logo
‘Insult to farmers': Fireys and farmers descend on parliament to protest controversial levy

‘Insult to farmers': Fireys and farmers descend on parliament to protest controversial levy

News.com.au20-05-2025
Thousands of furious CFA volunteers and firefighters have descended on Melbourne's CBD to protest the state government's expanded emergency services levy.
Rows of firetrucks were lined up on Spring St in front of Parliament House early on Tuesday morning in protest of the new levy. Signs and banners called for Premier Jacinta Allan to scrap the controversial tax ahead of the state budget, which will be handed down on Tuesday afternoon.
The Emergency Services Volunteer Fund (ESVF) levy is set to replace the existing Fire Services Levy that's attached to land rates in the state. The ESVF would increase the fees payable by farmers, many of whom are volunteer firefighters.
Money raised would go towards fire services, the state control centre, SES and triple-0, the government said.
Struggling farmers say they can't afford the tax increase, which opposition agriculture spokeswoman Emma Kealy said could be as high as 189 per cent.
Traffic was at a standstill as the firetrucks rang their sirens through the concrete streets, sharing words of support to other farmers and volunteers standing at the steps of Parliament House.
The protest began at 10am, with 3000 people expected to take to the streets, but dozens of firetrucks and CFA vehicles were already snaking around the streets of Melbourne before 9am as a crowd gathered at the steps.
Dressed in CFA uniforms and waving signs and banners, a sea of farmers and volunteer CFA members blocked off Spring St.
Protesters propped up bones of cows, sheep and other farm animals on the steps of parliament, while another dangled a plastic skeleton on the back of a vehicle.
Among the protesters were CFA members from Stradbroke, Glenaladale, the Grampians, Allambee, and Fish Creek, whose firetrucks crossed the West Gate Bridge shortly after 4am.
'Scrap the tax,' one sign read.
'We fight your fires and grow your food. Now we pay your debts too?' read another.
'Fight your own fires, Jacinta,' was written on the side of a firetruck.
'We quit,' another read.
Police lined up at the entrance of Parliament House as the sea of protesters marched the streets.
Two firefighters from the Region 17 Parade in the Grampians region, who did not wish to be named, told NewsWire that the CFA was 'struggling for volunteers at the moment', and the levy would only add further strain to the load.
'A lot of people … are that close to jumping ship as it is,' he said.
The Grampians firefighter urged Ms Allan to 'think hard about what (she's) doing'.
'(The Victorian government) can't do what (it's) doing,' he said. 'You're going to have a lot of people revolt within the communities here.'
The firefighter told NewsWire their region was already suffering through a 'massive drought', and the new tax was adding fuel to the fire.
'Our area (is) looking very dicey at the moment … because we haven't had very much rains there,' he said.
'(Farmers) don't need much to be pushed over the edge.'
Geoff Kendell, a farmer and former fire captain from Kerang who recently celebrated 50 years with the CFA, said the levy was an 'insult to farmers'.
'When there's a call-out, we stop everything we're doing, drop our tools and we go,' he said, adding the firefighters and volunteers 'put (their) lives on the line and the Labor government wants to go ahead and actually tax the living daylights out of us'.
'We're the guys that actually give the voluntary service and (the Premier) wants to tax absolute insides out of it,' he told NewsWire.
While the majority of protesters took to the streets of the city, there was also a march in Victoria's Gippsland region.
About half a dozen CFA firetrucks and between 250 to 300 people marched down Commercial Rd in Morwell about 11am – past the courthouse where Erin Patterson's triple-murder trial is being held.
Protesters chanted slogans including 'axe the tax' as they travelled down the street, taking advantage of a large media pack outside for the trial.
One protester told media they decided they might as well use the media presence in Morwell to voice their opposition to the government's emergency services levy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judgment day for Brittany Higgins
Judgment day for Brittany Higgins

Perth Now

time5 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Judgment day for Brittany Higgins

A judgment in the long running defamation suit launched by former senator Linda Reynolds against her former junior staffer Brittany Higgins will be handed down next week. Justice Paul Tottle will deliver his verdict in the defamation case against Ms Higgins and her husband David Sharaz in the WA Supreme Court next Wednesday. Ms Reynolds sued the pair over a series of social media posts they made in 2022 and 2023, claiming they damaged her reputation. Ms Higgins relied on the truth defence claiming the social media posts were substantially true during the defamation proceedings. A verdict in former senator Linda Reynolds' defamation case against Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz will be handed down in the WA Supreme Court on August 27. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia Former senator Linda Reynolds brought the defamation proceedings after social media posts made by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia The posts were critical of Ms Reynolds' handling of Ms Higgins' allegation she was raped in the senator's office at Parliament House in 2019 by her then-colleague Bruce Lehrmann. He was charged with rape and faced trial in 2022, but the trial was aborted due to juror misconduct. The charge was dropped and Mr Lehrmann continues to maintain his innocence. Mr Lehrmann lost a subsequent civil defamation case in April last year when the Federal Court determined, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Lehrmann had raped Ms Higgins at Parliament House. He is appealing the decision. Private text messages and emails between federal ministers, senators, staffers, press gallery journalists and lawyers were laid bare during the five-week blockbuster trial last year. Ms Higgins' defence team called for the action to be dismissed entirely at the end of the high-stakes legal battle. Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz sold the French chateau they called home to pay for legal fees. Credit: Supplied Ms Reynolds, who has retired from politics, mortgaged her home in a bid to clear her name. Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz sold their French home to pay for legal fees, as she maintained her version of events about what happened to her at Parliament House. It was revealed Ms Reynolds was seeking more than half a million dollars in damages. Her lawyer Martin Bennett asked the court to 'nail the lies' Ms Higgins allegedly perpetuated after making her rape allegation public in 2021. The court was told Ms Higgins 'grossly defamed' her former boss in social media posts shared years later. Ms Higgins' defence lawyer Rachael Young said it was a series of events in 2021 that led to the then-Senator Reynolds' distress and reputational damage, not social media posts created by her client two years later. Ms Young argued Ms Reynolds' decline was caused by backlash from her referring to Ms Higgins as a 'lying cow', a senate grilling over the allegations, her hospitalisation, losing the defence ministry and missing out on a shadow ministry under Peter Dutton. Ms Higgins' defence lawyer Rachael Young argued it was a series of events in 2021 that led to Ms Reynolds distress and reputational damage, not social media posts created by her client two years later. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia She said the former senator tried to besmirch the people she blamed for her political demise, namely Ms Higgins, who continued to face the heaviest burden in all this. Two dozen witnesses were called to give evidence including former prime minister Scott Morrison. A who's who of the nation's parliament, media and legal circles were dragged into the proceedings as diary entries, minutes and communications between senators, staffers, journalists, police officers and lawyers were exposed in court. The trial centred around what happened in the aftermath of Ms Higgins speaking out about her alleged rape in a article and The Project interview that were published on February 15, 2021, two years after the alleged incident. Ms Reynolds' lawyer Martin Bennett argued in court statements that Ms Higgins made in those media interviews and in her personal injury claim were wrong and that she had lied. Former senator Linda Reynolds lawyer Martin Bennett argued every fairytale needs a villain. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia He said his client had been cast as a villain in Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz's fictional story that alleged Ms Reynolds had tried to cover-up a rape. 'Every fairytale needs a villain, and in 2020 or 2021, Ms Higgins and her then-partner and now-husband, Mr Sharaz, cast Ms Reynolds in that role for their fictional story of a cover-up of the rape,' Mr Bennett told the WA Supreme Court. 'The fact she had been raped was traumatic and terrible but it needed something more to attract the attention, to attract media interest, to attract the promotion of Ms Higgins, so she made it a political sex scandal.' Ms Young argued the matter was not, and never had been, a 'fairytale' for her client saying the comments were misplaced, harassing and retraumitising. Ms Young told the court Ms Reynolds had picked the 'wrong target' for the hurt and distress and that her reputation was already 'baked in' when her client posted to social media in the years that followed.

Duelling roundtables hit Canberra
Duelling roundtables hit Canberra

Perth Now

time6 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Duelling roundtables hit Canberra

Nationals senator Matt Canavan says expanding Australia's economy will require a smaller government following a his own economic reform roundtable challenging Jim Chalmers' three-day summit. The Queensland senator labelled the official talks, which canvassed reducing regulation to boost efficiencies in housing, as a 'fake productivity roundtable'. Instead Senator Canavan said his 'public' table was open to media and involved participants including the Productivity Commission's first chair, Gary Banks, and former assistant Treasury secretary David Pearl. Participants discussed the importance of eliminating bracket creep, reducing growth of the NDIS, scrapping net-zero targets and fiscal discipline. Senator Canavan advocated for less intervention from Canberra, saying that 'if we want our economy to be bigger, we need our government to be smaller'. 'The overburdensome red tape in our housing sector, construction sectors and others are holding our nation back,' he said. Queensland senator Matt Canavan hosted his own productivity roundtable in parliament on Wednesday. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'The ineffective interventions in our energy market, such as the reckless and destructive rush to renewables, and the futile and failing net zero policies, are restricting the latent potential of our great nation. 'We need to stop Canberra from telling people what car they can drive, what power they should use, what food they can even eat.' Prof Banks also took aim at Labor for high government spending, which had strained private sector growth. 'Unfortunately, attention to regulation has been more about increasing, rather than reducing it or improving it, and the government's productivity agenda is mainly a spending agenda,' he said. Economic Reform Roundtable attendees were invited to the Lodge for drinks after day 2 of the meeting. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet Steven Kennedy and CBA chief executive Matt Comyn arrive at the Lodge. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Meanwhile official talks focused on slashing regulation, with participants largely supporting a pause to the National Construction Code amid criticisms the overbearing regulations weigh down housing approvals and increase costs. While there was general consensus on the need to reduce regulation to speed up housing approvals, Wentworth teal MP Allegra Spender said participants did not agree to whether the code should be paused or for new changes to be delayed until the next review due in 2029. Although there were concerns around whether this would affect environment standards, she described discussions as 'constructive'. 'I think that we should come out with something on the Construction Code,' she said. 'I think the government is looking at how to get the construction code right from a point of view of not making too many unnecessary changes that makes it just more expensive to build.' Allegra Spender tipped an announcement on pausing or freezing the National Construction Code following the summit. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, who attended the roundtable representing the states, said there was 'pretty strong consensus emerging that that is a sensible step forward'. 'Regardless of what's in the National Construction Code, states already have strong rules around building safety, building standards, energy efficiency, and so from our perspective,' he said. 'If the National Code is frozen, it gives us a bit more time to get the interactions between national standards and state standards clear and sorted, but equally, give a lot of confidence to people who are looking to build right now.' However former Labor cabinet minister Ed Husic, who didn't participate in the roundtable, said he would be 'concerned about a pause to the National Construction Code,' and said it would a repeat of a 'bad mistake of the Coalition'. However he conceded the code was 'in a funk,' and said a review was a better option. 'Think about the fact that the last time we put pause in the National Construction Code we ended up having to scramble and put on hold a whole host of changes,' he told the ABC. 'That makes really hard for the construction sector the building sector to deal with a lot of changes at once. There is a much more sensible way to get it done.'

‘I am truly sorry': Premier Jacinta Allan has promised to overhaul Victoria's childcare system after damning review
‘I am truly sorry': Premier Jacinta Allan has promised to overhaul Victoria's childcare system after damning review

Sky News AU

time7 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘I am truly sorry': Premier Jacinta Allan has promised to overhaul Victoria's childcare system after damning review

Premier Jacinta Allan has promised to overhaul Victoria's troubled childcare system after a damning review found major changes were needed to ensure children's safety. The Allan government's Rapid Child Safety Review, released on Wednesday, has handed down 22 recommendations while outlining a strict 12-month timeline for much needed improvements across multiple areas. The review, undertaken by former South Australian premier Jay Weatherill and veteran public servant Pam White, was launched following shocking allegations of abuse by a Victorian childcare worker came to light in July. Responding to the review on Thursday, Premier Allan acknowledged the system 'simply isn't working'. 'Parents must be able to drop their children off at childcare, knowing they will be encouraged to play and learn — trusting they will be safe. That trust has been horribly broken,' Ms Allan said. 'To every family who has been hurt by these horrifying allegations, I am truly sorry. You put your trust in a system, and that system let you down. 'As a mum, I cannot begin to imagine that pain. But as Premier, I can do everything in my power to act.' The Victorian government has accepted all 22 recommendations and has announced immediate action to create a new independent regulator, boost funding to the sector by $42 million, and massively overhaul the state's Working With Children Check (WWCC) system. The WWCC system been the target of intense criticism since July with revelations emerging last week that a childcare worker who had been blacklisted from the industry in 2020 over accusations of grooming, kissing toddlers, and attempting to organise unsanctioned catch-ups, still had a valid working WWCC. The rapid review recommended major changes to the WWCC, which found the system was 'not fit-for-purpose' and needed to be 'rebalanced in favour of child safety'. Among the biggest flaws highlighted was the inability for childcare workers to be stripped of their WWCC without a formal criminal charge, conviction or finding of guilt. The review not only recommended making it easier for childcare workers to have their WWCCs suspended or cancelled on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations, but also changes to allow police and child protection authorities to share unsubstantiated information to enable action to be taken. It also recommended the removal of the ability for those accused of misconduct to appeal the decision to VCAT, with this being replaced by an internal review process with child safety experts responsible for all decisions. Many of the concerns about the WWCC system were previously recommended by former Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass. And following the release of the rapid review, the Director of the Australian Catholic University's Institute of Child Protection Studies said that while action from the government was welcome, the findings 'do not tell us anything new'. 'Disappointing that it took such high-profile horrific incidents of abuse involving vulnerable children for the spotlight to finally be shone on these long-running safety gaps in early childhood education and care,' Professor Daryl Higgins told the Herald Sun. Professor Higgins said the government needed to match its words with actions. 'We need to match the strong verbal commitments of the Victorian Government today with real and urgent action to implement these recommendations,' he said. Shadow Education Minister Jess Wilson said the fact the government had not acted sooner showed a 'failure of leadership'. 'What is clear from today's review is that the government has delayed obvious, urgent action to keep children safe in this state,' she said. 'They have been warned for years that the system is not up to standard, that it is not keeping children safe, and it is failing to ensure that those who should not be working with children are not in the system and working with children.' Ms Wilson pointed out the Liberal and National parties had introduced legislation to improve the WWCC system three weeks ago and it had been voted it down by the government. 'As a consequence of not passing those laws last in the last sitting period, there are individuals now still holding active working with children, checks in this state that should not be that pose a risk to children,' the shadow minister said. 'Had the premier, had the government worked constructively with the opposition, that would not be the case.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store