
Wegovy and Zepbound prices are dropping but steady access to the weight-loss drugs remains a challenge
The medications still amount to around $500 per month for those without insurance — out of reach for many patients. And even for people with insurance, coverage remains uneven.
'The medications should be available, the question is at what price and can people sustain that,' said Matt Maciejewski, a Duke University professor who studies obesity treatment coverage.
Doctors say the situation forces them to get creative in treating patients, but there's hope that prices may fall more in the future.
The drugs are still in high demand
Wegovy and Zepbound are part of a wave of obesity medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists that have soared in popularity.
Zepbound brought in $2.3 billion in U.S. sales during this year's first quarter, making it one of drugmaker Eli Lilly's best sellers.
Novo Nordisk says Wegovy has about 200,000 weekly prescriptions in the U.S., where it brought in nearly $1.9 billion in first-quarter sales.
Insurance coverage is increasing — for some
The benefits consultant Mercer says more businesses with 500 or more employees are adding coverage of the injected drugs for their workers and family members.
And Novo says 85% of its patients who have coverage in the U.S. pay $25 or less per month.
Plus some patients with diabetes can get coverage of the GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Mounjaro from Novo and Lilly that are approved to treat that condition.
But most state and federally funded Medicaid programs don't cover the drugs for obesity and neither does Medicare, the federal program mainly for people age 65 and older.
Even the plans that cover the drugs often pay only a portion of the bill, exposing patients to hundreds of dollars in monthly costs, said Dr. Beverly Tchang.
Drugmakers offer help with these out-of-pocket costs, but that assistance can be limited.
'Coverage is not the same as access,' said Tchang, a New York-based doctor who serves as a paid advisor to both Novo and Lilly.
But coverage remains inconsistent
Bill-payers like employers are nervous about drugs that might be used by a lot of people indefinitely.
Some big employers have dropped coverage of the drugs due to the expense. Pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, also are starting to pick one brand over the other as they negotiate deals with the drugmakers.
One of the nation's largest PBMs, run by CVS Health, dropped Zepbound from its national formulary, or list of covered drugs, on July 1 in favor of Wegovy.
That forced Tchang to figure out another treatment plan for several patients, many of whom took Zepbound because it made them less nauseous.
Dr. Courtney Younglove's office sends prospective patients a video link showing them how to check their insurer's website for coverage of the drugs before they visit.
'Then some of them just cancel their appointment because they don't have coverage,' the Overland Park, Kansas, doctor said.
Cheaper compounded drugs are still being sold
Compounding pharmacies and other entities were allowed to make off-brand, cheaper copies of Wegovy and Zepbound when there was a shortage of the drugs. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determined earlier this year that the shortage had ended.
That should have ended the compounded versions, but there is an exception: Some compounding is permitted when a drug is personalized for the patient.
The health care company Hims & Hers Health offers compounded doses of semaglutide, the drug behind Wegovy, that adjust dose levels to help patients manage side effects. Hims says these plans start at $165 a month for 12 months, with customers paying in full upfront.
It's a contentious issue. Eli Lilly has sued pharmacies and telehealth companies trying to stop them from selling compounded versions of its products.
Novo recently ended a short-lived partnership with Hims to sell Wegovy because the telehealth company continued compounding. Novo says the compounded versions of its drug put patient safety at risk because ingredients are made by foreign suppliers not monitored by US regulators.
Hims says it checks all ingredients to make sure they meet U.S. quality and safety standards. It also uses a third-party lab to verify that a drug's strength is accurately labeled.
Prices have dropped
Both drugmakers are selling most of their doses for around $500 a month to people without insurance, a few hundred dollars less than some initial prices.
Even so, that expense would eat up about 14% of the average annual per person income in the U.S., which is around $43,000.
There are some factors that may suppress prices over time. Both companies are developing pill versions of their treatments. Those could hit the market in the next year or so, which might drive down prices for the older, injectable doses.
Younglove said some of her patients save as much as 15% by getting their doses shipped from a pharmacy in Canada. They used to get them from an Israeli pharmacy until the Canadians dropped their prices.
She says competition like this, plus the introduction of pill versions, will pressure U.S. prices.
'I think price wars are going to drive it down,' she said. 'I think we are in the early stages. I have hope.'
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Former Olympic wrestler and MMA star Ben Askren recovering after double lung transplant
MILWAUKEE — Former Olympic wrestler and MMA star Ben Askren, who has been hospitalized in Wisconsin after a severe case of pneumonia, said in a post on social media Wednesday that he had undergone a double lung transplant and is in recovery. Askren said during the Instagram video that he recalls very little of what happened over a monthlong stretch from late May through the first two days of July. His wife, Amy, had said in a series of social media posts that Askren was put on a ventilator in June and placed on the donor list for a lung transplant on June 24.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Poisoned pelicans fly again after the worst algal bloom in a decade
A flock of brown pelicans waddled back into the wild on Wednesday morning, survivors of Southern California's latest toxic algal bloom. This year's bloom was the deadliest such event since 2015, when thousands of animals were killed along a coastal swath stretching from Central California to Alaska. This year's intense bloom, which started in January, poisoned the 13 pelicans and many other sea animals in the region, including sea lions that sometimes threatened beachgoers. The pelicans that took off Wednesday had made a full recovery at the Wetlands and Wildlife Care Center in Huntington Beach. The release was held just south of the pier, with community members invited to watch. "This is always a special moment — not just for our team and volunteers who worked tirelessly to save these birds, but for the community as well," said Debbie McGuire, executive director of the wildlife nonprofit. "Watching them take flight is a powerful reminder of why our work matters." Huntington Beach junior lifeguards volunteered at the event, according to a news release from the center, unzipping the cages on the beach to allow the birds to waddle out to shore. The event was mostly successful, according to Jaratt Dazey, the volunteer coordinator for the wildlife group. After the birds were released, most of them took flight — but two remained on the sand. The pair were taken back to the center's veterinary facilities for more treatment, Dazey said. "Overall, though, the release went well," he said. "They came out of the cages, they sat on the sand for a few minutes, and they all took off and flew together." The 13 pelicans had been poisoned by domoic acid, a toxin that occurs in algal blooms, which fish can consume. Marine animals can then become poisoned if they eat the contaminated fish, causing abnormal behaviors and seizures, Dazey said. This is the fourth year that a dangerous algal bloom has occurred in Southern California, but this year's was especially threatening, as the Los Angeles Times previously reported. A number of sickened sea lions were reported, with one surfer encountering one that he called "feral, almost demonic." The Marine Mammal Care Center in San Pedro reported at the end of May a possible end to "the longest, most toxic, and deadliest bloom we've ever experienced." The Wetlands and Wildlife Care Center rescued nearly 200 seabirds in total, which Dazey said was an abnormally large number. Levels of toxic algae along the coast of Southern California had begun to decline by early June. The toxic algae blooms can be caused by water and wind patterns as well as an overproduction of nutrients in the water, which can "overfeed" algae colonies and lead them to grow out of control, according to the National Ocean Service. The effects of climate change can also make algal blooms more frequent and more severe, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Warmer water temperatures and higher carbon dioxide levels make the perfect habitat for algae breeding. Varying rainfall patterns and coastal upwelling both lead to more nutrient-dense waters, which only encourages algae growth. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ford: AHS decisions can serve up confusion
The Calgary Stampede is in full swing. This year's celebration would be equivalent to the Stampede of 1950. That was a time of childhood delights, including the thrill of the midway, going on the rides with my father. But reliving my childhood is not what prompts thoughts of the past. It is the reality of today, when serious voices advise women who are pregnant, infants too young to be vaccinated and those who are immune-compromised to avoid the Stampede grounds. That they should be cautious of this year's annual celebration of all things Calgary and country. The reason is as simple as it is stupid and surprising. Measles. A childhood disease supposedly eradicated after a vaccine was introduced in 1963. Within five years, the incidence of measles had dropped more than 97 per cent. Now, nearly 60 years later, we are facing a resurgence of a disease that was considered banished. What's next? Polio? Iron lugs? I don't understand why adults refuse vaccinations for themselves or their children. I don't understand why proof of vaccinations aren't required in order to be enrolled in school. Also, I don't 'get' the stupidity of grown-ups putting their own children and the public at risk for whatever ignorant reasons they come up with. Why is measles so dangerous? Because it is so highly contagious and lingers in the air. Enter professional advice to be wary of participating in the joys of Stampede. All of this is just one more head-scratcher involving the Alberta health system. Whatever the provincial government is trying to do, I don't understand. Confuse the public to the point it can ram through whatever changes fits the hard-right program that has changed this province into a conundrum? I could investigate. I could ask questions of those involved, even do a computer search. But that would not bring the reality of what is transpiring into focus before Albertans who have no access to professionals, but rely on AHS being there when it is needed. As someone 'captured' by the system, just another patient, the changes to the health system are puzzling. It is as if a shiny new bauble is waved before us with a 'look over here' message. Alberta measles cases surpass 1,000 How will the measles outbreak in Alberta affect kids? There are many examples of how the public has been distracted. One is splitting AHS into four silos, each presumably with its own well-paid management and bureaucracy. Don't ask if any are experienced or qualified. In case the public focuses on that, we are again 'told' to look away. What is the reasoning (one that makes sense) behind making some of the most vulnerable, neediest and poorest pay for COVID shots? As a senior, I don't like the idea, but paying $100 for protection is not going to break my bank. Does any of this make sense to ordinary people who want 'the system' to function for the people, not in spite of the people? I write not to complain, but to make public the real concerns so many Albertans have with our public health-care system. (Wait times excluded.) This is inspired by experience, having spent much of this year at the whims and vagaries of the system. I ask if anyone can explain AHS to me. I must pay for COVID shots, but licensed caregivers are coming to my house twice weekly to 'tend' to cuts to ensure they heal. I appreciate the treatment, but reflect that at the same time, AHS sent me a bill for $1,880. That was to cover the costs of providing my husband with a bed in a crowded four-person ward while awaiting placement in a facility. (He's now in private care, no thanks to 'the system.') It's not as if we had a choice. Major surgery rendered me physically incapable of personally caring for him. Home was not an option. This was not my choice, but happenstance. It has taught me that transparency is a joke and 'care' is a matter of personality. How? All of the health-care professionals have the qualifications; only some have the personality to deal with the sick, frail, aging and sometimes dementia-stricken. This matters because the person receiving care is at the mercy of individuals directly, not the system. If AHS needs to be shaken up, start with vetting the staff for more than professional qualifications. Catherine Ford is a regular columnist.