digital Marketing Data Science Artificial Intelligence Healthcare MBA Project Management Operations Management Data Science Degree Management Others others healthcare Product Management MCA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Months IIM Calcutta Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details The top court said that was undisputed that Hyatt's executives and employees paid frequent and regular visits to India to oversee operations and implement SOSA. 'The finding of the assessing officer, based on travel logs and job functions, establish continuous and coordinated engagement, even though no single individual exceeded the 9-month stay threshold,' according to SC Under Article 5(2)(i) of the agreement between the government of India and the United Arab Emirates for avoidance of double taxation (DTAA) Under Article 5(2)(i) of the DTAA, the relevant consideration is the continuity of business presence in aggregate – not the length of stay of each individual employee. Once it is found that there is continuity in the business operations, the intermittent presence or return of a particular employee becomes immaterial and insignificant in determining the existence of a PE, Justice Mahadevan, writing for the bench stated, adding the HC was correct in concluding that Hyatt's role was not confined to high-level decision making, but extended to substantial operational control and implementation. The Dubai-based company's ability to enforce compliance, oversee operations, and derive profit-linked fee from the hotel's earnings, demonstrate a clear and continuous commercial nexus, and control with the hotel's core functions, the judgment said, adding that this nexus satisfied the condition necessary for the constitution of a fixed place of PE under Article 5(1) of the India – UAE DTAA. The top court further said that 'the extent of control, strategic decision-making, and influence exercised by the appellant clearly establish that business was carried on through the hotel premises, satisfying the conditions under Article 5(1)…the hotel itself was the situs of the appellant's primary business operations, carried out under its direct supervision and aligned with its commercial interests.' Welcoming the ruling, Amit Baid of BTG Advaya said that "the judgment provides a clear conceptual framework for determining PE thresholds—frequent, regular visits by employees, rather than the duration of individual stays, is the key factor; once continuity of business presence is established, the return or rotation of individuals becomes irrelevant; and operational control, oversight, and income linked to core functions establish a commercial nexus necessary for a PE. The ruling could set a precedent for PE determinations in cases involving frequent employee travel to India." The judgement establishes that substantive operational involvement, such as orchestrating policies, directly overseeing operations, and controlling implementation, will be closely scrutinised when determining the existence of a fixed place PE in India, said Varun Gakhar, Research Associate at Janssen-Sanghavi & Associates. 'In essence, oversight that crosses into operational control may trigger domestic tax exposure under Indian tax treaties. This judgement will have to be analysed closely by multinationals, as determining whether a PE exists is a very fact- and circumstance-specific question,' he added. In 2008, Hyatt had entered into two strategic oversight services agreements with Asian Hotels Ltd. One was in respect of hotel Hyatt Regency, Delhi owned by Asian Hotels, and the other pertained to a hotel in Mumbai. Under the terms of the agreement, Hyatt agreed to provide strategic planning services and "know-how" to ensure that Hyatt Regency was developed and operated as an efficient and a high quality international full-service hotel. Asian Hotels was thereafter reorganised and its name was subsequently changed to Asian Hotels (North) Ltd., which continued to own Hyatt Regency. For the Assessment Year 2009-10, Hyatt filed its return of income declaring 'Nil' income and claiming a refund of around Rs 88 lakh. The Assessing Officer had passed assessment orders for 2009-18, holding that Hyatt's activities constituted a business connection under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act; a PE under Article 5 of the DTAA; royalties and fees for technical services under both the Income Tax Act and DTAA. However, Hyatt asserted that its income was not taxable under the Act as there was no specific Article under the DTAA for taxing Fees for Technical Services. It further stated that it did not have any fixed place of business, office, or branch in India, and that the presence of its employees in India during the relevant previous year did not exceed the nine-month threshold under Article 5(2) of the DTAA. Therefore, the appellant claimed that it did not have a PE in India and that its business income was not taxable under Article 7 of the DTAA. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in December 2019 and then the HC rejected Hyatt's contention that it did not have a PE in India.

ADIA seeks CCI nod to acquire minority stake in Micro Life Sciences
ADIA seeks CCI nod to acquire minority stake in Micro Life Sciences

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

ADIA seeks CCI nod to acquire minority stake in Micro Life Sciences

New Delhi, Jul 24 (PTI) Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund ADIA has sought approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to acquire a 3 per cent stake in medical devices firm Micro Life Sciences Pvt Ltd (Meril) in a USD 200 million deal. The development came after a wholly-owned subsidiary of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) on Monday said it has entered into definitive agreements to invest USD 200 million for a 3 per cent stake in Meril. ADIA, through its affiliate Platinum Jasmine A 2018 Trust (acting through its trustee Platinum Owl C 2018 RSC Ltd), is acquiring a stake in Gujarat-based Meril. 'The acquirer (Platinum Jasmine A 2018 Trust) proposes to subscribe to certain equity shares proposed to be issued by the target (Micro Life Sciences) and acquire certain equity shares of the target from Bilakhia Holdings Pvt Ltd, amounting to approximately 3.06 per cent shareholding in the target," according to a notice filed with the CCI on Wednesday. Platinum Jasmine A 2018, Trust and Micro Life Sciences said the proposed transaction does not have any impact on any relevant market in India, let alone any appreciable adverse effect on competition, and therefore, the definition of the relevant product and geographic market may ultimately be left open. Following the transaction, ADIA said this investment values the firm (MERIL) at an enterprise value of USD 6.6 billion. Founded by the Bilakhia Group, Meril is a global innovator in medical technology with a focus on clinically advanced solutions across multiple specialities, including cardiovascular, structural heart, orthopaedics, endo-surgery, in-vitro diagnostics and surgical robotics. Headquartered in Vapi, Gujarat, Meril employs more than 13,000 people, has over 35 global subsidiaries, and serves healthcare systems in around 150 countries. 'This investment will enable us to accelerate growth, attract world-class talent, and further strengthen our…clinical research efforts as we work towards improving the quality of human life through advanced healthcare solutions," Sanjeev Bhatt, Senior Vice President – Strategy at Meril, said. Established in 1976, ADIA is a globally diversified investment institution that prudently invests funds on behalf of the Abu Dhabi government through a strategy focused on long-term value creation. PTI HG HG BAL BAL view comments First Published: July 24, 2025, 21:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

ED raids call centres in Chandigarh Tricity running tech support scam
ED raids call centres in Chandigarh Tricity running tech support scam

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

ED raids call centres in Chandigarh Tricity running tech support scam

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday said it had conducted midnight searches on multiple illegal call centres operating in the Chandigarh Tricity region. These centres were duping foreign nationals by offering fraudulent tech support services. According to the ED, the companies had created overseas counterparts to receive payments from unsuspecting customers through payment gateways. The funds were then routed to India through formal banking channels as well as hawala. While the firms advertised services such as web designing and fixed wireless internet, they did not disclose details of promoters or staff. Many employees lacked the technical expertise normally associated with software or BPO services, indicating that the operations were entirely clandestine. One such entity, FSAL Technologies Pvt Ltd, was found running a fake call centre through an overseas front named Bios Tech in the United States. It falsely claimed to provide support for Microsoft, HP printers, routers, and other hardware. However, its director, Faisal Rashid Peerzada, failed to produce any agreements or authorizations from Microsoft, HP, or Arlo to offer such services. Investigators found that FSAL was controlling the backend of Bios Tech's website and monitoring payments received from foreign customers. Another associate, Arshdeep, a friend of Faisal, was listed as the director of Bios Tech. 'Similarly, Terrasparq and Visionaire, operated by Sahu Jain, have been running similar tech scams since 2016. Jain's sister, Ms. Priya, owns a US-based company, CTS Mobility, which acted as the overseas counterpart. ED officials recovered emails and WhatsApp chats showing the creation of fake Microsoft popup alerts and periodic fraudulent credit card transactions from foreign customers for non-existent services,' said an ED statement. The websites of these companies claimed to offer services such as mobile device management, network and device management, and Device-as-a-Service (DaaS), but provided no promoter details. Photographs displayed on the websites portrayed large IT park offices, which were contrary to the reality. The ED has confirmed that further investigation is underway. The directors are likely to be summoned for questioning, and more action is expected as the probe into the multi-crore tech support fraud progresses.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store