‘Unbeatable' bank account for millions on Universal Credit that could help you save £1,200
BANK ON IT 'Unbeatable' bank account for millions on Universal Credit that could help you save £1,200
MILLIONS of people on Universal Credit could earn £1,200 in free cash with an 'unbeatable' bank account.
Help to Save is a type of savings account that gives you a 50% bonus on any money you squirrel away.
Advertisement
1
Millions of people on Universal Credit can get £1,200 free cash with bank account
Credit: Getty
Anyone on Working Tax Credit or receiving Universal Credit can open one.
You can pay in between £1 and £50 each calendar month and save into the account for up to four years.
The bonuses are paid at the end of the second and fourth years, with the maximum bonus worth £1,200.
If you paid in the maximum of £50 a month for a year then you could earn £300 over the year.
Advertisement
But if you opened the account now and paid into it until the new year then you would earn £125.
The scheme has paid out millions of pounds to more than 500,000 people since it was launched in 2018.
Meanwhile, MoneySavingExpert founder Martin Lewis has described the account as 'unbeatable'.
But David Cameron, who launched Help to Save when he was Prime Minister, said up to 3.5million people could be eligible for the scheme, meaning millions are missing out.
Advertisement
How does Help to Save work?
Help to Save is a type of savings account that is available to people who receive Tax Credits and Universal Credit.
The scheme is government-backed so all of your money is protected and you will not lose anything you pay in.
You can open a Help to Save account if you are receiving Universal Credit and you had a take-home pay of £1 or more in your last monthly assessment period.
Your take-home pay is your pay after deductions such as tax or National Insurance.
Advertisement
If you stop claiming benefits you can keep using your Help to Save account.
One thing to consider is that if your Help to Save cash means you have more than £6,000 in personal savings, it can affect whether you are eligible for some benefits and how much you get.
How you can find the best savings rates
If you are trying to find the best savings rate there are websites you can use that can show you the best rates available.
Doing some research on websites such as MoneyFacts and price comparison sites including Compare the Market and Go Compare will quickly show you what's out there.
These websites let you tailor your searches to an account type that suits you.
There are three types of savings accounts fixed, easy access, and regular saver.
A fixed-rate savings account offers some of the highest interest rates but comes at the cost of being unable to withdraw your cash within the agreed term.
This means that your money is locked in, so even if interest rates increase you are unable to move your money and switch to a better account.
Some providers give the option to withdraw but it comes with a hefty fee.
An easy-access account does what it says on the tin and usually allow unlimited cash withdrawals.
These accounts do tend to come with lower returns but are a good option if you want the freedom to move your money without being charged a penalty fee.
Lastly is a regular saver account, these accounts generate decent returns but only on the basis that you pay a set amount in each month.
If you or your partner have £6,000 or less in personal savings, this will not affect how much Universal Credit or Housing Benefit you get.
This includes any savings in your Help to Save account, including bonuses.
Advertisement
Any savings or bonuses you earn through Help to Save will also not affect how much Working Tax Credit you get.
Are there any other options?
If you're not on Universal Credit or Tax Credits so don't qualify for a Help to Save account, you do have some other options.
It is always a good idea to have an easy-access savings account so you can withdraw money whenever you need to.
But make sure you read the small print as some have withdrawal limits which if you breach could mean your interest rate falls.
Advertisement
At time of writing you can get 5% on savings of up to £3,000,000 with Chase Bank and there is no minimum pay in.
Meanwhile, you can earn 4.75% with Atom Bank and can open the account with just £1.
But if you make a withdrawal in a month then the rate drops to 2.5%.
Another option is a regular savings account, which allows you to put money away each month and the interest is paid yearly.
Advertisement
These accounts offer higher interest rates than traditional or easy-access savings accounts but usually impose rigid rules such as limiting the number of withdrawals you can make.
They will also usually cap how much you can save.
Zopa customers can earn 7.1% interest on up to £300 a month with its regular savings account.
To be eligible you need to have a Zopa 'Biscuit' current account.
Advertisement
First Direct will give you 7% interest if you pay in between £25 and £300 a month into its regular savings account.
If you paid in the maximum £300 a year then you would earn £135 a year in interest.
But if you close the account early then you will only get 1.75% interest.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Advertisement
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
10 hours ago
- Scotsman
How SNP and Labour are putting future of Scottish tourism industry at risk
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Not that you would think it from the torrential rain showers we've been experiencing recently, but we are at the height of the Scottish tourist season. Driving up the A9 north at the weekend, I could not help but notice the number of visitors' vehicles parked in laybys along the road, as people took photographs of mist-covered hills. These scenes, welcome as they are, rather belie the real underlying story affecting Scottish tourism and hospitality sectors. Because what we hear from the industry is that while international visitor numbers have generally held up well, there are very real concerns about the domestic market, which won't be helped by another wet and windy summer. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish families are once again crowding to our airports in search of sunnier climes rather than holidaying at home, and the cost of living means that visitor spend for those staying home is being squeezed. Edinburgh in August is a boom-time for the tourism sector, but in many parts of the country this important industry is struggling (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Industry warnings and job losses According to the Scottish Tourism Alliance, in 2024 the 16,000 businesses operating across the tourism and hospitality sectors in Scotland employed a total of 245,000 people, and generated revenues of £16.5 billion, 9 per cent of Scotland's economy. But Marc Crothal, STA's chief executive, warns that in recent months trading conditions have become far more difficult for many operators, and only look set to become more challenging still. Government measures are undoubtedly having a detrimental impact on the sector. Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics reveal that the UK hospitality sector has lost 84,000 jobs since Rachel Reeves' Budget and the increase in employers' National Insurance, with the industry the hardest hit sector of the economy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That was a decision taken by the UK Labour government, but the SNP administration in Holyrood cannot be exempted from the blame for the current difficult situation. The botched introduction of short-term let licensing has led to many smaller operators choosing to withdraw from the market altogether, given the additional costs and bureaucracy involved in complying with an overly complex scheme. Those who remain face additional financial burdens. All this for a system which was far too broad in its reach and should never have been applied on a national basis, but introduced only where there was specific local need. The same Scottish Government has failed to pass on the rates relief available to retail, hospitality and leisure businesses in England from the UK Government to Scottish businesses for two years now, putting our operators at a competitive disadvantage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad READ MORE: New push to highlight significant benefits of visitor economy to Scotland 'Unnecessary and avoidable' And now we have the visitor levy currently being considered by council administrations across Scotland. First out of the traps has been Edinburgh, setting the levy at 5 per cent, plus VAT, on all accommodation bookings in the city, to apply from April next year. It is a scheme which has been heavily criticised by the industry as 'unworkable', with no guidance having been issued to operators as to how to apply and pay the levy back to the council. According to tourism leaders, the current timeline for those required to apply the levy 'places unnecessary and avoidable strain on the sector', which is already struggling with rising costs. Other councils are following suit, with consultations being launched across Scotland on whether the levy should be introduced. Fortunately, some, like Aberdeenshire, are extending their deadline for responses, after starting to realise the issue is more complex than it first appears. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But the question of a visitor levy goes beyond simply the matter of the administrative burden of collection. There is a much more serious matter to be considered: whether Scottish tourism can really afford, in a competitive international market, to make itself even more expensive with this new tax. A recent survey showed that Edinburgh is now Europe's most expensive short-break destination. We know Scottish families will choose package holidays overseas, not just because of the guarantee of sunshine, but because these often work out considerably cheaper than staying within our own shores. By imposing a visitor levy, are we not at risk of doing even further damage to an already struggling sector? Perthshire is famous for its trees and scenery, including the Meikleour Beech Hedge, the world's tallest, on the A93 Perth to Blairgowrie road (Picture: Peter Thompson/Heritage Images) |A sensible plan It may be that Edinburgh during the festival period can well sustain a visitor levy without a detrimental impact. But that certainly does not apply to Scotland as a whole. Complaints about 'over-tourism' ring hollow in many parts of Perthshire and Fife that I represent in the Scottish Parliament, where we would be delighted to see greater visitor numbers than we currently have, particularly outwith the hot-spot season of July and August. One self-catering operator I spoke to recently told me he would bite off my hand to have a bit of the 'over-tourism' that is deemed such a problem in places like Edinburgh and Skye. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last month the Scottish Conservatives, for whom I speak on tourism matters, published a policy paper with four proposals to assist Scotland's tourist sector. Firstly, to ensure there is significant rates' relief for hospitality that's at least as generous as that applied south of the Border. Secondly, changes to the short-term let licensing regime to exclude letting rooms within your own home, remove B&Bs and guest houses from the scope of the rules, and introduce a lighter touch to the regulations as a whole. Thirdly, to change the visitor levy rules so that any sums applied would be a fixed rate rather than a percentage, which would help address the concerns about affordability. And fourthly, a new initiative to promote careers in the hospitality industry, particularly to younger people. Taken together, this is a package of support which has been warmly welcomed by the sector, and would help address many of their concerns. Without this or something similar from the Scottish and UK governments, we are likely to see further job losses in an industry which should be our national flagship.
Scotsman
10 hours ago
- Scotsman
How SNP and Labour are putting future of Scottish tourism industry at risk
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Not that you would think it from the torrential rain showers we've been experiencing recently, but we are at the height of the Scottish tourist season. Driving up the A9 north at the weekend, I could not help but notice the number of visitors' vehicles parked in laybys along the road, as people took photographs of mist-covered hills. These scenes, welcome as they are, rather belie the real underlying story affecting Scottish tourism and hospitality sectors. Because what we hear from the industry is that while international visitor numbers have generally held up well, there are very real concerns about the domestic market, which won't be helped by another wet and windy summer. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish families are once again crowding to our airports in search of sunnier climes rather than holidaying at home, and the cost of living means that visitor spend for those staying home is being squeezed. Edinburgh in August is a boom-time for the tourism sector, but in many parts of the country this important industry is struggling (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Industry warnings and job losses According to the Scottish Tourism Alliance, in 2024 the 16,000 businesses operating across the tourism and hospitality sectors in Scotland employed a total of 245,000 people, and generated revenues of £16.5 billion, 9 per cent of Scotland's economy. But Marc Crothal, STA's chief executive, warns that in recent months trading conditions have become far more difficult for many operators, and only look set to become more challenging still. Government measures are undoubtedly having a detrimental impact on the sector. Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics reveal that the UK hospitality sector has lost 84,000 jobs since Rachel Reeves' Budget and the increase in employers' National Insurance, with the industry the hardest hit sector of the economy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That was a decision taken by the UK Labour government, but the SNP administration in Holyrood cannot be exempted from the blame for the current difficult situation. The botched introduction of short-term let licensing has led to many smaller operators choosing to withdraw from the market altogether, given the additional costs and bureaucracy involved in complying with an overly complex scheme. Those who remain face additional financial burdens. All this for a system which was far too broad in its reach and should never have been applied on a national basis, but introduced only where there was specific local need. The same Scottish Government has failed to pass on the rates relief available to retail, hospitality and leisure businesses in England from the UK Government to Scottish businesses for two years now, putting our operators at a competitive disadvantage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad READ MORE: New push to highlight significant benefits of visitor economy to Scotland 'Unnecessary and avoidable' And now we have the visitor levy currently being considered by council administrations across Scotland. First out of the traps has been Edinburgh, setting the levy at 5 per cent, plus VAT, on all accommodation bookings in the city, to apply from April next year. It is a scheme which has been heavily criticised by the industry as 'unworkable', with no guidance having been issued to operators as to how to apply and pay the levy back to the council. According to tourism leaders, the current timeline for those required to apply the levy 'places unnecessary and avoidable strain on the sector', which is already struggling with rising costs. Other councils are following suit, with consultations being launched across Scotland on whether the levy should be introduced. Fortunately, some, like Aberdeenshire, are extending their deadline for responses, after starting to realise the issue is more complex than it first appears. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But the question of a visitor levy goes beyond simply the matter of the administrative burden of collection. There is a much more serious matter to be considered: whether Scottish tourism can really afford, in a competitive international market, to make itself even more expensive with this new tax. A recent survey showed that Edinburgh is now Europe's most expensive short-break destination. We know Scottish families will choose package holidays overseas, not just because of the guarantee of sunshine, but because these often work out considerably cheaper than staying within our own shores. By imposing a visitor levy, are we not at risk of doing even further damage to an already struggling sector? Perthshire is famous for its trees and scenery, including the Meikleour Beech Hedge, the world's tallest, on the A93 Perth to Blairgowrie road (Picture: Peter Thompson/Heritage Images) |A sensible plan It may be that Edinburgh during the festival period can well sustain a visitor levy without a detrimental impact. But that certainly does not apply to Scotland as a whole. Complaints about 'over-tourism' ring hollow in many parts of Perthshire and Fife that I represent in the Scottish Parliament, where we would be delighted to see greater visitor numbers than we currently have, particularly outwith the hot-spot season of July and August. One self-catering operator I spoke to recently told me he would bite off my hand to have a bit of the 'over-tourism' that is deemed such a problem in places like Edinburgh and Skye. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last month the Scottish Conservatives, for whom I speak on tourism matters, published a policy paper with four proposals to assist Scotland's tourist sector. Firstly, to ensure there is significant rates' relief for hospitality that's at least as generous as that applied south of the Border. Secondly, changes to the short-term let licensing regime to exclude letting rooms within your own home, remove B&Bs and guest houses from the scope of the rules, and introduce a lighter touch to the regulations as a whole. Thirdly, to change the visitor levy rules so that any sums applied would be a fixed rate rather than a percentage, which would help address the concerns about affordability. And fourthly, a new initiative to promote careers in the hospitality industry, particularly to younger people. Taken together, this is a package of support which has been warmly welcomed by the sector, and would help address many of their concerns. Without this or something similar from the Scottish and UK governments, we are likely to see further job losses in an industry which should be our national flagship.
Powys County Times
11 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Grocery inflation soars to 18-month high as pressure grows on UK shoppers
UK grocery prices have increased at their fastest pace for 18 months amid growing concern from shoppers about the rising cost of living, according to new figures. Grocery price inflation accelerated to 5.2% in the four weeks to July 13, according to market research firm Worldpanel by Numerator, which was recently renamed from Kantar. It represented a rise from inflation of 4.7% a month earlier and marked the highest level since January 2024. The data indicated that rising prices are set to add an average of £275 to shoppers' annual grocery spending. Fraser McKevitt, head of retail and consumer insight at Worldpanel, said: 'Just under two thirds of households say they are very concerned about the cost of their grocery shopping, and people are adapting their habits to avoid the full impact of price rises. 'Own label products, which are often cheaper, continue to be some of the big winners and, in fact, sales of these ranges are again outpacing brands, growing by 5.6% versus 4.9%.' He added that shopping data also showed that consumers have been cooking simpler meals in recent months as part of efforts to stick to budgets. The price increases come amid a backdrop of commodity price pressures and higher costs for retailers, after recent increases in National Insurance contributions and the national minimum wage. Worldpanel data also showed that overall consumer spending across UK grocers rose by 4.6% over the 12 weeks to July 13. Online retail specialist Ocado saw the fastest rise in sales over the period, with 11.7%. It was closely followed by German discount chain Lidl, which saw sales rise 11.1%, to take its share of the UK grocery market to 8.3%, moving it close to the size of rival Morrisons. Elsewhere, the UK's largest supermarket chain Tesco increased its share of the market further after growing sales by 7.1%.
